FWP 2017 l Luca VITA, DNV GL “Project financing: what conditions need to be fulfilled?”

1. CERTIFICATION FOR FLOATING WIND
LUCA VITA, DNV GL

2. 2
1st JIP:
DNV-OS-J103 Standard
(2011-2013)
New JIP:
coupled analysis
(2016-2017)
DNVGL-ST-0119 and
new RP
DNV GL & FLOATING INDUSTRY – THE JOINT JOURNEY
THIRD PARTY SERVICES AND JOINT PROJECTS
2
Hywind demo 2.3MW (2008)
Pelastar FEED (2013)
VolturnUS – concept (2014)
ACS - Concept (2014-2015)
Aerodyn SCD Nezzy – Concept (2014)
WindFloat Atlantic (2015- on-going)
Hywind Scotland 24MW(2015-2017)
European floating wind farm (2017 – on-going) Nuatilus – concept (on-going)

3. WHAT IS CERTIFICATION?
3
Do they match???
Sky
2000
Arklow
Bank
Utgru
nden
Horn
s Rev
Bl
yt
h
B
e
at
ri
c
e
Docking
Shoal
Race
Bank
Tunø
Knob
N
y
st
e
d
Vi
n
d
e
b
y
S
a
m
s
ø
B
el
ts
e
e
B
re
itli
n
g
Nyst
ed II
Smygg
eham
Arkona-
Becken
Südost
Kriegers
Flak II
Klutzer
Winkel
Omø
Stalgrunde
Ytte
Stengrund
Lille
grun
d
North
Misjobanken
Uttgrun
den II
Bl
e
ki
n
g
e
Ska
brev
et
Middelgr
unden Bars
eban
k
Friedrichs
haven
L
a
e
s
ø
E
m
d
e
n
Wilhelms
haven
FI
N
O
Alpha
Ventus
RWE Innogy
IBorkum
Riffgrund
B
ar
d
N
L
Bute
ndiek
Norder
gründe
Amrumbank
West
Ri
ff
g
at
Dan
Tysk
Prince
ss
Amalia
(Q7)
Gode
Wind
B
al
tic
1BARD
Offshore IBorkum Riffgrund
West
Baltic 2
Nördlicher
Grund
Sandbank
24
Nordse
e Ost
Amrum
bankMee
rwin
d
GE
OG
FRe
E
`He
Dreiht‘
`N
ord
se
e‘
Global
Tech I
Robin
Rigg
Cromer
Metmast
Scroby
Sands
Deutsche
Bucht
London
Horns
Rev II
Delta
NordseeBorkum
West II
Veja
Mate
North
Hoyle
Gwynt
y Mor
Lessons learned from more than
50 offshore wind projects

4. 4
WHY CERTIFICATION? (SEEN FROM OUR CUSTOMERS)
4
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Adding quality to the
design
Requirements from
insurance companies
Requirements from
authorities
Attracting investors
Why Certification?
Source: DNVGL Floating wind customer survey, 2015
QUALITY
TRUST
SAFETY

5. 5
Third party certification
CERTIFICATION FOR FLOATING WIND
Concept Design Project
Wind Turbine
Floater
System
Risk
Value

6. 6
RISK REDUCTION – CONCEPT PHASE
Concept
MAIN PROJECT RISK
 Possible novelties to be identified
 Unpredicted technical challenges
 Challenging design for next phases, e.g. adaptability to site
conditions or execution phases
MAIN CERTIFICATION OBJECTIVES
 Identifying possible show stoppers
 Issuing recommendations on next development phase
 Adding confidence towards possible investors and partners
Source: Aerodyn
Source: Henrik Stiesdal

7. 7
RISK REDUCTION – DESIGN PHASES
MAIN PROJECT RISK
 Challenging locations to determine site conditions
 Young industry - few experienced partners
 Multiple partners in the projects
 Consistency in design process
(time schedule, standards, components, project phases,…)
MAIN CERTIFICATION OBJECTIVES
 From design basis to detailed design
 Interphases, and trust among stakeholders
 Quality of design
Design
WindFloat
Photo: Principle Power
Hywind
Photo: Knut Ronold DNVGL
PelaStar
Source: Glosten

8. 8
RISK REDUCTION – EXECUTION PHASES
MAIN PROJECT RISK
 Challenging weather conditions
 Procedure and tools adapted from other industries
 Procedures not adapted to the design or site conditions
MAIN CERTIFICATION OBJECTIVES
 From manufacturing to commissioning
 Specifications and design codes are complied with
 All operations planned w.r.t. weather and contingencies
 Safety
Execution

9. #FWPAtlantic
QUESTIONS?
Luca.vita@dnvgl.com