application of multi-stakeholder risk management in small-scaled water resources project in Thailand. By asking stakeholders identify, asses and propose risk response, this measure was suggested to be effective for public project risk management.

1. Multi-stakeholder risk
management in small-scaled water
resources project
Piriya URAIWONG
Kochi University of Technology, Japan

2. Multi-stakeholder risk management
process workshop
Project
•Sai Yu channel conservation and rehabilitation project
Location
•Songkhla province, Thailand
Project Characteristic
•Channel rehabilitation (dredging and construction of side way)
5,450 meter
•Water storage and water distribution system
2 2012/9/28

3. Sai Yu channel after rehabilitation
3 2012/9/28

4. Workshop Process
Cooperate with project owner and local
administration leader
Introduce multi-stakeholder risk management
process to the local leader
Invite locals and beneficiaries to participate in
the workshop
Introduce risk management process to the
workshop participants
Conduct multi-stakeholder risk management
process
4 2012/9/28

5. Multi-stakeholder risk management
process (in this workshop)
Stakeholder risk
• What is risk? assessment
• Why we need to
•Methods
• Risk allocation
do this? (project life cycle)
dealing
• Risk management
process
• Risk assessment with risks
• Risk ranking (risk
Introduction to consensus) Risk response
risk management plan
5 2012/9/28

6. Participants

7. Results
No. Risk allocation Cause Impact Opportunity Impact Risk score
(1-5) (1-5)
Land acquisition Worry to Project 1 1 1
lost cannot
benefit construct as
from land designed
1 Water shortage Storage is No 5 5 25
from rain agriculture
harvest activity
only
4 High pumping in No water No 5 2 10
dry season agriculture
activity
Flooding in rain Nature Lost income 1 2 2
season
2 Water demand need more Unstable 5 4 20
increasing income income
7 2012/9/28

8. Results 2
No. Risk allocation Cause Impact Opportunity Impact Risk score
(1-5) (1-5)
No rule for water Individual No effect to 1 1 1
consumption use others
3 Saline intrusion Pumping Agriculture 5 3 15
water from products
another lost
channel
Water pollution Polluted Ecosystem 1 1 1
from factory in water degradation
the area dumped Endanger to
from life/ disease
factory
Digging and Capitalism Individual 2 3 6
selling topsoil benefit/
income
8 2012/9/28

9. Results 3
Ranking Risk Response
1 Water shortage Extend water distribution system
Communication among stakeholders
2 Water demand increasing Underground water
Crop Zoning
Effective water usage
Establish water user group/ water use
regulation
Low water consumption plants
3 Saline intrusion Chronic problem on downstream (no
solution yet)
Water gate construction
4 High pumping in dry season Acceptable
9 2012/9/28

10. Highlights
Requirement of willingness to participate
motivation!!
Leader has a strong influence
Unforeseen risk/ lack of experience
Not get use to with the word “risk”/ more familiar
with “problem” or “worry”
10 2012/9/28

11. Highlights
Facilitation skill is important/
trusted person
Risk consensus can be achieved by
open and sincere discussion
Local language
11 2012/9/28

12. Challenges
Cover all related stakeholders
Larger scale project more stakeholders
From plan to implementation? Budget?
Hierarchical objectives among stakeholders?
12 2012/9/28

13. Acknowledgement
Lam Dang people and Lam Dang Tambon
Administration Office
The department of water resource, Regional office 8
(Songkhla province)
Prof.Tsunemi Watanabe, Kochi University of
Technology
13 2012/9/28

14. 14 2012/9/28