Operational research is becoming important in real world setting of health care as it always tried to find out challenges or gaps in any health related issues or in program. For health program improvement, OR should be conducting frequently. Program manager and doctors should be involve in OR and encourage to do so.
2. Definitions
Evolution of OR
How does OR differ from other
type of research?
Why OR is important?
OR technique
Approaches for conducting OR
studies
Who does OR?
Steps of conducting OR studies
Barriers to OR
Journal & Societies related with OR
Conclusion
References
OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION
3. Research means a systematic investigation, including
research development, testing & evaluation, designed to
develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge
(45 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 46)
4. Biomedical & Health research means research including studies on
basic, applied & operational research or clinical research, designed
primarily to ↑ scientific knowledge about disease & conditions;
their detection & cause; & evolving strategies for health
promotion, prevention or amelioration of disease & rehabilitation
(New Drugs & Clinical Trial Rules, India, 2018)
RESEARCH
5. Purpose is theory testing and to produce
generalizable knowledge. Goal is to contribute to
knowledge base.
(CDC)
RESEARCH
6. The use of systematic research techniques for program
decision-making to achieve a specific outcome
(WHO – Framework for OR/IR in health &
disease control programs, 2003)
OR
7. OR helps policy-makers & program managers to
review, redirect & restructure programs that have been
in place for many years
(The Population Council, 2000)
OR
8. OR aims at studying the process by which programs are
implemented & interventions are delivered to intended
beneficiaries
(International Food Policy Research Institute, 2005)
OR
9. Research into strategies, interventions, tools or knowledge
that can enhance the quality, coverage, effectiveness or
performance of health system/programme in which the
research is being conducted
(The International Union against TB & Lung Disease)
OR
10. Any research producing practically usable knowledge which
can improve the program implementation regardless of the
type of research falls within the boundaries of OR
(WHO, 2008)
OR
11. Strategies undertaken to implement evidence-based
technologies, services, diagnostics or therapeutics in real-
life populations and contexts
(NIH, 2011)
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH
12. HEALTH SYSTEM RESEARCH (HSR)
The production of new knowledge, to improve how societies
organize themselves to achieve health goals
Service delivery Medical products & technologies
Information & Evidence Health workforce
Health financing Leadership & Governance
The Alliance for Health Policy & System Research (HPSR)
14. OR IR HSR
Which locations
should be targeted for
delivering HIV
prevention services in
Equator province,
DRC?
How to improve
access to vaccination
among children who
are currently not
reached by
immunization
services?
To what extent do
health services reach
the poor? How can
this be improved?
15. The research that occurs before a program is designed
& implemented or while a program is being conducted
(The AIDS Partnership of California, 2003)
FORMATIVE RESEARCH
16. TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
It apply scientific investigation approaches to study how the
outputs of basic & applied research can be effectively
translated into practice & have an impact
(CDC)
17. Translation to
humans
Translation to pts
Translation to
practice
Translation to
population
𝑻 𝟏 𝑻 𝟑𝑻 𝟐 𝑻 𝟒
Pre-clinical
Phase 1 trials
FIH
Phase 2 & 3
clinical trials
Phase 4 clinical
trials
Health service
research
Population level
outcome studies
Controlled
environment Sample size
18. It examines a system
It requires collaboration
b/w managers & researchers
It succeeds only if the results
are used to make decisions
It addresses specific problem How does OR
differ from other
types of research?
19. ‘Father of OR’
He did a research into the cost of
transportation & sorting of mail in
England’s Universal Penny Post in 1840
Charles Babbage
(1791-1871)
20. 1948 - OR club was formed
1949 – OR unit was established
at Regional Research
Laboratory, Hyderabad
1950 – First OR journal
was published
21. 1953 – OR unit was established
in Indian Statistical Institute,
Calcutta
1955 – OR Society of India
(ORSI) was created
1963 – ORSI started a
journal
22. Why is OR
important?
Important role to play in the success of program
It gives context-specific answers
Useful for coordinating the various activities
within an organization
It can aid in generating evidence based solution
24. Problem structuring Methods
& conceptual modelling
Areas of application in health
Soft System Methodology Outpatient service modelling
Strategic Options & Decision
Analysis (SODA)
Tele-health systems design
Validation Measuring patient/staff
satisfaction
Strategic Choice Analysis Strategic employment relations
(Source: NICE)
25. Mathematical approaches Areas of application in health
Queuing theory Waiting time/utilization
analysis
Location analysis Hospital placement
Meta-heuristics Staffing/Scheduling
Mathematical programming Resource allocation
(Source: NICE)
26. Simulation Areas of application in health
Discrete Event Simulation
(DES)
Redesign of clinical pathways
Waiting list issues
System Dynamics Identifying areas for policy
focus
Agent based modelling Modelling disease
spread/screening
Monte Carlo Demand estimation
(Source: NICE)
27. Queuing model
» Developed by A.K. Erlang in
1904
» Queue – a line that
persons/products have to wait in
» Channel – each person serving
an individual in the Queue
29. » Delays are the result of a disparity b/w demand for a
service & the capacity available to meet the demand
» Mismatch due to natural variability in the timing of
demands & the duration of time needed to provide
service
30. Fundamentals of queuing theory
» Assumption: there is no limit on the no. of the customers that
can be waiting for service (there is an infinite waiting room)
» It deals with system performance in steady-state
» Utilization:
𝐴𝑣𝑔.𝑛𝑜.𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑢𝑠𝑦 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜.𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠
∗ 100
31. Trade-off b/w average delay & utilization in a queuing system
Elbow depends on
variability & system size
32. Implications
» Avg. total capacity: No. of server times the rate at which each
server can serve customers (>than the avg. demand)
» Smaller the system, longer the delays will be for a given
utilization level
33. » Larger hospitals can operate at higher utilization levels
than smaller yet maintain similar levels of congestion
& delays
» Greater the variability in the service time the longer
the delays at a given utilization
34. Why queuing model is useful in healthcare?
To,
» Predict the level of congestion
» Determine how much capacity is needed to achieve
some desired level of performance
» Identify appropriate levels of staff, equipment, beds etc.
» Make decisions about resource allocation & the design
of new services
35. Simulation models
» Computer-based modelling
methodology
» Stimulate dynamic behaviours of
complex systems & interactions
b/w individuals & their
environments
36. Select & isolate certain features of reality to develop
a more/less idealized situation
Construct a model = Idealized situation + Real situation
The impact of changes on the total output can
thus be estimated
37. We can simulate,
» No. of pts arriving at a health caring centre on near future days
» Transportation of medicine to different areas
» Pt & doctors schedule so that their waiting time may be
minimized
» Sampling of pts of the same nature for analysing the
effectiveness of a new intervention
38. Does OR always require complex mathematical
modeling techniques?
39. Approaches for carrying out OR studies in public health
1. Secondary data analysis
E.g.
To determine the no. of smear examinations recorded in
laboratory registers that yielded one additional case of sputum
smear +ve TB following 2 –ve examinations
40. In this study 24 records from Moldova and 30
from Uganda were included
Data on the reason for examinations & the results
obtained for up to 3 examinations were included
To detect 1 additional TB case on a 3rd smear, 273
examinations in Moldova & 175 in Uganda were required
41. 2. Primary level approach
» Exploratory/Diagnostic studies - help in problem
identification (e.g. Formative research, Need assessment)
» Intervention studies – before-after studies
» M’OR’E studies – evaluate ongoing innovative HIs
» Economic analysis
43. Who does OR?
Program implementers Researchers
Other stakeholders
Defining the problem
Specifying when the study result
is needed for decision-making
Ensuring the provider &
facilities cooperate with the
researchers
Utilizing the findings in program
decision-making
44. Who does OR?
Program implementers Researchers
Other stakeholders
Responsible for translating
the program problem into a
researchable problem
Researchers from mix of
backgrounds
45. Who does OR?
Program implementers Researchers
Other stakeholders
Representatives from civil society
groups, NGOs, affected
communities
48. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
1. Organize the research group & advisory committee
2. Determine problems & frame research questions
3. Develop a research proposal
5. Identify funding sources & obtain support for OR
6. Establish a budget & financial management
7. Plan for capacity building & technical support
4. Obtain ethical clearance
49. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
1. Organize the research group & advisory committee
2. Determine problems & frame research questions
3. Develop a research proposal
5. Identify funding sources & obtain support for OR
6. Establish a budget & financial management
7. Plan for capacity building & technical support
4. Obtain ethical clearance
50. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
1. Organize the research group & advisory committee
2. Determine problems & frame research questions
3. Develop a research proposal
5. Identify funding sources & obtain support for OR
6. Establish a budget & financial management
7. Plan for capacity building & technical support
4. Obtain ethical clearance
• OR questions should relate to specific challenges
faced in implementing & managing health
programs
• Should emerge from discussions with program
managers, researchers and clients of the services
Testing possible
solutions
Considering
underlying
reasons
Identification of
the problem
51. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
1. Organize the research group & advisory committee
2. Determine problems & frame research questions
3. Develop a research proposal
5. Identify funding sources & obtain support for OR
6. Establish a budget & financial management
7. Plan for capacity building & technical support
4. Obtain ethical clearance
1. Title page
2. Abstract/summary
3. Statement of research questions & objectives
4. Overview of the study area providing
information that is relevant to the problem at
hand, the communities involved and the
nature of the health system (Rationale &
importance)
5. Description of the intended research team
6. Ethical considerations & approval processes
7. Research methods
8. Plans for dissemination and use of findings
9. Budget for the proposed project &
justification
10. List of references for literature cited
52. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
1. Organize the research group & advisory committee
2. Determine problems & frame research questions
3. Develop a research proposal
5. Identify funding sources & obtain support for OR
6. Establish a budget & financial management
7. Plan for capacity building & technical support
4. Obtain ethical clearance
• Approval of ethical & safety issues
from Institutional Review Board
• Informed consent form – signed by the
participants
• Risk & benefits
• Privacy & confidentiality
53. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
1. Organize the research group & advisory committee
2. Determine problems & frame research questions
3. Develop a research proposal
5. Identify funding sources & support
6. Establish a budget & financial management
7. Plan for capacity building & technical support
4. Obtain ethical clearance
• Tropical Disease Research (TDR)
• Council for the Development of Social
Science Research in Africa
• Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and
Malaria
• International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (IBRD, the World Bank)
• Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
• International Development Research
Centre
• Rockefeller Foundation
• Welcome trust
54. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
1. Organize the research group & advisory committee
2. Determine problems & frame research questions
3. Develop a research proposal
5. Identify funding sources & obtain support for OR
6. Establish a budget & financial management
7. Plan for capacity building & technical support
4. Obtain ethical clearance
Budget items for Operations Research
Research Costs
Implementation / Program
Costs
Institutional
Costs
• Personnel
• Supplies & materials
• Equipment
• Travel or
transportation
• Dissemination costs
• Educational materials for
clients & community
• Funds for mobilization
• Job aids for health care
staff
• Training programs for
implementers
• Commodities needed for
intervention
• Overhead
costs
55. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
1. Organize the research group & advisory committee
2. Determine problems & frame research questions
3. Develop a research proposal
5. Identify funding sources & obtain support for OR
6. Establish a budget & financial management
7. Plan for capacity building & technical support
4. Obtain ethical clearance
• Capacity building can be done by senior researcher,
direct experience, organizing short courses
• Experts / consultants to work with the research team
for short periods of time
56. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
8. Monitor project implementation & maintain quality
9. Pre-test all research procedures
10. Establish & maintain data management & quality control
11. Explore together with stakeholders interpretations &
recommendations arising from research findings
57. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
8. Monitor project implementation & maintain quality
9. Pre-test all research procedures
10. Establish & maintain data management & quality control
11. Explore together with stakeholders interpretations &
recommendations arising from research findings
• Work plan and regular meetings
• During implementation, the research team
probably needs to meet on a weekly basis
• Report to the advisory committee on a
monthly basis
58. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
8. Monitor project implementation & maintain quality
9. Pre-test all research procedures
10. Establish & maintain data management & quality control
11. Explore together with stakeholders interpretations &
recommendations arising from research findings
Valid ?
Reliable ?
Necessary to test where they will be used in
the field, possibly in a different community
with similar characteristics
Two groups of people can be
involved in the pretesting process
Actual interviewers &
field assistants
Data management staff
59. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
8. Monitor project implementation & maintain quality
9. Pre-test all research procedures
10. Establish & maintain data management & quality control
11. Explore together with stakeholders interpretations &
recommendations arising from research findings
Reflect the
objectives
Data entry & cross
checking
Review &
Supervision
ObservationTraining
Analysis
60. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
8. Monitor project implementation & maintain quality
9. Pre-test all research procedures
10. Establish & maintain data management & quality control
11. Explore together with stakeholders interpretations &
recommendations arising from research findings
• Listing key findings
• Come up with a road map (Findings to
action)
1st meeting
2nd meeting
• Occur within a week after data entry
• A set of frequency tables or summaries
• Start assigning responsibilities
• Outline budget needs
Final step
61. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
12. Develop a dissemination plan
13. Disseminate results & recommendations
14. Document changes in policy &/or guidelines
15. Monitor changes in the revised program
16. Consider ways of improving the program that can
be tested through further research
62. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
12. Develop a dissemination plan
13. Disseminate results & recommendations
14. Document changes in policy &/or guidelines
15. Monitor changes in the revised program
16. Consider ways of improving the program that can
be tested through further research
• Dissemination activities must be
matched to the key audiences
• 2 types of audiences:
1) External
2) Internal
Dissemination plans: external audience
Annual presentation of research
findings at national & international
conferences
Publication of research findings
Meetings with local & national
stakeholders
Regular reports to funding agency
Press release & briefings
Identifying & involving the most
effective advocacy voice
63. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
12. Develop a dissemination plan
13. Disseminate results & recommendations
14. Document changes in policy &/or guidelines
15. Monitor changes in the revised program
16. Consider ways of improving the program that can
be tested through further research
• Dissemination involves carrying out the suggested steps and
activities as planned
• The research team needs to involve the advisory committee as
mentioned
• Issues like timing, venue and opportunity need to be considered
64. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
12. Develop a dissemination plan
13. Disseminate results & recommendations
14. Document changes in policy &/or guidelines
15. Monitor changes in the revised program
16. Consider ways of improving the program that can
be tested through further research
• “Did the implementing/collaborating organization(s) “act on”
the results
• Implementation of the actual services of the intervention or
the activities to support those services
65. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
12. Develop a dissemination plan
13. Disseminate results & recommendations
14. Document changes in policy &/or guidelines
15. Monitor changes in the revised program
16. Consider ways of improving the program that can
be tested through further research
• Responsibilities of program managers & stakeholders
• Particular OR/IR which was carried out, effective or not in large scale
• The suggested & implemented changes in policy and procedures had
been any impact on program performance
66. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
12. Develop a dissemination plan
13. Disseminate results & recommendations
14. Document changes in policy &/or guidelines
15. Monitor changes in the revised program
16. Consider ways of improving the program that can
be tested through further research
During M & E, the new
strategy may find new problem
Start new OR process over
again with a new focus
67. PHASES / PROCESS OF OR
Planning Implementation Follow-Through
12. Develop a dissemination plan
13. Disseminate results & recommendations
14. Document changes in policy &/or guidelines
15. Monitor changes in the revised program
16. Consider ways of improving the program that can
be tested through further research
During M & E, the new
strategy may find new problem
Start new OR process over
again with a new focus
Program
improvement is an
ongoing process
68. EXAMPLES OF OR IN PUBLIC
HEALTH IN INDIA
ANKUR Project: Field trial on HBNC to reduce neonatal mortality in India
•Conducted in Gadchiroli
district, Maharastra, 1993-1998
•39 intervention & 47 control
villages
•Introduced HBNC in the
intervention group
•Village health workers trained
& repeated visits to household
to detect and manage common
neonatal problems
• Baseline NMR was 62:58
(I:C)
• Net reduction of NMR & IMR
compared with the control
area, were 25·5 (62·2%) &
38·8 (45·7%) respectively
• Case fatality in neonatal sepsis
declined from 16·6% to 2·8%
after treatment by village
health workers
69. • Trial concluded:
Home-based neonatal care, including management of sepsis, is acceptable,
feasible, and reduced neonatal and infant mortality by nearly 50% among
our malnourished, illiterate, rural study population
HBNC is implemented under NHM in 2011 to reduce for reduction
of neonatal mortality through village health workers i.e ASHA
On this basis, ANKUR project (2001-2005) initiated in 7 sites by
ICMR, similar success achieved
70. EXAMPLES OF OR IN PUBLIC
HEALTH IN INDIA
Appreciative Inquiry (AI) in Leprosy?
•Wagh AN et al conducted OR to
assess the correctness of case
diagnosis in Bihar (LCDC) 2016-18
•AI involving the health care staff of
these 8 PHCs using the 4-D
framework (Discovery-Dream-
Design-Destiny)
• Mixed methods research with the
two validation exercises conducted
• The decline in false positive
diagnosis was estimated to be
about 9%
71. Study recommended that
• The program must focus on routine validation exercice in
future to improved the performance of the program
• Appreciative inquiry model must be included in different
orientation or refresher training
72. BARRIERS TO OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Training and capacity building
• Trained uninterested staff
• Irregularities/absenteeism
• Unqualified person engage
Study protocol and publications
Ineffective research partnerships
• Wrong choice of research question
• Poorly designed studies
• Lack of writing & language skills
• No ethics clearance or exemption
• Inadequate experience
• Lack of joint ownership
• Partnership starts but fails with time
• Sideline research
Policy and practice
• Key decision and policy makers
were not involved
• The researcher invests until the
publication & goes no further
• Authorship is not inclusive
73. WHEN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH WILL
BE USEFUL?
Effective dissemination and accepted by wider scientific community
Implementation of the findings had an impact on program performance
or patient outcomes
Advocating for change to policy and practice
Program managers & stakeholders uses for decision making
75. M’OR’E
CONCLUSION
Identifying
problems
Operational Research needs to
be integrated as an essential part
of monitoring & evaluation
efforts in Public Health
Involvement of program
managers throughout the
research & use by policy
makers are two successful tools
of OR
OR Process
76. REFERENCES
• Operational framework. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/operational/framework/en/index.html
• Global fund: operational research. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/operational/globalfund/en/index.html
• Institute for Operations Research and Management Sciences. Operations research: the science of better. What
operations research is. http://www.scienceofbetter.org/what/index.html
• Sengupta PG, Mondal SK, Ghosh S, Gupta DN, Sikder SN, Sircar BK. Review on development and
community implementation of oral rehydration therapy. Indian J Public Health 1994;38:50-7.
• Kundu D, Chopra K, Khanna A, Babbar N, Padmini TJ. Accelerating TB notification from the private health
sector in Delhi, India. Indian J Tuberc 2016;63:8-12.
• Shewade HD, Nair D, Klinton JS, Parmar M, Lavanya J, Murali L, et al. Low pre-diagnosis attrition but high
pre-treatment attrition among patients with MDR-TB: An operational research from Chennai, India. J
Epidemiol Glob Health 2017;7:227-33.
• Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule SB, Reddy MH, Deshmukh MD. Effect of home-based neonatal care and
management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: Field trial in rural India. Lancet 1999;354:1955-61.
• Wagh AN, Mugudalabetta S, Gutierrez NO, Padebettu K, Pandey AK, Pandey BK, et al. Does appreciative
inquiry decrease false positive diagnosis during leprosy case detection campaigns in Bihar, India? An
operational research study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018;12:e0007004.
• Zachariah R, Harries AD, Ishikawa N, Rieder HL, Bissell K, Laserson K, et al. Operational research in
low-income countries: What, why, and how? Lancet Infect Dis 2009;9:711-7.
It provides policy makers & managers with evidence that they can use to improve program operations
Decision-making: choose one of the alternative course of action
The main purpose is to identify as early as possible in the life of the program any short comings in the process that may affect the delivery of the intervention
Access is defined as the facility with which disease affected population can obtain relevant components of specific public health intervention – it reflects both supply as well as demand for the intervention
OR-strong problem solving focus, IR- focus on need for innovative approaches/ensure the effectiveness of implemented interventions
HSR- addresses question related with system/policy & are not disease specific
Utility – a fact/character/quality of something being useful
It helps understand the interests, attributes & needs for the populations
It ensure the programs are acceptable to clients & feasible before launching - appropriateness
Putting research outputs into practice/use
Clinical & translational research spectrum
Basic research(scientific exploration that can reveal fundamentals of biology ,disease, behavior) – it connects basic science of medicine with human medicine/for further understanding the basis of the disease/living system (T1)- clinical research (testing & refining interventions/regulatory approval) T2 – clinical implementation (adoption of intervention into routine clinical care for general population/includes implementation research) – T4 (findings help to assess the effects of current interventions & to develop new ones)
War baby – aim was to discover the most efficient usage of limited military resources by the application of quantitative technologies
In need of mutual support group for introducing OR into industry – later on it was expanded to form OR society
Centre for cellular & molecular biology
Later on they renamed into Journal of OR Society
With the objective of use of OR in national planning & survey
Which is among the first members of International federation of OR society
Collection of individuals seeking a common goal
SSM compares different stakeholder’s perspectives of a system to build up a picture of key relationships and interactions to assist understanding
SODA uses cognitive maps to aggregate and identify clusters of key issues and hierarchically organise necessary actions - Aids decision making at the strategic level
SCA allows users to define a problem area, identify and compare plausible solutions, and then select solutions based on defined criteria
Metaheuristics provide a general purpose algorithm to guide the search for good solutions that approach optimality
linear programming where the objective function and constraints all take a linear form.
Whatever entity is waiting for service & does not have to be a person
If all the server is busy upon a customers arrival they must join a queue
Single line, queues in parallel & network design
This is a good assumption when customers do not physically join a queue, as in a telephone call center, or when the physical space where customers wait is large compared to the number of customers who are usually waiting for service
In all queueing systems, the higher the average utilization level, the longer the wait times
First, as average utilization (e.g. occupancy rate) increases, average delays increase at an increasing rate
Elbow – avg. delay increases dramatically in response to even small increase in utilization
Avg. delay approaches infinity when avg utility approaches 100%
unless average utilization is strictly less than 100%, the system will be ''unstable" and the queue will continue to grow
So a clinic or physician office that specializes in e.g. vision testing or mammography, will experience shorter patient waits than a university based clinic of the same size and with the same provider utilization that treats a broad variety of illnesses and injuries.
It is an act to imitate
A simulation models seeks to ‘duplicate’ the behaviour of the system under investigation by studying the interactions among its components.
Real situation are complex - In simulation, a given system is copied and the variables and constants associated with it are manipulated in that artificial environment to examine the system behaviour
The decision to switch over from 3 sputum smear examination to two smear in diagnosing TB stemmed from laboratory register records looking for additional gains by performing third smear over 2nd. In Maldova upper critical value was 100 & Uganda it was 50
Proportion of pts in whom the medical technique yielded a definitive diagnosis out of total no of pts that have received the diagnostic procedure
Overhead costs (cover basic operating costs ranging from electricity to support staff, but are difficult to itemize directly in a research budget)
Plan of action or work plan
A comprehensive listing of all activities
Indication of date of commencement for each activity
Indication of expected date of completion of the activity
Indication of responsible person/s for each activity
Indication of important milestones for each activity
Internal audience: shareholders, staffs, researcher, funders, within the research team
External audience: Mass media partners, stakeholders, Govt. action group, General publics or communities
Bang et al. 1993-1995, Effect of Home-Based Neonatal Care and Management of Sepsis on Neonatal Mortality: Field Trial in Rural India
(NLEP) launched Leprosy Case Detection Campaign (LCDC)—an active community-based case detection campaign—in 2016 in all high burden areas to detect undiagnosed cases. Following these LCDC, a small validation exercise was conducted in 8 Primary health centres (PHCs) in Bihar State by an independent expert group, to assess the correctness of case diagnosis. It found that ~30% of the cases detected were not true cases, but false positive diagnosis.
Funded by:(SORT IT), a global partnership led by the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases at the World Health Organization (WHO/TDR). The model is based on a course developed jointly by the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union) and Mede´cins sans Frontières (MSF/Doctors Without Borders).
An umbrella organization for Operational Research societies world-wide
Represents 50 national societies including those in US, UK, France, Germany, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Philippines, India, Japan & South-Africa
ORSI Founded in 1957, The society is affiliated to the IFORS, Head quarter of ORSI is located in Kolkata at 39, Mahanirvan Road , Kolkata
The society publishes a quarterly journal OPSEARCH.
The ORSA (1952) merged with TIMS to create INFORMS (1995)
US–based organization
INFORMS started an initiative to market the Operations Research profession
This initiative has been adopted by Operational Research Society in UK
CORT established in 1991 is one of the leading research and training organization in India
Its headquarter is in Varodara, Gujarat
Broadly it covers area of health , demography and social and development issues
OR: Any research producing practically usable knowledge (evidence, findings, information’s) which can improve program implementation (effiectiveness, efficacy, quality, access, scale up, sustainability) regardless of the type of research falls within the boundaries of operations research.
TRIZ (the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) is a systematic approach for understanding and solving problems which allows clear thinking and the generation of innovative ideas. RIGHT SOLUTION AT RIGHT TIME. Right solution can not gain by wrong problem. Genrich Altshuller. TEORIYA Resheniya Izobretatelskikh Zadatch.