Greater Ohio consulted with the Ohio Attorney General's office to conduct workshops to provide assistance/guidance to Ohio cities receiving demolition funding.
Insurers' journeys to build a mastery in the IoT usage
Moving ohio forward grant program for demolition funding
1. Moving Ohio Forward Grant Program for
Demolition Funding
GREATER OHIO POLICY
CENTER STAFF
Lavea Brachman
Executive Director
Alison D. Goebel
Associate Director
Samantha Spergel
Research Associate
Workshop
Columbus, OH
June 8, 2012
2. Greater Ohio Policy Center
• Mission: Advance public policy and local projects
that grow Ohio’s economy and improve the
quality of life through intelligent land use.
• Support redevelopment of existing communities,
strengthen regional cooperation and protect the
countryside and Ohio's natural resources.
• Non-partisan, non-profit, primarily foundation-
funded
3. Greater Ohio Policy Center
• Conduct and commission research
• Use research to advocate for practical policy
solutions at the state and federal level
• Play an advisory role to state level officials,
General Assembly and local officials
• Project-based work with local partners
4. Overview of Moving Ohio Forward Grant Program
The Ohio Attorney General has allocated a total
of $75 Million to all 88 counties in Ohio to
demolish vacant, abandoned and blighted
properties
5. Moving Ohio Forward Required Attachments
• Attachment 1-Application Summary Document
• Attachment 2-Authorizing Resolution or
Ordinance
• Attachment 3-Strategic Plan
• Attachment 4-Sources and Uses of Funds
(complete the fillable portion of the application)
• Attachment 5-Match Supporting Documentation
• Attachment 6-Remedial Action Plan
• Attachment 7-Project Assumptions/Cost Estimate
6. Moving Ohio Forward Required Attachments
• Attachment 8- Reimbursement Request
Report is a cover page required to be
submitted with each payment request.
• Attachment 9-Final Performance Report is
required to be submitted after the conclusion
of the grant program and no later than
December 31, 2014.
7. Greater Ohio Policy Center
The Office of Attorney General Mike DeWine has
contracted with GOPC to advise communities on
their Strategic Plan (Application Attachment 3)
and Site Eligibility.
GOPC assistance involves:
• 2 workshops
• Email & Phone consultation
• In person, as needed
8. Important Due Dates to Moving Ohio
Forward Grant Program
Application Submission Deadline: June 30, 2012-5:00pm
Grant Award Date: August 1, 2012
Project Completion Date: December 31, 2013
Final Drawdown Date: January 31, 2014
Final Performance Report Due Date: December 31, 2014
9. Overview of Presentation
• Site Eligibility
• Strategic Demolition
– Defining strategic demolition – five guiding principles
– Targeted Areas
• Completing Attachment 3
– Conditions of Buildings
– Failed Market Conditions
– Engaging Stakeholders
– Selecting Contractors
– Land Reuse Options
10. Site Eligibility: Residential “anti-blight”
“Residential” means a structure is:
• land zoned for residential use
• being used as a residential dwelling
• has been used as a residential dwelling
• connected to any structure that is
currently used or has previously been
properly used as a residential dwelling as
mixed use.
11. Site Eligibility
Moving Ohio Forward Funds cannot be
used for:
• commercial or industrial projects
• maintenance or post-demolition costs
• demolition of structure which are not
blighted, vacant or abandoned
• property acquisition
12. Eligibility: Site Acquisition
Acquisition of blighted residential property
is anticipated through:
• Tax-delinquent foreclosure process
• Nuisance abatement
• Condemnation
• Consent
• Other voluntary means of purchase.
13. Strategic Demolition –
Five Guiding Principles
Strategic Demolition maximizes
strategic impact of demolition
and
help applicants maximize impact of program
funding to improve neighborhoods and property
values
14. Defining Strategic Demolition:
Five Guiding Principles
1. Demolition is a step in the process toward
neighborhood revitalization.
2. Any community-wide demolition plan should
establish rational criteria for selecting neighborhoods
to target buildings to demolish and retain.
3. Applicants should get input from a range of
stakeholders.
4. Demolition does not benefit all neighborhoods
equally.
5. A well-thought out post-demolition reuse plan can
prevent newly vacant land from becoming a
problem.
15. 1. Demolition is a step in the process
toward neighborhood revitalization.
• Demolition is not an end to itself- it is one strategy to
stabilizing or revitalizing neighborhoods.
• Connecting demolition activities to other
revitalization efforts underway ensures demolition is
part of a larger redevelopment strategy.
• Linking demolition to redevelopment ensures a
larger Return On Investment.
16. 2. Demolition plans should establish
rational criteria.
• Local governments should develop priorities
to guide their demolition activities.
• Resources should be coordinated and as
comprehensive as possible, and dedicated to
stabilizing neighborhoods that are undergoing
challenges.
17. 3. Applicants should get input from a range
of stakeholders.
Discussions on demolition criteria should
include a wide range of interests and
viewpoints, both within and outside
government.
18. 4. Demolition does not benefit all
neighborhoods equally
Severely distressed neighborhoods face so many challenges
that demolition may not be enough to overcome the legacy
of disinvestment. However, demolition can have outsized
impact in certain neighborhoods.
Demolition is most impactful when it:
• Stabilizes neighborhood conditions
• Stabilizes property values
• Create a variety of attainable reuse opportunities
19. 5. Reuses of Land
Demolition will lead to vacant land.
• Good planning, solid community strategy, and clear-eyed
understanding of local capacity can ensure that newly created
vacant land is used productively, and does not become a
problem.
• Local governments may want to prioritize demolition to be
used for land that has specific re-use potential.
• Some parcels may remain vacant.
• Local governments and their partners should try to establish
protocol for maintaining vacant land.
20. Value of Strategic Demolition
• A study done by the Federal Reserve Bank of
Cleveland shows that vacant homes can
decrease sales prices of nearby homes by
2.2%
• If the home has been tax delinquent,
foreclosed and vacant, the sales prices of
neighboring homes decreases by 17.8%.
21. Value of Strategic Demolition
• By demolishing a vacant home, the median
sales price of a neighboring home increases by
$1,340.
• If the home had been tax delinquent,
foreclosed and vacant prior to demolishment
the median sales price increased by $15,000.
22. Determining a Strategic Plan
Priority should be given to areas where removal
of individuals buildings is likely to help stabilize
neighborhood conditions and property values
and create potential reuse opportunities.
23. Determining a Strategic Plan
Strategic demolition goals are demonstrated by
addressing:
– A description of the blight and abandonment
conditions
– The target area benefits from the demolition
– The demolition is linked to potential property
reuse and area-wide revitalization.
24. Strategic Approaches:
Menu of Options
• Wholesale demolition in a target area is part
of a larger comprehensive strategy that will
positively benefit the neighborhood and
surroundings areas.
• Selected demolition
• Dispersed demolition
25. Wholesale Demolition
Wholesale demolition is only appropriate in very
select conditions.
Wholesale demolition would be used to create a
“clean slate” in a neighborhood that is almost
completely disinvested.
26. Wholesale Demolition
Photo from a block in Detroit where 60 of 66 houses
are abandoned or vacant.
Photo courtesy of: http://www.sweet-juniper.com/2009/04/singularity.html
27. Selective Demolition
Selective demolition acts as extra reinforcement to keep
a neighborhood from further degrading. In practice, this
may be 1 or 2 houses, on average, per block in an eight
block neighborhood.
Selective demolition is often appropriate in
neighborhoods that still have vitality and market demand.
Often these neighborhoods are called “tipping point”
neighborhoods.
28. Leveraging the value of selective demolition
• A strong social fabric, reflected in strong
neighborhood or civic associations or neighborhood-
level institutions
• Active CDC-led stabilization or revitalization activities
• Great market potential, such as distinctive housing
stock, or location to a strong anchor intuition
• A significant planned public investment, such as a
new school
31. Dispersed Demolition
In suburban and
urban areas,
dispersed
demolition can be
appropriate for
single problem
properties in
otherwise strong
market
neighborhoods. Photo courtesy of Youngstown
Neighborhood Development Corporation
32. Dispersed Demolition
In rural areas that do not have widespread
vacancies, dispersed demolition can be
appropriate for:
• Mitigating health/safety hazards, particularly
in small villages
• Harmonizing land use; for example removing
an abandoned house near a county industrial
park to address aesthetic and safety issues
33. Targeted Areas
Strategic demolition maximizes benefits for
communities.
Identifying targeted areas (assumed in
Attachment 3 ) maximizes the ability to be
strategic
34. Identifying “Target Areas”
Prior to answering the five questions outlined in
the Moving Ohio Forward Application, local
governments need to identify the specific
“areas” or neighborhoods they are targeting.
35. Using Targeted Neighborhood Investment
to Identify Target Areas in Cities
• Targeted Neighborhood Investment is a
strategy by which local governments choose
to devote extra resources to specific
communities.
• The TNI strategy matches neighborhoods
needs with the right resources to ensure funds
are used as effectively as possible.
36. Youngstown TNI Example
• Youngstown Neighborhood Development
Corporation (YNDC) has focused its resources
and energies on three specific neighborhoods
which have been “tipping point”
neighborhoods with declining housing values,
population loss, and increased vacancies.
37. Youngstown TNI Example
Public, private, and nonprofit investments are
targeted to Crandall Park North, Lincoln Park,
and Idora because these neighborhoods have:
• Existing community networks and block groups
• Majority owner-occupied homes
• Access to community amenities
• Attractive residences
39. Five Sections of Attachment 3
1. Building Conditions:
– Provide a brief description of the dilapidated
condition of buildings(s) selected for demolition with
the following criteria as a guide.
2. Failed market conditions
– of target area and its relation to the rest of the
surrounding community
3. Stakeholder inclusion
4. Contractors selection process
5. Proposed land reuse options
41. Building Conditions
– How does the targeted property/area affect
neighboring property values, safety, and
revitalization activities
– How the building poses a danger to public health
or safety
– Likely cost to rehab building substantially
outweigh the value
– Description of other criteria that will be used to
identify structures for demolition
42. Building Conditions:
How targeted property affects neighboring property values,
safety and revitalization activities?
• Are property values of
neighboring homes
declining?
• Is the building near a
school/library/public
park?
• Is the building inhibiting
new construction?
• Has the neighborhood
begun to see other
revitalization activities?
43. Building Conditions: Danger to public
health or safety
• Has crime in the
neighborhood
increased?
• Does the building
pose an
environmental
concern?
• Does the building fit
the “blighted parcel”
criteria?
44. Building Conditions: Cost of Rehab
• Would the cost
to rehab to 2X
the cost to
demolish?
• Is there any
substantial
market value in
rehabbing the
home? Photo courtesy of Youngstown
Neighborhood Development Corporation
45. Building Conditions: Other criteria
• Does the presence of the
building add to the
existing neighborhood
texture? Would removing
a building compromise
the texture?
• Does the demolition align
with community
priorities?
• What are the market and
neighborhood
conditions?
46. Building Conditions: Collecting information
• Much of this information has already
been identified in a community's
Comprehensive Plan or through the work
of the Community Development
Department.
• Some analysis can be obtained from a
simple exterior survey of the building and
its surroundings.
47. Building Conditions Decisions
• Setting neighborhoods priorities will help determine
demolition choices.
• Besides emergency demolitions, demolitions should
be made through a decision process that takes into
account a range of factors.
• Demolition decisions will not be clear-cut.
• Decisions will involve balancing many different
factors.
49. Failed Market Conditions
– Does the housing stock constitute a present or potential
nuisance (i.e. breed crime, negatively affect nearby
property values)?
– Are there additional safety concerns? Is the blighted
property near a school?
– Does demolition maintain the social fabric and historical
nature of the neighborhood?
– Percentage of owner-occupied buildings, absentee owner
buildings, vacant buildings and vacant lots, if available.
– Does demolition fit into the local government’s
comprehensive plan of redevelopment for the overall
community for improving property values, and increasing
private investment and redevelopment? If so, how?
50. Failed Market Conditions:
Local Governments look for
– valuable impact on selected neighborhoods.
– stabilization impact on select
neighborhood, but surrounding
communities as well by assessing the city
and regional market and texture.
– rooted in current revitalization activities
and goals already outlined by the
community.
51. Failed Market Conditions: Information
Collection
• Quantifying conditions can help justify demolition
choices.
• Informational data on crime rates, declining property
values, median age of property, etc. can be found
through:
• jurisdiction’s community development department
• jurisdiction’s police department
• U.S. Census
• FBI Crime Reports
53. Stakeholder Inclusion
• Identify specific partners and stakeholders:
• Nonprofits
• Public entities
• Community groups
• Institutions, like colleges
Identify how stakeholder feedback is solicited:
• Interviews
• Public meetings
• Surveys
55. Selecting Contractors
The application should explain:
• The process for selecting contractors for
demolition
• Provide a brief time-line to prove
capacity and ability to spend funding in a
timely manner.
56. Selecting Contractors
Attorney General requires contractors to have:
– Liability Insurance
– Workers Compensation
– Checking the Federal and State debarment list
– Documenting policy and procedures for barring poor
performing contractors from continuing to participate in
the program
– Having policies regarding a Drug Free Workplace and EEO
– Knowledgeable of and understand Ohio Ethics and Conflict
of Interest of Laws.
57. Selecting Contractors
There is no one specified process for selecting
contractors. Applicants have a variety of options when
choosing contractors including:
– Demolition as competitive bid
– Demolition in-house with city crews and
equipment
– Put out competitive bid packages for multiple
demolitions
– Fixed Price or retainer contracts
– Negotiated or sole source contracts
– Deconstruction contractors
59. Land Reuse Options
For Question 5 the application requires
applicants to describe proposed plans for land
reuse options.
The answer should describe the details for
Selective demolition
And/or
Wholesale demolition
60. Land Reuse Options: Strategy
Selective and wholesale demolition leads
to the creation of vacant land.
• Using established priorities, market and
neighborhood conditions and feedback
from stakeholders, local governments
can develop a strategy for land post-
demolition.
61. Why is Land Re-use Strategy Important?
Improving commercial corridors,
streetscapes, parks, and cleaning vacant
lots at the same time, have the potential
for the greatest impact on struggling
neighborhoods.
62. Why is Land Re-use Strategy Important?
Home values can increase more than 25%
when they are near improvements to
streetscapes, such as:
• street tree plantings
• container plantings
• small pocket parks
• parking lot screens and median plantings
63. Why is Land Re-use Strategy Important?
Proximity to a neglected vacant lot
subtracts 20 percent from the base value
from a nearby home
A home near a stabilized lot—one that has
been improved through cleaning and
greening—increases by approximately
15% the home’s base value
64. Land Re-Use Strategy
Different demolition methods produce
different land reuse options that local
governments can undertake.
65. Selected Demolition example of Land Reuse
Removed house
to create green
side lot on
Brentwood St,
Youngstown
Photos courtesy of Youngstown
Neighborhood Development Corporation
66. Other Selected Demolition
• Other options for selected site demolition
include:
– Side Lots
– Mini-Parks
– Park Expansion
– Stabilization/minimal treatment
– Pathways
– Off-street parking
67. Wholesale Demolition example
of Land Reuse
Removed abandoned
six-plex and replaced
with an urban
agriculture site.
Youngstown
Photo courtesy of Youngstown
Neighborhood Development Corporation
68. Other Selected Demolition
• For larger scale demolition some land-reuse options
include:
– Community gardens
– Community orchards
– Urban agriculture
– Daylighting streams, waterways and floodplains
– Greening
– Expansive Redevelopment
69. Other examples of Land Reuse
Demolition
can prepare
a lot for
potential
reuse in the
future
71. Moving Ohio Forward Application Basics
• Review Moving Ohio Forward Grant Program
Demolition Guidelines before completing
application.
• Applications must include all attachments and
supporting documentation.
• Pages of the application without fill-in fields shall
be typed using font size no smaller than 12 point.
• All pages should be numbered indicating the
section, attachment number and page number.
72. Example of Attachment 3
Example Attachment 3
Available at GOPC’s website:
www.greaterohio.org.
73. Greater Ohio Policy Center
Greater Ohio Policy Center is available to advise
applicants through:
• Email
• Phone
• In person, as needed
For our assistance, please contact:
Samantha Spergel, Research Associate
sspergel@greaterohio.org
614-224-1087
74. Moving Ohio Forward Grant Program for Demolition
Funding
QUESTIONS?
Visit our website: http://greaterohio.org/
Read our Greater Ohio blog:
http://greaterohio.org/blog
Follow us on Twitter: @GreaterOhio
Like Greater Ohio Policy Center on Facebook
Hinweis der Redaktion
Image courtesy of Millie Davis, Greater Ohio 2009 staffer
- The Moving Ohio Forward Grant Program is a unique funding stream, solely dedicated to the demolishment of residential structure. - that detract from existing home values and create a toxic breeding ground for crime.Dedicated funding toward demolition activities is rare- and thus this program may be a “one-shot” opportunity for communities to address blighted properties through demolition.
All seven attachments are due at the time of the application submittal.
These two attachments are not required for the application submission.
The Office of Attorney General Mike DeWine has contracted with GOPC to advise communities on their Strategic Plan (Application Attachment 3) and Site Eligibility, as they develop, finalize, and submit their Application under the AG’s Moving Ohio Forward Grant Program. GOPC is holding this workshop on behalf of the Attorney General’s office.GOPC is contracted to provide advice and guidance to communities. We will not complete or submit applications for applicants.
Demolition is not an end to itself- it is one strategy to be used as a means to achieving the ultimate goal of neighborhood stabilization or revitalization. To the greatest extent possible, demolition activities should connect to communities’ other revitalization efforts, and Comprehensive Plans to ensure demolition is part of a larger redevelopment strategy.By linking demolition to redevelopment, this helps ensure a larger Return On Investment- in both financial and social contexts.
2. Criteria will not only legitimize decisions made by the local governments and their partners, but also will maximize the value of demolition and provide the greatest impact on communities.
3. It is important that discussion on demolition criteria not be limited to just village, city and county officials-but instead include a wide range of interests and viewpoints, both within and outside government. The process of making decisions needs to be opened up to those who can evaluate criteria, and who are aware of, and engaged in revitalization activities in the community.
Priority should be given to neighborhoods where demolition and removal of buildings is most like to help stabilize neighborhood conditions and property values and create a variety of reuse opportunities. Severely distressed neighborhoods face so many challenges that demolition may not be enough to overcome the legacy of disinvestment. However, demolition can have outsized impact in certain neighborhoods.Demolition does not benefit all neighborhoods equally. Demolition is most impactful when it:Stabilizes neighborhood conditionsStabilizes property valuesCreate a variety of attainable reuse opportunities
Local governments must be cognizant of their strategy and capacity in ensuring that any vacant land created is being used productively, and does not become a problem in itself. Local governments may want to prioritize demolition to be used for land that has specific re-use potential. Additionally, while some land can be repurposed to another developmental use, some parcels may remain vacant. Local governments and their partners should try to establish protocol for maintaining vacant land.
Knowing the impact of property values on vacant blighted homes, communities are greatly served by understanding their market conditions and targeting demolition in ways that maximizes resources.
The applicant's demolition strategy should complement current redevelopment efforts and future goals that have already been identified through these plans.
It is encouraged that applying entities write Attachment 3 based upon their own Strategic, Comprehensive Plans and/or Community Housing Improvement Strategy.
Detroit, Cleveland and Youngstown are undertaking extremely targeted wholesale demolition in their hardest hit neighborhoods. Even in one of the most disinvested neighborhoods of Cincinnati—Over-the-Rhine– little demolition has occurred because the architectural fabric is so significant and is a major asset in OTR’s revitalization.photo from photo project by Jim Griffeon: http://www.sweet-juniper.com/2009/04/singularity.html
Selective demolition works best when it’s coordinated withStrong social fabricActive nonprofit involvementExisting market potentialAnd/orPlanned public investment
This picture comes from a residential neighborhood near the city square in Mansfield, Ohio.Removing this house would secure a children’s play area that is located in a populated residential neighborhood.
This approach to demolition can be used in a less coordinated way. Communities can use the money to demolish homes that constitute an immediate safety or health concern, or where an end-user has been identified (i.e. a neighbor that would want a side lot).
Source:
Photos??
Strategic demolition (meaning: wholesale, selected or dispersed) maximizes benefits for communities. Identifying targeted areas (assumed in Attachment 3 ) maximizes the ability to be strategic
Prior to answering the five questions outlined in the Moving Ohio Forward Application, local governments need to identify the specific “areas” or neighborhoods they are targeting. This will assist in answering several components to Attachment 3: Section 1: framing decisions concerning criteria for building conditions, Section 2: describing the failed market conditions,and Section 5: illustrating the land reuse options.
Targeted Neighborhood Investment is a strategy by which local governments choose to devote extra resources to specific communities. By targeting investments, a Targeted Neighborhood investment strategy may have a larger impact on a community with respect to resident confidence and future tax revenues than wholesale demolition. The TNI strategy matches neighborhoods needs with the right resources to ensure funds are used as effectively as possible.Broadly, we define neighborhoods into three different types to help determine where to target neighborhood investments:Strong neighborhoods are those that have low vacancy and abandonment rates and strong housing markets. Tipping point neighborhoods are locales are those that are beginning to experience an increase in vacancy rates, some blighted homes, and a weakening housing market. However, the neighborhood still enjoys some vitality- through strong neighborhood groups and associations, and land-reuse potential. Severely challenged neighborhoods are those that have experienced severe disinvestment- they may have over a 50% vacancy rate, and a drastic drop in median home values.In many cases, a community’s demolition priorities should not be in heavily abandoned and disinvested areas, but in areas where removal of buildings are likely to help stabile neighborhood conditions and property values and create potential reuse opportunities.
The Youngstown Neighborhood Development Corporation, a Youngstown-based non-profit specifically chose to focus on three neighborhoods: Crandall Park North, Lincoln Park and Idora. All three neighborhoods are “tipping point neighborhoods”.
The Youngstown Neighborhood Development Corporation, a Youngstown-based non-profit specifically chose to focus on neighborhoods that had assets and vitality that could be strengthened and built upon—revitalization in these neighborhoods did not “start from scratch”The neighborhoods that Youngstown is directing significant investments into have assets like:Existing community networks and block groups among neighbors that could be strengthen relatively easilyMajority owner-occupied homes, despite lower rates of occupancyAccess to community amenities like Mill Creek Park (one of the largest metro parks in the nation) and Stambaugh Golf CourseArchitecturally unique and attractive residences
Now that we’ve explained the “behind the scenes” thinking that will help you decide what areas to focus demolition onto,We will now walk through Attachment 3 to show where these pieces fit in the different Attachment Components
The purpose of Attachment 3 is to specifically identify procedures and processes the applicant will undergo to 1). Choose which buildings to demolish; 2). Establish how demolition activities will impact neighborhoods; 3). Engage various stakeholders; 4). Ensure contractors are selected fairly; and 5). Indicate how vacant land will be utilized. Through answering these five questions, applications should further demonstrate their capacity to use funding in a timely manner and stress the importance of collaboration with other sub-recipients.
These are the questions the Attorney General raises for Question 1 of Attachment.
Here are additional questions or issues we recommend applicants consider as they answer Question 1 on the Attachment.
Here are additional questions or issues we recommend applicants consider as they answer Question 1 on the Attachment.
Here are additional questions or issues we recommend applicants consider as they answer Question 1 on the Attachment.
Here are additional questions or issues we recommend applicants consider as they answer Question 1 on the Attachment. Texture and Conditions:Does the presence of the building contribute meaningfully to the existing neighborhood texture, and would it be compromised by the building’s removal? Is the physical texture of the area strong, or has it been compromised through abandonment and demolition or inappropriate development?What are the set of priorities identified by the county and participating communities?Priorities can be set in official plans, but stakeholders often have priorities that may not be officially established in city or county documents.What are the market and neighborhood conditions? here are some ideas:What is regional and city wide demand?Are there key emerging trends such as houses being rehabilited or speculative building that may affect neighborhood demand.
Here are additional questions or issues to consider as you answer Question 1 on the Attachment. Building conditions:Much of this information has already been identified in a community's Comprehensive Plan or through the work of the Community Development Department.Some analysis can be obtained from a simple exterior survey of the building and its surroundings.
Here are additional questions or issues to consider as you answer Question 1 on the Attachment. Setting neighborhoods priorities will help determine demolition choices.The choice of which buildings to demolish, other than emergency demolitions, should be made through a decision process that enables the applicants and engaged stakeholders to weigh their various factors for or against demolition of any specific building. Demolition decisions will not be clear-cut. Decisions will involve balancing many different factors.
For Questions 2 in the Attachment, the Attorney General requests applicants: Demonstrate failed market conditions of target area and its relation to the rest of the surrounding community with the follow criteria as a guide.Here are the criteria the Atty General wants applicants to consider:Does the housing stock constitute a present or potential nuisance (i.e. breed crime, negatively affect nearby property values)?Are there additional safety concerns? Is the blighted property near a school?Does demolition maintain the social fabric and historical nature of the neighborhood?Percentage of owner-occupied buildings, absentee owner buildings, vacant buildings and vacant lots, if available.Does demolition fit into the local government’s comprehensive plan of redevelopment for the overall community for improving property values, and increasing private investment and redevelopment? If so, how
Here are additional questions and issues we suggest applicants consider:- demolition activities would impact and aid selected neighborhoods. Applicants should focus on the destabilizing factors that have greatly affected the neighborhood (decreasing property values, vacancy rates, blight, crime) without disturbing the historical nature, social fabric or texture of the neighborhood. further articulate how demolition can stabilize not only the selected neighborhood, but also surrounding communities as well by assessing the city and regional market and texture.
Here are additional questions and issues we suggest applicants consider for question 2:Here are some factors to consider. When possible, quantify the factors. For example, the decline of property values in the last 20 years, will help to explain why the demolition of structures in XX neighborhood will have a significant positive impact on the surrounding properties and neighborhood.Informational data can be found either in the community’s Comprehensive Plan, through the Community Development Department or through the U.S. Census.
For question 3 on the attachment, applicants must discuss the inclusion of key stakeholders in the decision-making process to ensure the demolition decisions are accounting for a full range of considerations and perspectives.Discussions on demolition criteria should include a wide range of interests and viewpoints, both within and outside of government. Input and feedback can be received through formal or informal processesThe process of making decisions needs to be opened up to those who can evaluate criteria, and who are aware of, and engaged in revitalization activities in the community. Applicants might consider creating a standing committee on demolition or a less formal working group that meets regularly to review proposed demolition.Potential stakeholders include: City planning, community development and building departmentsCity or county historical preservation agencyEconomic Development departmentLaw DepartmentPolice DepartmentFire DepartmentLocal SchoolsOther city/county departmentsCDCsOther neighborhood or community organizationsOther non-governmental organizations such as Foundations, Chamber of Commerce, Businesses Applications might describe how key stakeholders will help identify and implement strategic demolition goals
For Question 4 of the Application, the Atty General’s office requires applicants to describe the contracting process.
For Question 4, the Atty Gen requires:Local governments must identify and document the requirements that local contractors must meet in order to participate in the program.In their application, local governments may want to outline the procedures they use with all contractors.
For Question4, we have identified different ways applicants can choose contractors :Applicants have a variety of options when choosing contractors including:Demolition as competitive bidDemolition in-house with city crews and equipmentPut out competitive bid packages for multiple demolitionsFixed Price or retainer contractsNegotiated or sole source contractsDeconstruction contractors
For Question 5 the application requires applicants to describe proposed plans for land reuse options.The answer should describe the details forSelective demolition And/orWholesale demolitionIn the case of selective demolition, the attorney General asks:what productive post-demolition use is envisioned, such as, greening of the parcel, the parcel is part of a side lot program, residential or commercial development, and urban gardening or agriculture?In the case of selective demolition, the attorney General asks:For larger areas of demolition, what options or plans are envisioned for property, such as assembling under a single public entity, greening, urban agriculture, or expansive redevelopment in the long term?
As we described at the beginning of our presentation in the 5 guiding principles, there should be a strategy for land post-demolition.The strategy should be connected to the demolition criteria and process.
University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business conducted a study that revealed that community-based investments provide significant economic benefits to neighborhoods as well as citywide gains.
Wharton School Study
University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business conducted a study that revealed that community-based investments provide significant economic benefits to neighborhoods as well as citywide gains.
For question 5 of the attachment, we want to highlight that different demolition methods produce different land reuse options that local governments can undertake. Wholesale, selective and dispersed demolition are linked to different reuse options, often because of the size of the newly vacant lot.
There are many different innovative options for land re-use. This is a greened side lot.
Here are other land re-use options that communities can write about for Question 5.
For question 5, larger scale demolition can lead to land-reuse options such as urban agriculture, like the plot in this slide from Youngstown
Here are other land re-use options that communities can write about for Question 5.
For question 5: another land re-use option possible for any time of demolition is “banking” land for future use. This is a vacant lot that is ready for private investment.Photo: Alison D. Goebel, Greater Ohio staff
GOPC is holding this workshop on behalf of the Attorney General’s office.GOPC is contracted to provide advice and guidance to communities. We will not complete or submit applications for applicants.