SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 19
Coca-Cola Wars Sofia Kjellström Lu Lei Anna Mononen Lukas Rose RomainAubert
Concentrate producers:
Rivalry Highly concentrated industry: Duopolistic Industry growth: Mature for CSD. Similar products  Low-fixed cost  Capacity could be expanded easily Fierce competition: products and company structure are really similar, the major difference comes from their marketing efforts.
Threats of substitute For the concentrate producers, the threat is low because cost of switching are high for bottlers, but increasing due to changes in end-consumer taste.  Low
New Entrants Very high entrance costs to develop distribution and sign contractual agreements  unequal distribution channel access.  Even for 3rd and 4th place of CSD, producers are still very large companies.  Brand equity is extremely high.  Bottlersare really affiliated to one of two giants. Current players have enormous financial power.  Barriers are high
Suppliers’ power (Artificial sweeteners, Caramel, Citric acid, Natural flavors. Caffeine...) More suppliers than producers. Relatively undifferentiated supplies. Suppliers power is quite low.
Power of buyers: Bottlers Territory exclusivity strengthens their position High market concentration Limited choice of concentrate producers Tight margins: volume requirement  Majority of bottling business is owned by Coca Cola and PepsiCo  Low power
Market Attractiveness: Concentrate Producers Gross profit 83% Concentrate price increase higher than inflation  CSD consumption is stagnating Increasing marketing costs CSD market size decreased from USD 10 billion in 2005 to USD 9.4 billion in 2009*  Still very profitable but not attractive *https://www.trefis.com/company?article=20065#
Bottlers
Bottle producers:
Rivalry Territorial exclusivity Market consolidation: CCE represents 70% of Coke’s North America business, PBG represents 54% of PepsiCo’s North America bottling business  Weak rivalry
Substitutes Limitations on bottling due to product characteristics  Low New Entrants High consolidation  High capacity requirement – low margin products  High fixed-cost vs. low marginal costs  Low
Suppliers Raw materials are easily available Help for the packaging from concentrate producers  Suppliers have high bargaining power Buyers of the bottlers (Vending machines, convenience stores, fountains, grocery stores) Vending Machines, Fountains: high bargaining power – contractual transactions Grocery stores: Also high because few buyers  Buyers have high bargaining power
Market Attractiveness: Bottlers Gross profit 35% CSD market size Retail price increase lower than inflation  Huge initial investment in production (up to USD 75m) Complex and inflexible production Highly dependent on concentrate producers’ marketing efforts Concentrate producers’ business is more attractive
Current state of the industry Concentrate producers are buying their bottlers: 	- to be closer to the customers  		- own the market 		- secure the supply chain in times of 		  financial crisis The carbonates market is the least growing
Current state of the industry ... declining but carbonated drinks still represent 40% of the soft drink market. Big two coming under pressure....
Today’s challenge Focus on value-added products: vitamin water, dairy segment, bottled water Large investment in Asia. (Coke in China, and Pepsi in India) New competitors need to be considered: Nestlé, Danone.
Q&A
Sources http://www.pr-inside.com/the-pepsi-bottling-group-inc-pbg-r2347878.htm http://www.ajc.com/business/the-pepsi-challenge-for-446766.html http://www.slideshare.net/xiaoyiliu/sse-cola-wars-group5?src=related_normal&rel=2947405 http://www.slideshare.net/guest89fff/sse-cola-wars-group8-presentation http://www.slideshare.net/akula77/sse-cola-wars-group3-2-presentation http://www.slideshare.net/SSEGroup9/cola-wars-2946604 Euromonitor International : Global Soft Drinks: Corporate Strategies – Diversification Drives Market Dynamics Soft Drinks Global Trends and Opportunities

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt? (18)

Sse Cola Wars Group8
Sse Cola Wars Group8Sse Cola Wars Group8
Sse Cola Wars Group8
 
Cola Wars
Cola Wars Cola Wars
Cola Wars
 
Sse cola wars_7b_2011
Sse cola wars_7b_2011Sse cola wars_7b_2011
Sse cola wars_7b_2011
 
Case Analysis Coke Pepsi2
Case Analysis Coke Pepsi2Case Analysis Coke Pepsi2
Case Analysis Coke Pepsi2
 
Sse Cola Wars Group4
Sse Cola Wars Group4Sse Cola Wars Group4
Sse Cola Wars Group4
 
Sse Cola Wars Group 10
Sse  Cola Wars  Group 10Sse  Cola Wars  Group 10
Sse Cola Wars Group 10
 
Sse Cola Wars Group 10
Sse  Cola Wars  Group 10Sse  Cola Wars  Group 10
Sse Cola Wars Group 10
 
SSE_ ColaWars_Group3a_2011
SSE_ ColaWars_Group3a_2011SSE_ ColaWars_Group3a_2011
SSE_ ColaWars_Group3a_2011
 
Case study 4
Case study 4Case study 4
Case study 4
 
Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2
 
Sse cola wars_group5a_2011
Sse cola wars_group5a_2011Sse cola wars_group5a_2011
Sse cola wars_group5a_2011
 
Direct and Global Sourcing
Direct and Global SourcingDirect and Global Sourcing
Direct and Global Sourcing
 
Beverage industry
Beverage industry Beverage industry
Beverage industry
 
Ice Fili
Ice FiliIce Fili
Ice Fili
 
Operation strategy kroger and wholefoods
Operation strategy kroger and wholefoodsOperation strategy kroger and wholefoods
Operation strategy kroger and wholefoods
 
5 force model
5 force model5 force model
5 force model
 
Coca Cola - 5 Porter’s forces
Coca Cola - 5 Porter’s forces Coca Cola - 5 Porter’s forces
Coca Cola - 5 Porter’s forces
 
Viewpoint Retail Packaging 2016 and beyond_English
Viewpoint Retail Packaging 2016 and beyond_EnglishViewpoint Retail Packaging 2016 and beyond_English
Viewpoint Retail Packaging 2016 and beyond_English
 

Ähnlich wie Sse cola wars_group2b_2011

Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2
tingche
 
Sse Colawars Group11
Sse Colawars Group11Sse Colawars Group11
Sse Colawars Group11
Marcus Holst
 
Coca cola presentation
Coca cola presentation Coca cola presentation
Coca cola presentation
Nick Holt
 
Sse Cola Wars Group5
Sse Cola Wars Group5Sse Cola Wars Group5
Sse Cola Wars Group5
xiaoyiliu
 
Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2
tingche
 
Cola Wars Continue
Cola Wars ContinueCola Wars Continue
Cola Wars Continue
shreyans86
 
Sse colawars group3b_2011
Sse colawars group3b_2011Sse colawars group3b_2011
Sse colawars group3b_2011
Jessica Larsson
 
Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1
Cola wars continue   coke and pepsi in 2006-1Cola wars continue   coke and pepsi in 2006-1
Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1
Hye Joo Lee
 
Coca cola company
Coca cola companyCoca cola company
Coca cola company
Amy Wang
 
Sse colawars group7a_2011
Sse colawars group7a_2011Sse colawars group7a_2011
Sse colawars group7a_2011
Erik Bengtson
 

Ähnlich wie Sse cola wars_group2b_2011 (20)

Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2
 
Sse Cola Wars Group6
Sse Cola Wars Group6Sse Cola Wars Group6
Sse Cola Wars Group6
 
Sse Colawars Group11
Sse Colawars Group11Sse Colawars Group11
Sse Colawars Group11
 
Coca cola presentation
Coca cola presentation Coca cola presentation
Coca cola presentation
 
Sse Cola Wars Group5
Sse Cola Wars Group5Sse Cola Wars Group5
Sse Cola Wars Group5
 
Sse cola wars_group8b_2011
Sse cola wars_group8b_2011Sse cola wars_group8b_2011
Sse cola wars_group8b_2011
 
Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2
 
Cola Wars Continue
Cola Wars ContinueCola Wars Continue
Cola Wars Continue
 
Sse colawars group3b_2011
Sse colawars group3b_2011Sse colawars group3b_2011
Sse colawars group3b_2011
 
Heineken 1229458438627486-2
Heineken 1229458438627486-2Heineken 1229458438627486-2
Heineken 1229458438627486-2
 
RedBull Analysis
RedBull AnalysisRedBull Analysis
RedBull Analysis
 
56-bs.pptx
56-bs.pptx56-bs.pptx
56-bs.pptx
 
Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1
Cola wars continue   coke and pepsi in 2006-1Cola wars continue   coke and pepsi in 2006-1
Cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2006-1
 
Coca cola company
Coca cola companyCoca cola company
Coca cola company
 
Sse cola wars_group1a_2011.ppt
Sse cola wars_group1a_2011.pptSse cola wars_group1a_2011.ppt
Sse cola wars_group1a_2011.ppt
 
Sse colawars group7a_2011
Sse colawars group7a_2011Sse colawars group7a_2011
Sse colawars group7a_2011
 
Cola wars between Cocacola and Pepsi
Cola wars between Cocacola and PepsiCola wars between Cocacola and Pepsi
Cola wars between Cocacola and Pepsi
 
Sse cola wars_7b_2011
Sse cola wars_7b_2011Sse cola wars_7b_2011
Sse cola wars_7b_2011
 
Industry analysis
Industry analysisIndustry analysis
Industry analysis
 
Industry analysis of soft drinks industry
Industry analysis of soft drinks industryIndustry analysis of soft drinks industry
Industry analysis of soft drinks industry
 

Sse cola wars_group2b_2011

  • 1. Coca-Cola Wars Sofia Kjellström Lu Lei Anna Mononen Lukas Rose RomainAubert
  • 3. Rivalry Highly concentrated industry: Duopolistic Industry growth: Mature for CSD. Similar products Low-fixed cost Capacity could be expanded easily Fierce competition: products and company structure are really similar, the major difference comes from their marketing efforts.
  • 4. Threats of substitute For the concentrate producers, the threat is low because cost of switching are high for bottlers, but increasing due to changes in end-consumer taste.  Low
  • 5. New Entrants Very high entrance costs to develop distribution and sign contractual agreements  unequal distribution channel access. Even for 3rd and 4th place of CSD, producers are still very large companies. Brand equity is extremely high. Bottlersare really affiliated to one of two giants. Current players have enormous financial power.  Barriers are high
  • 6. Suppliers’ power (Artificial sweeteners, Caramel, Citric acid, Natural flavors. Caffeine...) More suppliers than producers. Relatively undifferentiated supplies. Suppliers power is quite low.
  • 7. Power of buyers: Bottlers Territory exclusivity strengthens their position High market concentration Limited choice of concentrate producers Tight margins: volume requirement Majority of bottling business is owned by Coca Cola and PepsiCo  Low power
  • 8. Market Attractiveness: Concentrate Producers Gross profit 83% Concentrate price increase higher than inflation CSD consumption is stagnating Increasing marketing costs CSD market size decreased from USD 10 billion in 2005 to USD 9.4 billion in 2009*  Still very profitable but not attractive *https://www.trefis.com/company?article=20065#
  • 11. Rivalry Territorial exclusivity Market consolidation: CCE represents 70% of Coke’s North America business, PBG represents 54% of PepsiCo’s North America bottling business  Weak rivalry
  • 12. Substitutes Limitations on bottling due to product characteristics  Low New Entrants High consolidation High capacity requirement – low margin products High fixed-cost vs. low marginal costs  Low
  • 13. Suppliers Raw materials are easily available Help for the packaging from concentrate producers  Suppliers have high bargaining power Buyers of the bottlers (Vending machines, convenience stores, fountains, grocery stores) Vending Machines, Fountains: high bargaining power – contractual transactions Grocery stores: Also high because few buyers  Buyers have high bargaining power
  • 14. Market Attractiveness: Bottlers Gross profit 35% CSD market size Retail price increase lower than inflation Huge initial investment in production (up to USD 75m) Complex and inflexible production Highly dependent on concentrate producers’ marketing efforts Concentrate producers’ business is more attractive
  • 15. Current state of the industry Concentrate producers are buying their bottlers: - to be closer to the customers - own the market - secure the supply chain in times of financial crisis The carbonates market is the least growing
  • 16. Current state of the industry ... declining but carbonated drinks still represent 40% of the soft drink market. Big two coming under pressure....
  • 17. Today’s challenge Focus on value-added products: vitamin water, dairy segment, bottled water Large investment in Asia. (Coke in China, and Pepsi in India) New competitors need to be considered: Nestlé, Danone.
  • 18. Q&A
  • 19. Sources http://www.pr-inside.com/the-pepsi-bottling-group-inc-pbg-r2347878.htm http://www.ajc.com/business/the-pepsi-challenge-for-446766.html http://www.slideshare.net/xiaoyiliu/sse-cola-wars-group5?src=related_normal&rel=2947405 http://www.slideshare.net/guest89fff/sse-cola-wars-group8-presentation http://www.slideshare.net/akula77/sse-cola-wars-group3-2-presentation http://www.slideshare.net/SSEGroup9/cola-wars-2946604 Euromonitor International : Global Soft Drinks: Corporate Strategies – Diversification Drives Market Dynamics Soft Drinks Global Trends and Opportunities

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. No real exit barrier
  2. CCE: Coca Cola Enterprises; PBC Pepsi Bottling Company
  3. CCE: Coca Cola Enterprises; PBC Pepsi Bottling Company
  4. CCE: Coca Cola Enterprises; PBC Pepsi Bottling Company