![Why Living Labs? ,[object Object]]()
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (20)
Ähnlich wie Koen De Vos - iLab.o
Ähnlich wie Koen De Vos - iLab.o (20)
Mehr von imec.archive
Mehr von imec.archive (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Koen De Vos - iLab.o
- 1. IBBT iLab.o Open Innovation Lab 12/10/2011 1
- 3. User no longer problem, but solution: creates value=> involve users in innovation process 2
- 5. MIT Labs,
- 7. City labs
- 8. Helsinki Virtual Village,
- 10. 12/10/2011 4 Technologies are not consumed, but domesticatedby users.
- 12. Real-life experimental introduction of new services and products
- 13. Local and Trusted environment
- 14. Critical Mass of users
- 15. Public-Private-People PartnershipBallon, Pierson & Delaere, 2005 5
- 16. The Trouble with Users Who are they? How will they use your product? How (high) do they value your product? 6
- 17. IBBT organization 7
- 18. From idea to business 8
- 19. Create world-class facilities Develop and maintainworldwide leadingexperimentalICT and Internet technical and user research facilities that strengthen the position of the Flemishindustrywithin a global market and that will contribute to a sustainable smart society. 12/10/2011 9
- 21. User selection and management
- 22. New methods for usage logging and monitoring
- 24. Strategy & policy tools
- 25. What are the results?
- 26. User & Social requirements
- 27. Market Potential & Business models
- 29. The EU Living Lab Framework
- 30. ENoLLiVZW as a partner repository 13
- 33. Founding member of ENoLL association (2010)
- 34. Hosting the ENoLL secretariat in Brussels
- 35. Elected as International Secretary
- 36. Developing and hosting the new ENoLL websites and newsletter
- 38. IBBT iLab.o Open Innovation Lab 12/10/2011 17
Hinweis der Redaktion
- This interface, including location-based applications dates back to 2007 and was the result of the I-City Project, in which companies HP and Microsoft collaborated to use Living Lab users and refine this technology. While user feedback was promising and user application ideas cutting edge, even by today’s measures, the technological outcomes were never truly adopted by neither Microsoft nor HP, who treated the project more as a localized branding project, more than a true core research project.In 2008-2010, it was Apple who finally commoditized apps with small resource footprints for dedicated tasks, much like i-City had developed earlier on.The story indicates that succesfull innovation needs a true ecosystem of users/co-creators, but also the business partners who are willing to think out of the box and take the user feedback seriously.Users are not willing sheep who simply accept the technology push, but customers who domesticate your offering as they see fit. Companies who acknowledge and accept this as part of their innovation cycle, are often much more succesfull at keeping up in this rapidly changing technology market.