Presentation by Pieter van der Hijden (pvdh@sofos.nl) of Sofos Consultancy (www.sofos.nl) and Stichting RechtenOnline (www.rechtenonline.nl) at the 39th annual conference of the International Simulation and Gaming Association (ISAGA,, www.isaga.info); Kaunas, Lithuania, 2008.

1. From learning design to game design and back; the Cyberdam example Stichting RechtenOnline Project Leren in een Virtuele Wereld Projectleiding: Diny Peters Pieter van der Hijden Projectpartners: E-Merge Hogeschool Rotterdam Hogeschool Utrecht Strathclyde University Glasgow TU-Delft Universiteit Leiden Thieme Meulenhoff IJsfontein Pieter van der Hijden MSc ( [email_address] ) Stichting RechtenOnline (Foundation Law Online) Sofos Consultancy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Presentation at 39 th ISAGA Annual Conference, Kaunas, Lithuania, 7-11 July 2008

2. Introduction www.cyberdam.nl

3. Introduction www.cyberdam.nl

5. Patterns in Game Design; Staffan Björk & Jussi Holopainen; 2005

6. Relation design tools <-> external goals of game are vague

8. Towards a Pattern Language for Networked Learning; Peter Goodyear et al.; NLC 2004

9. The on-line report on pedagogical techniques for computer-mediated communication; M.Paulsen; 1995

10. Training complex cognitive skills: a four component instructional design model for technical training; J. van Merriënboer; 1997

11. Digital Didactics

12. Where can game design and learning design meet?

15. How are requirements on learning objectives met by game?

17. How are requirements on learning objectives met by game? http://www.pd-trak.com/devtools.htm

20. Welcome to Cyberdam

21. Welcome to Dharadam Dharadam was created during the 5th ISAGA Summer School in Delhi, India, 21-30 June 2008 by Aashish Bhardwaj (India), Vinod Dumblekar (India), Renata Furman (Poland), Monica Mor (India), Vladimir Solodov (Russian Federation), Joanna Woźniakiewicz (Poland) and team manager Pieter van der Hijden (The Netherlands). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial -Share Alike 3.0 Unported License .

22. Cyberdam screenshot

23. Definition phase Set boundaries and external requirements Define the game Explore the domain of possible games Identify basic learning opportunities Know the topic of the game Deep reading Know the gaming environment Cyberdam demo Assessment of available resources Offered/wanted exercise Design relevance Activity

24. Definition phase

25. Design phase 1/2 Exploring possible actions between roles Filling the communications matrix Identify relevant roles in the game Assessment of stakeholders (max. 7) Completing and reducing set of stakeholders Categorising stakeholders Diverging complexity Brainstorming on stakeholders Design relevance Activity

26. Design phase

27. Design phase 2/2 Set the boundaries for the playground map Determine the magic circle Guard internal consistency All roles: cross check Global specification of activities from step to step Per role: plausible scenario to go from A to B Materials for briefing, individual targets Per role: initial state A and end state B Design relevance Activity

28. Design phase

29. Realisation phase NA Make the playground map NA Per role – per step: write instructions NA Realise playground characters NA Recapitulate the design, resolve any issues Design relevance Activity

30. Realisation phase

31. Implementation phase NA Preparing first run and launch NA Preparing introduction, briefing, debriefing Design relevance Activity

32. Implementation phase

34. Discussion www.cyberdam.nl

35. www.cyberdam.nl www.cyberdam.nl 2008 – Stichting RechtenOnline Pieter van der Hijden ( [email_address] )