SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 20
Designing and Planning a
Teaching Session




     This document is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales
     license, available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/.
Today‟s menu
•   Approaches to study – some theories
•   Constructivism – what is it?
•   Video 1: outcomes
•   Outcomes-based planning – a background
•   Describing 'thinking skills'
•   Activity 1: writing learning outcomes
•   Alternative views on outcomes
•   Lesson planning
•   Video 2: students today
•   Activity 2: how does this affect learning design?
•   Learning technology – what is available?
•   Activity 3: lesson planning
•   Video 3: design in a technology-rich context
Expected learning outcomes
At the end of this session participants should be able to:
• state the rationale for using an outcome-based approach
   to planning teaching sessions
• write expected learning outcomes for a specific
   course/session
• discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various
   learning technologies
• select appropriate teaching and learning activities to
   support outcomes
• designing a teaching session using a template
Approaches to study – what a student does

• Deep and surface approaches (Marton etc,’70s)
• Strategic approaches (Biggs, Ramsden, ‘80s)
• Approaches can be modified by designing the
  learning context (Biggs, ‘90s)
• ‘Constructive alignment’ – congruence
  between
  – What the teacher intends learners to be able to
    do, know or understand (can be described as
    outcomes)
  – How they teach i.e. the activities
  – How they assess
So what is constructivism?

• Piaget (1950s), Brunner (1960s) . . .
• New learning and knowledge builds on old
  understanding – rarely a ‘blank slate’
• Learning is not just adding knowledge but
  bringing change or transformation to pre-
  existing concepts to refine understanding and
  linkages – hence notion of ‘deep learning’
• ‘threshold concepts’(Meyer & Land 2005)
Video 1



• 4 mins
What the teacher intends students to learn:
“outcomes”

• Planning starts with clear learning outcomes and
  the aim of planning is to align our learning
  activities with these.
• Rationale: the planning of learning experiences
  and assessment of student learning has a
  significant impact on students’ approaches to
  learning.
• Part of a systematic or ‘rational planning’ model
• Dominant in the UK since ’90s
Why is outcomes-based planning important?

• Became dominant in UK Higher Education since
  the Dearing Report (1997)
• Often used in proposals for new programmes or
  modules
• Used in the QAA Subject Benchmark statements
  – set out general academic characteristics and standards
    of degrees in a range of subjects:
    http://www.qaa.ac.uk/AssuringStandardsAndQuality
    /subject-guidance/Pages/Subject-benchmark-
    statements.aspx
UCL Context
Programme design includes
(i) the educational aims of the programme, including its intended
    learning outcomes and how these will be communicated to
    students, staff and external audiences;

Programme Institution Questionnaire (PIQ UG)
    “The programme provides opportunities for students to develop and
    demonstrate knowledge and understanding, qualities, skills and
    other attributes in the following areas:
       A: Knowledge and understanding
       B: Skills and other attributes - intellectual (thinking) skills
       C: Skills and other attributes - practical skills
       D: Skills and other attributes - transferable skills

       http://www.ucl.ac.uk/academic-manual/
Writing Learning Outcomes

Outcomes should be
• Written in a future tense (will, should be able to…)
• Identify important learning requirements
• Be achievable
• Be assessable
• Use language which students can understand
• Relate to explicit statements of achievement
….but ‘thinking’ outcomes perhaps most difficult to
  define
Describing „thinking‟ skills
Bloom – 1956, revised, Anderson & Krathwohl 2001 verbs


 1. Evaluation               1. Create
 --------------              --------------
 2. Synthesis                2. Evaluate
 --------------              --------------
 3. Analysis                 3. Analyze
 --------------              --------------
 4. Application              4. Apply
 --------------              --------------
 5. Comprehension            5. Understand
 --------------              --------------
 6. Knowledge                6. Remember
Describing „thinking‟skills
Biggs SOLO Taxonomy – more verbs
http://www.johnbiggs.com.au/solo_taxonomy.html
misses point
 Prestructural

                                               identify, do simple
 Unistructural                                 procedure

                                               enumerate, describe, list,
 Multistructural                               combine, do alogorithms

                                               compare/contrast, explain
 Relational                                    causes, analyse, relate,
                                               apply
                                               theorise, generalise,
 Extended abstract                             hypothesise, reflect
Biggs (1996) Structure of Observed learning Outcomes
Pictures from ATHERTON J S (2009) Learning and Teaching; SOLO taxonomy [On-line] UK: Available:
http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/solo.htm Accessed: 27 October 2009
Writing Learning Outcomes


• Consider your general aim/s for a module you are
  teaching. Write specific learning outcomes for this
  course: what do you want the students to learn?
Local/Solo        Knowledge &     Intellectual   Practical   Transferable
                  Understanding   skills         skills      skills

Prestructural


Unistructural


Multistructural




Relational


Extended
abstract
Alternative views
Laurillard (1993) - learning/teaching is a rich dialogue
Haggis (2003) - deep/surface models can be challenged
Rowland (2006) – outcomes imply a passive learner -
  learners may take on increasing responsibility for
  ‘designing’ their personal learning (PLEs)
Siemens (2005) – ‘connectivism’: know how where
Sfard (2007) – communities of practice
But also...
   learners develop in unpredictable ways depending on
      their own independent motivations
Lesson Planning


• aim of planning is to align our learning processes
  and activities with the intended learning outcomes.
• assessment is particularly important
• technology becoming increasingly central . . .
Designing learning activities in a technology-
rich context (JISC template)
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearningpedagogy/workshops/session
3.aspx

Issues to take into account            Issues to decide

    Who are your learners?                  What will learners do (learning
    What are your intended learning         activity/ies)?
    outcomes?                               How will they be supported?
    Where does learning take place?         How will learners receive
    What learning technologies are          feedback?
    available?                              What resources will they use?
    What learning resources are             What technologies will they use?
    available?                              What is the e-learning advantage?
    What are the challenges?
Why„a technology-rich context‟?

• Video A Vision of Students Today




• (How) do these changes affect learning design?
Learning technology at UCL




• (How) do these technologies affect learning design?

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Designing and Planning a Teaching Session

Vikki udl complete presentation july 11
Vikki udl complete presentation july 11Vikki udl complete presentation july 11
Vikki udl complete presentation july 11
vpriddle
 
SPS Inquiry Learning PD Session 1 2015
SPS Inquiry Learning PD Session 1 2015SPS Inquiry Learning PD Session 1 2015
SPS Inquiry Learning PD Session 1 2015
mrdeshylton
 
Universal design
Universal designUniversal design
Universal design
melnieuwenhuis
 

Ähnlich wie Designing and Planning a Teaching Session (20)

#DAPP162 Session 3: Designing for learning & learning theories
#DAPP162 Session 3: Designing for learning & learning theories#DAPP162 Session 3: Designing for learning & learning theories
#DAPP162 Session 3: Designing for learning & learning theories
 
Student Centered
Student CenteredStudent Centered
Student Centered
 
Ldc
LdcLdc
Ldc
 
UDL and Active Learning Strategies
UDL and Active Learning StrategiesUDL and Active Learning Strategies
UDL and Active Learning Strategies
 
Vikki udl complete presentation july 11
Vikki udl complete presentation july 11Vikki udl complete presentation july 11
Vikki udl complete presentation july 11
 
RBC TLC Think space_Course outlines for accessible inclusive and equitable bl...
RBC TLC Think space_Course outlines for accessible inclusive and equitable bl...RBC TLC Think space_Course outlines for accessible inclusive and equitable bl...
RBC TLC Think space_Course outlines for accessible inclusive and equitable bl...
 
Module 3 - What are the Strategies for Differentiated Instruction.pptx
Module 3 - What are the Strategies for Differentiated Instruction.pptxModule 3 - What are the Strategies for Differentiated Instruction.pptx
Module 3 - What are the Strategies for Differentiated Instruction.pptx
 
Spice Up Your Life
Spice Up Your LifeSpice Up Your Life
Spice Up Your Life
 
SPS Inquiry Learning PD Session 1 2015
SPS Inquiry Learning PD Session 1 2015SPS Inquiry Learning PD Session 1 2015
SPS Inquiry Learning PD Session 1 2015
 
Ed Technology Pedagogy 2014
Ed Technology Pedagogy 2014Ed Technology Pedagogy 2014
Ed Technology Pedagogy 2014
 
Course Design in Higher Education with narration
Course Design in Higher Education with narrationCourse Design in Higher Education with narration
Course Design in Higher Education with narration
 
Amy Driscoll: Signature Assignments
Amy Driscoll: Signature AssignmentsAmy Driscoll: Signature Assignments
Amy Driscoll: Signature Assignments
 
A_SYSTEMS_APPROACH_TO_INSTRUCTIONAL_DESIGN.ppt
A_SYSTEMS_APPROACH_TO_INSTRUCTIONAL_DESIGN.pptA_SYSTEMS_APPROACH_TO_INSTRUCTIONAL_DESIGN.ppt
A_SYSTEMS_APPROACH_TO_INSTRUCTIONAL_DESIGN.ppt
 
Course design
Course designCourse design
Course design
 
Introduction to Universal Design for Learning
Introduction to Universal Design for LearningIntroduction to Universal Design for Learning
Introduction to Universal Design for Learning
 
11 may12
11 may1211 may12
11 may12
 
Instructional plan (unit 3) ; teaching strategies.
Instructional plan (unit 3) ; teaching strategies.Instructional plan (unit 3) ; teaching strategies.
Instructional plan (unit 3) ; teaching strategies.
 
Universal design
Universal designUniversal design
Universal design
 
Using UDL in Online Learning
Using UDL in Online LearningUsing UDL in Online Learning
Using UDL in Online Learning
 
Ubdppt
UbdpptUbdppt
Ubdppt
 

KĂźrzlich hochgeladen

1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 

KĂźrzlich hochgeladen (20)

Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptxDyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptxMagic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
 
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptxAsian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student briefSpatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
 
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 

Designing and Planning a Teaching Session

  • 1. Designing and Planning a Teaching Session This document is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales license, available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/.
  • 2. Today‟s menu • Approaches to study – some theories • Constructivism – what is it? • Video 1: outcomes • Outcomes-based planning – a background • Describing 'thinking skills' • Activity 1: writing learning outcomes • Alternative views on outcomes • Lesson planning • Video 2: students today • Activity 2: how does this affect learning design? • Learning technology – what is available? • Activity 3: lesson planning • Video 3: design in a technology-rich context
  • 3. Expected learning outcomes At the end of this session participants should be able to: • state the rationale for using an outcome-based approach to planning teaching sessions • write expected learning outcomes for a specific course/session • discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various learning technologies • select appropriate teaching and learning activities to support outcomes • designing a teaching session using a template
  • 4. Approaches to study – what a student does • Deep and surface approaches (Marton etc,’70s) • Strategic approaches (Biggs, Ramsden, ‘80s) • Approaches can be modified by designing the learning context (Biggs, ‘90s) • ‘Constructive alignment’ – congruence between – What the teacher intends learners to be able to do, know or understand (can be described as outcomes) – How they teach i.e. the activities – How they assess
  • 5. So what is constructivism? • Piaget (1950s), Brunner (1960s) . . . • New learning and knowledge builds on old understanding – rarely a ‘blank slate’ • Learning is not just adding knowledge but bringing change or transformation to pre- existing concepts to refine understanding and linkages – hence notion of ‘deep learning’ • ‘threshold concepts’(Meyer & Land 2005)
  • 7. What the teacher intends students to learn: “outcomes” • Planning starts with clear learning outcomes and the aim of planning is to align our learning activities with these. • Rationale: the planning of learning experiences and assessment of student learning has a significant impact on students’ approaches to learning. • Part of a systematic or ‘rational planning’ model • Dominant in the UK since ’90s
  • 8. Why is outcomes-based planning important? • Became dominant in UK Higher Education since the Dearing Report (1997) • Often used in proposals for new programmes or modules • Used in the QAA Subject Benchmark statements – set out general academic characteristics and standards of degrees in a range of subjects: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/AssuringStandardsAndQuality /subject-guidance/Pages/Subject-benchmark- statements.aspx
  • 9. UCL Context Programme design includes (i) the educational aims of the programme, including its intended learning outcomes and how these will be communicated to students, staff and external audiences; Programme Institution Questionnaire (PIQ UG) “The programme provides opportunities for students to develop and demonstrate knowledge and understanding, qualities, skills and other attributes in the following areas: A: Knowledge and understanding B: Skills and other attributes - intellectual (thinking) skills C: Skills and other attributes - practical skills D: Skills and other attributes - transferable skills http://www.ucl.ac.uk/academic-manual/
  • 10. Writing Learning Outcomes Outcomes should be • Written in a future tense (will, should be able to…) • Identify important learning requirements • Be achievable • Be assessable • Use language which students can understand • Relate to explicit statements of achievement ….but ‘thinking’ outcomes perhaps most difficult to define
  • 11. Describing „thinking‟ skills Bloom – 1956, revised, Anderson & Krathwohl 2001 verbs 1. Evaluation 1. Create -------------- -------------- 2. Synthesis 2. Evaluate -------------- -------------- 3. Analysis 3. Analyze -------------- -------------- 4. Application 4. Apply -------------- -------------- 5. Comprehension 5. Understand -------------- -------------- 6. Knowledge 6. Remember
  • 12. Describing „thinking‟skills Biggs SOLO Taxonomy – more verbs http://www.johnbiggs.com.au/solo_taxonomy.html
  • 13. misses point Prestructural identify, do simple Unistructural procedure enumerate, describe, list, Multistructural combine, do alogorithms compare/contrast, explain Relational causes, analyse, relate, apply theorise, generalise, Extended abstract hypothesise, reflect Biggs (1996) Structure of Observed learning Outcomes Pictures from ATHERTON J S (2009) Learning and Teaching; SOLO taxonomy [On-line] UK: Available: http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/solo.htm Accessed: 27 October 2009
  • 14. Writing Learning Outcomes • Consider your general aim/s for a module you are teaching. Write specific learning outcomes for this course: what do you want the students to learn?
  • 15. Local/Solo Knowledge & Intellectual Practical Transferable Understanding skills skills skills Prestructural Unistructural Multistructural Relational Extended abstract
  • 16. Alternative views Laurillard (1993) - learning/teaching is a rich dialogue Haggis (2003) - deep/surface models can be challenged Rowland (2006) – outcomes imply a passive learner - learners may take on increasing responsibility for ‘designing’ their personal learning (PLEs) Siemens (2005) – ‘connectivism’: know how where Sfard (2007) – communities of practice But also... learners develop in unpredictable ways depending on their own independent motivations
  • 17. Lesson Planning • aim of planning is to align our learning processes and activities with the intended learning outcomes. • assessment is particularly important • technology becoming increasingly central . . .
  • 18. Designing learning activities in a technology- rich context (JISC template) http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearningpedagogy/workshops/session 3.aspx Issues to take into account Issues to decide Who are your learners? What will learners do (learning What are your intended learning activity/ies)? outcomes? How will they be supported? Where does learning take place? How will learners receive What learning technologies are feedback? available? What resources will they use? What learning resources are What technologies will they use? available? What is the e-learning advantage? What are the challenges?
  • 19. Why„a technology-rich context‟? • Video A Vision of Students Today • (How) do these changes affect learning design?
  • 20. Learning technology at UCL • (How) do these technologies affect learning design?

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Comment: This was a reasonably successful two hour session delivered to c40 participant, but more sensibly could have split the planning from the learning technology. There are many points for expansion and more detailed activities, also for embedding local planning processes, documentation and technologies.
  2. Comment: part of overall course objectives (also spread across virtual alternative).
  3. Comment: the students already had access to a reading list for the programme and should have been familiar with these authors to some extent, the list included:Marton, F. and Saljo, R., "Approaches to learning" in The experience of learning by Marton, Ference, Hounsell, Dai, Entwistle, Noel James, Scottish Academic Press, 1984, pages 39-58. Note: The author's created a new line of educational research in the 1970s with their phenomenographic study which proposed that students can take a deep approach to learning or a surface approach to learning with different intentions and consequences. This chapter revisits these classic studies and relates the approaches to learning to conceptions of learning held by the learners.Biggs, J., "What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development" in Higher education research & development, 18(1), 1999, pages 57-75. Note: A summary of the key ideas about constructive alignment in the Biggs book. A good preview, or if you are too busy to read the book!
  4. Comment: Threshold concepts would have been already covered by some groups.Meyer, E and Land, R, "Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages and ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines" in Enhancing Teaching - Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses, University of Edinburgh, 2003, pages 1-12. Note: This report has been very influential, generating a great deal of thinking about 'threshold concepts' or key ideas that students must struggle with and understand in order to enter the discourse of a discipine, and how to teach them
  5. Comment: Embed code for this video (note it starts midway). The aim of this segment is to remind the audience of the constructed nature of knowledge and introduce the SOLO model we refer to later. These videos BTW are far from ideal but clips can be useful.<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SfloUd3eO_M?fs=1&hl=en_GB&rel=0" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SfloUd3eO_M?fs=1&hl=en_GB&rel=0&start=139" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object>
  6. Comment: The Dearing Report 1997 http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/There’s an interesting comment on Dearing with respect to tuition fees athttp://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2007/jul/24/highereducation.tuitionfeesHave highlighted the local context – suggest presenter would insert local planning documents here, or ask students to find them. They will all be much the same and link to QAA Subject Benchmarks. Most students will be familiar with these types of processes.An example from UCL was used to illustrate the requirement to specify learning outcomes in new course proposals:“Programme design includesthe educational aims of the programme, including its intended learning outcomes and how these will be communicated to students, staff and external audiences”
  7. Comment: This was given as homework
  8. Comment: There are a number of templates available, for example this JISC one which can be helpful.
  9. Comment: on reflection this section would have worked better as a separate session, though it followed quite well from the planning and theoretical perspectives previously. Wesch’s famous and powerful video<object width="480" height="385"><param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dGCJ46vyR9o?fs=1&hl=en_GB&rel=0" name="movie" /><param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" /><param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess" /><embed width="480" height="385" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dGCJ46vyR9o?fs=1&hl=en_GB&rel=0" /></object>
  10. Comment:We have a standard presentation of local e-learning systems (Moodle, Mahara, Echo 360 lecture capture), which is done on live systems rather than by PPT. This can be extended from a basic c 15 minute run-through to an hour or more with discussion and questions. Tried to link regularly back to the issues from the first part of the session. This could easily be substituted by a presentation on local systems.