Companies in the pharmacy and PBM space need to optimize key business processes and operational health by embracing new and distinctive organizational designs that make them more agile.
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Future-Proofing the PBM and Pharmacy Business
1. • Cognizant 20-20 Insights
Future-Proofing the PBM and
Pharmacy Business
Executive Summary black-box earnings are a bigger threat. Getting
there requires PBMs and pharmacies to rapidly
Pharmacies and pharmacy benefit management
build distinctive capabilities and optimize exist-
firms (PBMs), large and small, are being forced to
ing operations — two challenges that, if not done
fundamentally remake their business models. This
efficiently and in a timely fashion, could further
is due to several factors, including a reduction in
jeopardize their long-term existence.
the number of blockbuster drugs, shorter product
lifecycles and design cycles and quick-and-easy This white paper examines how companies in
replication of efficient distribution models by the the pharmacy and PBM space can optimize key
competition. Many of these companies are losing business processes and improve their overall
their hard-earned competitive advantage and operational health by embracing new and distinc-
are seeking the next big thing to revitalize their tive organizational designs that make pharmacies
revenue streams. and the PBM more agile.
The competitive landscape is changing rapidly,
with competition coming from unexpected
quarters. For example, Argus Health is pioneering Industry Trends Forcing
a new approach for selling services to PBMs via Business Cycle Change
a utility model. Walmart-Caterpillar’s direct-to-
• Healthcare reform transparency regulations
payer contract model is also causing a stir by dis-
• Simplification of pharmacy benefits
intermediating PBMs. This is not too dissimilar to
• Generics replacing blockbuster drugs
what is going on in other industries. For instance,
who in the previous decade would have thought • Reduced emphasis on pharmacy benefits
management
that e-tailing behemoth Amazon would be among
• Increased emphasis on patient-centric approach
today’s cloud computing leaders? Or that music
distribution or mobile communication would be • PBM disintermediation from retail giants
revolutionized by a PC maker, Apple? • Rapidly emerging nontraditional PBM models:
PBA, transparent PBMs
Moreover, the unrelenting forces of regulation, • Questionable viability of standalone PBMs
demographic changes, consumerism and techno- • Conflicts of interest for retail-owned PBMs
logical advancements are challenging pharmacies • Concerns over increased payer costs in
and PBMs. Additionally, shrinking margins in core self-dealing PBMs
revenue streams, commoditization of services,
and transparency regulations that undercut Figure 1
cognizant 20-20 insights | september 2011
2. Business Model Transformation demanding change is the Health Resources and
Services Administration’s launch of the Patient
Safety and Clinical Pharmacy Services Collabora-
tive for evidence-based pharmacy services.
Patient Management As the pharmacy space undergoes major business
transformation, many players will need to re-invent
Therapy Management themselves. At issue is whether pharmacy
companies can leverage existing knowledge and
Benefit Management capabilities to successfully transform.
The Challenge for Business Model
Distribution
Transformation
Business reinvention requires new distinc-
tive capabilities and enhancements to existing
operating models, which takes time and resources
to build and let mature. According to Amazon’s
Figure 2
Thursday, September 1, 2011 CEO Jeff Bezos,1 it takes five to seven years before
the seeds of innovation planted at his company
have a meaningful impact on the economics of
Business Model Transformation the business. When it comes to transforming the
The pharmacy industry has traditionally gener- business model, the commitment of resources —
ated earnings by driving efficient delivery of combined with a high level of risk and uncertain-
drugs from manufacturers to patients. A majority ty surrounding the ability to deliver effectively
of the industry’s earnings have historically been and on time — is among the biggest decision
driven by the sale of blockbuster drugs. Several barriers business leaders face. Sometimes, by
bio-pharma challenges — including patent expira- the time decisions are made and the capabili-
tion deadlines for many brand ties are developed, a new business cycle begins
At issue is whether drugs, a dearth of blockbuster
pharmacy companies drugs in the landscapea and a
pipeline, highly
competitive A Congruent Relationship
can leverage low barrier for new entrants to
existing knowledge replicate the current low-cost
and capabilities drug delivery-based operating
model — are rippling across STRATEGY
to successfully the industry value chain, indi-
transform. rectly impacting pharmacies
and PBMs. These forces influ- BUSINESS MODEL
ence rebate yields, average
prescription price and simplification of pharmacy
OPERATING MODEL
Business Agility
benefits design. As a result, pharmacy companies
Capability Agility
are looking to revitalize their revenue streams
by adding new and innovative value-added ser-
vices to their current distribution channels
CAPABILITIES
(see Figure 2).
PROCESS
Among the supporting trends is ongoing health-
care reform. As reform slowly churns, the phar-
PEOPLE
macy segment is rightly positioned within the
industry value chain to drive high-quality, lower-
TECHNOLOGY
cost healthcare for all. As evidence, pharmacies
are already experimenting with in-store clinics,
in-store inoculation, disease management and
health services to foster reductions in patients’
out-of-pocket healthcare costs. Another force Figure 3
cognizant 20-20 insights 2
3. to emerge and the company ends up behind the Embracing the Future of Work
curve, needing to contend with the challenges of
It takes a great amount of resources to build
the next business cycle.
distinctive capabilities within the organization,
The pharmacy space is currently at this not to mention the time required to mature and
juncture. Major pharmacies have to make the scale them. As business cycles compress, phar-
decision of whether to embark on adding clinical macy and PBM companies
have to continually revitalize
management, therapy and disease management Increased competition
and benefits management services to their by frequently creating new
current product portfolio to improve the and distinctive capabilities. in the pharmacy and
economics of the business. To build these new The reason: shorter planning PBM segment will
cycles means they have little
product and services offerings, senior leadership force existing players
must assess how quickly and efficiently their latitude to wait for returns
teams can build new and distinctive capabilities. on expensive Cap-Ex invest- to embrace a virtual
ments. In the past, pharma- operating model,
cies and PBM companies
To achieve material increases in net margins, our
where many non-core
experience reveals that business leaders must could depreciate capital
assemble the right combination of processes, investments over five- to business functions
skills, knowledge, structure and tools. Moreover, 10-year horizons. However, and capabilities are
given accelerating industry
they need a business operating model that is
delivered as utility-
agile enough to quickly integrate the new and changes, today they must
distinctive capabilities required to support new plan and invest for returns based cloud services.
products and services. Those companies that achieved three to four quar-
can more swiftly revise their business operating ters down the road.
models to accommodate new capabilities and
decouple current capabilities that no longer align To rapidly add or remove the capabilities to
with business strategy will be better positioned to match tighter business cycles, PBMs must
rapidly adapt to changing business cycles. Those move from an integrated to a virtual operating
companies willing to embrace these new concepts model. This virtual operating model, where
will be positioned to leave their rivals behind contextual business functions and capabili-
(see Figure 3). ties are provided by more efficient partner
Shifting Operating Models
Virtual Operating Model
• Core capabilities kept in-house.
• Non-core capabilities, such as billing, distribution
and manufacturing utility, obtained from third-party.
• Flexible for business transformation.
• Quickly available.
• Requires business architecture to be able
to couple with various cloud-based services.
• Medium to high efficiency but highly agile.
Integrated Operating Model
• All capabilities built in-house.
• Major new capabilities added through
creation of new organizations.
• Rigid to transformation.
• High cultural change barriers.
• Closed business architecture.
• Drives very high efficiency.
• Recommended for mature capabilities.
Figure 4
cognizant 20-20 insights 3
4. companies, has already been adopted by some business functions and capabilities are delivered
of the more successful companies in the high- as utility-based cloud services (see Figure 4).
technology market, a sector where winning
requires not only innovative products but also Pharmacies have been slow to embrace virtual
dynamic business models and go-to-market collaboration models and externally delivered
strategies.2 The virtual integration operating services for one primary reason: Their business
model requires tight but flexible integration environment did not compel them to do so. But
between companies with transparent processes with increasing volatility, pharmacy companies
and information freely flowing and PBMs will have to shift from a completely
between the partners. integrated operating model to a hybrid approach
But with increasing before fully embracing a virtual operating model
volatility, pharmacy This virtual model is evident — but only if warranted by business conditions.
at companies such as Dell,
companies and PBMs where almost all business For starters, pharmacies will have to open up
will have to shift functions and capabilities their business architectures and identify loose
couplings for seamless adoption of the emerging
from a completely of product manufacturing,
cloud-delivered services within their current
delivery and support (other
integrated operating than brand management) are operating models. The current spectrum of “as a
model to a hybrid handled by third parties.3 service” utility-based offerings such as business
process as a service (BPaaS), infrastructure as a
approach before fully For pharmacies and PBM service (IaaS), platform as a service (PaaS) and
embracing a virtual organizations to migrate software as a service (SaaS) are examples of
operating model – but from an integrated to a point solution-based capabilities that reliably and
virtual operating model, they consistently deliver a specified outcome.
only if warranted by must completely understand
business conditions. current business processes Sanovia’s PA-Logic is a good example of a prior
and fundamental perfor- authorization capability delivered as BPaaS.
mance levels. They also need to instrument its ADP’s Payroll Services is another example of a
demand forecasting process so output can be utility-based BPaaS to manage the employee
shared by all the partners within the virtual payroll process, a function that is often not the
model. core competency of the pharmacy or PBM.
A key challenge to overcome is the decision of To swiftly derive distinctive business capability
which business processes to turn over to a partner. relevant for the pharmacy business space,
To answer this, the organization must acquire a businesses must optimally combine the dynamic
strong understanding of the current process, its potential of these point solutions-based capabili-
performance and its impact on the business. The ties from various vendors. The combined benefit
decision to partner can be a challenging one given of a traditional operating model with the dynamic
that these decisions may require the organiza- potential of cloud-based services will reduce the
tion to partner for business processes in which it learning curve the organization must ascend
already has significant investments. when building new and distinctive capabilities,
and it will also reduce the capital investment
Another impact of this model will be on the usually required.
organizational structure. The organizational
structure of the company adopting the virtual Pharmacies and PBMs that learn how to adopt
operating model will undergo a major change “cloud services” will be better equipped to
and will have to add the capabilities to manage transform themselves by embracing a more
processes that can span multiple partner com- virtual business operating model. Taking this tack
panies. In addition, the organization will have to will enable them to more efficiently and rapidly
apply more mature decision-making processes respond to changing market dynamics and
to harness the benefits of the virtual operating business cycle volatility. In fact, this approach will
model. form the foundation for thoroughly transform-
ing the business core across the enterprise for
Increased competition in the pharmacy and PBM the future. Cloud-based services will be the key
segment4 will force existing players to embrace attribute for next-generation operating models
a virtual operating model, where many non-core that leave key rivals in the rear-view mirror.
cognizant 20-20 insights 4