1. Raw Materials and (food) security: a need for
information and analysis (intelligence) ?
The Hague, January 2015Krijn J. Poppe
with thanks to Thom Achterbosch and Koen Boone
2. Wageningen UR - For the quality of life
Plant
Sciences
Group
Animal
Sciences
Group
Agro-
technology
and Food
Sciences
Group
Environ-
mental
Sciences
Group
Social
Sciences
Group
Wageningen University Department of Social Sciences
Research Institutes (DLO) LEI
Experimental Research and consultancy CDI
3. National States
Many actors
Coope-
rative
Non
coope-
rative
Multipolair
⢠Power blocks
⢠Economic and politcal
competition
⢠Protectionism
Fragmentation
â˘Stagnating globalisation
â˘Insecure society
â˘Identity first
Multilateral
⢠Strong west and upcoming BRICs
⢠Global governance reformed
⢠Globalisation continues
Network
⢠Non-polair world order
⢠Global market economy and civil
society
⢠Unpredictable
Four scenarios on Scarcity and Transition
3Š De Ruijter Strategie
Food
⢠Every block (EU. VS, China etc.) handles
scarcity differently
⢠Management of transitions
⢠No food scarcity in Europe, water scarcity
in Southern Europe only
⢠No real change in food system in Europe,
but crises management : active control
policy like food stocks, water buffers for
periods of disruption and drought
⢠Water transport in Europe from North to
South (depending on costs and benefits)
⢠European policies are needed, steering
with Common Agricultural Policy â the
return of Mansholt to increase production
to self sufficiency levels
⢠Consumption of meat will be discouraged
5. Lessons from political science
ď§ European thinking is based on multilateralism with global
governance systems to facilitate trade, access to
resources and spread western values (soft power).
ď§ âEmerging markets view access to raw materials as an
object of power politics. Europe sees it as trade policyâ
ď§ âEurope and Japan are in a transition from nation state
to market state: in response to globalisation they make
the citizen responsible for prosperity (by privatizing)â
ď§ âGeo-economics becomes more important as emerging
markets see that their prosperity is linked to unhindered
access to scarce resourcesâ.
ď§ âMechanisms for conflict resolution should be taken
seriouslyâ >> should we develop something on food in The Hague ??
Quotes: Rob de Wijk â Machtspolitiek, 2014
8. 12,5% NL exports outside EU are inputs:
support local production to reduce tension
ď§ Export seeds: ⏠1,1 billion
intra EU extra EU
ď§ Export means of production (machinery etc.): ⏠3,1 bln.
intra EU extra EU
ď§ Glasshouses built outside the EU from Dutch origin
80 %
8
50
%
50
%
55
%
45
9. Imports
ď§ Phosphate (and potassium)
â Dependent on a few sources, mainly Morocco
ď§ Protein-rich animal feed (soy beans)
â EU uncompetitive in cost price (but home-grown
would not be not a big effect on consumer price ?)
â Meat consumption slows down â a good thing
â In supply disruption the stock is a big buffer
ď§ Tropical products, including palm oil and fats
ď§ Fish: EU aquaculture is not competitive compared to Asia
ď§ Rare metals etc for machinery and ICT: who knows?
ď§ If needed, NL could feed itself (autarky), EU too ?
9
10. Where to go from here
ď§ Monitoring
â Agriculture and Food have good world trade data
(less true for rare metals etc.)
â Life cycle analysis and other methodologies of the
Sustainability Consortium could be used for
monitoring, finding alternatives, promote
recirculation
ď§ Cooperation and reciprocity in trade
â Support with know how, but keep the lead (with
ICT?)
ď§ Develop a conflict resolution mechanism in the city of
justice - The Hague
11. 11
The Sustainability Consortium
SOURCE: TSC member interviews
⢠Providing multi-stakeholder input
to ensure industry alignment
⢠Identifying issues beyond LCAs
⢠Committing to scientific rigor
⢠Early access to a vast multi-
stakeholder network
⢠Collaboration on innovative
sustainability solutions and
consumer engagement
Member testimonials
âBy looking at sustainability as a
business opportunity, we are
innovating products now that we
wouldnât have been otherwiseâ
âTSC is bringing stakeholders
together in a collaborative fashion
to develop sustainability solutions
for common themes across
product sustainabilityâ
âTSC provides common language
and a uniform approach to
measure sustainability across the
supply chainâ
Products
Approach
Network
⢠Defining clear standards for
environmental and social metrics
⢠Creating implementable tools
⢠Reducing cost and complexity of
reporting
12. Reciprocity as a principle in risk mitigation
ď§ Match normative with strategic foreign policy in agrofood
ď§ Beyond largest supply at lowest cost (anticipate risk)
ď§ Cooperative solutions, mutual long term benefits
ď§ Implications
â Sustain NL knowledge & innovation base
â Explore new sourcing opportunities
â Multilateral efforts yet also strategic partnerships
â Dialogue with the agro-food sector on supply risk
13. A central role for ICT as a tool in a
cooperative solution and reciprocity ?
App store
Services
sensors
actuators
data sources
(âInternet of Thingsâ)
Local Information systems
Spraying Advisory
Services
Meteorological
Service
State and Policy
Information Service
Consumer Food
safety service
E-agriculturist Service
for spraying potatoes
Machine Breakdown
Service
Userâs devices
Other sources
Cloud
Information
systems
14. In conclusion
ď§ Food exports are diverse, some big import streams
ď§ Monitoring
â Agriculture and Food have good world trade data
(less true for rare metals etc.)
â Life cycle analysis and other methodologies of the
Sustainability Consortium could be used for
monitoring, finding alternatives, promote
recirculation
ď§ Cooperation and reciprocity in trade
â Support with know how, but keep the lead (ICT?)
ď§ Develop a conflict resolution mechanism in the city of
justice - The Hague
14
Totale export NL in 2013: 78,5 mrd. euro
62,4 mrd. euro intra-EU
16,1 mrd. euro extra-EU
Aandeel handel EU: rond de 80%
Aandeel naaste buren (D, VK, B, LUX, FRK): rond de 56%
Geopolitieke maatregelen beperkt effect?
Boycot heeft vooral korte termijn effect => vraag blijft overeind
Effect is vooral dat handelsstromen verschuiven
Producten vinden andere wegen naar de eindbestemming, al dan niet via (illegale) re-export door landen die niet onder de boycot vallen
Uit de pers na de Rusland boycot:
sterk gestegen export uit OekraĂŻne en Wit-Rusland naar Rusland van groente en fruit
toename vlees- en zuivelexport uit OekraĂŻne en Wit-Rusland
Brengt wel transactiekosten met zich mee
Zaaigoed: export intra en extra ongeveer evenveel. Zaaigoed is inbegrepen bij agrarische producten
Bron kassen; LEB 2013, uit rapport Baltussen en Smit
 zie ook:
https://www.wageningenur.nl/upload_mm/c/c/f/a75361e6-7c6c-461e-a3fd-34991b6ecdbd_13776_brochure%20LEI_05_NL_LR.pdf