Martin Weller is Professor of Educational Technology at The Open University, UK. His keynote at the #EDEN2015 Annual Conference is captured on video and will be published on on EDEN's Youtube channel. Read about EDEN: http://www.eden-online.org
21. Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Björk B-C, et al. (2011) The Development of
Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE 6(6): e20961.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961
Growth of OA
25. Saylor: Increased
enthusiasm for study
(59%). Increased
interest in subject
(58%), Gaining
confidence (50%)
Over 30% of students
reported studying their
subject via OER
before joining their
course
60% CCCOER
identified reduced
cost of materials as a
driver of student
retention
OpenStax downloads
120K times, leading to
an estimated $3
million savings for
students (Green
2013)
Feldstein et al. (2013)
47% of students
purchased the paper
textbooks, 93% of
students reading the
free online textbook
Impact findings
28. Udacity has an exclusive relationship,
so Georgia Tech cannot offer its own
content elsewhere. Udacity can,
however, offer that content to other
learners outside of the Masters
Open as in…
31. Wellcome trust - 2012 – 2013, academics spent £3.88 million to
publish articles in OA journals– of which £3.17M was paying for
publications that Universities would then be charged again for
(http://access.okfn.org/2014/03/24/scale-hybrid-journals-
publishing/)
5-year mean:
£1,164 – OA journals
£1,849 – hybrid journals
(Pinfield, S., Salter, J. and Bath,
P.A. 2015)
https://flic.kr/p/8chgS3
Double dipping
33. Education is broken. Face it. It
is so broken at so many ends, it
requires a little bit of Silicon
Valley magic
Thrun
The models of higher
education that marched
triumphantly across the
globe in the second half
of the 20th century are
broken
(Avalanche report)
The education
space is massive,
very broken”
(Shirky)
Education is
broken.
Someone should
do something
degreed.com
“Education is
broken”
34. disruption is a
necessary and
overdue chapter in
our public schools.
(Christensen)
elements of the traditional university are
threatened by the coming avalanche. In
Clayton Christensen’s terms, universities are
ripe for disruption
(Avalanche report)
OERs have not
noticeably disrupted
the traditional
business model of
higher education .
(Korteyemer)
A disruption
obsession
35. Education is broken!
Education is ripe for
disruption!
MOOCs are
technological
solution!
Outsiders with new
ideas!
Irresistible MOOC
story for media
36. “The failure of MOOCs to disrupt higher education has nothing to do with
the quality of the courses themselves, many of which are quite good and
getting better. Colleges are holding technology at bay because the only
thing MOOCs provide is access to world-class professors at an unbeatable
price.”
A new narrative about MOOC
failure…
41. Lessons from the VLE
Rapid adoption &
mainstreaming
Outsourcing &
sedimentation
42. https://flic.kr/p/dNxyCd
The charges
Systems - privileges a
technology
management mindset
Silos – does not allow
for the benefits of
openness
Missed opportunities –
learners use a system
unlike anything outside
of education
Costs – drain the
financial and also the
human resources,
Confidence – ed techs
are required to manage
the system
(Groom J & Lamb B
(2014) ‘Reclaiming
Innovation’. EDUCAUSE
Review, vol. 49, no. 3
44. Remember those common
themes?
Belief in openness
as public good
Becomes
mainstream
Gets adopted and
adapted
Resisted –
unworkable, low
quality,
You are
here
45. The longue duree
old attitudes of thought and action,
resistant frameworks dying hard, at
times against all logic
Hinweis der Redaktion
Open access advocate
Available freely as pdf, kindle, epub etc or buy physical
Central argument is twofold:
In many ways the current period marks the victory of open approaches
Doesn’t mean everyone knows about OERs or uses open approaches, but they are part of mainstream process now, not a fringe, peripheral group
It’s a strange time to be into open ed
It’s seeing more investment, headlines, interest, and uptake than ever before
And yet it feels like it’s also being overtaken somewhat
Is this just the price we pay for being popular, like when a band makes it big?
Anyone of these is a talk in itself so I won’t be covering all the issues around them eg MOOC completion rates in detail
Understand people don’t like militaristic language but the reasons why I’ve framed it as a battle are telling
People do fundamentally disagree about the direction of open education, which I’ll illustrate with examples. So there is real conflict about its future direction
Education is a $6Trillion sector globally and lots of people now see it as the next big sector ripe for commercial takeover.
Elsevier had $2billion revenue in Science publishing
Big money is at stake
Look at this particularly in relation to MOOCs
Just want to look briefly at influencing factors that shape what we mean by open education
Freedom to reuse
Open access
Free cost
Easy use
Digital, networked content
Social, community based approaches
Ethical arguments for openness
Openness as efficient model
OA is probably the most mature area – successful, large impact. It’s probably also the easiest to understand and apply
Mandating that publications from publicly funded research is made available OA
A significant moment – good example of that victory of openness. It’s not 100% but that it’s over half indicates a tippin point
Seeing research emerging now that shows real impact for OER on things we care about
Guelph trademarked OpenEd and then aggressively pursued others using it
They have since backtracked largely as a result of the negative response, but that they should try is telling
Getting a double dip
a technological fix is both possible and in existence;
external forces will change, or disrupt, an existing sector;
wholesale revolution is required
the solution is provided by commerce.
LMS tale
Change happens very slowly, until it happens very quickly