The document discusses challenges with coordinating telecommunications market regulation across the European Union. It notes that international mobile roaming regulation has taken up significant time and resources over 25 years without fully addressing the issues. It also questions whether national telecommunications regulators are still needed given they have not delivered competition or a true single market. The document argues that tighter coordination of regulations will be a long process and eliminating national regulators may be easier to achieve a single telecommunications market in the EU.
1. Ewan Sutherland
LINK Centre, Wits University
CRIDS, University of Namur
Coordinating market regulation across the EU
21 June 2013 London
2. Scotland:
◦ Yet another regulator; or
◦ Some complex extra-legal, pseudo-federal network governance
International mobile roaming:
◦ 25 years of “regulatory” activities (1996-2022)
◦ 9 years of statutory price controls (2007-2016)
◦ A failure to address tax havens
◦ Precious little to do with a single market
Operators:
◦ Reduced their geographic “footprints”
◦ Actively pursuing consolidation within member states
Telecommunications regulators:
◦ Ensuring their independence
◦ Entrenching their position
◦ A Gordian knot of network governance
Single market for telecommunications:
◦ Neither the same as nor a prerequisite for the Digital Single Market
◦ There are neither measures of nor data on harmonisation
◦ What benefits are there for consumers and enterprises?
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 2
3. One of the four UK “nations”
Plebiscite due in September 2014
Presumed to be(come) a member state of EU
Would need a new set of regulatory bodies:
◦ OFCOM, CMA, CAT, GCHQ, OTA2, ASA, etc.
◦ With its own network governance
Split the licences
Split the markets
Argued to be closer to the people
SNP wants to aggregate all regulators
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 3
4. Polling evidence says Scotland will stay in UK
Need to rethink “devolution”:
◦ Will additional powers be transferred?
How to channel political and community
messages to regulators?
Engage with complex non-transparent
network governance coordination in:
◦ Scotland
◦ United Kingdom
◦ European Union
How to channel and coordinate state aid?
Little evidence of preparation for this revamp
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 4
5. Original deal was to deliver economies of
scale for GSM manufacturers
Operators would get to enter new markets
A few premium customers could roam:
◦ Handsets would not need further approval
◦ Home country numbers would be used abroad
◦ Up to 15 per cent surcharge on home prices
The issue of high prices identified in 1998
Commissioner van Miert authorised initial
investigation in 1999
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 5
6. Never expected to be a 25-year problem
Without exception everyone made mistakes
Few admit those mistakes:
◦ Commissioner Kroes recanted her views
Price regulation is very crude but effective
However, there was no bounce in demand
Structural remedies will not work
Why has roaming taken up so much time?
◦ What is it diverting attention from?
Minimal relevance for the internal market
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 6
7. Regulators have been investigating operator
costs for years or decades
The issue of the use tax havens has never
been raised
Yet not paying (much) tax greatly affects
costs
Regulators have a massive trans-national
network which could address such matters
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 7
They also failed to spot corruption
8. Old complaints about leased lines
On-going U.S. regulation of “special access”
Service providers failed in alliances
Then they created their own networks:
◦ Acquired networks from customers
◦ Built facilities in foreign countries
◦ Leased facilities from incumbent operators
Some recent complaints from service
providers about incumbent operators
Never added mobile to fixed VPNs:
◦ A real market failure
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 8
9. A long process to persuade member states:
◦ Disinterest
◦ Incomprehension
◦ Lack of tradition
Gradual improvements
EC still pressing member states
◦ Romania, Spain, Netherlands, etc.
NRAs now seen to be permanent
◦ Sunset clauses have failed
◦ Regulation will never end
But, do we still need the NRAs?
◦ They have not delivered competition
◦ Market analyses and remedies will continue for years
◦ They cannot deliver a telecoms internal market
◦ Could use “big data” instead
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 9
10. Communications Committee (COCOM)
Radio Spectrum Committee (RSC)
Article 7 procedures
Associations and groups:
◦ Independent Regulators Group
◦ European Regulators Group I
◦ European Regulators Group II
◦ Body of European Regulators of Electronic
Communications (BEREC)
Enduring divergences arise from:
◦ Transposition of directives
◦ Implementation by regulators
◦ Decisions by national appellate bodies
◦ Unanticipated creativity of national regulators
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 10
11. Single European Act:
◦ To be completed in 1992
Liikanen contribution to Lisbon Agenda:
◦ “the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based
economy in the world”
Monti Report on the internal market:
◦ No digital internal market
◦ Digital single market represented a one-off €500 billion
potential boost to EU GDP
Jobs and Growth 2020
Digital Agenda for Europe
A digital supply chain
Digital invoicing
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 11
“A radical legislative compromise”
Commissioner Neelie Kroes
12. Action 18: Harmonisation of numbering regimes
Action 19: Spectrum Policy plan
Action 20: Investigate the cost of non-Europe in the
telecoms market
Action 42: Adopt an EU broadband communication
Action 43: Funding for high-speed broadband
Action 44: European Spectrum Policy Programme
Action 45: Foster the deployment of NGA networks
Action 48: Use structural funds to finance the roll-out
of high-speed networks
Action 49: Implementing the European Radio Spectrum
Policy Programme in Member States
Action 101: Look for durable solutions for voice and
data roaming by 2012
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 12
http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/our-goals/
13. Digital Single Market:
◦ Is very much more than a single telecoms market
◦ Does not require a single telecoms market
What would it require?
◦ A single regulator:
Commissioner Reding at BITKOM
Commissioner Kroes on Monday “not pragmatic”
◦ A single number for Europe:
European Telephony Number Space
◦ Multi-country spectrum assignments:
GMPCS
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 13
14. No single market with 27+ regulators
Tighter coordination will take decades
Better/easier just to get rid of the NRAs
◦ If you want a telecommunications single market
Roaming regulation is an abomination
◦ Not based on competition or market analyses
Do not appear to be real consumer benefits
from a single telecommunications market
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 14
15. International mobile roaming:
◦ Market definition(s)
◦ Market failure(s)
Regulation:
◦ What was roaming regulation diverting us from?
◦ How might we measure harmonisation?
Trans-national services for business
Measuring harmonisation
Operators geographic scope
What comes after “ladders of investment”?
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 15
16. Ewan Sutherland
sutherla [at] gmail.com
http://anti-corruption-telecoms.blogspot.com/
http://www.ssrn.com/author=927092
+44 141 649 4040
skype://sutherla
Ewan Sutherland, June 2013, Coordinating market regulation across the EU 16