1. Katalog & Pengatalog:
tantangan kini dan masa depan

2. Nama: Hendro Wicaksono
Pendidikan: S1 Jurusan Ilmu
Perpustakaan FS-UI (92-97)
Pengalaman kerja: Kemenpera, BEJ,
CIFOR, British Council, Karim
Business Consulting, KPK.
Lead developer SLiMS
twitter.com/hendrowicaksono
facebook.com/hendrowicaksono
hendrowicaksono@yahoo.com

3. What is a library?
Apa itu perpustakaan?

5. Jadi Perpustakaan adalah:
Sebuah lingkungan pembelajaran
Dimana orang yang datang terinspirasi untuk belajar
Dan terdorong untuk berbagi pengetahuan

6. Apa itu katalog?

7. Representasi sumberdaya
(Metadata)

8. Books
Journals
Newspapers
Gov docs
Maps
Scores
AV
Dissertations
Library catalogs
Special
collections
Manuscripts
Papers
Univ records
Archives
Journal
articles
Conference
proceedings
Etc.
Abstracting &
Indexing services

9. Katalog Pengatalog

10. Tantangan

11. Teknologi sudah berkembang jauh

12. Koleksi berkembang pesat

13. Perilaku para pencari informasi juga berubah

14. Elinor Ostrom, 2009 Nobel Prize, Economics
Born: Los Angeles
Fields: Political theory, policy analysis, economics
-- How does the library help her create
new knowledge?
-- What are her information seeking/sharing
behaviors and preferences?
-- In what ways does the library
serve her colleagues and her graduate
and post-doctoral students?
Elinor Ostrom at 2009 Nobel prize press conference
Attribution: © Prolineserver 2010, Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons (cc-by-sa-3.0)

15. Tech-savvy
Nimble
Enthusiastic
Achievement-oriented
“We’re special”

16. Metadata terus berkembang

17. Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
MPEG-7
Ecological Metadata Language (EML)

24. Many types of information objects (things, places, people, more)
Metadata production – manual and automated
Process redesign
Data mining
Metadata design, development, consulting
Metadata reuse/conversion/exchange; ‘mash-ups’

25. Where do you typically begin your search
for information on a particular topic?
Search Engines Library Portals
89% 2%
From OCLC: Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (2005)

26. Geocentric/
Aristotelian view:
The local
catalog is the
sun
Heliocentric/
Copernican view:
The local catalog
is a planet

27. Digital Libraries
The Internet
Local library systems
Online cooperative cataloging
Ohio College Library Center (OCLC)
MARC Record

28. Early 21st Century Technical Services Landscape
Bibliographic Desktop (TS Data The Web
Control & Workstation) Management
Metadata
New sources/types Network, hardware Relational Data Authoring
of records and software Management
administration
New workflows Transitions to new SQL: queries and Publishing
library systems reports
(Windows, Web
clients)
New metadata Macros; impt. of More data Web site
standards ergonomics manipulation, less organization and
data entry management
E-resources and Growing number of Global change Digital library
digital collections applications management
systems
Source: Calhoun, Karen. Technology, productivity, and change in library technical services.
Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services Volume 27, Issue 3,
Autumn 2003, Pages 281-289

29. “[T]he stuff of cultural heritage collections, digital assets, pre-print
services and the open Web, research labs, and learning management
systems remains for the most part outside the scope of the catalog.
Scholarly information objects now include digitized rare and
historical materials, textual primary source materials, graphical images,
materials described in institutional and disciplinary repositories,
conference Web sites, scholarly Web sites … data sets, software,
simulations, a rising array of multimedia resources, learning objects
and courses—the list goes on.”
Calhoun, Karen. The changing nature of the catalog and its integration
with other discovery tools. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 2006.
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf

30. “The availability of primary sources has
been crucial for the success of my
teaching in history. Students have “The function of searching across
remarked what a difference it has made, collections is a dream frequently
and I have noticed a big difference
discussed but seldom realized at a
between this course with the availability
of online primary resources to those I robust level. This paper …
have taught before that were based on discusses how we might move
printed resources.” –History instructor, from isolated digital collections to
University of California
interoperable digital libraries.”
—Howard Besser
“Digital libraries, far from being simple digital
versions of library holdings, are now attracting a
new type of public, bringing about new, unique and
original ways for reading and understanding
texts.”—BibUsages Study, BnF, 2002

31. • Faculty and students do more
work and study away from
campus Do you use electronic sources all of the time,
most of the time, some of the time, or none of the
• Loyal to the library, but library is time?
only one element in complex
60%
information structure 50%
40%
Percent
• Print still important, but almost Faculty/Graduate
30%
Undergrad
half of undergraduates say they 20%
10%
rely exclusively or almost 0%
exclusively on electronic All of the Some of the None of the
time/most of time time
materials the time
Responses
• Seamless linking from one
information object to another is http://www.clir.org/PUBS/reports/pub110/contents.html
expected
• Fast forward to 2010: these
trends many times stronger!

32. Metadata Before and After the Web:
What is a “Full” Record?
Product
description
& purchase
information
More like this
Editorial
reviews & author
Bibliographic data info
Library Holdings
Inside the book
Details
Tags, Ratings
Subjects
Customer reviews
Editions
Lists
Reviews
More + 3 more screens
With thanks to David Lankes:
http://quartz.syr.edu/rdlankes/Presentations/2007/ALCTS.pdf

33. B.W. (Before the Web) A.W. (After the Web)
• For finding and managing • For finding and managing many
library materials (mostly print) types of materials, for many user
• Catalog records (well- communities
understood rules and • Many types of records
encoding conventions) • Loosely coupled metadata
• Shared cooperative management, reuse and exchange
cataloging systems services among multiple
• Usually handcrafted, one at a repositories
time • Automated creation and metadata
extract, conversion, mapping,
ingest and transfer services

34. By Angela Ben de Cosanostra http://flickr.com/photos/amcclen/281983490/

35. Apa yang bisa
KITA
lakukan bersama

36. Terbuka pada hal-hal baru:
pemakai/pemustaka, teknologi,
cara kerja, budaya, dll

37. Membangun jaringan dan
kolaborasi dengan institusi /
repositori lain.

38. Mulai melakukan implementasi
Teknologi Informasi sedikit demi
sedikit

39. Menggunakan/mengembangkan
aplikasi yang ramah dengan isu
pertukaran data / interoperabilitas

40. Integrasi prosedur dan aplikasi
perpustakaan dengan sistem lain:
sistem pembelajaran/e-learning, sistem
akademis, web services, dll.

41. Renovasi perpustakaan.

42. Membangun SDM perpustakaan
yang skill TI nya mumpuni untuk
operasional perpustakaan.

43. Tingkatkan skill dan wawasan
pengatalogan.

44. Efisiensi dan
efektivitas kerja
pengatalogan di
perpustakaan

45. Kreatif dan berani mengambil
keputusan.

46. Kerjasama, bukan hanya sama-sama
kerja.

47. Affordability and Expense of cataloging
Rapid growth of Web resources and
Scalability digital assets
Need more than descriptive
metadata
Interoperability issues
Competition for Shrinking tech services
departments
Resources to Develop Streamlining tech services
New Library Services workflows
Increasing use of external sources
of data; automated cataloging
methods
Significance of the Catalog is one part of a much
larger infosphere
Catalog Many new types of scholarly
information objects not covered by
catalog

48. Help build new kinds of systems for
Increasing investment discovery and delivery; many new
in discovery systems kinds of metadata; emphasis on re-
use, interconnections,
interoperability
Active participation in Project and team-based
workplaces; involvement in digital
the community asset management; metadata
creation and consulting work;
decreasing involvement in
traditional cataloguing duties
Technology-driven Need for “IT fluency,” esp.
metadata specialists; increasing
research, teaching and involvement in digital library
research, development, and
learning production projects
Tables 1 and 2 adapted from: Calhoun, Karen. 2007. "Being a librarian: metadata and metadata
specialists in the twenty-first century". Library Hi Tech. 25 (2): 174-187. Preprint available: http://hdl.handle.net/1813/2231

49. • Achieving efficiencies; freeing up expertise for other
priorities
• Achieving quality results
• Making collections more visible and usable
• Optimizing the usefulness of the metadata we already have
• Realizing the dream of interoperable digital libraries

50. 1. Look at the whole process as one process (e.g.,
selection to ordering to receipt to cataloging to
shelf-ready)
2. Maximize acquisitions/cataloging collaboration
3. Capture bibliographic data as far upstream as
possible (at point of selection/ordering if you
can)
4. To the greatest extent possible, handle items and
records only once
5. Perform work where it makes the most sense;
and maximize use of students/volunteers
6. Wholly manual processes do not scale; integrate
automated and manual operations

51. Must begin with user’s needs and end with
user’s perceptions
What does ‘quality’ mean?
• Fast cycle time for new materials
• Providing for easy, convenient use of library
collections
• Being creative, responsive and flexible
• Optimizing the library’s investment in
personnel, materials, equipment, etc.
• Balancing trade-offs

52. “Rather than enhancing
MARC and MARC-based
systems, let’s give priority
to interoperability with
other encoding schemas
and systems. We need to
meet the demands that
have arisen from the
rest of the information
universe. “
http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2010/2010-06.pdf

56. Data Flickr Commons
s y nc h
WorldCat &
WorldCat Partners…
Other partners

57. State Library of
Queensland
http://www.flickr.com/photos/statelibraryqueensland/3197460723/

58. Find in a library

59. ser s in:
ulling u
ao ut, p data
met adat ng m
et a
ush ing ut l inki
P l abo
It ’s al

60. Outward
Integration,
Exposure,
Machine to
Machine Data
Services
Portal Products,
GLOBAL
Group
Data Aggregation &
Flows, Search, Resource
Sharing
Synchronization,
Web services,
Local
Metadata Authentication,
GROUP
Management Collection
Building, Delivery
Services

61. Optimizing the metadata we already have: an
example (James Thurber’s Identity)

62. VIAF (Virtual International Authority File):
Facilitating research across languages

63. WorldCat knowledge base management
Librarian Librarian Librarian
1 2 3
WorldCat knowledge base Admin
WorldCat knowledge base data
Knowledge base API
Federated Link
ERM A to Z list
Search Resolver
User 1 User 2 User 3

64. Worldwide Open Access Repositories
Source:
1,719 repositories
worldwide
Of the top 50:
US – 16
Germany – 8
France – 7
Switzerland – 4
UK – 3
Netherlands – 2
Australia – 2
(Source: Cybermetrics Lab)

65. • Aggregation (union catalog) of harvested open access
collections
• OAI-OMH
• 25 million records, 1100 contributing institutions
• Began at University of Michigan; now managed by OCLC
• Going to self-service contribution model (Digital
Collections Gateway)

66. Self-service tool for uploading to WorldCat
Freely available to members and non-members of OCLC
Makes digital content more visible
Compatible with all OAI-compliant repositories
More information:
http://www.oclc.org/gateway/about/default.htm

67. Library metadata has reached a point of
discontinuous change
We must change how we think about it
and what we do
Photo by: OMG Ventures
http://www.flickr.com/photos/imagebuilders/2877401212/

68. 1. Cooperate (don’t go it alone)
2. Use a blend of metadata techniques to:
• Create many paths to your collections (print, licensed,
digital)
Synchronize
Syndicate
• Call attention to a wide array of collections on behalf of your
communities (not just your own holdings)
3. Think of traditional library metadata as one of many
possible approaches

69. 1. Extend WorldCat’s relevance for multilingual
cataloging, discovery, and delivery
2. Help libraries collaborate to reduce costs and reach
more citizens, students, and scholars
3. Help libraries expose their collections where the
users are—on the Web, using the global information
infrastructure

71. The OCLC cooperative:
2008
69,826 libraries in 112 countries
1,355
5,639
55,284
4,253
Cataloging 1,080
eBooks
Reference
882
Digitization & Preservation 1,015
Resource Sharing
Collection Analysis 320

72. 90.6m Books 3.8m Sound recordings
4.6m Serials 2.4m Scores
3.6m Visual materials .8m Computer files
1.6m Maps .9m Archival collections
108 million records
1.3 billion holdings

73. Contoh ucs dan nayanes

74. Give added value services