The document discusses the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which legally guarantees 100 days of employment per year to rural households. Some key points:
- Enacted in 2005, it guarantees employment within 15 days of application, payment within 15 days, and work within 5km of residence with no gender discrimination.
- Launched in 2006, it was implemented gradually across India and strengthened social and gender equality by reserving jobs for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and 50% of jobs for women.
- The primary objective is to provide wage employment for the poorest while developing natural resources and infrastructure in rural areas through labor-intensive works.
2. INTRODUCTION
ï Enacted by legislation on August 25,2005.
ïLegal guarantee of 100 days of employment.
ïEmployment within 15 days of application.
ïPayment within 15 days.
ïWork within 5kms.
ïNo gender discrimination.
ïBasic worksite facilities.
3. HISTORY
ï§ Launched on Feb 2,2006,from Anantapur in Andhra Pradesh.
ï§Implemented in phased manner covering 200 districts, with
min.wages of Rs.60.
ï§Started with budget of 1100 cr.
ï§Strengthen the social and gender equality dimensions at 23%
workers in the scheme are SC,17% ST and 50%Women.
ï§On 7th Jan,2010 NREGA was renamed as MGNREGA.
5. OBJECTIVE
âȘ The primary objective of the Act is augmenting wage employment for the poorest of the
poor while the secondary objective is to strengthen natural resource management
through works that address causes of chronic poverty, like drought, and thus encourage
sustainable development.
âȘ The Act is an attempt to provide a legal guarantee of employment to anyone in rural areas
willing to do casual manual labour at a statutory minimum wage.
âȘ Strengthening grass route processes of democracy infusing transparency and
accountability in governance.
âȘ Guaranteed demand based funding from central budget.
âȘ To reduce rural urban migration.
7. Costing Indiaâs flagship program
MGNREGA started with an initial outlay of Rs.11300 cr. in year 2006-07.The
funding has considerably been increased as shown below -
8.
9.
10. Issues of MGNREGA
ïLack of initiative on part of sarpanch andTDOâs.
ïLack of awareness at theTaluka and village level despite intensive IES
activities.
ïBPL families were given preference to others.
ïThere are also statements of fake workers and job cards by damaged
authorities resulting in so-called leak in system investing.
ïAn evaluation released by Indian in Sept 2011 confessed that the lack of
experienced specialists at almost every site under MGNREGA system,
along with guidelines prohibiting the use of equipment or companies
(labour is usually by shovel).
ïLack of context specific project and convergence.
ïMGNREGA implementation is still driven by the supply of work made
available, not the demand for it.
11. HOW SUCCESSFUL ?
Year Work completion rate (%)
2006-07 46.34
2007-08 45.99
2008-09 43.76
2009-10 48.94
2010-11 50.86
2011-12 20.25
2012-13 15.02
Total 33.22
12. ïŒLarge scale distress migration of farmers and people from rural areas
has shown a declining trend.
ïŒAgricultural cover in some states has increased.
ïŒWomen have accounted for 47% of the total person days generated,
well above the mandatory 33% as required by theAct.
ïŒAverage wage per person-day has gone up by 81% since the Schemeâs
inception.
ïŒWages used In daily consumption (94.14%)
ïŒFreedom to women (financially)
ïŒDebt repayment.