SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 2
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Kenneth Horton                                                                  Main: (801) 832-2600
Associate Professor, Intellectual Property Law & Strategy                       Cell: (801) 809-0310
MBA Technology Management Program                                               Direct: (801) 212-2056
Gore School of Business, Westminster College                                    Khorton@Westminstercollege.edu
1840 South 1300 East                                                            http://www.linkedin.com/in/HortonIP
Salt Lake City, UT 84105

                         THE IP STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MINUTE
                       MARCH 2012: WHAT IS YOUR IP BUSINESS MODEL
I have used the following concept when teaching. The other participants at the 2012 LES IP100 Executive Forum
encouraged me to share the concept in this newsletter.

Last month I discussed the role IP assets can play in a business using the lower part of the diagram below. But what if
flip this concept on its head? In other words, why not ask what role a business can play in IP assets? If we ask this
question, we can add an upper part to this diagram.




As you move up the inverted upper part of the diagram, the IP assets become more important in the business, just as in
the lower part of this diagram. But in the upper part of the diagram, the business contains fewer and fewer components
in the business that can generate revenue for the company. In other words, as you move upward, the business becomes
more reliant on the IP assets themselves—rather than other corporate assets—to bring in revenue for the company.

At level 6, the company is categorized as transitory. At this stage, the company has recognized that the business cannot
be sustained as it currently exists. The business has decided to focus more on the revenue that can generated from
existing IP assets and so has partially turned away from generating revenue using other business assets. An example of a
company currently operating in a level 6 mode is Yahoo. Yahoo has not walked away from its web search engine and
web advertising business model, but has started to look at the revenues that can be generated from leveraging its IP
portfolio (i.e., from its recent enforcement actions against Facebook).

At level 7, the company becomes a technocracy. At this stage, the company not only decides to increasingly rely on its
existing IP assets to generate revenue, but decides also to strategically create new IP assets for the purpose of revenue
generation. Some of the typical business operations that would normally generate revenue from other assets are then
re-assigned to creating new IP assets. An example of a company operating in a level 7 mode is Rambus. This company
does not actually sell any physical products, like memory devices. Instead, Rambus sells technology and know-how via
licensing and enforcement. The company continues to perform R&D, but that R&D is used to create the technology and
know-how, rather than the physical products themselves.

At level 8, the company has moved into the realm of an opportunist. At this stage, the company has moved further
away from traditional business operations and more towards generations of revenues from IP assets. The company now
generates a majority of its revenue from IP assets. An example of this company was Acacia Research Corporation
(ACTG) when it still contained an “operating unit” devoted to medical devices. Another example of this company would
be Kodak, which still has some film operations but has been increasingly using its patent portfolio for revenue
generation as its film business continues to shrink.

At level 9, the company has become a privateer. As this stage, the company has stopped almost all business operations
except for those assets used for generating IP assets. An example of a company operating in a level 9 mode is
Intellectual Ventures (IV), which continues to perform R&D but that R&D is performed solely for the purpose of
generating IP assets (i.e., brainstorming sessions). A distinction can be drawn between IV and Rambus in the purpose
and use of their respective R&D. Rambus performs its R&D for the purpose of creating technology and know-how that
can be incorporated into a physical product. The R&D of IV, on the other hand, is used for the purpose of creating the
IP assets themselves.

At level 10, the company has become the proverbial patent troll or NPE. The only business operations of the company
are the acquisition and monetization of IP assets. There is no longer any development or creation of IP assets internally
within the company. An example of a company operating in a level 10 mode is CIVIX-DDI, LLC since it’s only revenue
comes from licensing and enforcing the patents. Another example of a level 10 company is the “new” Acacia Research
Corporation. If you want another example, just look at the daily patent infringement cases filed around the country on
any given day.

The question that remains to be answered, though, is whether the profits generated from the upper part of the diagram
can match the profits generated in the lower part of the diagram.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Picture 2
Picture 2Picture 2
Picture 2awonkov
 
Curriculum vitae.,,
Curriculum vitae.,,Curriculum vitae.,,
Curriculum vitae.,,Eriicka LG
 
Dibujo de religion daniela noriega
Dibujo de religion daniela noriegaDibujo de religion daniela noriega
Dibujo de religion daniela noriegaDaniela Noriega
 
Gv act1 proceso de estructura de mi clase
Gv act1  proceso de estructura de mi claseGv act1  proceso de estructura de mi clase
Gv act1 proceso de estructura de mi claseGaby Vela Soberanis
 
As film evaluation editing.
As film evaluation   editing.As film evaluation   editing.
As film evaluation editing.andreapegasiou
 
los valores y antivalores en el cuento francisca y la muerte
los valores y antivalores en el cuento francisca y la muertelos valores y antivalores en el cuento francisca y la muerte
los valores y antivalores en el cuento francisca y la muerteyenigiraldo
 
Guia redes adulto_mayor
Guia redes adulto_mayorGuia redes adulto_mayor
Guia redes adulto_mayorIvan Molina
 
Modelo Aa Be Contexto Escola P.Point
Modelo Aa Be Contexto Escola P.PointModelo Aa Be Contexto Escola P.Point
Modelo Aa Be Contexto Escola P.Pointeudorapereira
 
Atividade avaliativa da ii unidade
Atividade avaliativa da ii unidadeAtividade avaliativa da ii unidade
Atividade avaliativa da ii unidadeangeladilauro
 
Juan david segura scratch
Juan david segura scratchJuan david segura scratch
Juan david segura scratchGIALEX
 
La tabla periodica alejandro ruiz cristancho
La tabla periodica alejandro ruiz cristanchoLa tabla periodica alejandro ruiz cristancho
La tabla periodica alejandro ruiz cristanchoAlejo Ruiiz Chriistancho
 
Texto Desafios Oportunidades Sessao 1
Texto  Desafios  Oportunidades  Sessao 1Texto  Desafios  Oportunidades  Sessao 1
Texto Desafios Oportunidades Sessao 1eudorapereira
 
Kybernetisches Changemanagement
Kybernetisches ChangemanagementKybernetisches Changemanagement
Kybernetisches ChangemanagementVAEXAKON10
 

Andere mochten auch (17)

Picture 2
Picture 2Picture 2
Picture 2
 
Curriculum vitae.,,
Curriculum vitae.,,Curriculum vitae.,,
Curriculum vitae.,,
 
Dibujo de religion daniela noriega
Dibujo de religion daniela noriegaDibujo de religion daniela noriega
Dibujo de religion daniela noriega
 
Curriculum vitae
Curriculum vitaeCurriculum vitae
Curriculum vitae
 
Gv act1 proceso de estructura de mi clase
Gv act1  proceso de estructura de mi claseGv act1  proceso de estructura de mi clase
Gv act1 proceso de estructura de mi clase
 
As film evaluation editing.
As film evaluation   editing.As film evaluation   editing.
As film evaluation editing.
 
los valores y antivalores en el cuento francisca y la muerte
los valores y antivalores en el cuento francisca y la muertelos valores y antivalores en el cuento francisca y la muerte
los valores y antivalores en el cuento francisca y la muerte
 
Guia redes adulto_mayor
Guia redes adulto_mayorGuia redes adulto_mayor
Guia redes adulto_mayor
 
100416_Krueger_Produkt.pdf
100416_Krueger_Produkt.pdf100416_Krueger_Produkt.pdf
100416_Krueger_Produkt.pdf
 
Modelo Aa Be Contexto Escola P.Point
Modelo Aa Be Contexto Escola P.PointModelo Aa Be Contexto Escola P.Point
Modelo Aa Be Contexto Escola P.Point
 
Atividade avaliativa da ii unidade
Atividade avaliativa da ii unidadeAtividade avaliativa da ii unidade
Atividade avaliativa da ii unidade
 
Juan david segura scratch
Juan david segura scratchJuan david segura scratch
Juan david segura scratch
 
La tabla periodica alejandro ruiz cristancho
La tabla periodica alejandro ruiz cristanchoLa tabla periodica alejandro ruiz cristancho
La tabla periodica alejandro ruiz cristancho
 
Informationsfluss
InformationsflussInformationsfluss
Informationsfluss
 
Texto Desafios Oportunidades Sessao 1
Texto  Desafios  Oportunidades  Sessao 1Texto  Desafios  Oportunidades  Sessao 1
Texto Desafios Oportunidades Sessao 1
 
Kybernetisches Changemanagement
Kybernetisches ChangemanagementKybernetisches Changemanagement
Kybernetisches Changemanagement
 
PLAN BICENTENARIO EJE 1
PLAN BICENTENARIO EJE 1PLAN BICENTENARIO EJE 1
PLAN BICENTENARIO EJE 1
 

Ähnlich wie Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter

Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy MinuteQ1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minutekhorton123
 
20 Red Hot, Pre-IPO Companies in 2015 B2B Tech
20 Red Hot, Pre-IPO Companies in 2015 B2B Tech20 Red Hot, Pre-IPO Companies in 2015 B2B Tech
20 Red Hot, Pre-IPO Companies in 2015 B2B TechIDG Connect
 
The First Rule You Know About Building Software is Wrong: Rippling CEO Parker...
The First Rule You Know About Building Software is Wrong: Rippling CEO Parker...The First Rule You Know About Building Software is Wrong: Rippling CEO Parker...
The First Rule You Know About Building Software is Wrong: Rippling CEO Parker...saastr
 
Case Analysis On Apple Inc
Case Analysis On Apple IncCase Analysis On Apple Inc
Case Analysis On Apple IncNina Vazquez
 
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...Thomas O. Dubuisson
 
Global patent concerns for 2016 e book
Global patent concerns for 2016 e bookGlobal patent concerns for 2016 e book
Global patent concerns for 2016 e bookRamya Nair
 
HBR_How_Apple_Is_Organized_For_Innovation-4.pdf
HBR_How_Apple_Is_Organized_For_Innovation-4.pdfHBR_How_Apple_Is_Organized_For_Innovation-4.pdf
HBR_How_Apple_Is_Organized_For_Innovation-4.pdfPratapBist1
 
IBM IP Advisor with Watson White Paper
IBM IP Advisor with Watson White PaperIBM IP Advisor with Watson White Paper
IBM IP Advisor with Watson White PaperSue Hallen
 
BUILDING COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, AND ALIGNING STRATEGY WITH THE EXECUTION
BUILDING COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, AND ALIGNING STRATEGY WITH THE EXECUTIONBUILDING COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, AND ALIGNING STRATEGY WITH THE EXECUTION
BUILDING COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, AND ALIGNING STRATEGY WITH THE EXECUTIONPankaj Kumar
 
The Telephone And Telegraph Corporation
The Telephone And Telegraph CorporationThe Telephone And Telegraph Corporation
The Telephone And Telegraph CorporationLori Gilbert
 
Aligning Intellectual Property with Corporate Strategy and Cultivating Corpor...
Aligning Intellectual Property with Corporate Strategy and Cultivating Corpor...Aligning Intellectual Property with Corporate Strategy and Cultivating Corpor...
Aligning Intellectual Property with Corporate Strategy and Cultivating Corpor...Naim Khan
 
Business Analytics per il Finance: stato dell’arte, esigenze emergenti e nuov...
Business Analytics per il Finance: stato dell’arte, esigenze emergenti e nuov...Business Analytics per il Finance: stato dell’arte, esigenze emergenti e nuov...
Business Analytics per il Finance: stato dell’arte, esigenze emergenti e nuov...Fondazione CUOA
 
Intellectual property services hyderabad
Intellectual property services hyderabadIntellectual property services hyderabad
Intellectual property services hyderabadAccuprosys
 
Intellectual Property Services
Intellectual Property ServicesIntellectual Property Services
Intellectual Property Servicesaccu6030
 
Intellectual property services hyderabad
Intellectual property services hyderabadIntellectual property services hyderabad
Intellectual property services hyderabadAccuprosys
 
Objects In Your Mirror Are Closer Than They Appear
Objects In Your Mirror Are Closer Than They AppearObjects In Your Mirror Are Closer Than They Appear
Objects In Your Mirror Are Closer Than They Appearprobinson99
 
Technology Trends, Business Trends, and the History of Tech in Los Angeles
Technology Trends, Business Trends, and the History of Tech in Los AngelesTechnology Trends, Business Trends, and the History of Tech in Los Angeles
Technology Trends, Business Trends, and the History of Tech in Los AngelesJohn Shiple
 
ISACA IT GRC Conference 2008 Creating Business Value by means of Stakeholder ...
ISACA IT GRC Conference 2008 Creating Business Value by means of Stakeholder ...ISACA IT GRC Conference 2008 Creating Business Value by means of Stakeholder ...
ISACA IT GRC Conference 2008 Creating Business Value by means of Stakeholder ...Arno Kapteyn
 

Ähnlich wie Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter (20)

Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy MinuteQ1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
 
ACEOsGuide
ACEOsGuideACEOsGuide
ACEOsGuide
 
20 Red Hot, Pre-IPO Companies in 2015 B2B Tech
20 Red Hot, Pre-IPO Companies in 2015 B2B Tech20 Red Hot, Pre-IPO Companies in 2015 B2B Tech
20 Red Hot, Pre-IPO Companies in 2015 B2B Tech
 
The First Rule You Know About Building Software is Wrong: Rippling CEO Parker...
The First Rule You Know About Building Software is Wrong: Rippling CEO Parker...The First Rule You Know About Building Software is Wrong: Rippling CEO Parker...
The First Rule You Know About Building Software is Wrong: Rippling CEO Parker...
 
Case Analysis On Apple Inc
Case Analysis On Apple IncCase Analysis On Apple Inc
Case Analysis On Apple Inc
 
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
 
Global patent concerns for 2016 e book
Global patent concerns for 2016 e bookGlobal patent concerns for 2016 e book
Global patent concerns for 2016 e book
 
HBR_How_Apple_Is_Organized_For_Innovation-4.pdf
HBR_How_Apple_Is_Organized_For_Innovation-4.pdfHBR_How_Apple_Is_Organized_For_Innovation-4.pdf
HBR_How_Apple_Is_Organized_For_Innovation-4.pdf
 
IBM IP Advisor with Watson White Paper
IBM IP Advisor with Watson White PaperIBM IP Advisor with Watson White Paper
IBM IP Advisor with Watson White Paper
 
Ip holding company
Ip holding companyIp holding company
Ip holding company
 
BUILDING COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, AND ALIGNING STRATEGY WITH THE EXECUTION
BUILDING COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, AND ALIGNING STRATEGY WITH THE EXECUTIONBUILDING COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, AND ALIGNING STRATEGY WITH THE EXECUTION
BUILDING COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, AND ALIGNING STRATEGY WITH THE EXECUTION
 
The Telephone And Telegraph Corporation
The Telephone And Telegraph CorporationThe Telephone And Telegraph Corporation
The Telephone And Telegraph Corporation
 
Aligning Intellectual Property with Corporate Strategy and Cultivating Corpor...
Aligning Intellectual Property with Corporate Strategy and Cultivating Corpor...Aligning Intellectual Property with Corporate Strategy and Cultivating Corpor...
Aligning Intellectual Property with Corporate Strategy and Cultivating Corpor...
 
Business Analytics per il Finance: stato dell’arte, esigenze emergenti e nuov...
Business Analytics per il Finance: stato dell’arte, esigenze emergenti e nuov...Business Analytics per il Finance: stato dell’arte, esigenze emergenti e nuov...
Business Analytics per il Finance: stato dell’arte, esigenze emergenti e nuov...
 
Intellectual property services hyderabad
Intellectual property services hyderabadIntellectual property services hyderabad
Intellectual property services hyderabad
 
Intellectual Property Services
Intellectual Property ServicesIntellectual Property Services
Intellectual Property Services
 
Intellectual property services hyderabad
Intellectual property services hyderabadIntellectual property services hyderabad
Intellectual property services hyderabad
 
Objects In Your Mirror Are Closer Than They Appear
Objects In Your Mirror Are Closer Than They AppearObjects In Your Mirror Are Closer Than They Appear
Objects In Your Mirror Are Closer Than They Appear
 
Technology Trends, Business Trends, and the History of Tech in Los Angeles
Technology Trends, Business Trends, and the History of Tech in Los AngelesTechnology Trends, Business Trends, and the History of Tech in Los Angeles
Technology Trends, Business Trends, and the History of Tech in Los Angeles
 
ISACA IT GRC Conference 2008 Creating Business Value by means of Stakeholder ...
ISACA IT GRC Conference 2008 Creating Business Value by means of Stakeholder ...ISACA IT GRC Conference 2008 Creating Business Value by means of Stakeholder ...
ISACA IT GRC Conference 2008 Creating Business Value by means of Stakeholder ...
 

Mehr von khorton123

Q3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletterkhorton123
 
October 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal MinuteOctober 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
August 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal MinuteAugust 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
July 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal MinuteJuly 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
June 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal MinuteJune 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q3 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletterkhorton123
 
May 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal MinuteMay 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
April 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal MinuteApril 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
March 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal MinuteMarch 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
February 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal MinuteFebruary 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012  IP Minute NewsletterJanuary 2012  IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletterkhorton123
 
December 2011 Newsletter
December 2011 NewsletterDecember 2011 Newsletter
December 2011 Newsletterkhorton123
 
November 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 NewsletterNovember 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 Newsletterkhorton123
 
December 2010 Newsletter
December 2010 NewsletterDecember 2010 Newsletter
December 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
January 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 NewsletterJanuary 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
March 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 NewsletterMarch 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
April 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 NewsletterApril 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
May 2010 Newsletter
May 2010 NewsletterMay 2010 Newsletter
May 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 

Mehr von khorton123 (20)

Q3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal Minute
 
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minute
 
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
 
October 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal MinuteOctober 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
August 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal MinuteAugust 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
July 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal MinuteJuly 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
June 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal MinuteJune 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q3 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
 
May 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal MinuteMay 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
April 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal MinuteApril 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
March 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal MinuteMarch 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
February 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal MinuteFebruary 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012  IP Minute NewsletterJanuary 2012  IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletter
 
December 2011 Newsletter
December 2011 NewsletterDecember 2011 Newsletter
December 2011 Newsletter
 
November 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 NewsletterNovember 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 Newsletter
 
December 2010 Newsletter
December 2010 NewsletterDecember 2010 Newsletter
December 2010 Newsletter
 
January 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 NewsletterJanuary 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 Newsletter
 
March 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 NewsletterMarch 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 Newsletter
 
April 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 NewsletterApril 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 Newsletter
 
May 2010 Newsletter
May 2010 NewsletterMay 2010 Newsletter
May 2010 Newsletter
 

Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter

  • 1. Kenneth Horton Main: (801) 832-2600 Associate Professor, Intellectual Property Law & Strategy Cell: (801) 809-0310 MBA Technology Management Program Direct: (801) 212-2056 Gore School of Business, Westminster College Khorton@Westminstercollege.edu 1840 South 1300 East http://www.linkedin.com/in/HortonIP Salt Lake City, UT 84105 THE IP STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MINUTE MARCH 2012: WHAT IS YOUR IP BUSINESS MODEL I have used the following concept when teaching. The other participants at the 2012 LES IP100 Executive Forum encouraged me to share the concept in this newsletter. Last month I discussed the role IP assets can play in a business using the lower part of the diagram below. But what if flip this concept on its head? In other words, why not ask what role a business can play in IP assets? If we ask this question, we can add an upper part to this diagram. As you move up the inverted upper part of the diagram, the IP assets become more important in the business, just as in the lower part of this diagram. But in the upper part of the diagram, the business contains fewer and fewer components in the business that can generate revenue for the company. In other words, as you move upward, the business becomes more reliant on the IP assets themselves—rather than other corporate assets—to bring in revenue for the company. At level 6, the company is categorized as transitory. At this stage, the company has recognized that the business cannot be sustained as it currently exists. The business has decided to focus more on the revenue that can generated from existing IP assets and so has partially turned away from generating revenue using other business assets. An example of a company currently operating in a level 6 mode is Yahoo. Yahoo has not walked away from its web search engine and web advertising business model, but has started to look at the revenues that can be generated from leveraging its IP portfolio (i.e., from its recent enforcement actions against Facebook). At level 7, the company becomes a technocracy. At this stage, the company not only decides to increasingly rely on its existing IP assets to generate revenue, but decides also to strategically create new IP assets for the purpose of revenue generation. Some of the typical business operations that would normally generate revenue from other assets are then
  • 2. re-assigned to creating new IP assets. An example of a company operating in a level 7 mode is Rambus. This company does not actually sell any physical products, like memory devices. Instead, Rambus sells technology and know-how via licensing and enforcement. The company continues to perform R&D, but that R&D is used to create the technology and know-how, rather than the physical products themselves. At level 8, the company has moved into the realm of an opportunist. At this stage, the company has moved further away from traditional business operations and more towards generations of revenues from IP assets. The company now generates a majority of its revenue from IP assets. An example of this company was Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) when it still contained an “operating unit” devoted to medical devices. Another example of this company would be Kodak, which still has some film operations but has been increasingly using its patent portfolio for revenue generation as its film business continues to shrink. At level 9, the company has become a privateer. As this stage, the company has stopped almost all business operations except for those assets used for generating IP assets. An example of a company operating in a level 9 mode is Intellectual Ventures (IV), which continues to perform R&D but that R&D is performed solely for the purpose of generating IP assets (i.e., brainstorming sessions). A distinction can be drawn between IV and Rambus in the purpose and use of their respective R&D. Rambus performs its R&D for the purpose of creating technology and know-how that can be incorporated into a physical product. The R&D of IV, on the other hand, is used for the purpose of creating the IP assets themselves. At level 10, the company has become the proverbial patent troll or NPE. The only business operations of the company are the acquisition and monetization of IP assets. There is no longer any development or creation of IP assets internally within the company. An example of a company operating in a level 10 mode is CIVIX-DDI, LLC since it’s only revenue comes from licensing and enforcing the patents. Another example of a level 10 company is the “new” Acacia Research Corporation. If you want another example, just look at the daily patent infringement cases filed around the country on any given day. The question that remains to be answered, though, is whether the profits generated from the upper part of the diagram can match the profits generated in the lower part of the diagram.