This presentation was provided by Mark Hahnel of Figshare, during the NISO event "Sustaining Openness: Ensuring the Long Term Vitality of Open Science, OER and More,” held on September 18, 2019.
Hahnel "Open Research Data has arrived - Who is going to peer review it?"
1. Open Research Data has arrived - Who is going to peer review it?
Mark Hahnel, CEO
2.
3. 1. Recommended open access to scholarly papers of publicly funded research
2. Recommended open access to all digital outputs of publicly funded research
3. Mandated open access to scholarly papers of publicly funded research
4. Mandated open access to all digital outputs of publicly funded research
5. Enforced, mandated open access to scholarly papers of publicly funded research
6. Enforced, mandated open access to all digital outputs of publicly funded research
4.
5.
6. Should funders withhold funding from (or penalise in other ways)
researchers who do not share their data if the funder has mandated
that they do so?
Should funders make the sharing of research data part of
their requirements for awarding grants?
10. Decoupling the scholarly journal
Jason Priem* and Bradley M. Hemminger
Front. Comput. Neurosci., 05 April 2012 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00019
Function of a journal
11. Decoupling the scholarly journal
Jason Priem* and Bradley M. Hemminger
Front. Comput. Neurosci., 05 April 2012 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00019
The decoupled journal
12. Decoupling the scholarly journal
Jason Priem* and Bradley M. Hemminger
Front. Comput. Neurosci., 05 April 2012 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00019
The decoupled journal
18. Decoupling the scholarly journal
Jason Priem* and Bradley M. Hemminger
Front. Comput. Neurosci., 05 April 2012 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00019
The decoupled journal
19. Decoupling the scholarly journal
Jason Priem* and Bradley M. Hemminger
Front. Comput. Neurosci., 05 April 2012 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00019
The decoupled journal