Lima declaration white paper on sustainable urban mobility in latin america
1. Luis R. Gutiérrez
MUSAL Executive Secretary
SIBRT General Secretary
Lima Declaration
White Paper on Sustainable Urban
Mobility in Latin America
2. Claudio Orrego
Mayor of the
Metropolitan Region of
Santiago
Pro Tempore President
Presidents of MUSAL and SIBRT in Santiago
de Chile, 2014-2016
Guillermo Muñoz
Director of the
Metropolitan Public
Transport Directory
President
3. Lima, August 8 - 2014
For the first time in history, the cities of Latin America
gathered in the name of urban mobility
4. Mayor of Lima,
Susana Villarán
Mayor of Curitiba,
Gustavo Fruet
SIBRT Honorary
President,
Jaime Lerner
Head of Government of
the Federal District of
Mexico,
Miguel Ángel Mancera
Initiative Committee:Founder:
Support:
5. COMMITMENT FOR JOINT PERMANENT ACTION BY
LATIN AMERICAN CITIES TO ACHIEVE HIGH-QUALITY
URBAN MOBILITY FOR ALL
Mobilize the societies and governments of each country so that urban mobility will
be recognized as a fundamental social right of the populations that they represent,
establishing duly integrated legal, institutional, and state public policy frameworks
that satisfactorily address people’s aspirations for happy, healthy, safe and successful
lives in high-quality competitive cities.
6. Initially 16 cities signed on to the Declaration,
however, other cities also sent letters of
support.
7.
8. • LAC is 85% urbanized
• Car dependency causes approximately 7
million deaths per year (PAHO/WHO):
• 3.3 million deaths by air pollution
• 1.3 million by traffic accidents
• 2.5 million by sedentarism and chronical
diseases .
• Negative externalities of unsustainable urban
mobility could reach 10% of countries GDP.
• Social movements demanding high quality
affordable (fare=zero) transit for all
URBAN MOBILITY IS MAINLY A
PROBLEM OF PUBLIC HEALTH
9. 1.5% 1.5%
1%
1.5%
1% 1%
2.0%
9.5%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
Acccidentes Contaminacion Falta de
actividad fisica
Congestion:
tiempo perdido
Combustibles
perdidos
Infraestructura y
equipos mal
usados
Inversion y
empleo
oportunidades
perdidas
TOTAL
Negative Externalities of Unsustainable Mobility:
Cost in terms of %GDP
Health Factor Transport Factor
Economic Factor
Total lost in USD million,
9.5% of 2013 Peruvian GDP:
20,153
19. Expert Contributions
Topic 1: Urban mobility as a social right and determining
factor for quality urban life.
João Alencar Oliveira Júnior
Nick Tyler
Topic 2: Institutionality and business structuring for
future mobility.
Gloria Hutt
Carlos Cristóbal Pinto
Patricio Pérez
Topic 3: Financing of high-quality multimodal integrated
systems for all.
Gerhard Menckhoff
Mario Córdova
Topic 4: Integrated and quality urban public transport to
structure sustainable cities.
Paulo Custodio
Salvador Herrera
Juan Tapia
Topic 5: Mobility for competitive cities.
Otávio Vieira Cunha Filho
Andre Dantas
Viviana Tobón
Topic 6: Mobility as a crucial determining factor of urban
health: road safety, air quality and physical activity.
Enrique Jacoby
Eugenia Maria Rodrigues
Munkhchuluum Ulzibayar
Topic 7: Clean transport and climate change: Mitigation
and adaptation. Position regarding the Lima COP20.
Adalberto Maluf
Jon Bickel
Topic 8: Citizen participation to oversee quality of services.
Lake Sagaris
Topic 9: Necessary human resources for the new mobility.
Juan Carlos Muñoz
Brittany Montgomery
Topic 10: Innovative Technologies focusing on quality of
services for users.
Claudio Varano
Design, Coordination, Compilation, Review and Edition.
Luis Gutiérrez
André Jacobsen
20. Download the digital document:
www.musalonline.org
SPECIAL THANKS TO:
- PAHO/WHO THAT SUPPORTED THE PUBLICATION
- BRT COE THAT ACCOMPANIED ALL THE ELABORATION PROCESS
- WRI/EMBARQ THAT SUPORTED THE BEGINNINGS OF SIBRT
21. Mission
Mobilize society and constituted powers of each country
to make urban mobility be recognized as fundamental
social right of the populations they represent,
establishing legal frameworks, institutional and public
policy properly integrated , which successfully meet the
aspirations of people to have a happy, healthy, safe and
successful, competitive and high quality life in all cities.
Vision
Be the platform for governments of Latin American cities
to promote joint and continuing actions in the adoption
of public policies to achieve high quality urban mobility
for all.
Mission
Generate synergies for the promotion, consolidation
and strengthening of comprehensive integrated systems
and BRT and provide mutual cooperation and exchange
of knowledge and best practices among its members.
Support the transformation and modernization of public
transport in Latin American cities.
Vision
Serve as a strong organization, self-financing, structured
and recognized as a regional and global reference on
innovation and the development of integrated urban
transport systems.
22. SIBRT / MUSAL main projects:
1. New Quality Management Framework for Public Transport in Latin
America. Surveys, indicators, contracts and quality certification;
tools to manage quality and develop a benchmarking process and
collaboration between cities. Inspired in EN13816, IBBG, TCRP 88,
cities experiences and needs.
2. Santiago Project. Support the consolidation of Santiago’s
achievements to use as a main reference for all LAC: SIT;
Metropolitan Authority; Concession contracts based on quality
indicators; Optimization of high demand transit corridors, and
Subsidies!!!
3. Public Policies. Based on the Lima Declaration. Studies, discussions
and events focused on urban mobility as a fundamental social right,
catalyzing public policies, programs, and actions necessary for
urban mobility transformation.
23. SIBRT Advisory Committee of Experts:
Brittany Nikole
Montgomery – USA,
Expert in Planning Urban
Mobility Systems, MIT
PhD Student
Claudio Varano –
Argentine, Expert in
technological
component of urban
mobility, Consultant
Carlos Cristobal Pinto –
Spain, Former CRTM
Director of External
Affairs, Consultant
Darío Carmona – Colombia,
Expert in Public Transport
Systems, Consultant
Edgardo Mercado
Neumann – Peru,
Lawyer specialized in
PPP, Consultant
Gerhard Menckhoff –
Switzerland, Former WB,
Experto in Urban Transport,
Consultant
24. Gloria Hutt – Chile,
Former Vice Minister
of Transportation,
Consultant
João Alencar Oliveira Jr. –
Brazil, Doctor of Science
in Transport Engineering,
Attorney
Juan Tapia Grillo –
Peru, President of the
CIDATT Group, Expert
in Transport, Economist
Juan Carlos Muñoz –
Chile, PhD in
Transport, Presidente
of the BRT Center of
Excellence, Researcher
and Professor
Lake Sagaris – Canada,
Urban planer, PhD in
Planning and
Participation, Advisor
of Ciudad Viva
Luis Fernando Gomez –
Colombia,
Epidemiologist,
Researcher and professor
on urban environment
and health
25. Mario Córdova España –
Mexico, Director of the
Institute of Mobility and
Transport of Jalisco,
Professor
Mauricio Osses –
Chile, Director of
the International
Sustainable Systems
Research Center –
ISSRC, Consultant
Nick Tyler – England,
Chadwick Professor of
Civil Engineering at the
University College
London
Paulo Custodio –
Brasil, Expert in
Sustainable Transit
Solutions, Consultant
Salvador Herrera –
Mexico, Expert in
Sustainable Urbanism
and Mobility,
Consultant
Ulises Navarro –
Venezuela, PhD in civil
engineering with
specialization in
transportation, ITDP
Viviana Tobón
Jaramillo – Colombia,
Lawyer specialist in
land transport and
state responsibility
26. II MUSAL Summit
of Latin American
Leading Cities on
Sustainable Urban
Mobility
Mexico City 2015:
August 7th 2015
27. Miguel Angel Mancera
Head of Government of the
Federal District of Mexico
Initiative Committee of
MUSAL Mexico City 2015:
Fernando Haddad
Mayor of Sao Paulo
Claudio Orrego
Mayor of the Metropolitan
Region of Santiago.
President Pro Tempore of
MUSAL
28. Topic of the II MUSAL Summit:
“Integrated Transport Systems: Quality,
Health and Competitiveness”
29. Questions to elaborate on “ITS: Quality,
Health and Competitiveness”
1. Why do we need to have a vision for our city and why do we need to aim for a
high quality of life in order to frame the right Integrated Transport System?
2. How can an ITS help to improve the health, quality of life and environment in the city?
How do we quantify the lives lost and the negative impact upon health and environment by
the absence of a good ITS? How do we jointly mobilize the sectors of public health,
environment, and urban mobility in order to push forward the best solutions?
3. How can an Integrated Transport System help to improve the efficiency and
competitiveness of a city? How do we quantify losses in efficiency, productivity,
employment and opportunities for investment because of the lack of a good ITS? How do
we mobilize communities to seek urban mobility and corporate private businesses to
promote the best solutions?
4. What attributes should characterize the infrastructure, fleet and technology of an ITS
with high quality service "door to door" solutions for everyone? Are
indispensable subways and "full BRT" necessary in order to have a high quality ITS? How do
we get the highest quality subways and BRT’s to extend to the entire city through the ITS?
How do we integrate existing motorized and non-motorized systems?
30. 5. What authority is required in an urban conglomerate to efficiently and soundly
manage a successful high-quality ITS? How should a national public urban mobility system
be structured so that it allows society to have this fundamental social right?
6. What attributes should characterize operators and collecting companies of an ITS to
enable quality service? What attributes should characterize concession contracts of
operation and collection of an ITS to stimulate a virtuous shared responsibility of public
agencies and private companies? What key quality indicators should be included in
contracts? How do we focus on quality contracts that are fulfilled effectively? What are the
key factors for a successful business transition towards a good Integrated Transport System?
7. Which financial model is the most appropriate in order to ensure universal
coverage and a high-quality ITS, which is managed transparently and efficiently? How do we
estimate the costs and fares? How do we define and commit resources? How do we include
adequate funding for urban mobility in the budgetary legal framework of the country?
8. How do we reach the broadest citizen sectors so they participate actively and massively
in the definition and implementation of urban mobility as a fundamental social right? How
do we structure a powerful coalition of all stakeholders in improving public transport and of
the whole of urban mobility? What mechanisms for social participation and
oversight are conducive to ensuring the implementation an ITS, which delivers quality
services with adequate fares and access for all? What indicators the citizens have to handle
to demand quality services from providers?
31. Luis Gutierrez
MUSAL Executive Secretary
SIBRT General Secretary
Thank You!
Lima Declaration
White Paper on Sustainable Urban Mobility in
Latin America