This document discusses pathways to democratic civic engagement through problem-based service learning (PBSL). It explores moving beyond a volunteer model to one where students solve real-world problems through service. The document notes that achieving democratic civic engagement requires moving multiple dimensions, including students, faculty, institutional support, and community partnerships. It also discusses how to design PBSL projects that appeal to faculty by directly relating to course outcomes and presenting students with complex problems to solve. Overall, the document provides a framework for designing PBSL projects and partnerships that can grow over time from initial projects into deep, democratic civic engagement between higher education and communities.
Problem-Based Service-Learning (faculty development at Bonner)
1. +
PBSL: Pathways to
Democratic Civic
Rick Gordon and Ruth Scipione
Siena College
2. +
Workshop Goals
Explore 21st century model of service learning--Hi impact
service and social change
Need to work smarter, not harder
Change paradigm from student placement/volunteer
model to problem solving model, from “technocratic” civic
engagement to democratic civic engagement
3. +
Eyes on the prize: Ends vs means
Challenge: Create a more socially just world
Sub-challenge: Aspiring to Democratic Civic Engagement
and Deep Partnerships
4. +
Multidimensional Problem
Student Engagement, Faculty Engagement, Institutional
Support, Community PartnershipsResults and Outcomes
Can’t move on to highest level without moving others as
well
5. +
Yeah, but…
How do you get faculty engagement at any level?
And how do you move them from initial interest or trying
SL to deep engagement and commitment?
6. +
Activity 1
Motivation: Get beyond altruism
Economic Theory: Incentive and Disincentives: Increase
benefits/lower costs
Brainstorm Incentives/Disincentives for each dimension
4 small groups: Student, Faculty, Institutional, Community
Partner
For each, list their interests in one column, obstacles in
another
7. +
How can we align faculty incentives/interests with those of
students, institution, community partner?
8. +
PBSL for faculty buy-in
Start with premise we are not promoting service—focus on
academic learning
Entry point for faculty to SL—get foot in the door but also
“Smarter,” more “democratic” orientation to engagement
9. +
PBSL Key Concepts
Clear identification of learning outcomes
Partnering with community partner with a problem that
directly relates to course learning outcomes
Presenting students with a problem to solve related to
learning outcomes that demands some type of service to
community partner
Preparing students for their PBSL work by building
knowledge, skills, and abilities
Employing on-going feedback—reflection and assessment
10. +
Appeal of PBSL
Relates directly to course outcomes
Not overly complicated logistics
Problem statement written by faculty member to
specifically address community need and desired learning
results
Usually requires student teamwork—real problems too
complex for any one person
How to achieve course outcomes, work with a community
partner, how to prepare students, how to manage logistics
11. +
Examples
“Generic” issues: Program evaluation, work by similar
organizations, future trends in the field
Siena Ed Program Evaluation: Social Sciences, Stats, etc.—
Apply theory to practice
Embedded: Environmental Studies intro course
12. +
How does this lead to Deep
Partnerships?
Partnerships
build over time—Around
problem/issue solutions
13. +
Within Course/Discipline
Colby Sawyer College—Psychology—theories of youth
development and playground violence
Needs analysis, program research, program selection and
planning, implementation
14. +
Across Disciplines
Unity House—Wraparound services in low income community
Problem to solve: How to improve student academic performance/
graduation?
----Initial connection through needs assessment for youth
education—
Initial direct service—youth afterschool/tutoring (Education dept)
Leads to workshops on parenting (Psych, Counseling)
Adult literacy (Education, Psych)
Food and nutrition (Nutrition)
Fundraising, development and budget management
(accounting)
Strategic Planning (Business and Management)
15. +
How do we get from technocratic
engagement to democratic?
PBSL alters the framework: Rather than how can faculty do
SL in a course, to what role does a faculty (or dept. or
institution) have with an issue/problem we aim to
address?
16. +
Activity 2 Development from
initial project to deep
Project Generation Game
5 year path along each of these 4 dimensions from initial
project to Deep, Democratic Civic Engagement.
17.
18. +
Closure: Book Proposal Ideas
Book Proposal Ideas: PBSL—Pathway to Democratic Civic
Engagement