2015 Strategy Execution Summit Presentation: Susan Hill & Walter Mitton from the Centers ffor Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS): Strategy Implementation in a Large Public Organization
Abortion pills in Jeddah |• +966572737505 ] GET CYTOTEC
Susan Hill & Walter Mitton: Strategy Implementation in a Large Public Organization
1. Strategy Implementation in a
Large Public Organization
Challenges,Wins, and the Road Forward
Susan Hill, Director of Strategy
Walt Mitton, Senior StrategyTechnical Advisor
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
3. Introduction
About CMS
◦ ~6,000 FTEs working across the Nation
◦ Combined, our programs touch the lives of ~123M
individuals (more than 1 in 3 Americans) and pay
almost one-third of the Nation’s health expenditures
◦ Largest purchaser of health care in the U.S.
Our Mission
◦ As an effective steward of public funds, CMS is
committed to strengthening and modernizing the
nation’s health care system to provide access to high
quality care and improved health at lower cost.
3
8. Leadership – A Critical Component
of Strategy
Strategy sponsorship is critical
Sponsor sets the direction
Sponsor’s message about the
organization’s future state is clear and
shared among leadership and staff
Public-sector risk – sponsor can change
mid-strategy
8
9. Governance – The Decision-making
Force of Strategy Design and
Implementation
Leverage or establish a decision-making body
for the strategy
Determine the strategic management
maturity of the governing body – have they
either created and more importantly,
implemented and managed strategy before?
Clarify roles and responsibilities of the
strategy’s governing body
9
10. Implementation Challenges and
Potential Solutions
CHALLENGES
Leadership –Who is the Strategy’s Sponsor and what
is her intent?
Governance –Who’s leading this effort and making
key decisions?
Team Membership and Competing Priorities –
You know I have a full-time job…right?
Taxonomy – Is it a goal, objective or an initiative? I’m
so confused!
Clarifying Desired Outcomes – Is it an outcome
or a means to an end?
Establishing a Representative Set of Meaningful
Performance Measures – Does this measure inform
us that we’re achieving success?
Establishing ProjectTeams – Who’s doing the
work, when, with what resources?
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS
Leadership – obtain and clearly communicate the
sponsor’s intent to key stakeholders
Governance – consider using charters and
determine decision-making bodies
Team Membership and Competing Priorities –
discuss level of commitment upfront
Taxonomy – integrate teachable moments in
consultation and/or meetings
Clarifying Desired Outcomes – take the time to
explain this term and make every attempt to limit the
number of outcomes per objective
Establishing a Representative Set of
Performance Measures – try to avoid the “use
what we have” mentality. Provide guidance, such as a
toolkit to facilitate the process
Establishing project teams – Provide teams with
project-oriented resources and a well-defined
reporting structure
10
11. Implementation – Wins!
Objectives are being Implemented
Senior leadership is referencing the Strategy
Objective-level and Outcome-focused
performance measures are being developed
Strategy Management consultation and facilitation
is being requested and deployed to help
implement new federal statutes and regulations
Other component-level strategies are being
implemented
11
12. Our Road Forward – Next Steps
The CMS Division of Strategy Management will
continue:
◦ Advising leadership on the benefits of Strategy
◦ Providing leading practices tools, guidance, and
consultation
◦ Refining framework and guidance
And start:
◦ Building a Strategy Community of Practice
◦ Providing more opportunities for Strategic Thinking and
Decision-making
12