Slide deck used during the AESP (Association of Energy Services Professionals) webinar by presenter Pat Stanton, Senior VP of Policy & Advocacy at CSG.
Green Building Construction Goes Mainstream: Sustainable Materials and Green ...
Aesp webinar pat_stanton_csg
1. AESP Webinar
Screening Energy Efficiency:
Best Practices
CSG LIPA Program
• Click to edit Master text styles
Residential Retrofit Perspective
– Second level
• Third level
Pat Stanton, SVP Policy & Advocacy
– Fourth level
Conservation Services Group
» Fifth level
November 8, 2012
2. Framework / Evolution
Original Task: CSG LIPA Program
• Set priorities for allocation of very limited resources
• Click to edit Master text styles
committed to energy efficiency
– Second level
Current• Tasks:
Third level
– Fourth level
• Identify all cost effective
efficiency measures
» Fifth level
• Promote energy efficiency as “first fuel”
• Mitigate risk, hedge against price volatility
3. Cost of Getting to the Door
• Current framework in
CSG LIPA Program
residential sector encourages
• Click to edit fruit” programs
“low hanging Master text styles
• Creates lost opportunities
– Second level
• Inefficient use of program overhead:
• Third level
homeowners not “buying” maximum energy
– Fourth level
efficiency during their (likely) single event
» Fifth level
shopping experience
4. Discount Rate
Projected Utility Generation Resources in 2015
Relative Cost and Relative Risk
CSG LIPA Program
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
Source: CERES
5. Measure/Program/Portfolio
• Homes: many components
– Lighting
CSG LIPA Program
– Electronics
• Click to edit Master text styles
– HVAC
– Second level
– Building shell
• • Third level
insulation
– Fourth
• air sealing level
» Fifth level
• windows
• Measure level application of Cost Effectiveness
creates extreme – lost opportunities
6. TRC: “Jack of all trades, master of none”
• TRC performed without full consideration of
CSG inconsistent, undervalues EE
OPIs is internally
LIPA Program
• • Click to edit Master text to do TRC correctly
Is it worth the extra costs styles
in allSecond level
– cases?
• Third level
• PAC test requires much less data – a lower
– Fourth level
cost alternativelevel
» Fifth
7. Food for Thought
• Should we use the lower cost PAC test as a
CSG Any program that passes
screening test? –
LIPA Program
• Clickgreen light
gets a to edit Master text styles
• Reserve fulllevel test, including valuation of
– Second TRC
OPIs, •only for programs with significant non-
Third level
– energy
regulatedFourth level benefits (i.e., low income
» Fifth level
programs or programs that create significant
non-regulated energy savings)
8. Thank you!
CSG LIPA Program
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
Pat Stanton
• Third level
patricia.stanton@csgrp.com
– Fourth level
508.365.3297
» Fifth level
www.csgrp.com
Hinweis der Redaktion
After almost 30 years . . . has framework evolved with industry?
“cream skimming,”“cherry picking,”
TRC = Total Resource CostPAC = Program Administrator Cost