This is a joint presentation by Jeroen Bosman and Bianca Kramer, given during a joint NISO-ICSTI webinar, held on Wednesday, October 26, on Enabling Innovation in Researcher Workflow and Scholarly Communication.

1. (except logo’s)
Changing research workflows
Driving forces for openness, efficiency and reproducibility
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman
ICSTI-NISO joint webinar, October 26, 2016
@MsPhelps
@jeroenbosman

2. Simple or complicated?
A model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving
comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review,
rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments
and measurements

3. Changing research workflows

4. Changing research workflows:
company silos vs. open science
Open Science
y y y y
Elsevier
y

6. Global survey 2015-2016

7. 20,663 respondents

8. 20,663 respondents

9. Data sharing
http://101innovations.wordpress.com
Dataset Data Note ScriptsDashboard

10. Open Science Framework (OSF)

11. Open Science Framework (OSF)
6021 respondents

12. Open Science Framework (OSF)
1237 OSF users

13. Open Science Framework (OSF):
Disciplines
1237 OSF users

14. Open Science Framework (OSF):
Research roles
1237 OSF users
What is their research workflow like?

15. What tools are used preferentially with OSF?

16. What tools are used preferentially with OSF?

17. What tools are used preferentially with OSF?
Archive/share data & code

18. What tools are used preferentially with OSF?
Read / view / annotate

19. OpenVIVO

20. Researcher profiles / author identifiers
13139 of 14896 researchers answered this question

21. Researcher profiles / author identifiers
% researchers using ORCID

22. Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
• declaring competing interests
• replication & reproducibility
• meaningful assessment
• effective quality checks
• credit where it is due
• no fraud, plagiarism
• connected tools & platforms
• no publ. size restrictions
• null result publishing
• speed of publication
• (web)standards, IDs
• semantic discovery
• re-useability
• versioning
open peer review •
open (lab)notes •
plain language •
open drafting •
open access •
CC-0/BY •
good
efficient open
technical
changes &
standards
research
governance
changes
economic
& copyright
changes
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library

23. Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
good
efficient open
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library

24. Tool usage: Good-Efficient-Open

25. Inform Support Advise, advocate (Co-)shape policies
e.g.:
Info on website,
in LibGuides, etc.
Offer training, Q&A
What’s a good choice,
why, what’s important
Think with institution,
graduate schools, etc.
asks
for:
Knowledge,
organizing info
Communication skills,
expertise
Advocating priorities,
field-specific knowledge;
a vision
Authority,
role being accepted
Types / levels of research support

26. Constraining and enabling contexts
for open and ‘good’ workflows
political support at (inter)national level •
pressure from funders •
public stance on Open Science by institution •
user-friendly and powerful tools •
interoperability •
role models •
attention for positive effects •
• assessment criteria
• institutional policies/culture
• PI demands
• learning curves
• agreements with collaborators
• uncertainty over effects & legitimacy

27. “Openness and Outreach!
Together with an efficient workflow and
minimal costs for researchers.
Impact should be shared with and created by the
public. That is only possible with Open Science.”

28. http://101innovations.wordpress.com