The document discusses enabling best practices for accounts payable automation. It begins with an agenda for the event covering various topics around AP automation. It then discusses challenges with current manual AP processes including time spent on physical filing, data entry, long processing times and lack of visibility. It promotes the benefits of AP automation in reducing costs, errors and bringing more control and visibility to the process. Key capabilities needed for effective AP automation are identified as multi-channel invoice capture, best practice workflows, system integration, analytics and mobility. The document advocates applying best practices to streamline the AP process.
2. 2
Agenda
Introduction
Enabling Best Practice for AP Automation, Howard Boretsky, Managing
Director, Xcellerate IT
Kofax TotalAgility - Smart Process Application Platform, Franck Letessier,
Senior Engineer, Kofax Australia
The Benefits of AP Automation, Michael Lapolla, Associate Director,
Strategic Financial Solutions, Victoria University
Lunch
Driving Efficiency and Change in the Workplace, Helena O’Loughlin,
Financial Controller, Sims Metal Management.
Questions and Wrap Up – Lucky Door Prize
6. Physical filing and retrieval of paper is time consuming
Manual data entry is time consuming
Processing times are too long
Non AP workers heavily involved in the AP Process
Manual interpretations and errors
Requisitions occur after the event
Receipting occurs after the event
No tracking or visibility
Manual reporting
Current process will not scale with growth
No time to work on the business
Attention is on every document processed not just the exceptions
Common Challenges
6
Performance Impact of Current Practice
Excessive, Costly Manual Paper Handling
High Error Rates in Extraction of Key Invoice Data
Lost and Duplicate Invoice Issues
Hazy Visibility of AP Status
Workflows Fail to Manage Exceptions
Weak Internal Controls
Ineffective Integration to ERP and LOB Systems
8. Invoice Processing – how good is current practice?
Best-in-Class (20%)
Industry Average (50%)
Laggards (30%)
Cost & time to
process one invoice
$38.77 20.8 days
$15.61 9.7 days
$3.09 3.8 days
Monthly
cost
$77,540
$31,220
$6,180
Invoices
processed monthly
2,000
2,000
2,000
7
9. “Systems of Record”
are enterprise applications
designed for internal use
ECM
BPM
CRM
ERP
9
Connecting Customers with Your Processes
Kofax provides an essential
connection to
“Systems of Engagement”
generate real time,
information intensive
communications
Transform &
Simplify the
Business Critical
“First Mile”
of Supplier
Interactions
Resulting in an
Optimized Customer
Experience &
Greatly Reduce
Operating Costs
11. 11
5 Critical Capabilities for Accounts Payable Automation
1. Multichannel Invoice Capture and Extraction
2. Best Practice AP Workflow – Productive, Controlled, Adaptable
3. Effective ERP Integration
4. Analytics
5. Mobility
11
12. Capture of invoice
Paper, email, XML, EDI, mobile, any channel
High-quality digital image
Available in workflows
Extraction of invoice information
PO and non-PO
Intelligent invoice recognition and online learning
Supplier and header
Line items and amounts
11
Multichannel Invoice Capture and Extraction
13. Best Practice Workflow: Productive, Auditable, Adaptable
Productive
Standardised, repeatable process
Low level of human touch
Efficient human touch, if needed
Auditable
Audit trail of every action
Documented AP processes
Adaptable
Easy to assign/re-assign work, escalate, etc.
Fast to expedite for discount capture, discrepancy resolution
13
14. 14
Effective System Integration
Close integration of invoice images and
information with workflow
Flexible exchange of AP information with ERP
and LOB systems
Multiple ERP and LOB integrations
ECM
BPM
CRM
ERP
15. 15
End to End Analytics – Business Intelligence
Historical – What happened and why?
Data from invoices that have already been
paid and related processes
Actionable – What’s happening now?
Real-time or near-real-time data on invoices
currently in workflow
Enable intervention to change course of
processing
Predictive – All data analyzed to provide
visibility into future
Determine next actions based on historical
trends, current process states, resource
availability, etc.
16. 16
Mobile Capture & Mobile Work
Capture any
document in any
format from any
device at any
location.
• Driver License
• Invoice
• Purchase contract
• W-2
• Tax form
• Paystub
• ID card
• Social Security card
• Lease agreement
Work anywhere,
anytime, any
device.
• Approval
• Escalation
• Confirmation
• Resolution
• Comment
• Prioritize
• Query
• Review
17. Enabling Best Practice
Centralised processing of all invoices the day it arrives
Disciplined culture of accurate PO creation
Educate users on goods receipting
Automate Invoice matching – Three way match
Streamline exception processing - STP
Simplify approval hierarchy
Adjust business processes to give approvals priority
Educate suppliers on Invoice structure requirements
17
18. 18
The value to your business…
Role Benefit
AP Staff/Manager
Improvements in operational efficiency and staff
productivity
Procurement
Improvements in spend analysis, better vendor
relationships
Central Finance
Cost Savings, improvement management of
cash flow and working capital
CFO
Confidence in effectiveness of internal controls
for ATO compliance
Business Operations
Focus on business operations rather than
invoice processing
22. Who is Victoria University ?
Dual sector University- HE & TAFE
Federal, State Government funding & full fee revenue
$450m Business
47,000 Students (our customers), including around 15,000 International
Students (onshore and offshore)
2,000 Employees
$1b in total assets
23. 11 campuses –CBD and western
corridor of Melbourne.
Who is Victoria University ?
24. Our Financials - Users
680 users of TechnologyOne
Financials
Moved from 60,000 Invoices to
30,000
Over a 5 year period, 2007-
2012
90% Invoices received electronically
25. Accounts Payable – The Past
60,000 invoices pa
Under utilised Technology-automation & integration
Manual processes
Unclear end to end business rules - not looking at
the whole procure to pay cycle
Time and effort to process financial information
Lacking visibility of financial information
26. The Shift – plan, plan & more planning
Over arching plan encompassing Procurement, AP & Credit
Card
Procure to Pay Cycle Approach
Invoice OCR/Scanning
27. The Shift – Planning, Planning & More planning
Business Case-In house vs. Outsourcing
Finance System- TechnologyOne Financials
The Xcellerate IT OCR solution chosen
Planning, development, testing and implementing cycle - 29 days
Go Live date-1 October 2007
Overall a very smooth transition
28. Data Capture Benefits - OCR
Speed
Accuracy
Minimisation of manual key
strokes
Streamlining and re-engineering
processes
“Real Time” integration between
the OCR & Finance System
29. The Goals - Challenges
To rationalize accounts payable processes and
achieve cost savings:
Reduce required man hours to process invoices
Refocus roles concentrating on compliance (6
AP Staff)
Improve efficiency:
Reduce time to respond to queries
Reduce archiving time
Reduce time spent on manual data entry
Provide a platform for further development
for:
Workflow (authorization process)
Enhanced displays and data entry screens
Storage reduction both off-site & on-site
31. A.P.Officer
A.P.Team Leader
Receive &
sort mail
Sort invoices
into Scan
batch types
Document to
be scanned?
Scan
invoices
Validate
invoice
Validation
Correct?
Create batch
importfile for
Finance 1
Manually
correctfields
Uploadfile into
Finance One
Matchinvoice
Invoice
needs
matching?
Is data
acceptable?
Correctthe
problem
PosttoLedger
Return to
originator for
correction
end
P.O.
Matches?
Perform drawdown
& generate back
order
Multiple
Allocation?
Perform CostCentre
dissection&
generate back order
Check
completeness
of the
documents
Documents
OK?
Overseas
Purchases
Processing
Contact
originator and
rectify
Return
un-scannable
invoice to
originator
Localor
Overseas
purchase?
Keyinto
Finance One
Paymentfor Goods
or Services
Return to
originator for
amendment
end
What Type of
Invoice?
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
Technology
One
(financials&
w/flow)
Xcellerate
(OCR)
Systems Legend
NAB
OnLine
File
unscanned
invoices
Yes
[98%]
Yes
[98%] Yes
[70%]
Yes
[70%]
No -
data error
[27%]
No -
data error
[27%]
Yes
[99%]
Yes
[99%]
Yes (P.O.)
[85%]
Yes (P.O.)
[85%]
No
[1%]
No
[1%]
No (non-P.O.)
[15%]
No (non-P.O.)
[15%]
No -
P.O. Error
[3%]
No -
P.O. Error
[3%]
Yes
[60%]
Yes
[60%]
No -
Invoice LESS
than P.O.
[39.8%]
No -
Invoice LESS
than P.O.
[39.8%]
No
[99%]
No
[99%]
Yes
[1%]
Yes
[1%]
No
[2%]
No
[2%]
No -
Missing
Documents
[5%]
No -
Missing
Documents
[5%]
No -
Invoice
Error
[5%]
No -
Invoice
Error
[5%]
Yes
[90%]
Yes
[90%]
Overseas
10%
Overseas
10%
Local
[90%]
Local
[90%]
No-
Invoice
GREATER
than P.O.
[0.2%]
No-
Invoice
GREATER
than P.O.
[0.2%]
Paper
document
[99.5%]
Paper
document
[99.5%]
Electronic
Consolidated
Invoice
[0.5%]
Electronic
Consolidated
Invoice
[0.5%]
Purchases Process Map
Data Capture (OCR) Stage 1 Manual Scanning
32. Stage 2 Roll out
From manual scanning of Invoices to automated process
Xcellerate IT on-line validation of Invoice data
Validation of key Tech One data including:
Supplier Number, Name, Address, Account Code, User Dept., Assigned User &
Invoice duplication
Automatic export to TechnologyOne Financials of Invoices
Drilldown facility within GL or AP transaction enquiry to view invoice image
Push invoices from TechnologyOne Financials to users for approval or goods received.
Advanced workflow rules developed adhering to policies and procedures
Purchase Order vs non-Purchase Order invoice rules applied
33. Partnered with Technology One to
build, automate and improve
processes. These included:
Auto Invoice matching-90%
Invoice workflow across the
University
Visibility of tracking invoices
Enhance Process Transparency
Invoice reduction from 60,000 to
30,000 through supplier & invoice
consolidation.
June 2010 rollout of Xcellerate IT
Email Xtractor utility
Automatic scan of PDF invoice
email attachments from nominated
mailbox
Further AP invoice reduction by
shifting <$1,000 AP invoice into credit
card
Stage 2 Roll out
34. Purchases Process Map Data Capture (OCR) Stage 2
A.P. Officer
A.P. Team Leader
Originator
Unit of Measure = Invoices >$500
(all less than this MUST be processed
via ICMS Credit Card PMT/Recon process)
Receive &
sort mail
Sort invoices
into Scan
batch types
Document to
be scanned?
Scan
invoices
Validate
invoice
Validation
Correct?
Create batch
import file for
Finance One
Manually
correct fields
Upload file into
Finance One
Invoice
needs
matching?
Is data
acceptable?
Correct the
problem
Post to Ledger
end
P.O.
Matches?
Perform drawdown
& generate back
order
Multiple
Allocation?
Perform Cost Centre
dissection &
generate back order
Check
completeness
of the
documents
Documents
OK?
Overseas
Purchases
Processing
Contact
originator and
rectify
Return
un-scannable
invoice to
originator
Local or
Overseas
purchase?
Key into
Finance 1
TO BEPayment
for Goods or Services
What Type of
Invoice?
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
Technology
One
(financials &
w/flow)
Xcellerate
(OCR)
Systems Legend
NAB
OnLine
Originator
recodes P.O.
Automatch the
Invoice and
the P.O.
Request
originator
confirmation
Originator
confirm goods
received
Send workflow
advice to
originator
What to do?
Send workflow
alert to Finance
Delete Invoice
Invoice Less
or Greater
than PO?
Amend PO and
match to
Invoice
end
Send workflow
advice to
originator
File
unscanned
invoices
Amend minor
P.O. Error
Send workflow
advice to
originator
Accept & Code
the Invoice
Yes
[98%]
Yes
[98%]
Yes
[92%]
Yes
[92%]
No -
data error
[5%]
No -
data error
[5%]
Yes
[99%]
Yes
[99%]
No
[1%]
No
[1%]
No
[99%]
No
[99%]
Yes
[1%]
Yes
[1%]
No
[2%]
No
[2%]
No -
Missing
Documents
[5%]
No -
Missing
Documents
[5%]
No - Invoice
Error
[5%]
No - Invoice
Error
[5%]
Yes
[90%]
Yes
[90%]
Overseas
10%
Overseas
10%
Local
[90%]
Local
[90%]
Paper
document
[99.5%]
Paper
document
[99.5%]
Electronic
Consolidated
Invoice
[0.5%]
Electronic
Consolidated
Invoice
[0.5%]
Yes (P.O)
[85%]
Yes (P.O)
[85%]
Yes
[60%]
Yes
[60%]
Reject
Invoice
[2%]
Reject
Invoice
[2%]
Accept -
PO Exists
[83%]
Accept -
PO Exists
[83%]
Invoice LESS
than P.O.
[39.8%]
Invoice LESS
than P.O.
[39.8%]
Invoice
GREATER
than P.O.
[0.2%]
Invoice
GREATER
than P.O.
[0.2%]
No
[40%]
No
[40%]
Invoice
Matches
P.O.
[60%]
Invoice
Matches
P.O.
[60%]
No - Major
PO Error
[1%]
No - Major
PO Error
[1%]
No -
Minor PO
Error
[2%]
No -
Minor PO
Error
[2%]
No PO
[15%]
No PO
[15%]
Accept -
Need Coding
[15%]
Accept -
Need Coding
[15%]
35. Scan
Extract Validate
Release to
Workflow
via
Finance
System
Instant electronic
delivery (2-3 sec)
e-Transactions
Receiver
e-Transactions
Sender
Supplier A
Supplier B
Postal service
(2-3 days)
Finance
System
Finance
System
PDF or TIFF
Print
Post
Open and prep
pre-match
invoices
against PO
information
Hybrid Paper/Electronic System
36. • Control Paper Flow
• Reduce Manual Labour
• Integrate Electronic Invoices
• Enhance Process
Transparency
• Improve Data Quality + Workflow
=
Automate the
whole process
& deliver value
at every step!
Solution to Automate Accounts Payable
37. 37
Enhance Process Transparency
Send receipt confirmations
Trigger exception notifications
• Enhance Process Transparency
The objective is to ‘reduce inbound calls’ to AP
38. Return on Investment (ROI)
Reduction in Manual data entry- 80%
Better control over invoices – efficient process
Reduced processing times
Compliance to audit & risk governance
On time payments
Visibility of invoices
38
39. Accounts Payable Dashboard
Background
The Accounts Payable processes had numerous issues despite having a fairly mature level of
automation that included OCR and workflows. By identifying and measuring the right KPIs across the
end-to-end process, the AP team was able to identify areas of improvement.
Deliverables
The timely implementation of the AP dashboard enabled measurement a shortlist of KPIs against
targets for improvement.
The dashboard is highly visual and has improved transparency around AP performance.
The dashboard measures financial and non-financial aspects.
Expect that this will be a key tool to drive ongoing improvements at AP
39
41. 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Jan-11
Feb-11
Mar-11
Apr-11
May-11
Jun-11
Jul-11
Aug-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Nov-11
Dec-11
% invoices with PO
Target 90%
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Average months of credit cards not
aquitted
Target: 1 month
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Jan-11
Feb-11
Mar-11
Apr-11
May-11
Jun-11
Jul-11
Aug-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Nov-11
Dec-11
urgent
Scheduled
No of payment runs per month
Target: <3
urgent pm
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
20.0 Days to approve
invoices
Target:
2 days
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
May
June
July
Aug
Target
POs raised after invoice date
May
June
July
Aug
Target
Extent of early
payments (Target 0%)
Q1 Q2 Q3L Q4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
May June July Aug Target
Credit cards spend <$500
value
%
Days
Weighted average
payable days
0.0
10.4
20.8 31.2
41.6
52.0
Target:
45
days
Dashboard - Reports
42. Further OCR enhancements with
XcellerateIT
Enterprise Mobility
Mobile image capturing
Where to Next ?
42
Contact details:
Michael Lapolla
Associate Director – Strategic Financial Solutions
Michael.Lapolla@vu.edu.au
43. 43
AP Automation Case Study
Driving Efficiency and Change within the Workplace
Helena O’Loughlin
Financial Controller
Sims Metal Management