The PACE Community is engaged in driving forward improvement for looked after children, and recently hosted a PACE Data Community Event, Milestones, Measures & Aims. How to incorporate the Data 'ask' into the system which looked at how data can practically be captured and analysed to drive and evidence improvement in achievement of early permanence for our looked after infants, children, and young people. The aim of the session was to look specifically at the key milestones on the journey to permanence and the data issues that these pose. We learned from examples of how local authority partnership areas have sought to address and overcome particular data issues, and shared general learning from CELCIS resulting from implementation of the PACE programme.

1. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Wednesday 23rd January 2019
CELCIS
Practice Exchange Workshop
Permanence and Care Excellence Programme (PACE)
Milestones, measures and aims:
How to incorporate the Data ‘ask’ into the system

2. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
WELCOME
Carol Wassell
Permanence & Care Team Lead, CELCIS

3. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Micky Anderson
Permanence Data Analyst, CELCIS
CarolAnn Anderson
Permanence Data Analyst, CELCIS

4. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Icebreaker
Q1. What did you have to do to get here
today?
Q2.How are you feeling about today’s
event?
Q3. What do you want to get out of this
event?

5. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Definitions
The importance of Data definitions for:
• Key Milestones
• Aim Setting

6. www.celcis.org www.celcis.org
Key milestones for children/ young who are looked after and become
accommodated away from home :
Milestones - Data
Looked After
Start Date
Looked After &
Accommodated
Review
Recommendation
Date
Agency
Decision
Maker
Sign Off
Order
Granted
Date
Application
Lodged at
Court
Aim 2 Aim 3 Aim 4
Last
Accommodated
Date Away
from Home

7. www.celcis.org www.celcis.org
Aim 2
Children who become
Looked after & accommodated
will have a
recommendation for
Permanence (including a
permanent return home within
6 months of becoming looked
after and accommodated
Aim 3
Children who have had
a recommendation for
permanence away from
home will have the decision
ratified by the Agency
Decision Maker within 14
week of the Looked After
Review that
recommended permanence.
Aim 4
Children whose plan has
been approved by the
Agency Decision their
application for a legal
order lodged
within 3 weeks of
Agency Decision Maker
agreement with the
recommendation
Aim 1
Children who
have been looked
after at home for
more than 2 years
will have a 24 month
review looking at their
whole period of time
being looked after at
home on a CSO.
National Aims

8. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Exercise:
Construct a measureable Aim
What definitional issues are there?
• Are the dates accessible?
• How and where is it recorded?
How would you measure the aim?
• Does it apply to all looked after children?
• Does the aim cover all placement types?

9. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Date child/young person became looked after (start of current episode of care)
Date child was first accommodated away from home (first placement in current episode)
Date child was last accommodated away from home (start of latest period of
accommodation)
LAC review (or other meeting) recommends pursuing permanence at home or away from
home for child
Date of Fostering/Adoption/Permanence/Kinship Panel
Agency Decision Maker approval of decision to pursue permanence for child
Date of move to (intended) final placement (even if not yet legally secured)
Date of application submission to court
Date that legal permanence is secured for child, including termination of order when
permanence at home is achieved
Data Requirements - Definitions

10. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Author:
Slide:
Administration 10
First Accommodated Date:
Home FC FC Residential
In this example it would be the date relating to the first FC placement
Last Accommodated Date:
Home FC Home FC Residential
In this example the date for last accommodated would be the second FC
placement
Accommodated Date Example

11. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Author:
Slide:
Administration 11
Accommodated Date Example
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Placements
0
ments
status
Foster care Home Kinship
Age
First Placement Away from home
Last Placement Away from home

12. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Coffee Break

13. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Examples from Practice
‘Capture & Extraction’
Nicola Milne
Performance & Evaluation Support Officer Education & Social Care
Moray Council
Stuart Osborne
Performance & Business Analyst
City of Edinburgh Council

14. Moray’s Data Journey
Nicola Milne
Performance & Evaluation Officer

15. Aim 1:
By 30 September 2018, 100% of children
looked after at home for more than two
years from 1 June 2018, will undergo a
peer review that will be reported to the
Service & Team Managers.

16. AIM 1
By 30 September 2018, 100% of children looked after at home for
more than 2 years from 1 June 2018, will undergo a peer review
that will be reported to the Service & Team Managers.
Date CSO at
home granted
18 Month
Reminder
2 YEAR
DEADLINE
Date CSO at
home
terminated
12-Jun-18 11-Dec-19 11-Jun-20
18-Jun-18 17-Dec-19 17-Jun-20
16-Oct-18 15-Apr-20 15-Oct-20
28-Jun-18 27-Dec-19 27-Jun-20 17-Oct-18

17. Aim 2:
By 1 July 2019, 90% of looked after &
accommodated children, accommodated
on or after 1 June 2018, will have a
recommendation for permanence within
30 weeks.

18. AIM 2
By 1 July 2019, 90% of looked after & accommodated children, accommodated on or
after 1 June 2018, will have a recommendation for permanence within 30 weeks.
KEY
MILESTONE
Date became
Accommodate
d
DEADLINE
Date Permanence Decision
due
RED - Overdue
AMBER - Due in next 30
days
GREEN - Decision made
KEY MILESTONE
Date of
permanence
recommendation
Weeks from
Accommodation to
recommendation
for Permanence
01-May-18 30-Oct-18 24-Oct-18 25
04-Jan-18 05-Jul-18
30-Jul-18 28-Jan-19

19. Aim 3:
By 1 July 2019, 60% of children who have
had a recommendation for permanence
away from home from 1 June 2018, will be
presented to the Fostering & Adoption
Panel within 15 weeks.

20. AIM 3
By 1 July 2019, 60% of children who have had a recommendation for permanence
away from home from 1 June 2018, will be presented to the Fostering & Adoption
Panel within 15 weeks.
DEADLINE
Date should be
presented to
Panel
RED - Overdue
AMBER - Due in
next 30 days
GREEN - Been to
Panel
Weeks
overdue
to Panel
Proposed
Permanence
Plan
KEY MILESTONE
Panel Date
(or LAC Review date
where decision
made that Panel no
longer appropriate -
in YELLOW)
Weeks from
Permanence
Decision to
Plan being
presented to
Panel
KEY
MILESTONE
Date ADM
Approved
Plan
Panel Admin
KEY
MILESTONE
Weeks to
ADM
approval from
date of
recommendat
ion for
Permanence
09-Jun-09 494 06-May-09 7 19-May-09 9
02-Dec-11 367 02-May-12 33 16-May-12 35

21. Aim 4:
By 1 July 2019, 60% of children from 1 June
2018, who have an agency approved
permanence plan to be secured via a
Permanence Order, will have the order
lodged within 16 weeks of the agency
decision date.

22. AIM 4
By 1 July 2019, 60% of children from 1 June 2018, who have an agency approved
permanence plan to be secured via a Permanence Order, will have the order lodged
within 16 weeks of the agency decision date.
Date
ADM
approv
ed
Match
DEADLINE
Date should
be in final
placement
RED -
Overdue
AMBER -
Due in next
30 days
GREEN - In
placement
KEY
MILEST
ONE
Date in
Final
Placeme
nt
KEY
MILEST
ONE
Weeks to
Final
Placeme
nt from
ADM
approval
KEY
MILESTONE
Weeks from
Accommoda
tion to Final
Placement
KEY
MILESTO
NE -
Date
Lodged
in Court
KEY
MILESTO
NE
Date
legal
order
granted
KEY
MILESTO
NE
Weeks
from
Lodging
in Court
to Order
being
granted
Final
Placeme
nt Type
07-Feb-19
07-Feb-19
19-Jun-
17
05-Oct-17 21-May-
15
-71 0 17-Mar-17 18-Apr-18 56 Permane
nt
Fostering

23. Issues
• Data spread throughout department
• Two separate departments in one
• Interrogating systems - sheer size of systems
• Culture change
• Lack of consistency

24. Plus points
• Better understanding of our processes
• Can try new ideas on a small scale
• Focus on process helps improve it overall
• Better understanding of the importance of
evidencing what we do

25. Edinburgh’s Data Journey
Stuart Osborne
Performance & Business Analyst
City of Edinburgh Council

26. City of Edinburgh Council
Recording of permanence recommendation
915 Looked After and Accommodated
376 LAC at home
single review team (12 FTE) managing all LAAC reviews and CPCCs
SWIFT
LAAC review types - core three:
'1st review’ six weeks from accommodation
'2nd review’ three months from 1st (and so 4.5 months from accommodation)
'subsequent review’ three months from 2nd (and so 7.5 months from accommodation) or
ongoing six month or annual
Initial thoughts were to record recommendation in 'Outcome' field of review for 1st,
2nd and any subsequent review until recommendation made.
Also only for those in focus for PACE in Edinburgh, i.e. those under 12, and from a
point in time forward.

27. City of Edinburgh Council
Recording of permanence recommendation
Discussion with review team regarding purpose, process, outcome options, guidance
Six options for Outcome field agreed:
• Further assessment required
• Decision previously made
• Not required, other order in place
• Required, referral to panel
• Required, no referral to panel
• Rehabilitation
Conclusion was that, for a number of reasons (reporting, DQ, consistency) the Outcome
field would be populated for every LAAC review going forward
AND a one off exercise to populate the appropriate review for every current LAAC where
the recommendation had been made
Exercise on 22 November 2017, full day commitment from team, just over 1,000 cases
Overall this has been successful and provided a fairly solid base for moving forward
with PACE work

28. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Lunch

29. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Practical Exercise Session
Displaying Data
Run Charts & Bar Charts

30. Sometimes called trend or time-
series charts
X axis: Sequential occurrence
of event
Y axis: Measure
Median: Mid-point of data
What is a run chart?

31. 52
0
50
100
150
200
24/08/2006
09/07/2007
13/05/2008
06/06/2008
25/11/2008
26/11/2009
02/12/2009
02/12/2009
17/06/2010
06/09/2010
06/09/2010
05/10/2010
24/01/2011
08/02/2011
01/11/2011
24/04/2012
24/04/2012
28/05/2012
12/07/2012
13/03/2013
13/03/2013
30/04/2013
31/05/2013
27/02/2014
27/02/2014
12/08/2014
12/08/2014
20/01/2015
12/05/2015
12/05/2015
12/06/2015
15/06/2015
15/06/2015
29/06/2015
29/06/2015
27/10/2015
15/02/2016
30/06/2016
31/08/2016
21/09/2016
02/11/2016
02/11/2016
02/11/2016
21/11/2016
21/12/2016
30/01/2017
30/01/2017
09/02/2017
09/02/2017
15/02/2017
15/02/2017
09/06/2017
09/06/2017
13/06/2017
13/06/2017
13/06/2017
26/06/2017
31/08/2017
19/10/2017
19/10/2017
Permanence Recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence recommendation(weeks)
Median
Weeks
PACE
start
223
187
184
182
182
175
172
152
150
129
126
124
99
88
85
68
64
64
39
36
35
35
35
31
29
20
9
9
9
7
7
7
7
7
5
3
2
0
0
100
200
300
Residential
Fostercare
Friends/Rela…
Residential
Residential
Fostercare
Fostercare
Fostercare
Home
Friends/Rela…
Friends/Rela…
Friends/Rela…
Friends/Rela…
Fostercare
Residential
Fostercare
Fostercare
Fostercare
Friends/Rela…
every dot is a child…
Start and end
of process:
Run chart
Start and no
end of process:
Bar chart

32. Let’s make one by hand…
(me first, then your turn,
- there is a prize for the best)

33. Understand variation in data
Simple way to make performance
visible
Show the impact of change:
- is change an improvement?
- is improvement sustained?
Why use a run chart?

34. Data for improvement, not data
for accountability
Use for:
individual tests of change
effects of tests of change
Why use a run chart?

35. Use your eyes, what can you see?
Probability based non-random
signals of change
Four rules:
• A shift
• A trend
• Too many or too few runs
• An astronomical data point
Reading a run chart

36. 63
0
20
40
60
80
100
3/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/24/2015
6/2/2015
6/15/2015
6/29/2015
6/29/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
1/30/2017
1/30/2017
2/9/2017
2/9/2017
6/9/2017
6/9/2017
6/13/2017
6/26/2017
9/7/2017
9/7/2017
6/29/2018
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence recommendation
Median
Weeks
Shift
6 or more consecutive points on either side of the median

37. 2 in a row = 1 in 2 = 50%

38. 3 in a row = 1 in 4 = 25%

39. 4 in a row = 1 in 8 = 12.5%

40. 6 in a row = 1 in 32 = 3.125%

41. 5 or more consecutive points increasing or decreasing
63
0
20
40
60
80
100
3/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/24/2015
6/2/2015
6/15/2015
6/29/2015
6/29/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
1/30/2017
1/30/2017
2/9/2017
2/9/2017
6/9/2017
6/9/2017
6/13/2017
6/26/2017
9/7/2017
9/7/2017
6/29/2018
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence recommendation
Median
Weeks
Trend

42. Too many or too few crossings of the median line is non-random
2 crossings here = 3 runs
28.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
3/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/24/2015
6/2/2015
6/15/2015
6/29/2015
6/29/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
1/30/2017
1/30/2017
2/9/2017
2/9/2017
6/9/2017
6/9/2017
6/13/2017
6/26/2017
9/7/2017
9/7/2017
6/29/2018
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence recommendation
Median
Weeks
Number of runs

43. Unusually large or small data point (wtf!)
39.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
3/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/24/2015
6/2/2015
6/15/2015
6/29/2015
6/29/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
1/30/2017
1/30/2017
2/9/2017
2/9/2017
6/9/2017
6/9/2017
6/13/2017
6/26/2017
9/7/2017
9/7/2017
6/29/2018
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence recommendation
Median
Weeks
Astronomical data point

44. 51.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
3/12/2015
4/24/2015
5/12/2015
5/24/2015
6/2/2015
6/15/2015
6/29/2015
8/13/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
10/8/2016
11/2/2016
12/14/2016
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence recommendation
Median
Weeks
PACE
Baseline with median plotted

45. 51.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
3/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/24/2015
6/2/2015
6/15/2015
6/29/2015
6/29/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence
recommendation
Median
Weeks
40
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3/12/2015
4/24/2015
5/12/2015
5/24/2015
6/2/2015
6/15/2015
6/29/2015
8/13/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
10/8/2016
11/2/2016
12/14/2016
1/13/2017
1/30/2017
2/9/2017
5/27/2017
5/29/2017
6/9/2017
6/13/2017
6/26/2017
9/7/2017
10/9/2017
6/29/2018
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence recommendation
Median
Weeks
PACE
start

46. 51.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
3/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/24/2015
6/2/2015
6/15/2015
6/29/2015
6/29/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence
recommendation
Median
Weeks
40
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3/12/2015
4/24/2015
5/12/2015
5/24/2015
6/2/2015
6/15/2015
6/29/2015
8/13/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
10/8/2016
11/2/2016
12/14/2016
1/13/2017
1/30/2017
2/9/2017
5/27/2017
5/29/2017
6/9/2017
6/13/2017
6/26/2017
9/7/2017
10/9/2017
6/29/2018
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence recommendation
Median
Weeks
PACE
start

47. 51.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
3/12/2015
4/24/2015
5/12/2015
5/24/2015
6/2/2015
6/15/2015
6/29/2015
8/13/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
10/8/2016
11/2/2016
12/14/2016
1/13/2017
1/30/2017
2/9/2017
5/27/2017
5/29/2017
6/9/2017
6/13/2017
6/26/2017
9/7/2017
10/9/2017
6/29/2018
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence recommendation
Median
Weeks
PACE
start
Freeze baseline median and extend

48. Let’s make one in Excel…
(no prize)

49. Complications…

50. 13.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1/21/2017
1/30/2017
2/13/2017
2/25/2017
2/26/2017
3/2/2017
3/3/2017
3/9/2017
3/12/2017
3/19/2017
3/20/2017
3/20/2017
3/21/2017
3/21/2017
3/27/2017
4/1/2017
4/5/2017
4/16/2017
4/17/2017
4/17/2017
4/17/2017
4/20/2017
4/21/2017
4/24/2017
4/24/2017
5/12/2017
5/21/2017
5/21/2017
6/8/2017
6/30/2017
7/8/2017
7/8/2017
7/13/2017
7/13/2017
7/17/2017
7/20/2017
8/18/2017
8/21/2017
8/27/2017
9/1/2017
9/12/2017
10/2/2017
10/19/2017
10/19/2017
10/27/2017
11/6/2017
11/10/2017
11/16/2017
Date accommodated
Accommodated to permanence recommendation
Median
Weeks
44
40
35
34
33
29
28
26
22
22
22
22
20
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
5/26/2017
7/28/2017
8/10/2017
9/16/2017
10/26/2017
10/28/2017
11/9/2017
Weeks
Date accommodated
Axis of
evil!
Appropriate for looking back
when all data is available,
but complications with
display of ongoing processes

51. 20.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1/21/2017
1/30/2017
2/13/2017
2/25/2017
2/26/2017
3/2/2017
3/3/2017
3/9/2017
3/12/2017
3/19/2017
3/20/2017
3/20/2017
3/21/2017
3/21/2017
3/27/2017
4/1/2017
4/5/2017
4/16/2017
4/17/2017
4/17/2017
4/17/2017
4/20/2017
4/21/2017
4/24/2017
4/24/2017
5/12/2017
5/21/2017
5/21/2017
5/26/2017
6/8/2017
6/23/2017
6/30/2017
7/8/2017
7/8/2017
7/13/2017
7/13/2017
7/17/2017
7/20/2017
7/28/2017
8/3/2017
8/10/2017
8/18/2017
8/21/2017
8/27/2017
9/1/2017
9/11/2017
9/12/2017
9/16/2017
9/29/2017
10/2/2017
10/19/2017
10/19/2017
10/26/2017
10/27/2017
10/27/2017
10/28/2017
10/28/2017
11/6/2017
11/9/2017
11/10/2017
11/12/2017
11/16/2017
Date accommodated
Run Chart
Median
Weeks
44
40
35
34
33
29
28
26
22
22
22
22
20
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
5/26/2017
7/28/2017
8/10/2017
9/16/2017
10/26/2017
10/28/2017
11/9/2017
Weeks
Date accommodated
Waiting list now shown on
run chart. New data points
appear in the middle of the
chart, disrupting previous
analysis

52. 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3/30/2017
4/2/2017
4/9/2017
4/21/2017
5/25/2017
5/29/2017
5/29/2017
6/8/2017
6/8/2017
6/8/2017
6/11/2017
6/15/2017
6/25/2017
8/6/2017
8/13/2017
8/24/2017
9/2/2017
9/8/2017
10/8/2017
10/9/2017
10/13/2017
10/20/2017
11/2/2017
11/13/2017
11/13/2017
11/24/2017
11/27/2017
11/27/2017
12/3/2017
12/3/2017
12/7/2017
12/7/2017
12/7/2017
12/9/2017
12/9/2017
12/15/2017
1/8/2018
1/12/2018
1/12/2018
1/26/2018
1/28/2018
2/3/2018
2/9/2018
2/10/2018
2/10/2018
2/18/2018
2/22/2018
3/9/2018
Date of permanence recommendation
Run Chart
Median
Weeks
44
40
35
34
33
29
28
26
22
22
22
22
20
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
5/26/2017
7/28/2017
8/10/2017
9/16/2017
10/26/2017
10/28/2017
11/9/2017
Weeks
Date accommodated
Change axis to show end of
process instead but…
…accommodated from 1st Jan only,
so those accommodated before 1st
Jan do not appear: No baseline

53. 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
6/7/2018
6/12/2018
6/21/2018
6/21/2018
6/26/2018
6/26/2018
7/2/2018
7/3/2018
7/3/2018
7/10/2018
7/18/2018
7/24/2018
7/24/2018
7/25/2018
7/26/2018
8/7/2018
8/14/2018
8/14/2018
8/14/2018
8/16/2018
8/17/2018
8/21/2018
8/21/2018
8/21/2018
8/21/2018
9/5/2018
9/5/2018
9/7/2018
Permanence Recommendation date
Accommodation to Permanence Recommendation
Median
Weeks
Accom after 1st
Aim applies to children accommodated after 1st of June
2018, but all recommendations after this date shown,
including those accommodated before this date.

54. 34.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
6/29/2015
6/29/2015
10/27/2015
2/15/2016
6/30/2016
8/31/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
11/2/2016
1/30/2017
1/30/2017
2/9/2017
2/9/2017
6/9/2017
6/9/2017
6/13/2017
6/26/2017
9/7/2017
9/7/2017
6/29/2018
Date of permanence recommendation
Last accommodated to permanence recommendation
Median
Weeks
Spot the siblings: Count groups with
same dates once for shifts and trends
Still a trend
Same date but
different values

55. 4.0
0
5
10
15
12/11/2…
04/12/2…
04/12/2…
22/12/2…
22/12/2…
08/01/2…
08/01/2…
13/01/2…
28/01/2…
28/01/2…
11/02/2…
11/02/2…
11/02/2…
22/02/2…
22/02/2…
06/05/2…
09/05/2…
20/05/2…
20/05/2…
17/08/2…
17/08/2…
19/08/2…
23/08/2…
29/08/2…
29/08/2…
30/08/2…
07/10/2…
28/10/2…
28/10/2…
22/11/2…
23/11/2…
06/12/2…
06/12/2…
09/01/2…
11/01/2…
11/01/2…
23/01/2…
25/01/2…
01/02/2…
02/02/2…
27/02/2…
27/02/2…
15/03/2…
15/03/2…
06/04/2…
19/04/2…
19/04/2…
19/04/2…
19/04/2…
25/04/2…
Date PO granted
Becoming looked after to PO granted
Median
Years
4.0
0
5
10
15
01/11/2…
01/12/2…
01/01/2…
01/02/2…
01/03/2…
01/04/2…
01/05/2…
01/06/2…
01/07/2…
01/08/2…
01/09/2…
01/10/2…
01/11/2…
01/12/2…
01/01/2…
01/02/2…
01/03/2…
01/04/2…
01/05/2…
Date PO granted
Becoming looked after to PO granted
Median
Years
Same data with
actual time between
POs granted shown
by using date axis

56. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
What we’ve learned – Q&A session

57. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
What we’ve learned – Q&A session
• Feedback to the Government
• New Information Management System
• Creation of Data Community

58. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Information Management System’s
Q. What challenges are Local Authorities
Facing?

59. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
PACE Data Community
Would it be useful?
What could you share?
What could you learn from each other?
How could you support each other?
Any topics PACE Data Analysts can cover?

60. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
PACE Data Community
• Purpose
• Infrastructure, functionality
• Moderator
• Social Media Platform
• What is focus

61. celcis.org @CELCISTweets
Event Close