Presents a critique of several common approaches to building e-capability on tertiary educational institutions, based on the metaphor of Melbourne's famous trams. The author's first job was as a conductor on the trams. Sadly, the conductors (called "connies") are no longer with us, although the author still is.
5. Impact: follow-up delivery RTO survey: What delivery follow-up has there been? Survey: 2008 E-learning Innovations projects
6. Impact: flow-on programs Business partner survey: What flow-on delivery (other courses) has there been?
7. Impact: sustainable teams Business partner survey: Is the 2008 team supporting other e-learning initiatives? Survey: 2008 E-learning Innovations projects
8.
9. Embedding e-learning Partner survey : which of these these strategies have you used? Survey: 2008 E-learning Innovations projects Most did a bit of everything – but building e-skills (staff, learners) main focus
48. Toorak check: mentoring ? delivery ? rationale for e ✗ budget ? timeline ? a plan ? follow up ? team ✗ marketing U of Ballarat: “Elves” program, $1m over 3 years. ROI?
49. So how do you really, really build your e-capability?