Presentation also includes justification, characteristics and related concepts of collaborative design processes. Leansite co-founder Ergo Pikas is one of the authors of the article “Collaborative Design – Justification, Characteristics and Related Concepts.”
1. COLLABORATION IN DESIGN –
JUSTIFICATION, CHARACTERISTICS
AND RELATED CONCEPTS
Ergo Pikas
Pikas, E., Koskela, L., Treldal, N., Ballard, G., and Liias, R. (2016). “Collaborative Design – Justification, Characteristics
and Related Concepts.” Proc. 24th Ann. Conf. of the Int’l. Group for Lean Construction, (IGLC 24), Boston, USA.
2. Introduction
• Within the last twenty and more years, the lack of
communication and collaboration have been considered as a
common issue for underperforming construction industry
(Latham 1994)
• For overcoming these barriers, collaboration has been
instantiated in different forms within the three domains of
projects’ (Thomsen et al. 2009): commercial terms, organization
and operating/production system.
• The purpose of this article is to understand the academic
landscape on collaboration in design, its characteristics and
related concepts for promoting collaboration within in the
project based production systems.
18.08.2016 2
3. Research questions
• We aim to answer to the following three questions:
– How to define collaboration in design and why individuals
need to collaborate during design?
– What characterizes effective collaboration in design?
– Which concepts support the development of collaboration in
design?
18.08.2016 2
4. Different views of Design
Collaboration
• There are two competing views of collaborative design:
communication theory (Carlile 2004, Kvan 2000) and constructivist
approach (Bucciarelli 2003):
1. Communication theory: A field of information theory and
mathematics, focused on the efficiency of exchanging
information and meaning between two points (dispersed
locations, individuals or groups of individuals)
2. Constructivist approach: Acknowledges design collaboration a
as a social process, where design is a dynamic intersection of
social and cultural views for developing a common meaning
and interests
18.08.2016 3
5. Definition: Collaboration in Design
• Collaborative design is the process through which actors from
different disciplines share their knowledge about the design process
and the design itself. This creates shared understanding related to
both process and artefact, helps integrate their knowledge, and
helps them focus on bigger common objectives––the final product
to be designed (Andreasen et al. 2015).
• Three building blocks of collaboration:
– Knowledge creation and integration between disciplines;
– Communication;
– The creation of a shared understanding.
18.08.2016 4
(Kleinsmann 2006)
6. Why Collaboration – dependencies
• The need to collaborate has been caused by the division of master
builder into distinct functional disciplines (Pikas et al. 2015),
operating within their own object world (Bucciarelli 2003).
• In design and engineering, disciplines must work together for
following three reasons (Koskela 2016):
– Needs arising from demanding requirements (purpose/goal of
the artefact, when prior solutions do not suffice);
– Needs arising from the design process (timely delivery of each
task outputs); and
– Needs arising from the product being designed (parts must fit
mutually, artefact behavioral performance has to be achieved
through network of connected parts).
18.08.2016 5
7. Collaboration requires boundary
crossing and bridging
• Two types of boundaries
– Material: caused by the arrangement of individuals into
organizations, disciplines, tasks and physical locations;
– Knowledge boundaries: syntactic (common vocabulary),
semantic (common meaning) and paradigmatic (common goals
and interests) differences in sociocultural worlds.
• These two do not exist separately but are entangled into the
interaction of individuals working together:
– An example from design could be an architect and engineer
from two separate organizations working together on a
common project, with shared interests, aiming to achieve
common goals.
18.08.2016 6
9. Lean Boundary Bridging and Crossing
Practices
18.08.2016 8
Methodologies Contractual and
organizational
Co-Location;
Joint-design sessions
Collaborative planning Prototyping
Technology (Building Information
Modelling, Communication)
10. Conclusion
• Many partially or fully overlapping concepts of collaboration and
design collaboration have been proposed.
• Collaboration requires the management of material and knowledge
boundaries, in order to develop common goals, processes and
product.
– Bridging the material boundaries: Boundary bridging roles,
standardized methods, organizational structures and commercial
terms.
– Crossing the knowledge boundaries: collective learning by means
of debating, negotiating and combining of different perspectives
and conceptualizations and boundary objects.
• In lean construction many concepts, methods and tools have been
developed to promote collaboration within the design and
construction process.
18.08.2016 9
11. Leansite: Solution for construction
management and team collaboration
• In order to improve team collaboration and reduce ineffencies in
construction, we created Leansite: a cloud-based application for
construction management and team collaboration
• When developing Leansite, many of the Lean Construction
principles have been taken into account:
– Focus on the process as a whole, instead of optimizing each
individual work package and task separately
– Kanban based operations management, enabling the
transparency and better communication of production process
and progress
– Contextualized communication for enabling better
collaboration
18.08.2016 9
Thus the goal of collaboration is knowledge creation and integration. This can be hampered by actors from different disciplines being unable to understand each other.
Kleinsmann’s studies have shown that collaboration is most difficult during the conceptual stage, especially with respect to shared understanding. The barriers and misunderstandings at this stage are not immediately obvious but grow through the project to cause serious issues in later stages.