![Setting the Stage for Partnerships ,[object Object]]()
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (7)
Andere mochten auch
Ähnlich wie Helsinki benefit sharing
Ähnlich wie Helsinki benefit sharing (20)
Mehr von vdg777
Mehr von vdg777 (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Helsinki benefit sharing
- 1. Delivering Development Gains Through Partnerships. Insights for REDD+ Findings from ongoing research supported by TF-ESSD & PROFOR DijiChandrasekharan Behr Natural Resource Economist, SDN Forests Team, World Bank
- 5. Climate Change, Partnerships and Benefit Sharing Arrangements More opportunities in the context of REDD+, afforestation/reforestation, and forest landscape restoration Link climate change objectives to poverty alleviation and broader sustainable development agenda Local partner: community, an association, individuals or a group of landholders Outside partner: private entity, government agency, NGO or CSO. Greater Prominence For Partnership
- 6. Focus of the research What factors influence stable and lasting partnerships When rights are unclear how do we identify legitimate beneficiaries What are ways for transferring benefits to these beneficiaries
- 10. Fully bargained
- 11. Incentives
- 13. Mutual respect
- 15. Past history of conflict is thoroughly addressed
- 16. Practical
- 18. Trust
- 20. Communication
- 21. Fully bargained
- 22. Incentives
- 24. Mutual respect
- 26. Past history of conflict is thoroughly addressed
- 27. Practical
- 29. Trust
- 32. Structure and content should be adapted to suit the purpose of the arrangement. In benefit-sharing arrangements - emphasis communication and dispute resolution, Profit-sharing contracts - contingencies, loss prevention, and how risks are divided between the partners. Establish formal communication, resolving grievances, sharing risks, structuring of milestones, transparency, and other issues of general interest Where standardized agreements are necessary, contract template should be developed based on consultation and discussions with potential partners and key technical advisors. Good Contracts
- 33. Good forest partnership contracts had a number of distinguishing attributes: clear, understandable, complete, address issues such as practicality, verifiability, and incentives, legally valid and provide means to resolve disputes that do not require those involved to go to court, where there is a history of disagreements or disputes, the issues involved are fully taken into account by the contract. Good Contracts
- 34. Benefit sharing should be open & verifiable serve legitimate beneficiaries look beyond compensation, towards promoting broader social and economic development. Benefit sharing arrangements could include: Cash payments Combinations of cash payments with technical assistance or services Provision of alternative benefits (market vouchers productive goods, access to new land, extension services, credit, employment, clarification/ acknowledgement of local partners’ ownership rights Benefit Sharing Arrangements
- 35. Legitimate beneficiaries Who could participate What can we learn from CBNRM experiences Mechanisms for transferring benefits What systems are in place How are they working What are transaction costs, capacity requirements, and needed institutional arrangements Case studies Remaining Activities
- 36. THANK YOU
Hinweis der Redaktion
- SMEs comprise 80-90% of all forestry enterprises in many developing countries. They employ 20 million people, are a major source of off-farm employment, and add US 130 billion in gross added value to the world economy
- Climate initiatives require long-term partnerships
- Contracts serve a number of important functions in collaborative arrangements,
- The definition of “legitimate” sellers and beneficiaries will be critical. It must reflect the legal position regarding ownership and other rights in the resource, but it must also be informed by a realistic understanding of the need to balance enforcement and incentives. If the enforcement capacity of the responsible institution is weak, as will often be the case, heavy reliance will need to be placed on incentives.