4 a.principi-work after retirement - italy ifa prague
1. IFA 11TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON AGEING
INCOME SECURITY, SOCIAL PROTECTION/SOCIAL SECURITY AND POVERTY PREVENTION
Prague, 28th May-1st June 2012
Work after retirement:
Government and companies’ policy trends in Italy
Principi A., Checcucci, P., Di Rosa, M. and Lamura, G.
INRCA - Italian National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing
Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing
Via S. Margherita 5, 60124, Ancona, Italy; e-mail: a.principi@inrca.it
2. Contents of the presentation
• National background data
• Work after retirement: a free or a “forced”
choice for individuals?
• Organisational drivers
• Relevant governmental policies
• Conclusions and recommendations
3. Contents of the presentation
• National background data
• Work after retirement: a free or a “forced”
choice for individuals?
• Organisational drivers
• Relevant governmental policies
• Conclusions and recommendations
4. Labour market EU 27
Employment rate of older workers (55-64 years)
75 Sweden
Germany
70 Denmark
Estonia
65 Finland
United Kingdom
60 Netherlands
Cyprus
55 Latvia
Lithuania
50 Ireland
Portugal
45 Czech Republic
Spain
40 Bulgaria
Austria
35 Slovakia
France
30 Romania
Greece
25 Luxembourg
Belgium
20 Italy
Poland
15 Hungary
Malta
1999 2002 2005 2008 2011
Slovenia
Source: Eurostat
5. Labour Market 34 OECD countries
Effective retirement age compared to official retirement age, 2004-2009
Source: OECD
6. Retired people working, in Italy (N)
2008-2011 _
+
2008 2009 2010
M F T M F T M F T
55-59 134,870 72,581 207,451 131,373 74,904 206,277 115,080 71,373 186,453
60-64 252,004 107,959 359,963 272,175 110,057 382,232 264,563 112,434 376,997
65-69 198,995 62,660 261,655 201,426 65,057 266,483 189,095 63,766 252,861
70-74 111,745 29,587 141,332 124,250 32,644 156,894 126,304 34,361 160,665
75-79 44,299 11,532 55,831 48,850 12,408 61,258 49,188 12,870 62,058
80+ 17,090 5,811 22,901 19,797 6,300 26,097 21,319 6,776 28,095
TOT 759,003 290,130 1,049,133 797,871 301,370 1,099,241 765,549 301,580 1,067,129
55+
Source: INRCA elaboration on INPS data
7. Retired people working:
the role of gender
• In 2010, working pensioners 55+ were 6.9%
of total pensioners 55+ (15,342,012).
• Retired workers men 55+ were 10.7% of
total retired men 55+ (i.e. 7,130,880)
• Retired workers women 55+ were 3.7% of
total retired women 55+ (i.e. 8,211,132).
Source: INRCA elaboration on INPS data
8. Work after retirement: data from
surveys on individuals
• BANK OF ITALY - SURVEY ON ITALIAN HOUSEHOLD
BUDGETS
(Banca d’Italia: Indagine sui bilanci delle famiglie italiane)
– The surveys’ sample consists of approximately 8,000 families (24,000
individuals), distributed in about 300 Italian municipalities.
• ISTAT – “CROSS SECTIONAL UDB” IT-SILC
(ISTAT: Indagine sui redditi e le condizioni di vita delle famiglie IT-
SILC)
– The sample includes about 20,000 households and 50,000 individuals.
• ISTAT - LABOUR FORCE SURVEY
(ISTAT: Indagine sulle forze lavoro)
– A sample of over 300,000 Italian families (about 800,000 individuals
yearly in different wawes) distributed in 1,300 Italian municipalities is
interviewed.
9. Work after retirement:
prevalence in Italy (N)
ISTAT IT- ISTAT-
Data source Bank of Italy
SILC Labour force
Year 2004 2010 2007 2010 2007 2011
Total sample 20,581 19,836 45,133 40,836 171,496 163,578
Total workers 7,183 6,864 19,891 17,698 61,922 56,205
Working
2.7% 4.7% 5.4% 5.5% 0.3% 0.2%
pensioners
10. Retired workers: main characteristics
• Women are increasing;
• Mostly married (63 to 80%) but divorced/separated are
increasing;
• High educated people are less represented;
11. Contents of the presentation
• National background data
• Work after retirement: a free or a “forced”
choice for individuals?
• Organisational drivers
• Relevant governmental policies
• Conclusions and recommendations
12. Work after retirement: individual drivers
Indications from national experts and the literature
Economic need:
• 63% of retired people with pension income lower than 1,000
euros monthly;
• One retired person in four has a pension income under 500
euros monthly;
• Until January 2012, good substitution (wage/pension) rate:
80%;
• Economic need of their adult children
13. Work after retirement: individual drivers
Indications from the case studies
Economic need:
• Gastronomist counter operator in a Supermarket 73 years-old
• Main reason for work after retirement (full-time contract):
to help economically his 3 adult children with
work/economic problems
• Chorister in a lyric choir 65 years-old
• Secondary reason for work after retirement (short fixed-
term contracts): the supplemental income is very helpful
14. Work after retirement: individual drivers
Indications from national experts and the literature
a) Demand-driven opportunities:
b) Personal interest in the work-desire to remain active;
• Rewarding jobs;
• High status jobs (top managers, directors, etc.);
• Intellettual jobs (instead of hard and repetitive ones)
15. Work after retirement: individual drivers
Indications from the case studies
a) Demand-driven opportunities
• Professor in a University 66 years-old
• An offer to retire being re-hired as pensioner, under better (income from
work+new wage) financial conditions for him (flexible contract)
b) Personal interest in the work-desire to remain active
• Chorister in a lyric choir 65 years-old
• Main reason for work after retirement (short fixed-term contracts): great
passion for this job;
• Gastronomist counter operator in a Supermarket 73 years-old
• Secondary reason for work after retirement (full-time contract): the retired
worker enjoys his work and considers himself as “the luckiest person in the
world”.
16. Contents of the presentation
• National background data
• Work after retirement: a free or a “forced”
choice for individuals?
• Organisational drivers
• Relevant governmental policies
• Conclusions and recommendations
17. Organisational drivers
Indications from the case studies
• Economic: to reduce staff costs (University);
• Regulatory:
– Internal: internal rule who protect “seniors” (Choir);
– External: to improve the performance in the light of
the legislation (University);
• Sensitiveness by the employer (Supermarket);
• Work experience of the retired worker
(Supermarket).
18. Contents of the presentation
• National background data
• Work after retirement: a free or a “forced”
choice for individuals?
• Organisational drivers
• Relevant governmental policies
• Conclusions and recommendations
19. Governmental policies
• The full combination of employment and pension income
is allowed from January 2009 (DL n. 112/2008 as enforced
by Law n. 133/2008).
• Flexible working opportunities:
Job on call (lavoro a chiamata) addressed to under 25 year-olds, over 45 year-old
workers and older pensioners; the workers are at the employer’s disposal (full-time or
part-time) and they are hired through typical seasonal contracts;
Job sharing, implying that two workers should share/divide the same job The division of
work can be both vertical (1 week each) or horizontal (both working some hours each
in the same day). In case of firing or resigning of one worker the contract is
automatically terminated for both, but the second worker can be shifted to a standard
(full/part-time) contract. Job sharing cannot be used by Public Organizations;
Job placement contracts (contratto di inserimento), especially aimed at placing or
replacing disadvantaged workers (among which over 50 year-old unemployed) in the
labour market by providing individual training programs within a fixed-term job;
Temping (lavoro interinale), which in case of contracts longer than six months, provides
disadvantaged unemployed persons (including over 50 year-old ones) with individual
replacement training programs. This measure can also be used for pensioners.
20. Governmental policies
Experiences from the case studies (organisations
currently employing retired workers):
1) Employers do not recognise any current
governmental policies to support work after
retirement;
2) Employers do not wish any future governmental
policies to this purpose;
3) Employers suggest governmental policies to
support work for young people (in October 2011
unemployment rate 29.2% vs 8.5% of all
population)
21. Governmental policies:
the “Fornero” reform
Year Old-age pension Seniority pension/early
(years of age) retirement*
(Years of contribution)
Men Women Men Women
2012 66 62 42+1 month 41+1 month
2013 42+2 months 41+2 months
2014 42+3 months 41+3 months
2018 66 66
2026 67 67
* Economic disadvantages for those people who retire before 62
22. Economic conditions of future
pensioners
• The transition from the wage-based to the contribution-
based system, will ensure that future pension income
will be lower than in the past.
• The pension substitution rate is going to fall from the
current 80% to 60% of the last received salary.
• The scenario is worsened by the fragmented and
unstable careers who are building current workers, due
to a labour market difficult to access, also in the light of
the economic crisis.
• This means that future pensioners will be poorer than
current ones: probably they will no longer able to help
their adult children in economic terms and they will
need to work after retirement to a greater extent to
survive themselves.
23. Governmental policies
The impact of the “Fornero” reform on work after
retirement
• In the short term:
– The increased staturory retirement age will probably lead to a
decline of the phenomenon since there will be a retrenchment
of pensioners who will enter later than in the past in their
condition of retired people.
• In the long term:
– The low pension income of the “new pensioners” will
probably lead to a considerable growth of the phenomenon
due to economic need.
An “incentive” to work after retirement
24. Contents of the presentation
• National background data
• Work after retirement: a free or a “forced”
choice for individuals?
• Organisational drivers
• Relevant governmental policies
• Conclusions and recommendations
25. Conclusions and recommendations (1/4)
• “Not only for money”: to prevent pension
inadequacy
– After the enforcement of the 2012 pension reform,
pension inadequacy is viewed as the main problem for
future retired people.
– A prolonged working life does not necessarily mean
“less” retired workers in the long term, but simply older
(and probably poorer) retired workers.
– The government and social partners should consider
right from now measures to both prevent pension
inadequacy.
– To combat undeclared work: this will increase their
contribution and so the magnitude of their pension.
26. Conclusions and recommendations (2/4)
• To combat intergenerational conflicts
– Adult vs. older people
• A category of mature, unemployed people have several
difficulties to join the labour market. They are at risk of long
term unemployment. Their working career is fragmented and
their pension income will be very low.
– Younger vs. older people
• Youth unemployment is a very sensitive issue in Italy.
Unemployment of younger people is high, and e.g. employers
call for support to work for younger people.
– Difficult to accept a promotion of work after retirement
in this context: it is important to grasp the message that
experience and skills of retired people are important,
and that younger generations should not pay the cost of
this in terms of difficulties to access the labour market.
27. Conclusions and recommendations (3/4)
• Too few work after retirement for interest or
pleasure? To improve working conditions.
– All case studies underlined the importance of this driver
(i.e. personal interest, pleasure), being in one case (i.e.
the Choir) the main one.
– The government, social partners and employers should
strive to “go beyond” a pension reform: to improve
working conditions of older workers before and after
their retirement, through e.g. life-long learning, a better
environment at work.
28. Conclusions and recommendations (4/4)
• Dedicated policies more appealing for employers.
– The evidence from case studies indicates that
employers do not recognise measures supporting work
after retirement in the Italian context: they do not know
any policies or measures to this aim.
– The government and social partners should consider
this issue during collective bargaining, trying to
implement measures more appealing for employers to
hire retired people.