PSP2 presentation

1. Faculty of Health and Wellbeing - Department of Biosciences
ASSESSED WORK FEEDBACK FORM
Student Name: Ben Walker
Module Title: Professional and Scientific practice 2
Title of coursework Oral Presentation
Marker: Dr Akram Khan
MARK*:
57%
Distinction Merit Pass Fail
Delivery and Structure
(x3)
Score circled
Confidently presented, well
paced, clear audibile tone.
Introduction and description of
methods clear and well
explained, with additional
outside reading.
Sections linked together in a
logical manner,
Key findings clearly presented,
in the context of the field.
Kept to time.
Confidently presented, well
paced, audibile tone.
Introduction and description
of methods clear and
generally well explained.
Sections linked together in a
logical manner,
Key findings clearly
presented.
Kept to time.
Presentation too
fast/slow in places,
speaker could not be
heard at times.
Introduction and
description of methods
poorly explained.
Sections linked
together,
Key findings presented.
Under or over time.
Presentation too fast/slow,
speaker could not be heard.
Introduction and description
of methods not explained.
Sections unlinked,
Key findings not presented.
Significantly under or over to
time.
10, 9, 8 7, 6.5 5, 4 3, 2, 1, 0
Visual Aids
(x3)
Score circled
Clear slides, excellent use of
appropriate figures,
appropriate to presentation,
slides used effectively, very
well prepared and coherent.
Clear slides, good use of
appropriate figures,
content appropriate to
presentation, slides used
effectively, well prepared.
Over use of text on
slides, some figures
used, generally
appropriate to
presentation, well
prepared.
Unclear or cluttered slides,
over use of text,
inappropriate to
presentation, slides not
used effectively,
unprepared.
10, 9, 8 7, 6 5.5, 4 3, 2, 1, 0
Scientific Content
(x4)
Score circled
Appropriate for audience,
well researched,
contains outside reading,
clearly demonstrates
understanding of key areas,
appropriate examples to
illustrate methods/results
Appropriate for audience,
well researched,
demonstrates
understanding of key
areas, appropriate
examples to illustrate
methods / results
Generally appropriate
for audience, limited
researched, some
understanding of key
areas, limited results
shown
Inappropriate for
audience, background
area not researched, little
understanding of key
areas,
limited results shown
10, 9, 8 7, 6 5.5 , 4 3, 2, 1, 0
Suggestions for Improvement:
Give an international picture of the disease with a world map.
Put more diagrams or pictures in. Make the presentation of graphs better. Show which mathematical model is used to
plot the standard plot. Include colour in error bars and use different colours for the random graph plots. Include
literature references at the end. The conclusion needs improving e.g which methods were the best for the detection..
Student comments for Feed-forward (how will you use this feedback to improve your future work?):
I need to research more into the subject that I am presenting about.
I need to make sure that I uses more figures and tables compared to just using text.
I need to reference more from the sources that I get the information from.
SIGNATURE DATE: 05/04/2021
*Unratified mark.

2. Class CG% General Characteristics L5
FIRST
96
Exceptional knowledge and understanding of the subject and its underlying concepts; critical evaluation/synthesis/analysis and of
reading/research; evidence of breadth anddepth of reading/researchto inform development of work;exceptional demonstration of
relevant skills; excellent communication;performance in some, if not all,areas deemed beyond expectation of the level.
89
81 Excellentknowledgeofthesubject asthestudentistypicallyabletogobeyondwhathasbeentaught(particularlyforahigh1st
); evidence of
breadth of reading/researchto inform development of work;excellent demonstration of relevant skills; demonstrates strong
communication skills.
74
UPPER SECOND
68 As below but very good work characterised by evidence of wider understanding of the subject as the student is typically able to relate
facts/concepts together with some ability to apply to known/taught contexts; identification and selection of material to inform development
of work; very good demonstration of relevant skills; demonstrates good communication skills.
65
62
LOWER SECOND
57%
58 Agoodbreadth of knowledge and understanding ofthetaught content although balanced towardsthedescriptive rather than analytical; uses
set material to inform development of work; addresses all aspects of the given brief; good demonstration of relevant taught skills,
though may belimited in range; communication shows clarity but structure may lack coherence.
55
52
THIRD
48 Knowledgeandunderstandingissufficienttodealwithterminology,basicfactsandconceptsbutfailstomakemeaningfulsynthesis;relies on set
material to inform development of work; generally addresses most of the requirements of the given brief; adequate demonstration of
relevant skills over a limited range; communication/presentation is generally competent but with some weaknesses.
45
42
FAIL
35
Insufficient knowledge and understanding of the subject and its underlying concepts; some ability to evaluate given reading/research
however work is more generally descriptive; naively follows or may ignore set material in development of work; given brief may be only
tangentially addressedor mayignorekeyaspectsofthebrief;demonstration of relevant skillsoverareducedrange;communication shows
limited clarity, poor presentation, structure may not be coherent.
25
15 Highly insufficient or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of the subject; understanding of taught concepts is typically at the word
levelwithfactsbeingreproducedin adisjointedordecontextualisedmanner; ignoressetmaterialindevelopment ofwork;failsto address most
or all of the requirements of the brief; fails to demonstrate relevant skills; lacks basic communication skills.
5
ZERO 0 Work of no merit OR absent, work not submitted, penalty in some misconduct cases.