Draft presentation for DEFRA seminar 1 July 2011

1. Designing more effective participatory decision-making processes What makes stakeholder participation in environmental management work? nvolved

2. Participation: frustrating... ... yet alluring

3. Barriers to participation Increasingly tractable

4. Barriers to participation Increasingly tractable

5. Overcoming barriers Deeper issues may take generations to change But most of these are tractable issues Practical – we can make time/money and good practice skills available Stakeholder scepticism: replacing bad with good practice, negative with positive experiences Decision-maker scepticism: good practice can set boundaries (avoid raising false expectations via participation if no alternatives) and minimise bias The key: identifying, spreading and facilitating good practice

6. How can we design participatory processes that effectively engage stakeholders in policy decisions? How can we harness participation to achieve social and environmental benefits, but avoid the pitfalls?

7. Plan Context: the Ecosystems Approach, big society & the Natural Environment White Paper What can the literature tell us? Preliminary findings from ongoing research

8. 1. Context

9. Ecosystem Approach A strategy for integrated management of land, water & living resources that promotes cons-ervation & sustainable use in an equitable way Emphasises Decentralising environmental management Inclusive stakeholder participation Capturing/valuing local knowledge Learning by doing (“adaptive management”)

10. Ecosystem Approach Much in common with localism & “big society” Echoed in Natural Environment White Paper Local Nature Partnerships & Natural Value Ambassadors Public-private partnerships to establish Nature Improvement Areas & Payments for Nature’s Services

11. Ecosystem Approach To apply the Ecosystem Approach in real-life decision-making, we need to know what works best when working with stakeholders How can we effectively adapt our practice to different contexts and purposes? What do we know are the key elements of a successful participatory process, regardless of context?

12. 2. What can the literature tell us?

13. 1. Start talking to people as soon as you can From concept to completion Early involvement leads to higher quality and more durable decisions Avoid raising false expectations: make sure there’s something to negotiate

16. Identify goals with stakeholders

17. Be prepared to negotiate and compromise

18. Partnerships, ownership and active engagement in the process is more likely3. Make sure you know what people want to talk about

20. Manage power4. Be flexible: base level of participation & methods on your context & objectives

22. Don’t underestimate the power of investing in a good facilitator to bring people together and deliver high quality outcomes5. Get a facilitator

25. Four ongoing paired projects Environmental Consequences of Participatory Governance (ECOPAG): a comparative meta-analysis of 300 OECD case studies in environmental decision-making (Jens Newig) Involved: in-depth interviews with those who led and participated in environmental management projects/programmes in Spain & Portugal

26. Four ongoing paired projects Sustainable Uplands and Ecocycles: interviews & Social Network Analysis of knowledge exchange processes across UK uplands & catchment management projects

27. One Goal To help people design participatory and knowledge exchange processes that are more likely to deliver the outcomes people want, by understanding why different approaches work in different contexts

28. Questions (1) Does participatory environmental governance – as opposed to more hierarchical, top-down approaches: Improve the quality of decisions or policies, facilitate their implementation and thus achieve environmental goals more swiftly and effectively? Benefit participants in other ways linked to the process e.g. learning, trust etc., and achieve their stated goals (whether related to the environment or not)?

29. Questions (2) Which contextual factors and which modes of participation affect the outcomes of participatory processes? More broadly, what are the barriers and factors that facilitate knowledge exchange (whether via participation or not)? How is knowledge transformed as it travels through peer-to-peer networks? What gets into policy and practice, and why?

30. Emerging lessons Low participation create simple solutions: easily implemented and accepted but perhaps ineffective High levels of participation may lead to deeper understanding, learning and more complex solutions: more effective but harder to apply Policy makers with actual decision-making power, need to be in the process for short-termimpact Can create power imbalance that limits active participation & generation of new ideas, but if not part of process, implementation less likely

31. Emerging lessons With participation of land managers: Outcomes may be more economically/practically feasible More social benefits (learning, trust etc.) Outcomes more likely to be implemented in longer term To get their participation, process needs to come to them and communication tailored appropriately No quantitative evidence from first 47 ECOPAG cases that participation leads to more beneficial environmental outcomes Group composition strongly influences outcome, so initial stakeholder analysis is important to get right

32. Conclusion Good practice is emerging and the evidence base is growing Need to continue sharing our experience and learning from each other Key lessons in your handout