The document discusses a study that explored using blogs as learning logs for students in a seminar. It investigated whether blogs were accepted as reflective tools, how useful they were, and whether performance increased from using prompted vs. naive learning logs. Key findings were that blogs took too much time and effort, students did not continue blogging after the seminar, and there was insufficient data to determine the impact of prompted vs. naive learning logs. The conclusion was that blogs show potential as learning logs but need improved usability and prompts to stimulate reflection.