Stakeholder processes for assessment of extension systems: comparative analysis of three country experiences.
•Als PPT, PDF herunterladen•
1 gefällt mir•754 views
May Hani
![Stakeholder Processes for Reviewing Extension Systems: comparative analysis of 3 country experiences ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Ähnlich wie Stakeholder processes for assessment of extension systems: comparative analysis of three country experiences.
Ähnlich wie Stakeholder processes for assessment of extension systems: comparative analysis of three country experiences. (20)
Mehr von Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation ACP-EU (CTA)
Mehr von Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation ACP-EU (CTA) (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Stakeholder processes for assessment of extension systems: comparative analysis of three country experiences.
- 1. Stakeholder Processes for Reviewing Extension Systems May Hani & Magdalena Blum Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- 14. THANK YOU
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Core Questions: How to avoid mistakes of copying ready models from outside that prevailed in the past and ensure that advisory services respond to the needs and demands of smallholders? How to enable farmers to participate in assessing the existing system and contribute to the design of a new system that matches their needs and aspirations? Who are the key players in today’s rural advisory services? What are the roles of the various stakeholders and service provider, public and non-public, in future extension systems? How can accountability to smallholders and their organizations be achieved? How can POs be involved in governance and decision making of the new extension systems?
- The external and internal influencing factors, and distinct strengths and weaknesses of the process implemented in each country demonstrate the fundamental need for country-specific processes that respond to the actual challenges smallholders are facing and to their priority needs, while observing common guidelines of good practice. Country-specific processes are fundamental – respond to actual challenges while observing common guidelines of good practice Active presence of multiple players providing RAS – new roles, partnerships and coordination National government’s commitment and openness - enabling environment and facilitative role Stakeholder participation and involvement of farmers and POs are crucial – ownership, commitment and relevance Increased investment and different funding modalities are needed: sub-contracting, co-funding and cost sharing – sustainability and effectiveness