SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 14
FMP Evaluation
Your name
Production Process Evaluation
Research
The strengths of my research were that I looked at pictures on the internet that I would be able to do and that would look similar
to my own. For example I looked at animals outside in the wild and I got pictures of my pet cat outside in the garden. This is a
similar concept to what I’ve now made. Other strengths of my research was that I looked at different times of the day to take
photos on and it worked. I took photos outside in the daylight and some of the photos inside in the evening. All the photos I
looked at on the internet decided my theme for my product and my theme in the end was animals. I started off looking at scenery
and landscape pictures of trees and places with good viewpoints.
The other strength of my research has to be the audience research when people gave feedback from a questionnaire I did and got
some decent responses. This helped me figure out what the audience wanted and helped me what to focus on what I include in
the photos. Also the interviews that were given helped me figure out certain things to include in my photos for my project. The
interviews and the questionnaire were very similar and had some good responses.
My research helped me with my product because I could base my product off a picture and change it slightly to make it my own.
So as said earlier I started off looking at viewpoints and scenery then when I thought of trees I thought of adding something to it.
This is when I thought of animals and including them with nature, however in the end I just went for animals in areas I could take
photos in. The research overall helped me set my theme (over a certain amount of time) and helped me think of what to include
on some of the photos, whether it was effects on the editing side or something in the background of the picture.
The weaknesses of my research were that I couldn’t find a pacific photo of what I really wanted, however in the end I edited some
of my photos to make them better. There wasn't that many weaknesses in my research because I got my theme within a couple of
hours and was easy after that talking about them. However when I went out getting photos to edit and put on my PowerPoint for
this project I had to delay some of the days because of bad weather and this was a disadvantage to me and made it harder for me
to get photos and talk about them without anything. This was definitely a weakness, the weather and timing of when I had
lessons and working with the photos. Some things I could have done better might of been the amount of photos I took. I didn’t
take that many so I was stuck with a small amount of photos I had to work with, however I edited them and made them better. If I
had weaknesses I didn't change to make them good my work would have an effect. The effect being that my audience would
either spot the mistakes or wouldn’t like the photos because of those mistakes.
Planning
My planning was mainly talked about on my Pre-Production PowerPoint. On this PowerPoint I mainly talked about what I was
going to include in my photos. This included texts, styles and fonts, layouts, risk assessment and a schedule. All this helped me
figure out what works best for my product. So the style sheet that includes the fonts, colours, and different styles helped me
figure out what goes together. I tried this and I ended up with the photos with a reasonable font and style. This was a good
strength having a style sheet because it helped me figure other everything like said previously. On the PowerPoint I made
everything organised so it’s easy to figure out which part I’m talking about is which. The strengths of the planning overall was
fairly simple because I knew what I wanted to do so I got on with it and did the PowerPoint within a short period of time. The
planning near the end of the PowerPoint such as the Contingency planning, health and safety and the schedule were also a good
strength of the planning because it helped me organise what I needed for my project to work.
The weaknesses of my planning was when I had to fill in the Health and Safety and the schedule slides in. This was a weakness
because I couldn’t figure out what else to put no the health and safety slide because I ran out of ideas. However for the Schedule I
struggled because I didn’t know exactly what I was going to do on them days. On a couple of them days I missed out on because
of the bad weather and this is when I had to refer back to the Contingency Planning. To improve these two slides on the
PowerPoint I could have asked somebody to give me ideas or gone on the internet to find out more.
I had a bit of my planning on my Initial Plans slide. This was a PowerPoint I had to fill in about ideas of what I was going to do. This
had only a few ideas of what I was going to do, but the Pre-Production slide has more information to talk about than the Initial
Plans.
Time Management
I think I managed my time well in this project. I was ahead majority of the time until the proper production work kicked in and fell
a bit behind. However I’ve handed in every piece of work in so far on time / on the deadline. In my opinion I managed my time
well and I don’t think I would of needed additional time to finish my work to a high standard because I got on with my work and
did everything properly.
If I had more time to produce my work I would take it slowly and make sure I’ve finished something before I start something else.
And after this process I would go through every step I’ve done and look for mistakes such as spelling, grammar and other language
techniques.
Also when I finished my work early it gave me chance to go back no other pieces of work and improve of them to make sure
everything's at a high standard.
I had my time managed on a schedule on my Pre-Production PowerPoint and honestly, I didn’t stick to it all the way through
because of bad weather and lack of equipment. So the lack of outside photos was because of this. The bad weather and lack of
equipment on some of the days prevented me sticking to the schedule.
Technical Qualities
These two photos are similar, but have some differences. The similarities are that both animals are types of cat and it’s a similar
background with plants, bushes and grass. The main similarity would be the colors, there’s plenty of the color green and a mixture of
others especially in my own work. The difference however is that my photo has more colors, a mixture whereas the other is only a few
colors.
However both pictures have a few differences such as the skies in the background and the setting. My work is set in a garden whereas
the other (which was used as a test picture on my Pre-Production PowerPoint) is set on a decent viewpoint of a town or something in
the background. Another massive difference is that the first picture (my own work) is set in an area with no wild animals and in a
garden whereas the other is set I think in my opinion in the wild where it’s open and free.
The photo from the internet is actually edited by me for one of my layouts and looks good with the effects on. They’re both edited
with more than two or three tools so there has been effort put into them, for getting them and editing them.
Aesthetic Qualities
In my opinion I think my work looks good because of the effects
added onto the pictures. The stuff that made it creative was mainly
the editing putting all the special effects on each photo. My work
looks good because of the creativity put into it. The type of aspects I
like about each photo are the colors because each photo at least has a
different color or looks different.
The strengths of these pictures are that they are all different in some
kind of way. For example all the photos on the left look the same, but
have different color schemes. Another strength would be that they are
all good quality pictures with nothing wrong with them. All the photos
look good because they have also been perfectly timed because it’s
hard to get animals near a camera, looking at one or to get a good
angle on them.
In my opinion there isn’t any weaknesses or anything to improve on. If
I was to improve on something I would improve on my camerawork
and getting more photos so I can talk about more in these kind of
situations.
Audience Appeal
I think I have appealed to my target audience because I referred to the questionnaire for answers on what to do. From the
questionnaire I took the reasonable answers because there were some stupid answers and I didn't pay attention to them.
So I picked the reasonable answers and they were good and useful to me and my project. My work is aimed at people at the
age of 10 and above. I think people will appreciate my work because I’ve put some of the suggestions from the
questionnaire into my work. If some people don’t like animals, them kind of people won’t be interested in my work and I’m
fine with that. My work won’t be aimed at people who aren’t animal lovers, but the opposite. I think people that are
interested in animals or have their own pet will be interested in my work because I’ve used effects on software's to make
them as good as possible. My work overall will appeal to people that have a pet animal or are interested in them. People
care about their animals / pets so they want something to remember them by.
Peer
Feedback
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– I thought the product was really good. All the pictures have a high quality standard to them and are explained well
with what effects have been used. I liked the effects on the photos that have been used and looks better than the
original pictures.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– Maybe instead of having a lot of close-ups have some distance pictures.
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– I thought the product was decent. Some really good shots taken and are decent quality. All have a different colour
scheme to them which is good and really do show the features of the cat. The angle is also important in these kind of
photos and they’ve done a good job on this.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– No improvements to be made.
Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– I liked al the photos effects, they really made them stand out. I also liked the close-ups of the cats because it shows
the little key features on them. I liked the text in the bottom corner to show that’s made by that person.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– Improvements could be the location of where the photos were taken, because they are all quite similar.
Peer Feedback Summary
What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
– Yes I do agree.
– I agree with the improvements I need to make and the positives on my photos such as the effects and the angles of
each picture.
What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
– I can’t disagree with anything because some of the changes the people want me to make will be changed if needed
and there’s nothing wrong with changing them because I can do it, but it might take some time.
Peer Feedback Summary
If I was to change anything it would be the location and the camera shots I took. It was hard to get these cats in different locations
because of bad weather at the time and because how they wonder about all the time. The camera shots are a definite change
because they were all close up except one so ill change the distances of each photo. If there’s anything wrong with the photos I
will always try to improve them some way or another. However if it’s something I think it’s not worth doing I won’t change, but if
it’s something major I will change it. I would change what I need to change because I want my target audience to be happy with
my work and not feel like something's wrong with it. Because of my age range being over 10, I want my photos to look perfect for
the younger and older aged people. I want to make a photo good for people to remember and admire.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)Andrew Downes
 
6. Production Reflection
6. Production Reflection6. Production Reflection
6. Production ReflectionGeorgia Brown
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationlouis harman
 
5. evaluation(1) fin
5. evaluation(1) fin5. evaluation(1) fin
5. evaluation(1) finamy foster
 
FMP: Unfinished evaluation
FMP: Unfinished evaluationFMP: Unfinished evaluation
FMP: Unfinished evaluationEwanWild
 
Extended Project Evaluation AO4 (Evaluating the project)
Extended Project Evaluation AO4 (Evaluating the project)Extended Project Evaluation AO4 (Evaluating the project)
Extended Project Evaluation AO4 (Evaluating the project)jake
 
Extended project log
Extended project logExtended project log
Extended project logRyan McDonnell
 
Extended project review
Extended project reviewExtended project review
Extended project reviewchantellleee
 
Fanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluationFanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluationcaleb wilcox
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationjay birkin
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationjay birkin
 
Fmp evaluation v3
Fmp evaluation v3Fmp evaluation v3
Fmp evaluation v3Charlie Atkin
 
5. Production Reflection sf 2017
5. Production Reflection sf 20175. Production Reflection sf 2017
5. Production Reflection sf 2017Libby Whitehorn
 
A04 - Review The Project - Extended Project Evaluation
A04 - Review The Project - Extended Project Evaluation A04 - Review The Project - Extended Project Evaluation
A04 - Review The Project - Extended Project Evaluation ash
 
Evaluation
Evaluation Evaluation
Evaluation OliviaBolt
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)
 
6. Production Reflection
6. Production Reflection6. Production Reflection
6. Production Reflection
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Main evaluation
Main evaluationMain evaluation
Main evaluation
 
Main evaluation
Main evaluationMain evaluation
Main evaluation
 
5. evaluation(1) fin
5. evaluation(1) fin5. evaluation(1) fin
5. evaluation(1) fin
 
FMP: Unfinished evaluation
FMP: Unfinished evaluationFMP: Unfinished evaluation
FMP: Unfinished evaluation
 
Extended Project Evaluation AO4 (Evaluating the project)
Extended Project Evaluation AO4 (Evaluating the project)Extended Project Evaluation AO4 (Evaluating the project)
Extended Project Evaluation AO4 (Evaluating the project)
 
Extended project log
Extended project logExtended project log
Extended project log
 
5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)
 
Extended project review
Extended project reviewExtended project review
Extended project review
 
Fanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluationFanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Fmp evaluation v3
Fmp evaluation v3Fmp evaluation v3
Fmp evaluation v3
 
Estings evaluation
Estings evaluationEstings evaluation
Estings evaluation
 
5. Production Reflection sf 2017
5. Production Reflection sf 20175. Production Reflection sf 2017
5. Production Reflection sf 2017
 
A04 - Review The Project - Extended Project Evaluation
A04 - Review The Project - Extended Project Evaluation A04 - Review The Project - Extended Project Evaluation
A04 - Review The Project - Extended Project Evaluation
 
Evaluation
Evaluation Evaluation
Evaluation
 

Andere mochten auch

Production - Production Reflection
Production - Production ReflectionProduction - Production Reflection
Production - Production ReflectionCharlie Davison
 
Production - Initial Plans
Production - Initial PlansProduction - Initial Plans
Production - Initial PlansCharlie Davison
 
Production - Pre-Production
Production - Pre-ProductionProduction - Pre-Production
Production - Pre-ProductionCharlie Davison
 
Production - Research
Production - ResearchProduction - Research
Production - ResearchCharlie Davison
 
Visual - Evaluation
Visual - EvaluationVisual - Evaluation
Visual - EvaluationCharlie Davison
 
Visual - Production Reflection
Visual - Production ReflectionVisual - Production Reflection
Visual - Production ReflectionCharlie Davison
 
Interactive - Research
Interactive - ResearchInteractive - Research
Interactive - ResearchCharlie Davison
 
Audio - reflection
Audio - reflectionAudio - reflection
Audio - reflectionCharlie Davison
 
Interactive - Evaluation
Interactive - EvaluationInteractive - Evaluation
Interactive - EvaluationCharlie Davison
 
Interactive - Proposal
Interactive - ProposalInteractive - Proposal
Interactive - ProposalCharlie Davison
 
Interactive - Pre-Production
Interactive - Pre-ProductionInteractive - Pre-Production
Interactive - Pre-ProductionCharlie Davison
 
Interactive - Production Reflection
Interactive - Production ReflectionInteractive - Production Reflection
Interactive - Production ReflectionCharlie Davison
 
Production - Production Experiments
Production - Production ExperimentsProduction - Production Experiments
Production - Production ExperimentsCharlie Davison
 
Interactive - Initial Plans
Interactive - Initial PlansInteractive - Initial Plans
Interactive - Initial PlansCharlie Davison
 
Theory - Research Pro-Forma
Theory - Research Pro-FormaTheory - Research Pro-Forma
Theory - Research Pro-FormaCharlie Davison
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Production - Production Reflection
Production - Production ReflectionProduction - Production Reflection
Production - Production Reflection
 
Production - Initial Plans
Production - Initial PlansProduction - Initial Plans
Production - Initial Plans
 
Production - Pre-Production
Production - Pre-ProductionProduction - Pre-Production
Production - Pre-Production
 
Audio - Proposal
Audio - ProposalAudio - Proposal
Audio - Proposal
 
Audio - script.
Audio - script.Audio - script.
Audio - script.
 
Production - Research
Production - ResearchProduction - Research
Production - Research
 
Visual - Research
Visual - ResearchVisual - Research
Visual - Research
 
Visual - Evaluation
Visual - EvaluationVisual - Evaluation
Visual - Evaluation
 
Visual - Proposal
Visual - ProposalVisual - Proposal
Visual - Proposal
 
Visual - Production Reflection
Visual - Production ReflectionVisual - Production Reflection
Visual - Production Reflection
 
Interactive - Research
Interactive - ResearchInteractive - Research
Interactive - Research
 
Audio - research
Audio - researchAudio - research
Audio - research
 
Audio - reflection
Audio - reflectionAudio - reflection
Audio - reflection
 
Interactive - Evaluation
Interactive - EvaluationInteractive - Evaluation
Interactive - Evaluation
 
Interactive - Proposal
Interactive - ProposalInteractive - Proposal
Interactive - Proposal
 
Interactive - Pre-Production
Interactive - Pre-ProductionInteractive - Pre-Production
Interactive - Pre-Production
 
Interactive - Production Reflection
Interactive - Production ReflectionInteractive - Production Reflection
Interactive - Production Reflection
 
Production - Production Experiments
Production - Production ExperimentsProduction - Production Experiments
Production - Production Experiments
 
Interactive - Initial Plans
Interactive - Initial PlansInteractive - Initial Plans
Interactive - Initial Plans
 
Theory - Research Pro-Forma
Theory - Research Pro-FormaTheory - Research Pro-Forma
Theory - Research Pro-Forma
 

Ă„hnlich wie Production - Evaluation

7. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 27. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 2NathanMead3
 
1. initial plans updated
1. initial plans updated1. initial plans updated
1. initial plans updatedAbbey Glancy
 
1. initial plans
1. initial plans1. initial plans
1. initial plansAbbey Glancy
 
1. initial plans (1)
1. initial plans (1)1. initial plans (1)
1. initial plans (1)Abbey Glancy
 
Production Reflection FMP
Production Reflection FMPProduction Reflection FMP
Production Reflection FMPTommy Lister
 
Production reflection
Production reflectionProduction reflection
Production reflectionAbbie Nicholls
 
FMP: Actually finished evaluation
FMP: Actually finished evaluation FMP: Actually finished evaluation
FMP: Actually finished evaluation EwanWild
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluationkallum-sykes
 
7. evaluation (2)
7. evaluation (2)7. evaluation (2)
7. evaluation (2)james Gannon
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationjay birkin
 
Production reflection
Production reflection Production reflection
Production reflection Harry Taylor
 
On going evaluations
On going evaluationsOn going evaluations
On going evaluationsOliviaBolt
 
production reflection
production reflectionproduction reflection
production reflectionTom Batty
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluationcelina smith
 
evaluation new.pptx
evaluation new.pptxevaluation new.pptx
evaluation new.pptxshelbyallerton
 

Ă„hnlich wie Production - Evaluation (20)

7. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 27. fmp evaluation 2
7. fmp evaluation 2
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
1. initial plans updated
1. initial plans updated1. initial plans updated
1. initial plans updated
 
1. initial plans
1. initial plans1. initial plans
1. initial plans
 
1. initial plans (1)
1. initial plans (1)1. initial plans (1)
1. initial plans (1)
 
Production Reflection FMP
Production Reflection FMPProduction Reflection FMP
Production Reflection FMP
 
Production reflection
Production reflectionProduction reflection
Production reflection
 
FMP: Actually finished evaluation
FMP: Actually finished evaluation FMP: Actually finished evaluation
FMP: Actually finished evaluation
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
7. evaluation (2)
7. evaluation (2)7. evaluation (2)
7. evaluation (2)
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Production reflection
Production reflection Production reflection
Production reflection
 
On going evaluations
On going evaluationsOn going evaluations
On going evaluations
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
production reflection
production reflectionproduction reflection
production reflection
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
Evaluation fmp
Evaluation fmpEvaluation fmp
Evaluation fmp
 
Evaluation
 Evaluation Evaluation
Evaluation
 
evaluation new.pptx
evaluation new.pptxevaluation new.pptx
evaluation new.pptx
 

Mehr von Charlie Davison

cv charlie davison
cv charlie davisoncv charlie davison
cv charlie davisonCharlie Davison
 
work related learning research
work related learning researchwork related learning research
work related learning researchCharlie Davison
 
evaluation - audio
evaluation - audioevaluation - audio
evaluation - audioCharlie Davison
 
7. evaluation - interactive
7. evaluation - interactive7. evaluation - interactive
7. evaluation - interactiveCharlie Davison
 
production reflection - interactive
production reflection - interactiveproduction reflection - interactive
production reflection - interactiveCharlie Davison
 
1. communication method evaluation
1. communication method evaluation1. communication method evaluation
1. communication method evaluationCharlie Davison
 
fmp production reflection
fmp production reflectionfmp production reflection
fmp production reflectionCharlie Davison
 
fmp pre production
fmp pre productionfmp pre production
fmp pre productionCharlie Davison
 
fmp production experiments
fmp production experimentsfmp production experiments
fmp production experimentsCharlie Davison
 
1 fmp initial plans
1  fmp initial plans1  fmp initial plans
1 fmp initial plansCharlie Davison
 
Pre-Production fmp
Pre-Production fmpPre-Production fmp
Pre-Production fmpCharlie Davison
 
Production experiments fmp
Production experiments fmpProduction experiments fmp
Production experiments fmpCharlie Davison
 

Mehr von Charlie Davison (20)

cv charlie davison
cv charlie davisoncv charlie davison
cv charlie davison
 
work related learning research
work related learning researchwork related learning research
work related learning research
 
evaluation - audio
evaluation - audioevaluation - audio
evaluation - audio
 
proposal - audio
proposal - audioproposal - audio
proposal - audio
 
7. evaluation - interactive
7. evaluation - interactive7. evaluation - interactive
7. evaluation - interactive
 
production reflection - interactive
production reflection - interactiveproduction reflection - interactive
production reflection - interactive
 
initial plans
initial plansinitial plans
initial plans
 
formal proposal
formal proposal formal proposal
formal proposal
 
1. communication method evaluation
1. communication method evaluation1. communication method evaluation
1. communication method evaluation
 
fmp evaluation
fmp evaluationfmp evaluation
fmp evaluation
 
fmp production reflection
fmp production reflectionfmp production reflection
fmp production reflection
 
fmp pre production
fmp pre productionfmp pre production
fmp pre production
 
fmp proposal
fmp proposalfmp proposal
fmp proposal
 
fmp production experiments
fmp production experimentsfmp production experiments
fmp production experiments
 
fmp research
fmp researchfmp research
fmp research
 
1 fmp initial plans
1  fmp initial plans1  fmp initial plans
1 fmp initial plans
 
Pre-Production fmp
Pre-Production fmpPre-Production fmp
Pre-Production fmp
 
Proposal fmp
Proposal fmpProposal fmp
Proposal fmp
 
Production experiments fmp
Production experiments fmpProduction experiments fmp
Production experiments fmp
 
Research fmp
Research fmpResearch fmp
Research fmp
 

KĂĽrzlich hochgeladen

_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting DataJhengPantaleon
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsKarinaGenton
 
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of PowdersMicromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of PowdersChitralekhaTherkar
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxRoyAbrique
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon AUnboundStockton
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docxPoojaSen20
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Celine George
 
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfConcept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfUmakantAnnand
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptxPoojaSen20
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxMENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxPoojaSen20
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 

KĂĽrzlich hochgeladen (20)

_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
 
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of PowdersMicromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docx
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
 
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfConcept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxMENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 

Production - Evaluation

  • 3. Research The strengths of my research were that I looked at pictures on the internet that I would be able to do and that would look similar to my own. For example I looked at animals outside in the wild and I got pictures of my pet cat outside in the garden. This is a similar concept to what I’ve now made. Other strengths of my research was that I looked at different times of the day to take photos on and it worked. I took photos outside in the daylight and some of the photos inside in the evening. All the photos I looked at on the internet decided my theme for my product and my theme in the end was animals. I started off looking at scenery and landscape pictures of trees and places with good viewpoints. The other strength of my research has to be the audience research when people gave feedback from a questionnaire I did and got some decent responses. This helped me figure out what the audience wanted and helped me what to focus on what I include in the photos. Also the interviews that were given helped me figure out certain things to include in my photos for my project. The interviews and the questionnaire were very similar and had some good responses. My research helped me with my product because I could base my product off a picture and change it slightly to make it my own. So as said earlier I started off looking at viewpoints and scenery then when I thought of trees I thought of adding something to it. This is when I thought of animals and including them with nature, however in the end I just went for animals in areas I could take photos in. The research overall helped me set my theme (over a certain amount of time) and helped me think of what to include on some of the photos, whether it was effects on the editing side or something in the background of the picture. The weaknesses of my research were that I couldn’t find a pacific photo of what I really wanted, however in the end I edited some of my photos to make them better. There wasn't that many weaknesses in my research because I got my theme within a couple of hours and was easy after that talking about them. However when I went out getting photos to edit and put on my PowerPoint for this project I had to delay some of the days because of bad weather and this was a disadvantage to me and made it harder for me to get photos and talk about them without anything. This was definitely a weakness, the weather and timing of when I had lessons and working with the photos. Some things I could have done better might of been the amount of photos I took. I didn’t take that many so I was stuck with a small amount of photos I had to work with, however I edited them and made them better. If I had weaknesses I didn't change to make them good my work would have an effect. The effect being that my audience would either spot the mistakes or wouldn’t like the photos because of those mistakes.
  • 4. Planning My planning was mainly talked about on my Pre-Production PowerPoint. On this PowerPoint I mainly talked about what I was going to include in my photos. This included texts, styles and fonts, layouts, risk assessment and a schedule. All this helped me figure out what works best for my product. So the style sheet that includes the fonts, colours, and different styles helped me figure out what goes together. I tried this and I ended up with the photos with a reasonable font and style. This was a good strength having a style sheet because it helped me figure other everything like said previously. On the PowerPoint I made everything organised so it’s easy to figure out which part I’m talking about is which. The strengths of the planning overall was fairly simple because I knew what I wanted to do so I got on with it and did the PowerPoint within a short period of time. The planning near the end of the PowerPoint such as the Contingency planning, health and safety and the schedule were also a good strength of the planning because it helped me organise what I needed for my project to work. The weaknesses of my planning was when I had to fill in the Health and Safety and the schedule slides in. This was a weakness because I couldn’t figure out what else to put no the health and safety slide because I ran out of ideas. However for the Schedule I struggled because I didn’t know exactly what I was going to do on them days. On a couple of them days I missed out on because of the bad weather and this is when I had to refer back to the Contingency Planning. To improve these two slides on the PowerPoint I could have asked somebody to give me ideas or gone on the internet to find out more. I had a bit of my planning on my Initial Plans slide. This was a PowerPoint I had to fill in about ideas of what I was going to do. This had only a few ideas of what I was going to do, but the Pre-Production slide has more information to talk about than the Initial Plans.
  • 5. Time Management I think I managed my time well in this project. I was ahead majority of the time until the proper production work kicked in and fell a bit behind. However I’ve handed in every piece of work in so far on time / on the deadline. In my opinion I managed my time well and I don’t think I would of needed additional time to finish my work to a high standard because I got on with my work and did everything properly. If I had more time to produce my work I would take it slowly and make sure I’ve finished something before I start something else. And after this process I would go through every step I’ve done and look for mistakes such as spelling, grammar and other language techniques. Also when I finished my work early it gave me chance to go back no other pieces of work and improve of them to make sure everything's at a high standard. I had my time managed on a schedule on my Pre-Production PowerPoint and honestly, I didn’t stick to it all the way through because of bad weather and lack of equipment. So the lack of outside photos was because of this. The bad weather and lack of equipment on some of the days prevented me sticking to the schedule.
  • 6. Technical Qualities These two photos are similar, but have some differences. The similarities are that both animals are types of cat and it’s a similar background with plants, bushes and grass. The main similarity would be the colors, there’s plenty of the color green and a mixture of others especially in my own work. The difference however is that my photo has more colors, a mixture whereas the other is only a few colors. However both pictures have a few differences such as the skies in the background and the setting. My work is set in a garden whereas the other (which was used as a test picture on my Pre-Production PowerPoint) is set on a decent viewpoint of a town or something in the background. Another massive difference is that the first picture (my own work) is set in an area with no wild animals and in a garden whereas the other is set I think in my opinion in the wild where it’s open and free. The photo from the internet is actually edited by me for one of my layouts and looks good with the effects on. They’re both edited with more than two or three tools so there has been effort put into them, for getting them and editing them.
  • 7. Aesthetic Qualities In my opinion I think my work looks good because of the effects added onto the pictures. The stuff that made it creative was mainly the editing putting all the special effects on each photo. My work looks good because of the creativity put into it. The type of aspects I like about each photo are the colors because each photo at least has a different color or looks different. The strengths of these pictures are that they are all different in some kind of way. For example all the photos on the left look the same, but have different color schemes. Another strength would be that they are all good quality pictures with nothing wrong with them. All the photos look good because they have also been perfectly timed because it’s hard to get animals near a camera, looking at one or to get a good angle on them. In my opinion there isn’t any weaknesses or anything to improve on. If I was to improve on something I would improve on my camerawork and getting more photos so I can talk about more in these kind of situations.
  • 8. Audience Appeal I think I have appealed to my target audience because I referred to the questionnaire for answers on what to do. From the questionnaire I took the reasonable answers because there were some stupid answers and I didn't pay attention to them. So I picked the reasonable answers and they were good and useful to me and my project. My work is aimed at people at the age of 10 and above. I think people will appreciate my work because I’ve put some of the suggestions from the questionnaire into my work. If some people don’t like animals, them kind of people won’t be interested in my work and I’m fine with that. My work won’t be aimed at people who aren’t animal lovers, but the opposite. I think people that are interested in animals or have their own pet will be interested in my work because I’ve used effects on software's to make them as good as possible. My work overall will appeal to people that have a pet animal or are interested in them. People care about their animals / pets so they want something to remember them by.
  • 10. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the product? – I thought the product was really good. All the pictures have a high quality standard to them and are explained well with what effects have been used. I liked the effects on the photos that have been used and looks better than the original pictures. • What improvements could have been made to the product? – Maybe instead of having a lot of close-ups have some distance pictures.
  • 11. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the product? – I thought the product was decent. Some really good shots taken and are decent quality. All have a different colour scheme to them which is good and really do show the features of the cat. The angle is also important in these kind of photos and they’ve done a good job on this. • What improvements could have been made to the product? – No improvements to be made.
  • 12. Feedback 3 • What did you like about the product? – I liked al the photos effects, they really made them stand out. I also liked the close-ups of the cats because it shows the little key features on them. I liked the text in the bottom corner to show that’s made by that person. • What improvements could have been made to the product? – Improvements could be the location of where the photos were taken, because they are all quite similar.
  • 13. Peer Feedback Summary What do you agree with from your peer feedback? – Yes I do agree. – I agree with the improvements I need to make and the positives on my photos such as the effects and the angles of each picture. What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? – I can’t disagree with anything because some of the changes the people want me to make will be changed if needed and there’s nothing wrong with changing them because I can do it, but it might take some time.
  • 14. Peer Feedback Summary If I was to change anything it would be the location and the camera shots I took. It was hard to get these cats in different locations because of bad weather at the time and because how they wonder about all the time. The camera shots are a definite change because they were all close up except one so ill change the distances of each photo. If there’s anything wrong with the photos I will always try to improve them some way or another. However if it’s something I think it’s not worth doing I won’t change, but if it’s something major I will change it. I would change what I need to change because I want my target audience to be happy with my work and not feel like something's wrong with it. Because of my age range being over 10, I want my photos to look perfect for the younger and older aged people. I want to make a photo good for people to remember and admire.

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  2. What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  3. Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  4. Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page alongside an existing product Use text boxes and arrows
  5. Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
  6. How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Refer to your findings from your questionnaire. Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
  7. What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?