1. Tatsuro Sakano & Farhan Helmy Department of Social Engineering Tokyo Institute of Technology Forest Governance in Banyumas: Preliminary Report of Social Capital Analysis 集団分極化現象と米国市民による政策投票の実験から学ぶリスクコミュニケーションの方法 December 4, 2006

2. Positive Effects of Social Capital : Some Evidences(1) Excerpted from Uslaner(2003)

3. Positive Effects of Social Capital : Some Evidences(2) Excerpted from Uslaner(2003)

8. Banyumas Survey: sampled villages Total Sample Size : 1005 households

10. Occupation by area upstream middle downstream total farmers 72.5 54.5 55.7 65.6 employed 12.8 24.8 29.5 18.2 others 14.8 20.7 14.8 16.2

12. forest preservation is important for your area? Mostly (94.5%) agrees

13. Level of deforestation No consensus on the seriousness of deforestation Only 16% perceives deforestation is serious

14. over exploitation in upstream affect on downstream region? Considerable portion disagrees

15. Problem of deforestation Water shortage is the most common problem water shortage 55.9 land slide 0.7 erosion 0.7 flodding 0 wikd pigs 9.2 lainnya 4.6

16. responsibility to manage forest Community is expected to take responsibility gov (national/district) 15.7 gnv (village) 2.3 local coommunity 18.3 gvn & LC 37.9 mandor 17 KPH 0.4 SFC & LC 0.6

18. most people in this village/neighborhood will help you if you need Mostly expect mutual help disagree 9.5 nutral 11.5 agree some 62.3 agree strong 15.2

19. community help (when unfortunate happen such as land slide/flood, the community get together to help? Mostly expect mutual help in emergency very unlikely 0.4 somewhat unlikely 0.9 somewhat likely 13.1 very likely 71.2

20. how likely will be criticized or sanctioned when not participate in community activity? Monitoring & control is effective in community very unlikely 2.1 somewhat unlikely 11 somewhat likely 22.5 very likely 50.3

21. Work/interact with other groups with similar group in In the village & neighborhood Outside the village & neighborhood Contact with outside the neighbor hood is less no 18.5 occasionally 26.6 frequently 13.4 no 27.5 occasionally 22.2 frequently 8.6

22. if you find logging activity what do you do ? Ask/inform to what community will do if they find logging? neighbourhood 25.1 community leader 12.1 village gvt 18.2 SFC 21.7 police 4.2 others 6.1 check to the location 16.8 no action 42.5 get organized to meet community leader 19.5 inform to the police 13.4

24. smaller extent small extent great extent greater extent own ethnic/tribe 1.7 5.6 10.8 82 other ethnic/tribe 6 27.5 24.4 42 religious leader 0.5 2.1 7 90.3 shopkeeper 1.1 7.7 12.8 75.7 local gvt 2 8.4 14.8 74.5 police 4.6 17.7 17 58.5 international NGO 5.2 15.3 29.9 30.7 national NGO 3.4 13.8 27.6 37.8 RPH 4.4 14.6 20.7 58.5 KPH 3.8 14.2 23.2 56.8 community leader 0.7 2.5 7 89.5 researcher 1.3 5.7 11.8 80.7 stranger 13.1 31 26.7 23 military 3.1 7.5 13.6 69.3

25. advice & expertise from whithin the members 32.3 other sources in the community 11.1 sources outside the community 10.6