This document discusses how firm investments can shape the competitive landscape of an industry. It presents hypotheses about the relationships between aggregate R&D and advertising investments and industry growth and volatility. The results show that R&D investments generally have an inverted U-shaped relationship with industry profit growth and volatility, while advertising investments have a U-shaped relationship. So firm-level decisions can impact both the firm and its industry environment.
1. Investments in Value Creation and
Value Appropriation: The Effect of
Industry Growth and Volatility
David R. King, U.S. Air Force
Rebecca J. Slotegraaf, Indiana University
August 10, 2009
2. Firm vs. Environment
Resource Based View (Barney, 1991; Dierickx &
Cool, 1989) has established firm investments
build internal capabilities
However, firm investments also impact the
competitive landscape (Peteraf, 2005)
Entry barriers (Williamson, 1975)
Spillover effects (Henderson & Cockburn, 1996;
Porter, 1985)
Question: How do firm investments shape
industry environment?
1
3. Environment & Investment
Environmental munificence – growth profit/sales
Value Creation – Aggregate R&D investment
3-phases innovation: Incremental/disruption/dominant
design
H1a: U-shaped relationship with industry sales
growth
Initially positive impact of R&D on profit, but
diminishing returns
H1b: Inverted U-shaped relationship with industry
profit growth
2
4. Environment & Investment
Environmental munificence – growth profit/sales
Value Appropriation – Aggregate advertising
investment
Diminishing returns to advertising
H2a: Inverted U-shaped relationship with industry
sales growth
Some advertising better than none, but establishing
brand requires significant investment
H2b: U-shaped relationship with industry profit
growth
3
5. Environment & Investment
Environmental dynamism – volatility profit/sales
Value Creation – Aggregate R&D investment
Predictable levels of R&D have lower sales volatility
H3a: U-shaped relationship with industry sales
volatility
R&D has high failure rate, but likely find something
useful with high investment
H3b: Inverted U-shaped relationship with industry
profit volatility
4
6. Environment & Investment
Environmental dynamism – volatility profit/sales
Value Appropriation – Aggregate advertising
investment
High advertising reaches new customers and markets
H4a: Positive relationship with industry sales
volatility
Advertising is an “expense” not fully covered by
premium pricing
H4b: Negative relationship with industry profit
volatility
5
7. Method
Sample
Longitudinal, secondary data
Annual data: 1980-2000
377 industries (4-digit SIC and 10+firms in industry)
Measures
Munificence/Dynamism (Keats & Hitt, 1988)
Sales growth/volatility
Profit growth/volatility
R&D and Advertising investment
Depreciated, 1 year lag of aggregate spending
Controls: Year, capital investment, intensive industries, and
industry debt & profitability
Analysis
Preliminary – Granger (1969) causality tests
6
OLS regression
8. Results: Growth
R&D Investment
H1a: U-shaped impact on sales growth Supported (p < .05)
H1b: Inverted U-shaped impact on profit growth Supported (p < .01)
Advertising Investment
H3a: Inverted U-shaped impact on sales growth Supported (p < .10)
H3b: U-shaped impact on profit growth Supported (p < .01)
Sales Growth Profit Growth
Effect on
R&D investments Effect on
Industry Sales R&D investments
Adv. investments Industry Profit
Grow th Grow th Adv. investments
Level of Cum ulative Investm ents
Level of Cum ulative Investm ents
7
9. Results: Volatility
R&D
H2a: U-shaped impact on sales volatility Supported (p < .05)
H2b: Inverted U-shaped impact on profit volatility Supported (p < .01)
Advertising
H4a: Increase sales volatility Supported (p < .01)
H4b: Decrease profit volatility Supported (p < .01)
Sales Volatility Profit Volatility
Effect on
Effect on Industry R&D investments R&D investments
Industry Profit
Sales Volatility Adv. investments Volatility Adv. investments
Level of Cum ulative Investm ents Level of Cum ulative Investm ents
8
10. Discussion
Firm-level investments (when aggregated) impact
industry characteristics
Firm level decisions make a difference internal and
external to a firm
Value Creation (R&D) and Value Appropriation
(Advertising) investments act as complements
Balance potentially negative second-order effects
Value of resources varies by Type & Industry
9