1. MOOQ for the quality of MOOCs:
“We will make MOOCs better”
Quality Reference Framework with
indicators for design & comparison
www.MOOC-quality.eu
Frameworks: MOOQ
2. Quality of Open
Education and MOOCs:
Interactive Workshop
@ EARLI 2017 in Tampere, Finland
by Christian M. Stracke
Open University of the Netherlands
3. Open CC License for
sharing & re-using slides
This work is free to share under the creative commons licence:
"Attribution – Noncommercial – Share Alike 3.0"
You can copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions:
1. Attribution –
2. Noncommercial –
3. Share Alike
Licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Some rights reserved, see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
5. MOOQ for the quality of MOOCs:
“We will make MOOCs better”
Quality Reference Framework with
indicators for design & comparison
www.MOOC-quality.eu
Frameworks: MOOQ
7. Quality Reference Framework with
indicators for design & comparison
Our main goal is the collaboration with all
to improve future MOOC design for
better MOOC learning experiences
8. 16 questions in 4 clusters (n=45):
1. Experience with MOOCs (5 questions)
2. Perception and Expectation (5 questions)
3. Personal Goals (4 questions)
4. Recognition and Certification (2 questions)
n=45: reveals that many MOOC learners
do not share the intentions of the
MOOC designer & have their own goals
MOOQ Pre-Survey
9.
10. Three main surveys for learners,
designers and facilitators of MOOCs
Please support us to improve next MOOCs:
www.survey.MOOC-quality.eu
Your feedback is most welcome!
21. How much do you agree with the
five phases?
(Analysis, Design, Implementation, Learning Process, Evaluation)
P-Q1: 5 Phases
Fully
disagree: Disagree: Neutral: Agree:
Fully
agree: N/A:
0 1 3 11 1 0
23. How much do you agree with the
planned target groups?
(National ministries, local authorities, MOOC providers,
MOOC designers, MOOC facilitators, MOOC learners)
T-Q1: Target Groups
Fully
disagree: Disagree: Neutral: Agree:
Fully
agree: N/A:
0 0 1 12 1 0
28. Quality dimensions of OE in practice
Dimension 1: Analysis
Dimension 2: Design
Dimension 3: Implementation
Dimension 4: Learning Process
Dimension 5: Evaluation & Optimization
OE Quality Dimensions
29. Quality indicators for OE in practice
For Dimension 1:
For Dimension 2:
For Dimension n:
OE Quality Indicators
30. Quality indicators for analysis in OE:
• Content structure
• Learning tasks
• Characteristics of target groups
• Budgets and resources
• Learning context
• Why provided as MOOC? And not other type?
• Convince stakeholders
OE D1: Analysis
31. Quality indicators for design in OE:
• Usability
• Accessibility
• Constructive alignment of teaching (content
and objectives are aligned)
• Interactivity design
• Action design
• Multimedia design
• Motivation design
OE D2: Design
32. Quality indicators for design in OE:
• Quality of learning tasks
• Teaching strategy (deductive vs inductive)
• Integration of content into narration
• Flexibility
• Heterogenuous learning paths
• Focus on precise definition of learning content
+ what you can learn (goals, structure, intention)
• What is the added value of the MOOC?
OE D2: Design
33. Quality indicators for design in OE:
• Level of the MOOC (basics vs expertise)
• Strategic plan for realization + marketing
• Target audience definition + characteristics
• Basic and special features (also for marketing)
• Definition of indicators for learning success
(maybe clustering individual intentions into
groups of learners)
OE D2: Design
34. Quality indicators for design in OE:
• Question: How are the indicators related to
each other? (dependencies/intertwinned)
OE D2: Design
35. Q. indicators for implementation in OE:
• Platform selection based on criteria for
learning goals and design
• Communicate with the stakeholders
• Meet the technical conditions + requirements
• Create the course area with all assignments
according to the design
• Define implementation period
• Marketing
OE D3: Implementation
36. Q. indicators for implementation in OE:
• Changing from implementation to preparation?
OE D3: Implementation
37. Quality indicators for learning in OE:
• Collect enrollments before the start of the
Learning process
• Scaffolding or help
• Enough interactions among peers
• Feedback from instructors
• Measuring of indicators for learning success
(maybe clustering individual intentions into
groups of learners)
OE D4: Learning Process
38. Quality indicators for learning in OE:
• Monitoring system of learning process (that
learners know where they are)
• Self-directed feedback through assignments
and self-assessment (in MOOCs without grades)
• Assessment of students learning within the
learning process
OE D4: Learning Process
39. Quality indicators for evaluation in OE:
• Kirkpatrick‘s four levels
• All quality indicators should be part of the
evaluation (quality criteria for the design have
to be evaluated)
OE D5: Evaluation