SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 67
QUALIFICATION OF ANALYTICAL
INSTRUMENTS AND GLASSWARE
PRESENTED
BY:GADUPUDI.PAVANI
Y17MPHPA426
CLPT
1
CONTENTS
 Components of analytical data quality
 Qualification, Protocol
 Calibration (Definition, Need)
 Calibration of Various Instruments
1) ELECTRONIC BALANCE
2)pH METER
3) UV-Visible spectrophotometer
4) FTIR
5) GC
6) HPLC
7) HPTLC
 Calibration of various Glassware
1) Volumetric flask
2) Pipette
3) Measuring cylinder
4) Beakers
5) Burette
 References
2
COMPONENTS OF ANALYTICAL DATA QUALITY
3
QUALIFICATION
 Qualification is a part of validation. It is action of proving
and documenting the equipment which are properly installed.
Qualification is of 4 types:
 Design Qualification
 Installation Qualification
 Performance Qualification
 Operational Qualification
4
PROTOCOL
 It is a written plan which states how validation will be
conducted. This protocol identifies the ,
Equipment process parameters
Product characteristics
Sampling data to be collected
No. of validation runs and acceptable test results.
5
Qualification phases
6
Qualification time line.
7
CALIBRATION
 It is set of operations which is established under specified
conditions.
 It is necessary to ensure the accuracy of the data produced
during the process
 Calibration is the process by which ensure that an instrument
readings are accurate the reference to establish standard. Calibration is
performed by using primary standard. It is done to check the zero error
deflection by using standard reference.
8
NEED FOR CALIBRATION:
* With a new instruments
* When a specified time period is elapsed
* When a specified usage (operating hours) has elapsed
* When an instrument has had a shock or vibration which potentially
may have put it out of calibration
* Sudden change in weather
* Whenever observation appears questionable
9
STATUS OF THE INSTRUMENTS IDENTIFICATION
The status of the instruments is identified by checking the calibration
tag of the instruments. Tag consists of information regarding instruments
like name of instrument, date of procurement, date of calibration,
next calibration date and signature of calibrated person with date.
Calibration of instruments is done in two ways internal
calibration and external calibration. Internal calibration is done the
in-house officials whom have sound knowledge on it. External
calibration is done according to the instructions of the manufacturer and
should be done in the government approved individual or institution.
10
CALIBRATION OF ELECTRONIIC BALANCE
11
 Many types of balances are used in chemical and biological tests.
These balances must be calibrated to ensure the accuracy of the data
produced by it.
 Different types of balances used are as follows:
12
Requirements of the balance
 It should work under optimal conditions like weighing room, weighing
bench, temperature, light, air etc.
S.NO REQUIREMENTS ACCEPTANCE
1) Weighing bench Should be non-magnetic vibration proof &
dust free
2) Temperature Constant temperature should be maintained.
Deviations should not exceed 5°c
3) Atmospheric humidity Should be between 40% to 60%
4) Light Should be protected from direct sunlight
5) Weighing vessel Smallest possible weighing vessel used.
Weighing vessel and sample it contains
should have same temperature. 13
Electronic Analytical Balance
14
CALIBRATION OF pH METER
15
TWO POINT CALIBRATION METHOD
 This is the method in which pH meter is calibrated with 2
different buffers of known pH and then checking the pH meter against
pH 7.00 standard buffer to confirm the calibration.
Again place the tip of the electrode in the second calibration buffer
i.e . either in pH 4.00 or 10.00 and repeat the procedure.
16
PROCEDURE:
 Check the level of the 3M KCL electrode filling
solution(electrical conductor between reference &sample) to ensure
that it is within 25mm of the filling hole(small circular hole on the side
of the electrode).
 Then rinse the probe with de-ionized water & blot dry with
wipes & then place the tip of the electrode into the pH 7.00 buffer
solution and pH 4.01 buffer or pH 9.20 buffer
 The pH meter will automatically read the endpoint when the
reading is stable & appropriate buffer symbol will appear on the display
and record the pH value.
17
 Note the endpoint when the reading is stable and appropriate
buffer symbol will appear on the display.
 The pH meter will also display electrode slope value. If the
slope is less than 95% or greater than 105% then refer to the
troubleshooting section.
18
Date & Time
(DD-MM-YY
&
am or pm)
Observed pH
4.01 Buffer
(±0.05)
7.00Buffe
r
(±0.05)
9.2Buffer
(±0.05)
Room
temp
(°C)
Cal. Status
(Pass/Fail)
Calibrated by
(Name &Sign)
Checked By
(Name
&Sign)
Daily pH meter Calibration
19
Precautions:
 Do not allow the fill solution to run dry and add fill solution when
ever the level falls 25mm below.
 Do not leave the electrode in organic solvents as the tip and body may
be damaged. Discard used buffer solutions daily. Do not reuse it.
Interference:
 The electrode can be stored for up to one week in pH 7.00 or 4.00 not
in distilled water.
 For longer storage periods remove the wetting cap and fill it with 3M
KCL solution and push it onto the tip of the electrode.
20
CALIBRATION OF UV-VISIBLE
SPECTROPHOTOMETER
21
Equipment Details:
Instrument/Equipment Calibration Record
INS/ EQP Name: UV-VISIBLE spectrophotometer
Department Name: Central Instrumentation Lab
Make,
Soft ware &
Version
Model
type &
Serial No
Beam type
(single/double)
INS/
EQP.ID
No.
SOP No. Calibration
Frequency
Every six
months
22
Tests Performed In UV-Visible Spectroscopy:
 Baseline flatness test
 UV region wave length accuracy test
 Visible region wave length accuracy test
 %Transmittance of Cuvette
 Control of absorbance
 Emission lines from deuterium discharge lamp
 Stray Light measurement
 Resolution power
 Photometric linearity
23
1) Baseline Flatness Test:
Measurement configuration parameters:
Reference : No Cuvette
Sample : No Cuvette
Cuvette material : Quartz
Wave length range : 200-800
Lamp : Deuterium lamp
Detector : PDA detector
24
WAVE LENGTH MEASURED
ABSORBANCE
ACCEPTANCE
CRITERIA
200 ±0.001
300 ±0.001
400 ±0.001
500 ±0.001
600 ±0.001
700 ±0.001
800 ±0.001
25
2) Uv Region Wave Length Accuracy Test:
Measurement configuration Parameters
Reference : Air (Empty Cuvette)
Sample : Benzene
Recording range : 220-270nm
Lamp : Deuterium Discharge
Detector : PDA Detector
WAVE LENGTH (nm) OBSERVED PEAKS
AT WAVE LENGTH
(nm)
ACCEPTANCE
CRITERIA
220-270 nm 235.9±0.5nm
26
3) Visible Region Wave Length Accuracy Test:
Measurement Parameters:
Reference : Distilled Water
Sample : 0.01% KMno4
Measuring mode : 300 to 600nm
WAVE LENGTH
(NM)
OBSERVED PEAKS
AT WAVE
LENGTH(NM)
ACCEPTANCE
CRITERIA
300-600nm 310±1nm
525±1nm
545±1nm
Lamp : Deuterium Discharge
Detector : PDA Detector
27
4) %Transmittance Of Cuvette:
Measurement configuration Parameters
Reference : Empty Cuvette
Sample : Empty Cuvette
Cuvette material : Quartz
Measuring mode : 240nm
Lamp : Deuterium discharge lamp
Detector : PDA Detector
WAVE LENGTH
(NM)
%TRANSMITTANCE ACCEPTANCE
CRITERIA
240nm Not less than 80%
28
5) Control of absorbance:
 Absorbance: Visible region
 Place dummy Cuvette in sample holder and set %T to “zero”. Now
remove dummy Cuvette, by using fine & coarse control set a reading
exactly 40.0 on the read out.
 Press Absorbance push button. If the maximum absorbance obtained at λ
of 485nm is 0.398 ± 0.002, the photometric calibration of instrument is
confirmed to be proper.
 To confirm, repeat above steps, and set 10.00 on read out
 Press Absorbance button. If the λ at 485 nm is 1.000±0.002 then it is
confirmed the photometric performance in the visible region is proper.
 Absorbance: U.V region
 Place blank0.1N H2SO4 Cuvette and 60ppm K2Cr2O7 as sample
 Set λ exactly to 257 nm, if the value of Absorbance of sample at the set λ
is 0.864±0.005, the instrument is measuring Absorbance properly.
29
6) Emission Lines From Deuterium Discharge Lamp:
Measurement configuration Parameters:
Reference : No Cuvette
Sample : Empty Cuvette
Recording range : 400-500, 600-700
:
THEORETICAL
VALUE
OBSERVED
VALUE
DIFFERENCE ACCEPTANCE
CRITERIA
486nm 486±0.3nm
656nm 656±0.3nm
30
7) Stray Light measurement:
 Weigh accurately 1.2g of dried Potassium chloride in 100 ml
volumetric flask and makeup to mark with Double distilled water.
 Measure the absorbance at 200 nm.
Acceptance criteria: Tolerance limit NLT 2.0
8) Resolution Power:
 Prepare 0.02%v/v solution of Toluene and make up with Hexane.
 Scan the wavelength from 250 to 280nm.
 Maximum absorbance is 269 nm and Minimum absorbance is 266nm
 Acceptance criteria: Ratio limit NLT 1.5
31
9) Photometric linearity:
 Weigh accurately 100mg of Potassium chromate in 100ml volumetric
flask and dissolve in 0.05N Potassium hydroxide solution. Make up with
the same solvent.
 From the above solution take 20ml and make up to 500ml with 0.05N
Potassium hydroxide solution.
 Now prepare dilution of 4,8,16,24,32 µg/ml
 Measure the absorbance at 370nm using blank.
 Acceptance criteria: The plot should be linear and regression
coefficient (R2) should NLT 0.999.
32
CALIBRATION OF FT-IR
33
Equipment Details:
Instrument/Equipment Calibration Record
INS/ EQP Name: FTIR
Department Name: Central Instrumentation Lab
Make,
Soft ware &
Version
Model type &
Serial No
INS/
EQP ID No.
SOP No. Calibration
Frequency
Every six
months
34
Physical Observation:
S.NO DESCRIPTION EXPECTED OBSERVED
(pass/fail)
1. Cabinet finishing To be free from scratches, stains,
dents
2. Instrument noise when start
up
To be smooth function with out
noise
3. Top cover fixing To be without gaps
4. Spectrum reading display To be clear display without blinking
5. Lamp check To be glow through out the
measurement
6. Anvil and piston set To be store always in liquid paraffin
oil after usage
7. Die set To be clean and free from rust
35
Control Of Resolution Performance:
Identification using reference spectra
Material used: Polystyrene film
36
37
NOMINAL
TRANSMISSION
MINIMA(cm-1 )
OBSERVED
TRANSMISSION
MINIMA(cm-1 )
ACCEPTANCE
CRITERIA (cm-1 )
3060.0 ±1
2849.5 ±1
1942.9 ±1
1601.2 ±1
1583.0 ±1
1154.5 ±1
1028.3 ±1
38
CALIBRATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
39
Various Calibration Parameters Are:
 Flow rate accuracy
 Column oven temperature accuracy
 System precision
 System precision for head space auto sampler
 Detector linearity
 Detector noise and drift test
40
1) Flow rate accuracy:
 Connect the digital flow meter to the detector outlet port.
 Set the carrier gas (Helium) flow and wait till it reaches the set flow.
 Note the observed flow in replicate.
 Repeat the procedure for other carrier gases such as Hydrogen and
Air.
 Record the result in GC calibration protocol.
 Acceptance criteria: The flow rate of carrier gas should be ±10% of
set flow.
S.No. Carrier gas Acceptance criteria in
ml/m
1 Helium 125
2 Hydrogen 40
3 Air 400
41
2) Column Oven Temperature Accuracy:
 Connect the column to the detector port.
 Place the thermometer probe in the column oven and set the column
oven temperature at 40°C.Wait till the temperature stabilizes.
 Note the observed temperature as read by the probe in triplicate
over a period of 10 m.
 Repeat the procedure for 100°C, 150°C and 190°C.
 Acceptance criteria: The resulting oven temperature from the
thermometer display should be within ±2°C of the set temperature.
42
3) System Precision:
Preparation of Standard solution:
Transfer 20 ml of Methanol, Ethanol and Acetone into 100ml volumetric
flask and make up with Ethyl acetate
Procedure:
Inject blank, followed by Standard preparation in 6 replicates. Note down
the areas and Retention times.
Acceptance criteria: The %RSD of retention time should be not more
than 1.0%& peak area should be not more than 5.0%.
43
4) System precision for head space auto sampler:
Preparation of standard solution:
Prepare a standard mixture solution by taking Methylene dichloride (0.6g),
Chloroform (0.06g), Trichloroethane (0.08g), 1,4-Dioxane (0.38g) in
volumetric flask containing about 40ml of Dimethyl formamide. Finally
makeup to volume with DMF(Solution-A)
Procedure:
Take 0.5 ml of standard solution-A in 6 different vials and seal with septum,
then magnetic caps and crimp. Place these vials on head space sampler;
prepare a blank vial also. Load the vials in head space sampler tray. Blank
vials followed by the standard vials.
Acceptance criteria: The %RSD of retention time should be NMT 1.0%&
peak area should be NMT 15.0%.
44
5) Detector Linearity:
Detector linearity solutions
SOLUTION-A
10ml of
methanol,
ethanol &
acetone
+
Dilute the
volume with
ethyl acetate
SOLUTION-B
15ml of
methanol,
ethanol &
acetone
+
Dilute the
volume with
ethyl acetate
SOLUTION-C
20ml of
methanol,
ethanol &
acetone
+
Dilute the
volume with
ethyl acetate
SOLUTION-D
25ml of
methanol,
ethanol &
acetone
+
Dilute the volume
with ethyl acetate
SOLUTION-E
30ml of
methanol,
ethanol &
acetone
+
Dilute the
volume with
ethyl acetate
Procedure:
Inject blank, followed by Detector linearity solutions and record the peak
responses .Draw a standard plot between the concentrations Vs the peak
responses.
Acceptance criteria: The plot should be linear and regression coefficient
(R2) should not be less than 0.99. 45
Detector Noise and Drift Test:
After GC is ready run the system up to 15 m through single run. After
completion of run calculate noise and drift through software.
Acceptance criteria: Noise NMT: 100 µV
Drift NMT: 2500 µV/hr
46
CALIBRATION OF HPLC
47
48
Various Calibration parameters are:
 Flow rate accuracy
 Injector accuracy
 System Precision
 Detector linearity
 Injector linearity
 Column oven temperature accuracy
49
1) Flow Rate Accuracy:
 Prime all the solvent lines with Milli Q water.
 Set the flow rate to 0.500 ml/m.
 Wait for about 15 m to stabilize the system and ensure that the
pressure is stable.
 Insert the outlet tubing into a 10 ml volumetric flask and start the
stop watch simultaneously.
 Stop the stopwatch when the lower meniscus reaches the 10 ml
mark on the flask.
 Record the elapsed time.
 Similarly check the flow for 1.0 ml/m and 2.0 ml/m.
Acceptance criteria: The time taken to collect the water should be
with in ± 2.0% of the actual value.
Set Flow Actual time required to
collect up to the mark in
m
Acceptance criteria (in m)
0.5 ml/m 20.0 19.6 – 20.4
1.0 ml/m 10.0 9.8 – 10.2
2.0 ml/m 5.0 4.9 – 5.1 50
2) Injector Accuracy:
 Connect the pump and detector inlet with union.
 Prepare mobile phase consisting of a mixture of water and Methanol
(70:30 v/v)
 Set a flow rate of 0.5 ml/m and a run time of 1 m.
 Set the column temperature at 25± 2°C.
 Fill a standard HPLC vial to 2/3rd with Milli-Q water. Seal the vial
properly with a cap. Weigh the vial and record the weight as W1 grams.
 Place the vial in the chromatographic system and perform 6 injections of
50µl volume from this vial.
 Weigh the vial again and note the weigh after the injections as W2 grams.
 Calculate the mean volume injected per injection as follows:
Mean injected volume (µl) = (W1 – W2) ×100/6
Acceptance criteria: The mean injected volume should be 50.0±1.0 µl.
51
3) System Precision:
Standard Preparation:
 Accurately weigh and transfer about 60mg of Caffeine into a 100ml
volumetric flask. Dissolve and dilute to the volume with mobile phase.
 Transfer 10ml of this solution into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to
the volume with mobile phase.
Procedure:
 Inject blank, followed by standard preparation in 6 replicates. Note down
the areas and retention times.
 Now calculate the %RSD of retention time and peak areas for 6
replicates injections.
Acceptance criteria: The %RSD of retention time & peak area should
be <1.0%. 52
4) Detector Linearity:
Standard Preparation:
Accurately weigh and transfer about 60mg of Caffeine into a 100ml volumetric
flask. Dissolve and dilute to the volume with mobile phase.
 Detector linearity solution 1(0.06 mg/ml): Transfer 10ml of Standard
Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with mobile
phase
 Detector linearity solution 2(0.048 mg/ml): Transfer 8ml of Standard
Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with mobile
phase.
 Detector linearity solution 3(0.03 mg/ml): Transfer 5ml of Standard
Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with mobile
phase. 53
 Detector linearity solution 4(0.24 mg/ml): Transfer 4ml of Standard
Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with
mobile phase.
 Detector linearity solution 5(0.012 mg/ml): Transfer 2ml of Standard
Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with
mobile phase.
Procedure: Inject blank, followed by Detector linearity solutions and
record the peak responses of Caffeine standard plot between the
concentration Vs the peak responses.
 Acceptance criteria: The plot should be linear and regression
coefficient (R2) should not be less than 0.99.
54
5) Injector Linearity:
Standard Preparation:
 Accurately weigh and transfer about 60mg of Caffeine into a 100ml
volumetric flask.
 Dissolve and dilute to the volume with mobile phase.
 Transfer 10ml of Standard Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and
dilute to the volume with mobile phase.
Procedure:
 Inject 5 µl of the mobile phase as blank injection.
 Inject 5 µl, 10 µl, 20 µl, 50 µl and 80 µl of the Standard Preparation and
record the peak areas.
 Plot a curve for the volume injected Vs peak area.
Acceptance criteria: The plot should be linear and regression coefficient (R2)
should not be less than 0.99. 55
6) Column Oven Temperature Accuracy:
 It is evaluated with a calibrated digital
thermometer at 30°Cand 60°C .
 Place the thermometer probe in the column
oven and set the column oven temperature at
30°C.
 Wait till the temperature stabilizes.
 Record the temperature displayed on the
thermometer.
 Similarly performs the column oven
temperature accuracy test at 60°C.
 Acceptance criteria: The resulting oven
temperature from the thermometer display should
be within ±2°C of the set temperature. 56
CALIBRATION OF HPTLC
57
Calibration of HPTLC done by following method:
 Spotting And Detection Capacity:
Requirements:
i. Alumina glass plates
ii. Sodium salicylate
iii. 96% v/v alcohol
Preparation of Stock Solution:
Stock solution- 1:
Weigh 500mg of sodium salicylate and transfer it into 250ml volumetric
flask dissolve and dilute with 96% v/v alcohol.
Stock solution- 2:
Weigh 100mg of sodium salicylate and transfer it into 250ml volumetric
flask dissolve and dilute with 96% v/v alcohol. 58
 Procedure:
Spot 5µl of each solution observe at 254nm and 366nm.
 Acceptance:
1) The spots shall be comparable intensity wise
2) Spot due to Stock solution-2 shall be visible at 254nm
3) Spot due to Stock solution-1 shall be visible at 366nm
59
CALIBRATION GLASSWARES
60
Calibration Procedure:
For Volumetric Flask and Beaker:
 Weigh accurately a previously dried volumetric flask.
 Make up the volumetric flask up to the mark with purified water.
 Wipe dry the out side of the volumetric flask and then weigh
 Find out the weight of water by subtracting the empty weight of volumetric
flask from total weight
Weight of Water(W3) = Total weight of volumetric flask(W2) – Empty
volumetric flask weight(W1)
 Calculate the volume by taking correction factor 0.99602gm ( i.e. 1ml of
Purified water at 25˚C = 0.99602gm) Record the observation in calibration
format.
 Repeat the above calibration 3 times and take average of sum of three
observed values.
61
For pipette and Burette:
 Weigh accurately previously dried empty beaker.
 Fill the Pipette and burette with purified water up to the mark with help of
bulb.
 Wipe dry the outside of the transfer pipette and burette and then transfer
the water in an pre-weighed beaker and weigh.
 Perform the calibration in triplet and calculate and record the average of
observed volume.
 Calculate the difference between label volume and average of observed
volume of glass ware as using following formula;
Difference in volume = Labeled volume – Average of observed volume
 Find out the weight of Water by subtracting the empty beaker weight from
total weight. 62
 Calculate the volume by taking correction factor 0.99602gm.
 Ensure that the difference in volume shall be with in the tolerance limits
as listed in table
CALCULATION:
Observations:
i. Weight of Pre weighed, dry, empty, glassware(W1)………..gm
ii. Weight of glassware and water(W2)………….gm
iii. Weight of Water(W3)………..gm
iv. Observed volume of glassware:(W2-W1)/D ……….ml
where ; D= 0.99602gm
Average of 3 Observed volume = Sum of 3 Observations/3
63
Glassware Tolerance Limits Table:
Volum
etric
flasks
Label
ed
volum
e , ml
10 25 50 100 200 250 500 1000
Tolera
nce±m
l
0.04 0.06 0.10 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.30 0.60
Transf
er
pipette
s and
burette
s
Labele
d
volum
e , ml
1 2 5 10 20 25 50 100
Tolera
nce±m
l
0.012 0.012 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.10 0.16
64
Schedule for Calibration/Inspection of Some Analytical
instruments and glassware Instruments
INSTRUMENT/GLASSWARE INTERVAL (MONTHS/DAYS)
ELECTRONIC BALANCE Daily & Six months
pH METER Daily
UV-Visible spectrophotometer Monthly once ±3days
FTIR Monthly once ±3days
GC Six months
HPLC Six months
HPTLC Six months
Volumetric flask Six months
Pipette Six months
Measuring cylinder Six months
Beakers Six months
Burette Six months
65
REFERENCES
 Gowrisankar.D., et al., (2010). Validation and Calibration of
Analytical Instruments.vol: 2(2),89-99.
 Annex-4 Guidelines on Qualification of IR
Spectrophotometers.(2007).
 Standard Operating Procedure for Calibration and Maintenance of
pH meters.(2005).
 Annex-8 Guidelines on Qualification of Balances.(2012).
 D.Gowrisankar, K.Abbulu, O.Bala Souri, K.Sujana* . Validation and
Calibration of Analytical Instruments . 2010; 2(2): .
66
67

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Analytical methods validation as per ich & usp
Analytical methods validation as per ich & uspAnalytical methods validation as per ich & usp
Analytical methods validation as per ich & uspGANESH NIGADE
 
Analytical method validation as per ich and usp
Analytical method validation as per ich and usp Analytical method validation as per ich and usp
Analytical method validation as per ich and usp shreyas B R
 
Rationale for the reporting control of degradation products
Rationale for the reporting control of degradation products Rationale for the reporting control of degradation products
Rationale for the reporting control of degradation products ManiKandan1405
 
Qualification of laboratory equipments
Qualification of laboratory equipmentsQualification of laboratory equipments
Qualification of laboratory equipmentsPranali Polshettiwar
 
validation of analytical method used in cleaning
validation of analytical method used in cleaningvalidation of analytical method used in cleaning
validation of analytical method used in cleaningKUNDLAJAYALAKSHMI
 
Impurities in residual solvents
Impurities in residual solventsImpurities in residual solvents
Impurities in residual solventsMehulJain143
 
Qualification of analytical instruments
Qualification of analytical instruments Qualification of analytical instruments
Qualification of analytical instruments PUNEET NIRMAL
 
Pharmaceutical validation, Quantification, streamlining, validation masterplan.
Pharmaceutical validation, Quantification, streamlining, validation masterplan.Pharmaceutical validation, Quantification, streamlining, validation masterplan.
Pharmaceutical validation, Quantification, streamlining, validation masterplan.begalavenu
 
Validation of compressed air and nitrogen
Validation of compressed air and nitrogenValidation of compressed air and nitrogen
Validation of compressed air and nitrogenManiKandan1405
 
IMPURITIES AND STABILITY STUDIES
IMPURITIES AND STABILITY STUDIESIMPURITIES AND STABILITY STUDIES
IMPURITIES AND STABILITY STUDIESprakash64742
 
Qualification of analytical instrument of FTIR
Qualification of analytical instrument of FTIR Qualification of analytical instrument of FTIR
Qualification of analytical instrument of FTIR KUNDLAJAYALAKSHMI
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Cleaning validation
Cleaning validationCleaning validation
Cleaning validation
 
Analytical methods validation as per ich & usp
Analytical methods validation as per ich & uspAnalytical methods validation as per ich & usp
Analytical methods validation as per ich & usp
 
Qualification Of HPTLC
Qualification Of HPTLCQualification Of HPTLC
Qualification Of HPTLC
 
CLEANING METHOD DEVELOPMENT
CLEANING METHOD DEVELOPMENT CLEANING METHOD DEVELOPMENT
CLEANING METHOD DEVELOPMENT
 
Qualification of high performance liquid chromatography
Qualification of high performance liquid chromatographyQualification of high performance liquid chromatography
Qualification of high performance liquid chromatography
 
Analytical method validation as per ich and usp
Analytical method validation as per ich and usp Analytical method validation as per ich and usp
Analytical method validation as per ich and usp
 
Rationale for the reporting control of degradation products
Rationale for the reporting control of degradation products Rationale for the reporting control of degradation products
Rationale for the reporting control of degradation products
 
Qualification of laboratory equipments
Qualification of laboratory equipmentsQualification of laboratory equipments
Qualification of laboratory equipments
 
SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
SITE ACCEPTANCE TESTSITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
validation of analytical method used in cleaning
validation of analytical method used in cleaningvalidation of analytical method used in cleaning
validation of analytical method used in cleaning
 
Pharmaceutical validation of water system
Pharmaceutical validation of  water system Pharmaceutical validation of  water system
Pharmaceutical validation of water system
 
Impurities in residual solvents
Impurities in residual solventsImpurities in residual solvents
Impurities in residual solvents
 
Qualification of analytical instruments
Qualification of analytical instruments Qualification of analytical instruments
Qualification of analytical instruments
 
Pharmaceutical validation, Quantification, streamlining, validation masterplan.
Pharmaceutical validation, Quantification, streamlining, validation masterplan.Pharmaceutical validation, Quantification, streamlining, validation masterplan.
Pharmaceutical validation, Quantification, streamlining, validation masterplan.
 
Qualification Of HPLC
Qualification Of HPLCQualification Of HPLC
Qualification Of HPLC
 
Validation of compressed air and nitrogen
Validation of compressed air and nitrogenValidation of compressed air and nitrogen
Validation of compressed air and nitrogen
 
IMPURITIES AND STABILITY STUDIES
IMPURITIES AND STABILITY STUDIESIMPURITIES AND STABILITY STUDIES
IMPURITIES AND STABILITY STUDIES
 
Qualification of gc equipment
Qualification of gc equipmentQualification of gc equipment
Qualification of gc equipment
 
Validation qualification
Validation qualificationValidation qualification
Validation qualification
 
Qualification of analytical instrument of FTIR
Qualification of analytical instrument of FTIR Qualification of analytical instrument of FTIR
Qualification of analytical instrument of FTIR
 

Ähnlich wie Qualification of instrumets

Qualification of High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC)
Qualification of High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC)Qualification of High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC)
Qualification of High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC)PRAVADA
 
Calibration Intermediate Check of Measuring and Voulmetric Equipemnt, Mr. Sub...
Calibration Intermediate Check of Measuring and Voulmetric Equipemnt, Mr. Sub...Calibration Intermediate Check of Measuring and Voulmetric Equipemnt, Mr. Sub...
Calibration Intermediate Check of Measuring and Voulmetric Equipemnt, Mr. Sub...Malarvili14
 
Calibration - UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Gas Chromatograph, IR spectroph...
Calibration - UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Gas Chromatograph, IR spectroph...Calibration - UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Gas Chromatograph, IR spectroph...
Calibration - UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Gas Chromatograph, IR spectroph...SELINA SRAVANTHI
 
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical InstrumentsCalibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical InstrumentsISF COLLEGE OF PHARMACY MOGA
 
Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the...
Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the...Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the...
Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the...PerkinElmer, Inc.
 
qualification of analytical instruments..M pharmacy 1st year.validation
qualification of analytical instruments..M pharmacy 1st year.validationqualification of analytical instruments..M pharmacy 1st year.validation
qualification of analytical instruments..M pharmacy 1st year.validationSohailPattan
 
CCS 140 141 endress+hauser datasheet-sensors for free chlorine
CCS 140 141 endress+hauser datasheet-sensors for free chlorineCCS 140 141 endress+hauser datasheet-sensors for free chlorine
CCS 140 141 endress+hauser datasheet-sensors for free chlorineENVIMART
 
do-and-bod-analysis.ppt
do-and-bod-analysis.pptdo-and-bod-analysis.ppt
do-and-bod-analysis.pptRodrigo664210
 
wrd-ot-do-and-bod-analysis_445265_7.ppt
wrd-ot-do-and-bod-analysis_445265_7.pptwrd-ot-do-and-bod-analysis_445265_7.ppt
wrd-ot-do-and-bod-analysis_445265_7.pptMyrnaFiel
 
do-and-bod-analysis.ppt
do-and-bod-analysis.pptdo-and-bod-analysis.ppt
do-and-bod-analysis.pptshubham871246
 
QUALIFICATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY.pptx
QUALIFICATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY.pptxQUALIFICATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY.pptx
QUALIFICATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY.pptxSurendra Chowdary
 
W.A.H.C 2014 The Future of Water Testing is Digital
W.A.H.C 2014 The Future of Water Testing is DigitalW.A.H.C 2014 The Future of Water Testing is Digital
W.A.H.C 2014 The Future of Water Testing is DigitalITS (Sensafe)
 
Performance qualification of High performance liquid chromatography
Performance qualification of High performance liquid chromatography Performance qualification of High performance liquid chromatography
Performance qualification of High performance liquid chromatography Atchaya Thalapathy
 
Pharmaceutical validation
Pharmaceutical validationPharmaceutical validation
Pharmaceutical validationMohiniTawade
 
High Performance Liquid Chromatography Qualification .pdf
High Performance Liquid Chromatography Qualification .pdfHigh Performance Liquid Chromatography Qualification .pdf
High Performance Liquid Chromatography Qualification .pdfBALASUNDARESAN M
 
Calibration of analytical instruments
Calibration of analytical instrumentsCalibration of analytical instruments
Calibration of analytical instrumentsVigneshVicky470
 
EBSO: CATALOGO CONTROL COMPANY - TERMOMETROS-HIGROMETROS
EBSO: CATALOGO CONTROL COMPANY - TERMOMETROS-HIGROMETROSEBSO: CATALOGO CONTROL COMPANY - TERMOMETROS-HIGROMETROS
EBSO: CATALOGO CONTROL COMPANY - TERMOMETROS-HIGROMETROSEBSO
 
Analysis of Trace Elements in Water by EPA Method 200.8 using ICP Mass Spectr...
Analysis of Trace Elements in Water by EPA Method 200.8 using ICP Mass Spectr...Analysis of Trace Elements in Water by EPA Method 200.8 using ICP Mass Spectr...
Analysis of Trace Elements in Water by EPA Method 200.8 using ICP Mass Spectr...Shimadzu Scientific Instruments
 

Ähnlich wie Qualification of instrumets (20)

Qualification of High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC)
Qualification of High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC)Qualification of High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC)
Qualification of High Performance Liquid Chromatography(HPLC)
 
Calibration Intermediate Check of Measuring and Voulmetric Equipemnt, Mr. Sub...
Calibration Intermediate Check of Measuring and Voulmetric Equipemnt, Mr. Sub...Calibration Intermediate Check of Measuring and Voulmetric Equipemnt, Mr. Sub...
Calibration Intermediate Check of Measuring and Voulmetric Equipemnt, Mr. Sub...
 
Calibration - UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Gas Chromatograph, IR spectroph...
Calibration - UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Gas Chromatograph, IR spectroph...Calibration - UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Gas Chromatograph, IR spectroph...
Calibration - UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Gas Chromatograph, IR spectroph...
 
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical InstrumentsCalibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
 
Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the...
Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the...Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the...
Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the...
 
qualification of analytical instruments..M pharmacy 1st year.validation
qualification of analytical instruments..M pharmacy 1st year.validationqualification of analytical instruments..M pharmacy 1st year.validation
qualification of analytical instruments..M pharmacy 1st year.validation
 
CCS 140 141 endress+hauser datasheet-sensors for free chlorine
CCS 140 141 endress+hauser datasheet-sensors for free chlorineCCS 140 141 endress+hauser datasheet-sensors for free chlorine
CCS 140 141 endress+hauser datasheet-sensors for free chlorine
 
QUALIFICATION OF HPLC , HPLC
QUALIFICATION OF HPLC , HPLCQUALIFICATION OF HPLC , HPLC
QUALIFICATION OF HPLC , HPLC
 
do-and-bod-analysis.ppt
do-and-bod-analysis.pptdo-and-bod-analysis.ppt
do-and-bod-analysis.ppt
 
wrd-ot-do-and-bod-analysis_445265_7.ppt
wrd-ot-do-and-bod-analysis_445265_7.pptwrd-ot-do-and-bod-analysis_445265_7.ppt
wrd-ot-do-and-bod-analysis_445265_7.ppt
 
do-and-bod-analysis.ppt
do-and-bod-analysis.pptdo-and-bod-analysis.ppt
do-and-bod-analysis.ppt
 
A Comparative Analysis of Semiconductor Electroplating Bath Additives by Cali...
A Comparative Analysis of Semiconductor Electroplating Bath Additives by Cali...A Comparative Analysis of Semiconductor Electroplating Bath Additives by Cali...
A Comparative Analysis of Semiconductor Electroplating Bath Additives by Cali...
 
QUALIFICATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY.pptx
QUALIFICATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY.pptxQUALIFICATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY.pptx
QUALIFICATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY.pptx
 
W.A.H.C 2014 The Future of Water Testing is Digital
W.A.H.C 2014 The Future of Water Testing is DigitalW.A.H.C 2014 The Future of Water Testing is Digital
W.A.H.C 2014 The Future of Water Testing is Digital
 
Performance qualification of High performance liquid chromatography
Performance qualification of High performance liquid chromatography Performance qualification of High performance liquid chromatography
Performance qualification of High performance liquid chromatography
 
Pharmaceutical validation
Pharmaceutical validationPharmaceutical validation
Pharmaceutical validation
 
High Performance Liquid Chromatography Qualification .pdf
High Performance Liquid Chromatography Qualification .pdfHigh Performance Liquid Chromatography Qualification .pdf
High Performance Liquid Chromatography Qualification .pdf
 
Calibration of analytical instruments
Calibration of analytical instrumentsCalibration of analytical instruments
Calibration of analytical instruments
 
EBSO: CATALOGO CONTROL COMPANY - TERMOMETROS-HIGROMETROS
EBSO: CATALOGO CONTROL COMPANY - TERMOMETROS-HIGROMETROSEBSO: CATALOGO CONTROL COMPANY - TERMOMETROS-HIGROMETROS
EBSO: CATALOGO CONTROL COMPANY - TERMOMETROS-HIGROMETROS
 
Analysis of Trace Elements in Water by EPA Method 200.8 using ICP Mass Spectr...
Analysis of Trace Elements in Water by EPA Method 200.8 using ICP Mass Spectr...Analysis of Trace Elements in Water by EPA Method 200.8 using ICP Mass Spectr...
Analysis of Trace Elements in Water by EPA Method 200.8 using ICP Mass Spectr...
 

Mehr von ChowdaryPavani

Drug product performance,relative and absolute bioavailability
Drug product performance,relative and absolute bioavailabilityDrug product performance,relative and absolute bioavailability
Drug product performance,relative and absolute bioavailabilityChowdaryPavani
 
Analysis of fats, oils &amp; waxes
Analysis of fats, oils &amp; waxesAnalysis of fats, oils &amp; waxes
Analysis of fats, oils &amp; waxesChowdaryPavani
 
General considerations and method development in ce,
General considerations and method development in ce,General considerations and method development in ce,
General considerations and method development in ce,ChowdaryPavani
 
Qc tets for tablets final
Qc tets for tablets finalQc tets for tablets final
Qc tets for tablets finalChowdaryPavani
 
Concept &amp; evolution of qa &amp; qc
Concept &amp; evolution of qa &amp; qcConcept &amp; evolution of qa &amp; qc
Concept &amp; evolution of qa &amp; qcChowdaryPavani
 

Mehr von ChowdaryPavani (12)

Drug product performance,relative and absolute bioavailability
Drug product performance,relative and absolute bioavailabilityDrug product performance,relative and absolute bioavailability
Drug product performance,relative and absolute bioavailability
 
Doc1 copy
Doc1   copyDoc1   copy
Doc1 copy
 
Vita microbial assay
Vita microbial assayVita microbial assay
Vita microbial assay
 
Analysis of vitamins
Analysis of vitaminsAnalysis of vitamins
Analysis of vitamins
 
Analysis of fats, oils &amp; waxes
Analysis of fats, oils &amp; waxesAnalysis of fats, oils &amp; waxes
Analysis of fats, oils &amp; waxes
 
Uplc&amp;nano
Uplc&amp;nanoUplc&amp;nano
Uplc&amp;nano
 
Potentiometry
PotentiometryPotentiometry
Potentiometry
 
General considerations and method development in ce,
General considerations and method development in ce,General considerations and method development in ce,
General considerations and method development in ce,
 
Qc tets for tablets final
Qc tets for tablets finalQc tets for tablets final
Qc tets for tablets final
 
Concept &amp; evolution of qa &amp; qc
Concept &amp; evolution of qa &amp; qcConcept &amp; evolution of qa &amp; qc
Concept &amp; evolution of qa &amp; qc
 
ICH guidelines
ICH guidelinesICH guidelines
ICH guidelines
 
Immunoassays
ImmunoassaysImmunoassays
Immunoassays
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docxPoojaSen20
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...EduSkills OECD
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAssociation for Project Management
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactPECB
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104misteraugie
 
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinStudent login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinRaunakKeshri1
 
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...anjaliyadav012327
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...fonyou31
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docx
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinStudent login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
 
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 

Qualification of instrumets

  • 1. QUALIFICATION OF ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS AND GLASSWARE PRESENTED BY:GADUPUDI.PAVANI Y17MPHPA426 CLPT 1
  • 2. CONTENTS  Components of analytical data quality  Qualification, Protocol  Calibration (Definition, Need)  Calibration of Various Instruments 1) ELECTRONIC BALANCE 2)pH METER 3) UV-Visible spectrophotometer 4) FTIR 5) GC 6) HPLC 7) HPTLC  Calibration of various Glassware 1) Volumetric flask 2) Pipette 3) Measuring cylinder 4) Beakers 5) Burette  References 2
  • 3. COMPONENTS OF ANALYTICAL DATA QUALITY 3
  • 4. QUALIFICATION  Qualification is a part of validation. It is action of proving and documenting the equipment which are properly installed. Qualification is of 4 types:  Design Qualification  Installation Qualification  Performance Qualification  Operational Qualification 4
  • 5. PROTOCOL  It is a written plan which states how validation will be conducted. This protocol identifies the , Equipment process parameters Product characteristics Sampling data to be collected No. of validation runs and acceptable test results. 5
  • 8. CALIBRATION  It is set of operations which is established under specified conditions.  It is necessary to ensure the accuracy of the data produced during the process  Calibration is the process by which ensure that an instrument readings are accurate the reference to establish standard. Calibration is performed by using primary standard. It is done to check the zero error deflection by using standard reference. 8
  • 9. NEED FOR CALIBRATION: * With a new instruments * When a specified time period is elapsed * When a specified usage (operating hours) has elapsed * When an instrument has had a shock or vibration which potentially may have put it out of calibration * Sudden change in weather * Whenever observation appears questionable 9
  • 10. STATUS OF THE INSTRUMENTS IDENTIFICATION The status of the instruments is identified by checking the calibration tag of the instruments. Tag consists of information regarding instruments like name of instrument, date of procurement, date of calibration, next calibration date and signature of calibrated person with date. Calibration of instruments is done in two ways internal calibration and external calibration. Internal calibration is done the in-house officials whom have sound knowledge on it. External calibration is done according to the instructions of the manufacturer and should be done in the government approved individual or institution. 10
  • 12.  Many types of balances are used in chemical and biological tests. These balances must be calibrated to ensure the accuracy of the data produced by it.  Different types of balances used are as follows: 12
  • 13. Requirements of the balance  It should work under optimal conditions like weighing room, weighing bench, temperature, light, air etc. S.NO REQUIREMENTS ACCEPTANCE 1) Weighing bench Should be non-magnetic vibration proof & dust free 2) Temperature Constant temperature should be maintained. Deviations should not exceed 5°c 3) Atmospheric humidity Should be between 40% to 60% 4) Light Should be protected from direct sunlight 5) Weighing vessel Smallest possible weighing vessel used. Weighing vessel and sample it contains should have same temperature. 13
  • 15. CALIBRATION OF pH METER 15
  • 16. TWO POINT CALIBRATION METHOD  This is the method in which pH meter is calibrated with 2 different buffers of known pH and then checking the pH meter against pH 7.00 standard buffer to confirm the calibration. Again place the tip of the electrode in the second calibration buffer i.e . either in pH 4.00 or 10.00 and repeat the procedure. 16
  • 17. PROCEDURE:  Check the level of the 3M KCL electrode filling solution(electrical conductor between reference &sample) to ensure that it is within 25mm of the filling hole(small circular hole on the side of the electrode).  Then rinse the probe with de-ionized water & blot dry with wipes & then place the tip of the electrode into the pH 7.00 buffer solution and pH 4.01 buffer or pH 9.20 buffer  The pH meter will automatically read the endpoint when the reading is stable & appropriate buffer symbol will appear on the display and record the pH value. 17
  • 18.  Note the endpoint when the reading is stable and appropriate buffer symbol will appear on the display.  The pH meter will also display electrode slope value. If the slope is less than 95% or greater than 105% then refer to the troubleshooting section. 18
  • 19. Date & Time (DD-MM-YY & am or pm) Observed pH 4.01 Buffer (±0.05) 7.00Buffe r (±0.05) 9.2Buffer (±0.05) Room temp (°C) Cal. Status (Pass/Fail) Calibrated by (Name &Sign) Checked By (Name &Sign) Daily pH meter Calibration 19
  • 20. Precautions:  Do not allow the fill solution to run dry and add fill solution when ever the level falls 25mm below.  Do not leave the electrode in organic solvents as the tip and body may be damaged. Discard used buffer solutions daily. Do not reuse it. Interference:  The electrode can be stored for up to one week in pH 7.00 or 4.00 not in distilled water.  For longer storage periods remove the wetting cap and fill it with 3M KCL solution and push it onto the tip of the electrode. 20
  • 22. Equipment Details: Instrument/Equipment Calibration Record INS/ EQP Name: UV-VISIBLE spectrophotometer Department Name: Central Instrumentation Lab Make, Soft ware & Version Model type & Serial No Beam type (single/double) INS/ EQP.ID No. SOP No. Calibration Frequency Every six months 22
  • 23. Tests Performed In UV-Visible Spectroscopy:  Baseline flatness test  UV region wave length accuracy test  Visible region wave length accuracy test  %Transmittance of Cuvette  Control of absorbance  Emission lines from deuterium discharge lamp  Stray Light measurement  Resolution power  Photometric linearity 23
  • 24. 1) Baseline Flatness Test: Measurement configuration parameters: Reference : No Cuvette Sample : No Cuvette Cuvette material : Quartz Wave length range : 200-800 Lamp : Deuterium lamp Detector : PDA detector 24
  • 25. WAVE LENGTH MEASURED ABSORBANCE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 200 ±0.001 300 ±0.001 400 ±0.001 500 ±0.001 600 ±0.001 700 ±0.001 800 ±0.001 25
  • 26. 2) Uv Region Wave Length Accuracy Test: Measurement configuration Parameters Reference : Air (Empty Cuvette) Sample : Benzene Recording range : 220-270nm Lamp : Deuterium Discharge Detector : PDA Detector WAVE LENGTH (nm) OBSERVED PEAKS AT WAVE LENGTH (nm) ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 220-270 nm 235.9±0.5nm 26
  • 27. 3) Visible Region Wave Length Accuracy Test: Measurement Parameters: Reference : Distilled Water Sample : 0.01% KMno4 Measuring mode : 300 to 600nm WAVE LENGTH (NM) OBSERVED PEAKS AT WAVE LENGTH(NM) ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 300-600nm 310±1nm 525±1nm 545±1nm Lamp : Deuterium Discharge Detector : PDA Detector 27
  • 28. 4) %Transmittance Of Cuvette: Measurement configuration Parameters Reference : Empty Cuvette Sample : Empty Cuvette Cuvette material : Quartz Measuring mode : 240nm Lamp : Deuterium discharge lamp Detector : PDA Detector WAVE LENGTH (NM) %TRANSMITTANCE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 240nm Not less than 80% 28
  • 29. 5) Control of absorbance:  Absorbance: Visible region  Place dummy Cuvette in sample holder and set %T to “zero”. Now remove dummy Cuvette, by using fine & coarse control set a reading exactly 40.0 on the read out.  Press Absorbance push button. If the maximum absorbance obtained at λ of 485nm is 0.398 ± 0.002, the photometric calibration of instrument is confirmed to be proper.  To confirm, repeat above steps, and set 10.00 on read out  Press Absorbance button. If the λ at 485 nm is 1.000±0.002 then it is confirmed the photometric performance in the visible region is proper.  Absorbance: U.V region  Place blank0.1N H2SO4 Cuvette and 60ppm K2Cr2O7 as sample  Set λ exactly to 257 nm, if the value of Absorbance of sample at the set λ is 0.864±0.005, the instrument is measuring Absorbance properly. 29
  • 30. 6) Emission Lines From Deuterium Discharge Lamp: Measurement configuration Parameters: Reference : No Cuvette Sample : Empty Cuvette Recording range : 400-500, 600-700 : THEORETICAL VALUE OBSERVED VALUE DIFFERENCE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 486nm 486±0.3nm 656nm 656±0.3nm 30
  • 31. 7) Stray Light measurement:  Weigh accurately 1.2g of dried Potassium chloride in 100 ml volumetric flask and makeup to mark with Double distilled water.  Measure the absorbance at 200 nm. Acceptance criteria: Tolerance limit NLT 2.0 8) Resolution Power:  Prepare 0.02%v/v solution of Toluene and make up with Hexane.  Scan the wavelength from 250 to 280nm.  Maximum absorbance is 269 nm and Minimum absorbance is 266nm  Acceptance criteria: Ratio limit NLT 1.5 31
  • 32. 9) Photometric linearity:  Weigh accurately 100mg of Potassium chromate in 100ml volumetric flask and dissolve in 0.05N Potassium hydroxide solution. Make up with the same solvent.  From the above solution take 20ml and make up to 500ml with 0.05N Potassium hydroxide solution.  Now prepare dilution of 4,8,16,24,32 µg/ml  Measure the absorbance at 370nm using blank.  Acceptance criteria: The plot should be linear and regression coefficient (R2) should NLT 0.999. 32
  • 34. Equipment Details: Instrument/Equipment Calibration Record INS/ EQP Name: FTIR Department Name: Central Instrumentation Lab Make, Soft ware & Version Model type & Serial No INS/ EQP ID No. SOP No. Calibration Frequency Every six months 34
  • 35. Physical Observation: S.NO DESCRIPTION EXPECTED OBSERVED (pass/fail) 1. Cabinet finishing To be free from scratches, stains, dents 2. Instrument noise when start up To be smooth function with out noise 3. Top cover fixing To be without gaps 4. Spectrum reading display To be clear display without blinking 5. Lamp check To be glow through out the measurement 6. Anvil and piston set To be store always in liquid paraffin oil after usage 7. Die set To be clean and free from rust 35
  • 36. Control Of Resolution Performance: Identification using reference spectra Material used: Polystyrene film 36
  • 37. 37
  • 38. NOMINAL TRANSMISSION MINIMA(cm-1 ) OBSERVED TRANSMISSION MINIMA(cm-1 ) ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (cm-1 ) 3060.0 ±1 2849.5 ±1 1942.9 ±1 1601.2 ±1 1583.0 ±1 1154.5 ±1 1028.3 ±1 38
  • 39. CALIBRATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY 39
  • 40. Various Calibration Parameters Are:  Flow rate accuracy  Column oven temperature accuracy  System precision  System precision for head space auto sampler  Detector linearity  Detector noise and drift test 40
  • 41. 1) Flow rate accuracy:  Connect the digital flow meter to the detector outlet port.  Set the carrier gas (Helium) flow and wait till it reaches the set flow.  Note the observed flow in replicate.  Repeat the procedure for other carrier gases such as Hydrogen and Air.  Record the result in GC calibration protocol.  Acceptance criteria: The flow rate of carrier gas should be ±10% of set flow. S.No. Carrier gas Acceptance criteria in ml/m 1 Helium 125 2 Hydrogen 40 3 Air 400 41
  • 42. 2) Column Oven Temperature Accuracy:  Connect the column to the detector port.  Place the thermometer probe in the column oven and set the column oven temperature at 40°C.Wait till the temperature stabilizes.  Note the observed temperature as read by the probe in triplicate over a period of 10 m.  Repeat the procedure for 100°C, 150°C and 190°C.  Acceptance criteria: The resulting oven temperature from the thermometer display should be within ±2°C of the set temperature. 42
  • 43. 3) System Precision: Preparation of Standard solution: Transfer 20 ml of Methanol, Ethanol and Acetone into 100ml volumetric flask and make up with Ethyl acetate Procedure: Inject blank, followed by Standard preparation in 6 replicates. Note down the areas and Retention times. Acceptance criteria: The %RSD of retention time should be not more than 1.0%& peak area should be not more than 5.0%. 43
  • 44. 4) System precision for head space auto sampler: Preparation of standard solution: Prepare a standard mixture solution by taking Methylene dichloride (0.6g), Chloroform (0.06g), Trichloroethane (0.08g), 1,4-Dioxane (0.38g) in volumetric flask containing about 40ml of Dimethyl formamide. Finally makeup to volume with DMF(Solution-A) Procedure: Take 0.5 ml of standard solution-A in 6 different vials and seal with septum, then magnetic caps and crimp. Place these vials on head space sampler; prepare a blank vial also. Load the vials in head space sampler tray. Blank vials followed by the standard vials. Acceptance criteria: The %RSD of retention time should be NMT 1.0%& peak area should be NMT 15.0%. 44
  • 45. 5) Detector Linearity: Detector linearity solutions SOLUTION-A 10ml of methanol, ethanol & acetone + Dilute the volume with ethyl acetate SOLUTION-B 15ml of methanol, ethanol & acetone + Dilute the volume with ethyl acetate SOLUTION-C 20ml of methanol, ethanol & acetone + Dilute the volume with ethyl acetate SOLUTION-D 25ml of methanol, ethanol & acetone + Dilute the volume with ethyl acetate SOLUTION-E 30ml of methanol, ethanol & acetone + Dilute the volume with ethyl acetate Procedure: Inject blank, followed by Detector linearity solutions and record the peak responses .Draw a standard plot between the concentrations Vs the peak responses. Acceptance criteria: The plot should be linear and regression coefficient (R2) should not be less than 0.99. 45
  • 46. Detector Noise and Drift Test: After GC is ready run the system up to 15 m through single run. After completion of run calculate noise and drift through software. Acceptance criteria: Noise NMT: 100 µV Drift NMT: 2500 µV/hr 46
  • 48. 48
  • 49. Various Calibration parameters are:  Flow rate accuracy  Injector accuracy  System Precision  Detector linearity  Injector linearity  Column oven temperature accuracy 49
  • 50. 1) Flow Rate Accuracy:  Prime all the solvent lines with Milli Q water.  Set the flow rate to 0.500 ml/m.  Wait for about 15 m to stabilize the system and ensure that the pressure is stable.  Insert the outlet tubing into a 10 ml volumetric flask and start the stop watch simultaneously.  Stop the stopwatch when the lower meniscus reaches the 10 ml mark on the flask.  Record the elapsed time.  Similarly check the flow for 1.0 ml/m and 2.0 ml/m. Acceptance criteria: The time taken to collect the water should be with in ± 2.0% of the actual value. Set Flow Actual time required to collect up to the mark in m Acceptance criteria (in m) 0.5 ml/m 20.0 19.6 – 20.4 1.0 ml/m 10.0 9.8 – 10.2 2.0 ml/m 5.0 4.9 – 5.1 50
  • 51. 2) Injector Accuracy:  Connect the pump and detector inlet with union.  Prepare mobile phase consisting of a mixture of water and Methanol (70:30 v/v)  Set a flow rate of 0.5 ml/m and a run time of 1 m.  Set the column temperature at 25± 2°C.  Fill a standard HPLC vial to 2/3rd with Milli-Q water. Seal the vial properly with a cap. Weigh the vial and record the weight as W1 grams.  Place the vial in the chromatographic system and perform 6 injections of 50µl volume from this vial.  Weigh the vial again and note the weigh after the injections as W2 grams.  Calculate the mean volume injected per injection as follows: Mean injected volume (µl) = (W1 – W2) ×100/6 Acceptance criteria: The mean injected volume should be 50.0±1.0 µl. 51
  • 52. 3) System Precision: Standard Preparation:  Accurately weigh and transfer about 60mg of Caffeine into a 100ml volumetric flask. Dissolve and dilute to the volume with mobile phase.  Transfer 10ml of this solution into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with mobile phase. Procedure:  Inject blank, followed by standard preparation in 6 replicates. Note down the areas and retention times.  Now calculate the %RSD of retention time and peak areas for 6 replicates injections. Acceptance criteria: The %RSD of retention time & peak area should be <1.0%. 52
  • 53. 4) Detector Linearity: Standard Preparation: Accurately weigh and transfer about 60mg of Caffeine into a 100ml volumetric flask. Dissolve and dilute to the volume with mobile phase.  Detector linearity solution 1(0.06 mg/ml): Transfer 10ml of Standard Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with mobile phase  Detector linearity solution 2(0.048 mg/ml): Transfer 8ml of Standard Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with mobile phase.  Detector linearity solution 3(0.03 mg/ml): Transfer 5ml of Standard Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with mobile phase. 53
  • 54.  Detector linearity solution 4(0.24 mg/ml): Transfer 4ml of Standard Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with mobile phase.  Detector linearity solution 5(0.012 mg/ml): Transfer 2ml of Standard Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with mobile phase. Procedure: Inject blank, followed by Detector linearity solutions and record the peak responses of Caffeine standard plot between the concentration Vs the peak responses.  Acceptance criteria: The plot should be linear and regression coefficient (R2) should not be less than 0.99. 54
  • 55. 5) Injector Linearity: Standard Preparation:  Accurately weigh and transfer about 60mg of Caffeine into a 100ml volumetric flask.  Dissolve and dilute to the volume with mobile phase.  Transfer 10ml of Standard Preparation into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the volume with mobile phase. Procedure:  Inject 5 µl of the mobile phase as blank injection.  Inject 5 µl, 10 µl, 20 µl, 50 µl and 80 µl of the Standard Preparation and record the peak areas.  Plot a curve for the volume injected Vs peak area. Acceptance criteria: The plot should be linear and regression coefficient (R2) should not be less than 0.99. 55
  • 56. 6) Column Oven Temperature Accuracy:  It is evaluated with a calibrated digital thermometer at 30°Cand 60°C .  Place the thermometer probe in the column oven and set the column oven temperature at 30°C.  Wait till the temperature stabilizes.  Record the temperature displayed on the thermometer.  Similarly performs the column oven temperature accuracy test at 60°C.  Acceptance criteria: The resulting oven temperature from the thermometer display should be within ±2°C of the set temperature. 56
  • 58. Calibration of HPTLC done by following method:  Spotting And Detection Capacity: Requirements: i. Alumina glass plates ii. Sodium salicylate iii. 96% v/v alcohol Preparation of Stock Solution: Stock solution- 1: Weigh 500mg of sodium salicylate and transfer it into 250ml volumetric flask dissolve and dilute with 96% v/v alcohol. Stock solution- 2: Weigh 100mg of sodium salicylate and transfer it into 250ml volumetric flask dissolve and dilute with 96% v/v alcohol. 58
  • 59.  Procedure: Spot 5µl of each solution observe at 254nm and 366nm.  Acceptance: 1) The spots shall be comparable intensity wise 2) Spot due to Stock solution-2 shall be visible at 254nm 3) Spot due to Stock solution-1 shall be visible at 366nm 59
  • 61. Calibration Procedure: For Volumetric Flask and Beaker:  Weigh accurately a previously dried volumetric flask.  Make up the volumetric flask up to the mark with purified water.  Wipe dry the out side of the volumetric flask and then weigh  Find out the weight of water by subtracting the empty weight of volumetric flask from total weight Weight of Water(W3) = Total weight of volumetric flask(W2) – Empty volumetric flask weight(W1)  Calculate the volume by taking correction factor 0.99602gm ( i.e. 1ml of Purified water at 25˚C = 0.99602gm) Record the observation in calibration format.  Repeat the above calibration 3 times and take average of sum of three observed values. 61
  • 62. For pipette and Burette:  Weigh accurately previously dried empty beaker.  Fill the Pipette and burette with purified water up to the mark with help of bulb.  Wipe dry the outside of the transfer pipette and burette and then transfer the water in an pre-weighed beaker and weigh.  Perform the calibration in triplet and calculate and record the average of observed volume.  Calculate the difference between label volume and average of observed volume of glass ware as using following formula; Difference in volume = Labeled volume – Average of observed volume  Find out the weight of Water by subtracting the empty beaker weight from total weight. 62
  • 63.  Calculate the volume by taking correction factor 0.99602gm.  Ensure that the difference in volume shall be with in the tolerance limits as listed in table CALCULATION: Observations: i. Weight of Pre weighed, dry, empty, glassware(W1)………..gm ii. Weight of glassware and water(W2)………….gm iii. Weight of Water(W3)………..gm iv. Observed volume of glassware:(W2-W1)/D ……….ml where ; D= 0.99602gm Average of 3 Observed volume = Sum of 3 Observations/3 63
  • 64. Glassware Tolerance Limits Table: Volum etric flasks Label ed volum e , ml 10 25 50 100 200 250 500 1000 Tolera nce±m l 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.30 0.60 Transf er pipette s and burette s Labele d volum e , ml 1 2 5 10 20 25 50 100 Tolera nce±m l 0.012 0.012 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.10 0.16 64
  • 65. Schedule for Calibration/Inspection of Some Analytical instruments and glassware Instruments INSTRUMENT/GLASSWARE INTERVAL (MONTHS/DAYS) ELECTRONIC BALANCE Daily & Six months pH METER Daily UV-Visible spectrophotometer Monthly once ±3days FTIR Monthly once ±3days GC Six months HPLC Six months HPTLC Six months Volumetric flask Six months Pipette Six months Measuring cylinder Six months Beakers Six months Burette Six months 65
  • 66. REFERENCES  Gowrisankar.D., et al., (2010). Validation and Calibration of Analytical Instruments.vol: 2(2),89-99.  Annex-4 Guidelines on Qualification of IR Spectrophotometers.(2007).  Standard Operating Procedure for Calibration and Maintenance of pH meters.(2005).  Annex-8 Guidelines on Qualification of Balances.(2012).  D.Gowrisankar, K.Abbulu, O.Bala Souri, K.Sujana* . Validation and Calibration of Analytical Instruments . 2010; 2(2): . 66
  • 67. 67