SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 114
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Figure 24.2 (b) Cladogenesis (a) Anagenesis
The Biological Species Concept ,[object Object],[object Object]
Similarity between different species.  The eastern  meadowlark ( Sturnella magna,  left) and the western  meadowlark ( Sturnella neglecta,  right) have similar  body shapes and colorations. Nevertheless, they are  distinct biological species because their songs and other  behaviors are different enough to prevent interbreeding  should they meet in the wild. (a) Diversity within a species.  As diverse as we may be  in appearance, all humans belong to a single biological  species ( Homo sapiens ), defined by our capacity  to interbreed. (b) Figure 24.3 A, B
Reproductive Isolation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],Figure 24.4 Prezygotic barriers impede mating or hinder fertilization if mating does occur Individuals of different species  Mating attempt Habitat  isolation Temporal  isolation Behavioral  isolation Mechanical  isolation HABITAT ISOLATION TEMPORAL ISOLATION BEHAVIORAL ISOLATION MECHANICAL ISOLATION (b) (a) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)
Viable fertile offspring Reduce hybrid viability Reduce hybrid fertility Hybrid breakdown Fertilization Gametic isolation GAMETIC ISOLATION REDUCED HYBRID  VIABILITY REDUCED HYBRID FERTILITY HYBRID BREAKDOWN (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m)
Limitations of the Biological Species Concept ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Other Definitions of Species ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Species Vs. Biblical Kinds  ,[object Object],The study of the Biblical Kinds is called Baraminology (Bara=create  min=kind).  The Biblical Kind is most commonly identified as the Order of Family level of modern classification.  God has set reproductive constraints on organisms in two separate Biblical Kinds. Read article about Baranomes
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],(a)   Allopatric speciation.  A  population forms a new  species while geographically  isolated from its parent  population. (b)   Sympatric speciation.  A small population becomes a new species without geographic separation. Figure 24.5 A, B
Allopatric (“Other Country”) Speciation ,[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 24.6 A. harrisi A. leucurus
Sympatric (“Same Country”) Speciation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Allopatric and Sympatric Speciation: A Summary ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Polyploidy ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 24.8 2 n  = 6 4 n  = 12 2 n 4 n Failure of cell division in a cell of a growing  diploid plant after chromosome duplication gives rise to a tetraploid branch or other tissue. Gametes produced  by flowers on this  branch will be diploid. Offspring with tetraploid  karyotypes may be viable  and fertile—a new  biological species.
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 24.9 Meiotic error; chromosome number not reduced from 2 n  to  n Unreduced gamete with 4 chromosomes Hybrid with 7 chromosomes Unreduced gamete with 7 chromosomes Viable fertile hybrid (allopolyploid) Normal gamete n  = 3  Normal gamete n  = 3  Species A  2 n  = 4 Species B  2 n  = 6 2 n  = 10
Adaptive Radiation ,[object Object],[object Object],Figure 24.11
Studying the Genetics of Speciation ,[object Object],[object Object]
The Tempo of Speciation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 24.13 Gradualism model.  Species  descended from a common  ancestor gradually diverge  more and more in their  morphology as they acquire  unique adaptations. Time (a) Punctuated equilibrium  model.  A new species  changes most as it buds  from a parent species and  then changes little for the  rest of its existence. (b)
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],“ To suppose that the eye, (with so many parts all working together)…could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.”  Charles Darwin Figure 24.14 A–E Pigmented cells (photoreceptors) Epithelium Nerve fibers Pigmented cells Nerve fibers Patch of pigmented cells. The limpet  Patella  has a simple patch of photoreceptors. Eyecup.  The slit shell mollusc  Pleurotomaria has an eyecup. Fluid-filled cavity Epithelium Cellular fluid (lens) Cornea Optic nerve Pigmented layer (retina) Optic nerve Pinhole camera-type eye. The  Nautilus  eye functions like a pinhole camera (an early type of camera lacking a lens). Cornea Lens Retina Optic nerve Complex camera-type eye.  The squid  Loligo  has a complex eye whose features (cornea, lens, and retina), though similar to  those of vertebrate eyes, evolved independently. (a) (b) (d) (c) (e) Eye with primitive lens.  The marine snail Murex has  a primitive lens consisting of a mass of  crystal-like cells. The cornea is a  transparent region of epithelium  (outer skin) that protects the eye and helps focus light.
Evolution of the Genes That Control Development ,[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Figure 24.15 A Newborn  2  5  15  Adult (a) Differential growth rates in a human.  The arms and legs  lengthen more during growth than the head and trunk, as    can be seen in this conceptualization of an individual at    different ages all rescaled to the same height. Age (years)
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Figure 24.17
Changes in Spatial Pattern ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Chicken leg bud Region of Hox  gene expression Zebrafish fin bud Figure 24.18
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 24.19 The vertebrate  Hox  complex contains duplicates of many of the same genes as the single invertebrate cluster, in virtually the same linear order on chromosomes, and they direct the  sequential development of the same body regions. Thus,  scientists infer that the four clusters of the vertebrate  Hox   complex are homologous to the single cluster in invertebrates. 5 First  Hox   duplication Second  Hox   duplication Vertebrates (with jaws) with four  Hox  clusters Hypothetical early vertebrates (jawless) with two  Hox  clusters Hypothetical vertebrate ancestor (invertebrate) with a single  Hox  cluster Most invertebrates have one cluster of homeotic  genes (the  Hox  complex), shown here as colored bands on a chromosome.  Hox  genes direct  development of major body parts. 1 A mutation (duplication) of the single  Hox  complex  occurred about 520 million years ago and may  have provided genetic material associated with the  origin of the first vertebrates. 2 In an early vertebrate, the duplicate set of  genes took on entirely new roles, such as  directing the development of a backbone.  3 A second duplication of the  Hox  complex,  yielding the four clusters found in most present-day  vertebrates, occurred  later, about 425 million years ago.  This duplication, probably the result of a polyploidy event,  allowed the development of even greater structural complexity, such as jaws and limbs. 4
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.1
Evolution Is Not Goal Oriented ,[object Object],[object Object],Figure 24.20 Recent (11,500 ya) Pleistocene (1.8 mya) Pliocene (5.3 mya) Miocene (23 mya) Oligocene (33.9 mya) Eocene (55.8 mya) Equus Hippidion  and other genera Nannippus Pliohippus Neohipparion Hipparion Sinohippus Megahippus Callippus Archaeohippus Merychippus Parahippus Hypohippus Anchitherium Miohippus Mesohippus Epihippus Orohippus Paleotherium Propalaeotherium Pachynolophus Grazers Browsers Key Hyracotherium
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
*Morphology or physical structures play an important role in evolutionary relationships (i.e. Organisms that have the same types of structures must have been related in the past. This is considered Divergent Evolution) Question:  Are these skulls from organisms in the same species?
Morphologies are deceiving! YES!  They are in the same species. They are both domestic dogs . -> ->
The Fossil Record ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.3 1   Rivers carry sediment to the  ocean. Sedimentary rock layers  containing fossils form on the  ocean floor. 2   Over time, new strata are  deposited, containing fossils  from each time period. 3   As sea levels change and the seafloor  is pushed upward, sedimentary rocks are  exposed. Erosion reveals strata and fossils. Younger stratum  with more recent  fossils Older stratum  with older fossils
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.4a–g (a)  Dinosaur bones being excavated  from sandstone (g)  Tusks of a 23,000-year-old mammoth,  frozen whole in Siberian ice (e)  Boy standing in a 150-million-year-old  dinosaur track in Colorado (d)  Casts of ammonites,  about 375 million  years old (f)   Insects  preserved  whole in  amber (b)  Petrified tree in Arizona, about  190 million years old (c)  Leaf fossil, about 40 million years old
Morphological and Molecular Homologies ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Sorting Homology from Analogy ,[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.5
Evaluating Molecular Homologies ,[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.6 C  C  A  T  C  A  G  A  G  T  C  C  C  C  A  T  C  A  G  A  G  T  C  C  C  C  A  T  C  A  G  A  G  T  C  C  C  C  A  T  C  A  G  A  G  T  C  C  G  T  A Deletion Insertion C  C  A  T  C  A  A  G  T  C  C  C  C  A  T  G  T  A  C  A  G  A  G  T  C  C  C  C  A  T  C  A  A  G  T  C  C  C  C  A  T  G  T  A  C  A  G  A  G  T  C  C  1 Ancestral homologous  DNA segments are  identical as species 1  and species 2 begin to  diverge from their  common ancestor. 2 Deletion and insertion  mutations shift what  had been matching  sequences in the two  species. 3 Homologous regions  (yellow) do not all align  because of these mutations. 4 Homologous regions  realign after a computer  program adds gaps in  sequence 1. 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 A  C  G  G  A  T  A  G  T  C  C  A  C  T  A  G  G  C  A  C  T  A T  C  A  C  C  G  A  C  A  G  G  T  C  T  T  T  G  A  C  T  A  G Figure 25.7
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Binomial Nomenclature ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Hierarchical Classification ,[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.8 Panthera pardus Panthera Felidae Carnivora Mammalia Chordata Animalia Eukarya Domain Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species
Linking Classification and Phylogeny ,[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.9 The Biblical Kind is found most often at the Family level Panthera  pardus (leopard) Mephitis  mephitis  (striped skunk) Lutra lutra  (European  otter) Canis  familiaris  (domestic dog) Canis lupus  (wolf) Panthera Mephitis Lutra Canis Felidae Mustelidae Canidae Carnivora Order Family Genus Species
[object Object],[object Object],Leopard Domestic cat Common ancestor
[object Object],[object Object],Leopard Domestic cat Common ancestor Wolf
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.10a (a) Monophyletic.  In this tree, grouping 1,  consisting of the seven species B–H, is a  monophyletic group, or clade. A mono- phyletic group is made up of an  ancestral species (species B in this case)  and  all  of its descendant species. Only  monophyletic groups qualify as  legitimate taxa derived from cladistics. Grouping 1 D C E G F B A J I K H
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.10b (b) Paraphyletic.  Grouping 2 does not  meet the cladistic criterion: It is  paraphyletic, which means that it  consists of an ancestor (A in this case)  and  some , but not all, of that ancestor’s  descendants. (Grouping 2 includes the  descendants I, J, and K, but excludes  B–H, which also descended from A.) D C E B G H F J I K A Grouping 2
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.10c Grouping 3 (c) Polyphyletic.  Grouping 3 also fails the  cladistic test. It is polyphyletic, which  means that it lacks the common ancestor  of (A) the species in the group. Further- more, a valid taxon that includes the  extant species G, H, J, and K would  necessarily also contain D and E, which  are also descended from A. D C B E G F H A J I K
Phylograms ,[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.12 Drosophila Lancelet Amphibian Fish Bird Human Rat Mouse
Ultrametric Trees ,[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.13 Drosophila Lancelet Amphibian Fish Bird Human Rat Mouse Cenozoic Mesozoic Paleozoic Proterozoic 542 251 65.5 Millions of years ago
Maximum Parsimony and Maximum Likelihood ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.15a APPLICATION   In considering possible phylogenies for a group of species, systematists compare molecular data for the species. The most efficient way to study the various phylogenetic hypotheses is to begin by first considering the most parsimonious—that is, which hypothesis requires the fewest total evolutionary events (molecular changes) to have occurred. TECHNIQUE   Follow the numbered steps as we apply the principle of parsimony to a hypothetical phylogenetic problem involving four closely related bird species. Species I Species II Species III Species IV I II III IV I III II IV I IV II III Sites in DNA sequence Three possible phylogenetic hypothese 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A G G G G G T G G G A G G G G A G G A A T G G A G A A G I II III IV I II III IV A G G G G G G Bases at  site 1 for  each species Base-change event 1   First, draw the possible phylogenies for the species  (only 3 of the 15 possible trees relating these four  species are shown here). 2   Tabulate the molecular data for the species (in this simplified  example, the data represent a DNA sequence consisting of  just seven nucleotide bases). 3   Now focus on site 1 in the DNA sequence. A single base- change event, marked by the crossbar in the branch leading  to species I, is sufficient to account for the site 1 data. Species
4 Continuing the comparison of bases at  sites 2, 3, and 4 reveals that each of  these possible trees requires a total of four base-change events (marked again by crossbars). Thus, the first four sites in this DNA sequence do not help us identify the most parsimonious tree. 5   After analyzing sites 5 and 6, we find that the first tree requires fewer evolutionary events than the other two trees (two base changes versus four). Note that in these diagrams, we assume that the common ancestor had GG at sites 5 and 6. But even if we started with an AA ancestor, the first tree still would require only two changes, while four changes would be required to make the other hypotheses work. Keep in mind that parsimony only considers the total number of events, not the particular nature of the events (how likely the particular base changes are to occur). 6   At site 7, the three trees also differ in the number of evolutionary events required to explain the DNA data. RESULTS   To identify the most parsimonious tree, we total all the base-change events noted in steps 3–6 (don’t forget to include the changes for site 1, on the facing page). We conclude that the first tree is the most parsimonious of these three possible phylogenies. (But now we must complete our search by investigating the 12 other possible trees.) Two base changes Figure 25.15b I II III IV I III II IV I IV II III I II III IV I III II IV I IV II III I II III IV I III II IV I IV II III I II III IV I III II IV I IV II III GG GG AA AA GG AA GG GG AA GG AA GG GG GG GG AA GG AA GG GG GG T G T G T T T T T G G T G T T G G T T T T 10 events 9 events 8 events
[object Object],[object Object],Assuming the four-chambered hear evolved once Assuming the four-chambered hear evolved twice Lizard Four-chambered heart Bird Mammal Lizard Four-chambered heart Bird Mammal Four-chambered heart (a) Mammal-bird clade (b) Lizard-bird clade
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Molecular Clocks ,[object Object],[object Object]
Neutral Theory ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Difficulties with Molecular Clocks ,[object Object],[object Object]
The Universal Tree of Life  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Figure 25.18 Bacteria Eukarya Archaea 4 Symbiosis of chloroplast ancestor with ancestor of green plants 3 Symbiosis of mitochondrial ancestor with ancestor of eukaryotes 2 Possible fusion of bacterium and archaean, yielding ancestor of eukaryotic cells 1 Last common ancestor of all living things 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 0 Billion years ago Origin of life
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Synthesis of Organic Compounds on Early Earth ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],  As material circulated through the apparatus,  Miller and Urey periodically collected samples for analysis. They  identified a variety of organic molecules, including amino acids such  as alanine and glutamic acid that are common in the proteins of  organisms. They also found many other amino acids and complex, oily hydrocarbons. RESULTS Figure 26.2 Miller and Urey set up a closed system in their  laboratory to simulate conditions thought to have existed on early  Earth. A warmed flask of water simulated the primeval sea. The  strongly reducing “atmosphere” in the system consisted of H 2 ,  methane (CH 4 ), ammonia (NH 3 ), and water vapor. Sparks were  discharged in the synthetic atmosphere to mimic lightning. A  condenser cooled the atmosphere, raining water and any dissolved  compounds into the miniature sea.  EXPERIMENT Electrode Condenser Cooled water containing organic  molecules H 2 O Sample for chemical analysis Cold water Water vapor CH 4 H 2 NH 3 CONCLUSION Organic molecules, a first step in the origin of  life, can form in a strongly reducing atmosphere.
Problems with the Miller and Urey Experiment   *Miller and Urey didn't add oxygen to the apparatus (science shows that oxygen has always been present on Earth) because it would explode when the spark was produced. *The experiment produced left and right handed amino acids, however, living organisms are only composed of left handed amino acids.   Chemical Evolution Video Clip
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.3
Protobionts ,[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Ribozyme (RNA molecule) Template Nucleotides Complementary RNA copy 3 5 5
[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.6
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.7 1 2 3 4 Accumulating  “daughter”  isotope Ratio of parent isotope  to daughter isotope Remaining  “parent”  isotope 1 1 1 1 Time (half-lives) 2 4 8 16
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],Table 26.1 According to Creationist
Creationist Model
Mass Extinctions ,[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.8 Cambrian Proterozoic eon Ordovician Silurian Devonian Carboniferous Permian Triassic Jurassic Cretaceous Paleogene Neogene Number of families (  ) Number of taxonomic families Extinction rate Cretaceous  mass extinction Permian mass  extinction Millions of years ago Extinction rate (  ) Paleozoic Mesozoic 0 20 60 40 80 100 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2,500 1,500 1,000 500 0 2,000 Ceno- zoic
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.9 NORTH AMERICA Chicxulub crater Yucatán Peninsula
[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.10 Land plants Animals Multicellular eukaryotes Single-celled eukaryotes Atmospheric oxygen Prokaryotes Origin of solar system and Earth Humans Ceno- zoic Meso- zoic Paleozoic Archaean Eon Billions of years ago Proterozoic Eon 1 2 3 4
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Lynn Margulis (top right), of the University of Massachussetts, and  Kenneth Nealson, of the University of Southern California, are  shown collecting bacterial mats in a Baja California lagoon. The mats are produced by colonies of bacteria that live in environments  inhospitable to most other life. A section through a mat (inset)  shows layers of sediment that adhere to the sticky bacteria as the bacteria migrate upward. Some bacterial mats form rocklike structures called stromatolites, such as these in Shark Bay, Western Australia. The Shark Bay stromatolites began forming about 3,000 years ago. The inset shows a section through a fossilized stromatolite that is about 3.5 billion years old. (a) (b) Figure 26.11a, b
The First Prokaryotes ,[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.12
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Endosymbiotic Origin of Mitochondria and Plastids ,[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.13 Cytoplasm DNA Plasma membrane Ancestral prokaryote Infolding of plasma membrane Endoplasmic reticulum Nuclear envelope Nucleus Engulfing of aerobic heterotrophic prokaryote Cell with nucleus and endomembrane system Mitochondrion Ancestral heterotrophic eukaryote Plastid Mitochondrion Engulfing of photosynthetic prokaryote in some cells Ancestral  Photosynthetic eukaryote
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.14 50 m
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The Earliest Multicellular Eukaryotes ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.15a, b 150 m 200 m (a) Two-cell stage (b) Later stage
The Colonial Connection ,[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.16 10 m
The “Cambrian Explosion” ,[object Object],[object Object],Cambrian Explosion?
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.17 Early Paleozoic era (Cambrian period) Millions of years ago 500 542 Late Proterozoic eon Sponges Cnidarians Echinoderms Chordates Brachiopods Annelids Molluscs Arthropods
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Continental Drift ,[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.18 North American Plate Caribbean Plate Juan de Fuca Plate Cocos Plate Pacific Plate Nazca Plate South American Plate African Plate Scotia Plate Antarctic Plate Arabian Plate Eurasian Plate Philippine Plate Indian Plate Australian Plate
[object Object],[object Object],Volcanoes and volcanic islands Trench Oceanic ridge Oceanic crust Seafloor spreading Subduction zone Figure 26.19
[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.20 India collided with  Eurasia just 10 million years ago, forming the Himalayas, the tallest and youngest of Earth’s major mountain ranges. The continents continue to drift. By the end of the Mesozoic, Laurasia and Gondwana separated into the present-day continents. By the mid-Mesozoic, Pangaea split into northern (Laurasia) and southern (Gondwana) landmasses. Cenozoic North America Eurasia Africa South America India Madagascar Antarctica Australia Laurasia Mesozoic Gondwana At the end of the Paleozoic, all of Earth’s landmasses were joined in the supercontinent Pangaea. Pangaea Paleozoic 251 135 65.5 0 Millions of years ago
Previous Taxonomic Systems ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Figure 26.21 Plantae Fungi Animalia Protista Monera Eukaryotes Prokaryotes
Reconstructing the Tree of Life: A Work in Progress ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],Figure 26.22 Proteobacteria Chlamydias Spirochetes Cyanobacteria Gram-positive bacteria Korarchaeotes Euryarchaeotes, crenarchaeotes, nanoarchaeotes Diplomonads, parabasalids Euglenozoans Alveolates (dinoflagellates, apicomplexans, ciliates) Stramenopiles (water molds, diatoms, golden algae, brown algae) Cercozoans, radiolarians Red algae Chlorophytes Charophyceans Domain Archaea Domain Eukarya Universal ancestor Domain Bacteria Chapter 27 Chapter 28
Bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) Plants Fungi Animals Seedless vascular plants (ferns) Gymnosperms Angiosperms Amoebozoans (amoebas, slime molds) Chytrids Zygote fungi Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Sac fungi Club fungi Choanoflagellates Sponges Cnidarians (jellies, coral) Bilaterally symmetrical animals (annelids, arthropods, molluscs, echinoderms, vertebrates) Chapter 29 Chapter 30 Chapter 28 Chapter 31 Chapter 32 Chapters 33, 34 Figure 26.21
Creation and Evolution: Major Beliefs  Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Date of the Earth   The Earth is at least 4.6 billion years old. Evolutionists must have vast amounts of time in order for mutations to accumulate; otherwise the variations we see today would not have had enough time to accumulate.  Creationists are divided on the age of the Earth; however, a straight forward reading of the book of Genesis indicates a young Earth.  Using the generations from Adam to Jesus we deduce approximately 4,000 years have passed and from Jesus to the present another 4,000 years. Approximate age of the Earth taken from scripture is between 6,000-7,000 years old.  Mutation Mutations have always existed since the first organism evolved.  Mutations are believed to be the major element and contributing factor causing the enormous quantity of variations we see in organisms today. Mutations originated at the fall of man (Genesis) and have accumulated from this point, however, mutations are not considered to be the major cause of variations within organisms, rather, variations were created by God and then selected to best fit an environment.  Mutations are most often negative and therefore could not have produced the organisms and variations we see today.
Creation and Evolution: Major Beliefs  Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Natural Selection A process that selects from existing traits and variations and fits organisms to their environment. Evolutionists extrapolate this observable process and belief that natural selection had the ability to guide evolving organisms through innumerable changes and alterations and to produce the organisms we see in the present. Natural selection (being a process) must act on living organisms and couldn’t have in itself functioned before organisms evolved.  A process that selects from existing traits and variations and fits organisms to their environment.  Creationists see natural selection as a process that was instituted by God after the fall in order to preserve variations and to fit organisms to their changing environment.  Creationists view natural selection as a method of preservation rather than a method of selection.  Creationists insist that natural selection explains the “survival of the fittest” but not the “arrival of the fittest”.  Tree of Life   All organisms are related to an ancestral organism.  The tips of the branches are modern day species and the trunk represents the first organism that evolved.  New evidence is continually altering major branches.  All organisms are not related. Instead of a tree, Creationists envision a lawn or orchard, where the tips represent modern day species and the base represents God’s Created Kinds (barmins, Genesis).  Creationists would agree that the connections of the branches in the evolutionary tree of life are not real relationships rather are only hypothesized and undocumented relationships.
Creation and Evolution: Major Beliefs  Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Species   Species are finely tuned organisms to their environments that have the capabilities of reproducing with those in their same species.  Evolutionists believe that new species are constantly forming due to geographic isolation, etc.  Species are viewed as finely tuned to their environment through natural selection, however, not all Creationists agree with the modern view of fixed species. Creationists instead view all modern day species as descendants of a Biblical Kind, sometimes still being able to breed with others of the same Biblical Kind.  Information  (DNA and RNA)   DNA had to accumulate over the vast eons (4.6 bya).  The first organism had little information compared to modern day species with vast quantities of information.  Evolutionists believe that the quantity of DNA has increased through mutational events.  DNA was created by God as the instructions for each Biblical Kind.  Written into the DNA are variations.  Creationists do not believe that new and novel DNA can be produced through mutations and have challenged evolutionists with the problem of DNA complexity.
Creation and Evolution: Major Beliefs  Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Variation Variations are a result of mutational events.  Variations were written into the DNA code by God.  New variations are possible through mutational events but they are almost always harmful or not beneficial.  Creationists would argue that mutations are incapable of producing all of the variations we see in the Biblical Kinds.  Missing-links   They are fossilized organisms that exhibit a transitional form between (usually) a more ancient species and a more modern species.  Archaeopteryx  is an example of a supposed missing-link between reptiles and birds.  Would suggest that missing-links do not exist and are still missing.  Creationists would view missing-links as an evolutionary forced relationship between two organisms that are in fact distinct species.
Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Microevolution Small incremental changes in the frequency of alleles within a species. Creationists would agree that microevolution occurs but would credit the frequency of alleles within a species as being selected from variation that was created by God rather than solely produced by mutation.  Creationists would also emphasize that microevolution fluctuates within a population.  Macroevolution   Evolutionists would extrapolate the small changes found in microevolution as accumulating to produce a much larger event, incorporating all of life into a large continuum.  Creationists would suggest that microevolution is not possible nor has been observed and that any extrapolation by evolutionists to prove macroevolution is hypothetical rather than actual. Creationists believe that macroevolution is not possible because God set natural limitations between the Biblical Kinds.
Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Darwin The first scientist that united various preconceived ideas to make a whole realm of thought, which later came to be known as evolution. Some scientist credit Darwin with allowing them to become “intellectually fulfilled atheists”, but not all evolutionists agrees with this view.  Creationists do not generally vilify Darwin but disagree with his final conclusion; that all life evolved in a continuum without the need of an intelligent designer.  Creationists view Darwin as a scientist who was a product of his time, making misguided extrapolations based on somewhat good reasoning but spoiling that good reasoning with unsubstantiated hypothetical reasoning. Creationists often claim that Darwin made conclusions based on faith rather than true science.  Human Evolution  Evolutionists include humans in the overarching evolutionary scenario, claiming that humans descended from ape-like organisms.  Creationists reject human evolution entirely, based on the belief that humans were created in the  image of God  (Genesis). Creationists believe that humans were created (Adam and Eve) fully formed with the ability to communicate with each other and with God from the beginning and reject any step-by-step process of human evolution.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

02 Species and Speciation
02 Species and Speciation02 Species and Speciation
02 Species and SpeciationJaya Kumar
 
3. Selection & Speciation
3. Selection & Speciation3. Selection & Speciation
3. Selection & Speciationrossbiology
 
Isolating mechanisms - kashmeera
Isolating mechanisms - kashmeeraIsolating mechanisms - kashmeera
Isolating mechanisms - kashmeeraKashmeera N.A.
 
Evolution3
Evolution3Evolution3
Evolution3Jolie Yu
 
Speciation prezygotic and postzygotic
Speciation prezygotic and postzygotic Speciation prezygotic and postzygotic
Speciation prezygotic and postzygotic Stephanie Beck
 
Rep isolating mechanism evolution final
Rep isolating mechanism evolution finalRep isolating mechanism evolution final
Rep isolating mechanism evolution finalNaeem Ahmed
 
IB Biology Option D.2: Species and speciation
IB Biology Option D.2: Species and speciationIB Biology Option D.2: Species and speciation
IB Biology Option D.2: Species and speciationJason de Nys
 
24 originofspecies text
24  originofspecies text24  originofspecies text
24 originofspecies textcarlgerard
 
Speciation in insects.
Speciation in insects.Speciation in insects.
Speciation in insects.SatishGolla6
 
Ecological speciation
Ecological speciationEcological speciation
Ecological speciationEmaSushan
 
Ecological speciation - kashmeera
Ecological speciation -  kashmeeraEcological speciation -  kashmeera
Ecological speciation - kashmeeraKashmeera N.A.
 

Was ist angesagt? (19)

Speciation
SpeciationSpeciation
Speciation
 
02 Species and Speciation
02 Species and Speciation02 Species and Speciation
02 Species and Speciation
 
Speciation 2013
Speciation 2013Speciation 2013
Speciation 2013
 
3. Selection & Speciation
3. Selection & Speciation3. Selection & Speciation
3. Selection & Speciation
 
Isolating mechanisms - kashmeera
Isolating mechanisms - kashmeeraIsolating mechanisms - kashmeera
Isolating mechanisms - kashmeera
 
Evolution3
Evolution3Evolution3
Evolution3
 
06 speciation
06 speciation06 speciation
06 speciation
 
Speciation prezygotic and postzygotic
Speciation prezygotic and postzygotic Speciation prezygotic and postzygotic
Speciation prezygotic and postzygotic
 
Speciation
SpeciationSpeciation
Speciation
 
Rep isolating mechanism evolution final
Rep isolating mechanism evolution finalRep isolating mechanism evolution final
Rep isolating mechanism evolution final
 
Evolution
EvolutionEvolution
Evolution
 
IB Biology Option D.2: Species and speciation
IB Biology Option D.2: Species and speciationIB Biology Option D.2: Species and speciation
IB Biology Option D.2: Species and speciation
 
Speciation and domestication
Speciation and domesticationSpeciation and domestication
Speciation and domestication
 
24 originofspecies text
24  originofspecies text24  originofspecies text
24 originofspecies text
 
Speciation in insects.
Speciation in insects.Speciation in insects.
Speciation in insects.
 
Ecological speciation
Ecological speciationEcological speciation
Ecological speciation
 
Speciation
SpeciationSpeciation
Speciation
 
Speciation
Speciation Speciation
Speciation
 
Ecological speciation - kashmeera
Ecological speciation -  kashmeeraEcological speciation -  kashmeera
Ecological speciation - kashmeera
 

Andere mochten auch (9)

02 chemistry text
02  chemistry text02  chemistry text
02 chemistry text
 
31 fungi text
31  fungi text31  fungi text
31 fungi text
 
07 membranes text
07  membranes text07  membranes text
07 membranes text
 
Skeletalsystem
SkeletalsystemSkeletalsystem
Skeletalsystem
 
06 cell text
06  cell text06  cell text
06 cell text
 
32 animaldiversity text
32  animaldiversity text32  animaldiversity text
32 animaldiversity text
 
08 metabolism text
08  metabolism text08  metabolism text
08 metabolism text
 
Human reproduction and development
Human reproduction and developmentHuman reproduction and development
Human reproduction and development
 
Digestive system
Digestive systemDigestive system
Digestive system
 

Ähnlich wie 24 originofspecies text

MidtermReview
MidtermReviewMidtermReview
MidtermReviewcmabg
 
202400Presentation-092748-pm_3b7245.pptx
202400Presentation-092748-pm_3b7245.pptx202400Presentation-092748-pm_3b7245.pptx
202400Presentation-092748-pm_3b7245.pptxjaneclairemillan
 
Ap Chapter 24 The Origin Of Species
Ap Chapter 24 The Origin Of SpeciesAp Chapter 24 The Origin Of Species
Ap Chapter 24 The Origin Of Speciessmithbio
 
Reproductive Specialist ( Reproduction, Speciation &Amp;...
Reproductive Specialist ( Reproduction, Speciation &Amp;...Reproductive Specialist ( Reproduction, Speciation &Amp;...
Reproductive Specialist ( Reproduction, Speciation &Amp;...Erica Baldwin
 
Awesome diversity introduction powerpoint 2012
Awesome diversity introduction powerpoint 2012Awesome diversity introduction powerpoint 2012
Awesome diversity introduction powerpoint 2012Manjinder Pannu
 
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.docx
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.docxCopyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.docx
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.docxvanesaburnand
 
7 THE CELLULAR BASISOF INHERITANCEFigure 7.1 Each of u.docx
7  THE CELLULAR BASISOF INHERITANCEFigure 7.1 Each of u.docx7  THE CELLULAR BASISOF INHERITANCEFigure 7.1 Each of u.docx
7 THE CELLULAR BASISOF INHERITANCEFigure 7.1 Each of u.docxalinainglis
 
Evolution natural selection_and_speciation 6 kings
Evolution natural selection_and_speciation 6 kingsEvolution natural selection_and_speciation 6 kings
Evolution natural selection_and_speciation 6 kingsJames H. Workman
 
Evolution, Natural Selection, Taxonomy, and Anthropology
Evolution, Natural Selection, Taxonomy, and AnthropologyEvolution, Natural Selection, Taxonomy, and Anthropology
Evolution, Natural Selection, Taxonomy, and Anthropologycgales
 
12th origin and evolution of life.pdf
12th origin and evolution of life.pdf12th origin and evolution of life.pdf
12th origin and evolution of life.pdfALMOST DONE STUDYING.
 
EVOLUTION AND MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION
 EVOLUTION AND MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION EVOLUTION AND MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION
EVOLUTION AND MECHANISM OF EVOLUTIONSANDEEP PATRE
 
Glossary Patterns Of Evolution4 Lois
Glossary Patterns Of Evolution4 LoisGlossary Patterns Of Evolution4 Lois
Glossary Patterns Of Evolution4 Loisallyjer
 

Ähnlich wie 24 originofspecies text (20)

24 Lectures P P T
24  Lectures  P P T24  Lectures  P P T
24 Lectures P P T
 
MidtermReview
MidtermReviewMidtermReview
MidtermReview
 
202400Presentation-092748-pm_3b7245.pptx
202400Presentation-092748-pm_3b7245.pptx202400Presentation-092748-pm_3b7245.pptx
202400Presentation-092748-pm_3b7245.pptx
 
Vikas
VikasVikas
Vikas
 
Ap Chapter 24 The Origin Of Species
Ap Chapter 24 The Origin Of SpeciesAp Chapter 24 The Origin Of Species
Ap Chapter 24 The Origin Of Species
 
Evolution
EvolutionEvolution
Evolution
 
Reproductive Specialist ( Reproduction, Speciation &Amp;...
Reproductive Specialist ( Reproduction, Speciation &Amp;...Reproductive Specialist ( Reproduction, Speciation &Amp;...
Reproductive Specialist ( Reproduction, Speciation &Amp;...
 
Awesome diversity introduction powerpoint 2012
Awesome diversity introduction powerpoint 2012Awesome diversity introduction powerpoint 2012
Awesome diversity introduction powerpoint 2012
 
Darwin
DarwinDarwin
Darwin
 
Species concept
Species conceptSpecies concept
Species concept
 
5.4 Evolution
5.4 Evolution5.4 Evolution
5.4 Evolution
 
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.docx
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.docxCopyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.docx
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.docx
 
7 THE CELLULAR BASISOF INHERITANCEFigure 7.1 Each of u.docx
7  THE CELLULAR BASISOF INHERITANCEFigure 7.1 Each of u.docx7  THE CELLULAR BASISOF INHERITANCEFigure 7.1 Each of u.docx
7 THE CELLULAR BASISOF INHERITANCEFigure 7.1 Each of u.docx
 
Unit 3 Notes
Unit 3 NotesUnit 3 Notes
Unit 3 Notes
 
Evolution natural selection_and_speciation 6 kings
Evolution natural selection_and_speciation 6 kingsEvolution natural selection_and_speciation 6 kings
Evolution natural selection_and_speciation 6 kings
 
Evolution, Natural Selection, Taxonomy, and Anthropology
Evolution, Natural Selection, Taxonomy, and AnthropologyEvolution, Natural Selection, Taxonomy, and Anthropology
Evolution, Natural Selection, Taxonomy, and Anthropology
 
12th origin and evolution of life.pdf
12th origin and evolution of life.pdf12th origin and evolution of life.pdf
12th origin and evolution of life.pdf
 
EVOLUTION AND MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION
 EVOLUTION AND MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION EVOLUTION AND MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION
EVOLUTION AND MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION
 
Glossary Patterns Of Evolution4 Lois
Glossary Patterns Of Evolution4 LoisGlossary Patterns Of Evolution4 Lois
Glossary Patterns Of Evolution4 Lois
 
5.1 & 5.2 Notes
5.1 & 5.2 Notes5.1 & 5.2 Notes
5.1 & 5.2 Notes
 

Mehr von Andrew McCaskill (20)

Respiratory syst
Respiratory systRespiratory syst
Respiratory syst
 
Cardiovascular system
Cardiovascular systemCardiovascular system
Cardiovascular system
 
37 plantnutrition text
37 plantnutrition text37 plantnutrition text
37 plantnutrition text
 
53 communities text
53 communities text53 communities text
53 communities text
 
48 nervous text
48 nervous text48 nervous text
48 nervous text
 
41 animalnutrition text
41  animalnutrition text41  animalnutrition text
41 animalnutrition text
 
51 behavior text
51 behavior text51 behavior text
51 behavior text
 
46 reproduction text
46 reproduction text46 reproduction text
46 reproduction text
 
44 excretion text
44 excretion text44 excretion text
44 excretion text
 
40 animalform&function text
40 animalform&function text40 animalform&function text
40 animalform&function text
 
35 plantstructure text
35  plantstructure text35  plantstructure text
35 plantstructure text
 
28 protists
28  protists28  protists
28 protists
 
29 plants ii text
29  plants ii text29  plants ii text
29 plants ii text
 
27 prokaryotes text
27  prokaryotes text27  prokaryotes text
27 prokaryotes text
 
23 evolutionofpopulations text
23  evolutionofpopulations text23  evolutionofpopulations text
23 evolutionofpopulations text
 
22 darwin text
22  darwin text22  darwin text
22 darwin text
 
Muscle system
Muscle systemMuscle system
Muscle system
 
Somatic.specialsenses
Somatic.specialsensesSomatic.specialsenses
Somatic.specialsenses
 
Prokaryotic eukaryoticgenome
Prokaryotic eukaryoticgenomeProkaryotic eukaryoticgenome
Prokaryotic eukaryoticgenome
 
Dn atechn genomics-developmemt
Dn atechn genomics-developmemtDn atechn genomics-developmemt
Dn atechn genomics-developmemt
 

24 originofspecies text

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4. Similarity between different species. The eastern meadowlark ( Sturnella magna, left) and the western meadowlark ( Sturnella neglecta, right) have similar body shapes and colorations. Nevertheless, they are distinct biological species because their songs and other behaviors are different enough to prevent interbreeding should they meet in the wild. (a) Diversity within a species. As diverse as we may be in appearance, all humans belong to a single biological species ( Homo sapiens ), defined by our capacity to interbreed. (b) Figure 24.3 A, B
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8. Viable fertile offspring Reduce hybrid viability Reduce hybrid fertility Hybrid breakdown Fertilization Gametic isolation GAMETIC ISOLATION REDUCED HYBRID VIABILITY REDUCED HYBRID FERTILITY HYBRID BREAKDOWN (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m)
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36. *Morphology or physical structures play an important role in evolutionary relationships (i.e. Organisms that have the same types of structures must have been related in the past. This is considered Divergent Evolution) Question: Are these skulls from organisms in the same species?
  • 37. Morphologies are deceiving! YES! They are in the same species. They are both domestic dogs . -> ->
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48.
  • 49.
  • 50.
  • 51.
  • 52.
  • 53.
  • 54.
  • 55.
  • 56.
  • 57.
  • 58. 4 Continuing the comparison of bases at sites 2, 3, and 4 reveals that each of these possible trees requires a total of four base-change events (marked again by crossbars). Thus, the first four sites in this DNA sequence do not help us identify the most parsimonious tree. 5 After analyzing sites 5 and 6, we find that the first tree requires fewer evolutionary events than the other two trees (two base changes versus four). Note that in these diagrams, we assume that the common ancestor had GG at sites 5 and 6. But even if we started with an AA ancestor, the first tree still would require only two changes, while four changes would be required to make the other hypotheses work. Keep in mind that parsimony only considers the total number of events, not the particular nature of the events (how likely the particular base changes are to occur). 6 At site 7, the three trees also differ in the number of evolutionary events required to explain the DNA data. RESULTS To identify the most parsimonious tree, we total all the base-change events noted in steps 3–6 (don’t forget to include the changes for site 1, on the facing page). We conclude that the first tree is the most parsimonious of these three possible phylogenies. (But now we must complete our search by investigating the 12 other possible trees.) Two base changes Figure 25.15b I II III IV I III II IV I IV II III I II III IV I III II IV I IV II III I II III IV I III II IV I IV II III I II III IV I III II IV I IV II III GG GG AA AA GG AA GG GG AA GG AA GG GG GG GG AA GG AA GG GG GG T G T G T T T T T G G T G T T G G T T T T 10 events 9 events 8 events
  • 59.
  • 60.
  • 61.
  • 62.
  • 63.
  • 64.
  • 65.
  • 66.
  • 67.
  • 68. Problems with the Miller and Urey Experiment *Miller and Urey didn't add oxygen to the apparatus (science shows that oxygen has always been present on Earth) because it would explode when the spark was produced. *The experiment produced left and right handed amino acids, however, living organisms are only composed of left handed amino acids. Chemical Evolution Video Clip
  • 69.
  • 70.
  • 71.
  • 72.
  • 73.
  • 74.
  • 75.
  • 76.
  • 77.
  • 78.
  • 80.
  • 81.
  • 82.
  • 83.
  • 84.
  • 85.
  • 86. Lynn Margulis (top right), of the University of Massachussetts, and Kenneth Nealson, of the University of Southern California, are shown collecting bacterial mats in a Baja California lagoon. The mats are produced by colonies of bacteria that live in environments inhospitable to most other life. A section through a mat (inset) shows layers of sediment that adhere to the sticky bacteria as the bacteria migrate upward. Some bacterial mats form rocklike structures called stromatolites, such as these in Shark Bay, Western Australia. The Shark Bay stromatolites began forming about 3,000 years ago. The inset shows a section through a fossilized stromatolite that is about 3.5 billion years old. (a) (b) Figure 26.11a, b
  • 87.
  • 88.
  • 89.
  • 90.
  • 91.
  • 92.
  • 93.
  • 94.
  • 95.
  • 96.
  • 97.
  • 98.
  • 99.
  • 100.
  • 101.
  • 102.
  • 103.
  • 104.
  • 105.
  • 106.
  • 107.
  • 108. Bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) Plants Fungi Animals Seedless vascular plants (ferns) Gymnosperms Angiosperms Amoebozoans (amoebas, slime molds) Chytrids Zygote fungi Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Sac fungi Club fungi Choanoflagellates Sponges Cnidarians (jellies, coral) Bilaterally symmetrical animals (annelids, arthropods, molluscs, echinoderms, vertebrates) Chapter 29 Chapter 30 Chapter 28 Chapter 31 Chapter 32 Chapters 33, 34 Figure 26.21
  • 109. Creation and Evolution: Major Beliefs Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Date of the Earth   The Earth is at least 4.6 billion years old. Evolutionists must have vast amounts of time in order for mutations to accumulate; otherwise the variations we see today would not have had enough time to accumulate. Creationists are divided on the age of the Earth; however, a straight forward reading of the book of Genesis indicates a young Earth. Using the generations from Adam to Jesus we deduce approximately 4,000 years have passed and from Jesus to the present another 4,000 years. Approximate age of the Earth taken from scripture is between 6,000-7,000 years old. Mutation Mutations have always existed since the first organism evolved. Mutations are believed to be the major element and contributing factor causing the enormous quantity of variations we see in organisms today. Mutations originated at the fall of man (Genesis) and have accumulated from this point, however, mutations are not considered to be the major cause of variations within organisms, rather, variations were created by God and then selected to best fit an environment. Mutations are most often negative and therefore could not have produced the organisms and variations we see today.
  • 110. Creation and Evolution: Major Beliefs Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Natural Selection A process that selects from existing traits and variations and fits organisms to their environment. Evolutionists extrapolate this observable process and belief that natural selection had the ability to guide evolving organisms through innumerable changes and alterations and to produce the organisms we see in the present. Natural selection (being a process) must act on living organisms and couldn’t have in itself functioned before organisms evolved. A process that selects from existing traits and variations and fits organisms to their environment. Creationists see natural selection as a process that was instituted by God after the fall in order to preserve variations and to fit organisms to their changing environment. Creationists view natural selection as a method of preservation rather than a method of selection. Creationists insist that natural selection explains the “survival of the fittest” but not the “arrival of the fittest”. Tree of Life   All organisms are related to an ancestral organism. The tips of the branches are modern day species and the trunk represents the first organism that evolved. New evidence is continually altering major branches. All organisms are not related. Instead of a tree, Creationists envision a lawn or orchard, where the tips represent modern day species and the base represents God’s Created Kinds (barmins, Genesis). Creationists would agree that the connections of the branches in the evolutionary tree of life are not real relationships rather are only hypothesized and undocumented relationships.
  • 111. Creation and Evolution: Major Beliefs Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Species   Species are finely tuned organisms to their environments that have the capabilities of reproducing with those in their same species. Evolutionists believe that new species are constantly forming due to geographic isolation, etc. Species are viewed as finely tuned to their environment through natural selection, however, not all Creationists agree with the modern view of fixed species. Creationists instead view all modern day species as descendants of a Biblical Kind, sometimes still being able to breed with others of the same Biblical Kind. Information (DNA and RNA)   DNA had to accumulate over the vast eons (4.6 bya). The first organism had little information compared to modern day species with vast quantities of information. Evolutionists believe that the quantity of DNA has increased through mutational events. DNA was created by God as the instructions for each Biblical Kind. Written into the DNA are variations. Creationists do not believe that new and novel DNA can be produced through mutations and have challenged evolutionists with the problem of DNA complexity.
  • 112. Creation and Evolution: Major Beliefs Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Variation Variations are a result of mutational events. Variations were written into the DNA code by God. New variations are possible through mutational events but they are almost always harmful or not beneficial. Creationists would argue that mutations are incapable of producing all of the variations we see in the Biblical Kinds. Missing-links   They are fossilized organisms that exhibit a transitional form between (usually) a more ancient species and a more modern species. Archaeopteryx is an example of a supposed missing-link between reptiles and birds. Would suggest that missing-links do not exist and are still missing. Creationists would view missing-links as an evolutionary forced relationship between two organisms that are in fact distinct species.
  • 113. Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Microevolution Small incremental changes in the frequency of alleles within a species. Creationists would agree that microevolution occurs but would credit the frequency of alleles within a species as being selected from variation that was created by God rather than solely produced by mutation. Creationists would also emphasize that microevolution fluctuates within a population. Macroevolution   Evolutionists would extrapolate the small changes found in microevolution as accumulating to produce a much larger event, incorporating all of life into a large continuum. Creationists would suggest that microevolution is not possible nor has been observed and that any extrapolation by evolutionists to prove macroevolution is hypothetical rather than actual. Creationists believe that macroevolution is not possible because God set natural limitations between the Biblical Kinds.
  • 114. Topic Evolutionists believe….. Creationists believe…. Darwin The first scientist that united various preconceived ideas to make a whole realm of thought, which later came to be known as evolution. Some scientist credit Darwin with allowing them to become “intellectually fulfilled atheists”, but not all evolutionists agrees with this view. Creationists do not generally vilify Darwin but disagree with his final conclusion; that all life evolved in a continuum without the need of an intelligent designer. Creationists view Darwin as a scientist who was a product of his time, making misguided extrapolations based on somewhat good reasoning but spoiling that good reasoning with unsubstantiated hypothetical reasoning. Creationists often claim that Darwin made conclusions based on faith rather than true science. Human Evolution Evolutionists include humans in the overarching evolutionary scenario, claiming that humans descended from ape-like organisms. Creationists reject human evolution entirely, based on the belief that humans were created in the image of God (Genesis). Creationists believe that humans were created (Adam and Eve) fully formed with the ability to communicate with each other and with God from the beginning and reject any step-by-step process of human evolution.