Suche senden
Hochladen
Chapter 15 Social Research
•
Als PPT, PDF herunterladen
•
2 gefällt mir
•
3,885 views
A
arpsychology
Folgen
Melden
Teilen
Melden
Teilen
1 von 36
Jetzt herunterladen
Empfohlen
Adler clark 4e ppt 11
Adler clark 4e ppt 11
arpsychology
Adler clark 4e ppt 03
Adler clark 4e ppt 03
arpsychology
Describes the nuts and bolts of good survey design for research in the social sciences.
Survey Design
Survey Design
James Neill
Qualitative and quantitative methods of research
Qualitative and quantitative methods of research
Jordan Cruz
In this lecture you will learn about the importance of research questions, how they related to research problems, the properties of good research questions, and the differences between quantitative and qualitative research questions.
Research questions
Research questions
BabakFarshchian
This presentation is about Quantitative Research, its types and important aspects including advantages and disadvantages, characteristics and definitions.
Quantitative research
Quantitative research
Tooba Kanwal
identification of the problem
Research identification of the problem
Research identification of the problem
Gunjan Verma
Marketing research exploratory research using qualitative and observation me...
Marketing research exploratory research using qualitative and observation me...
Stevanus Handoko, S.Kom., MM
Empfohlen
Adler clark 4e ppt 11
Adler clark 4e ppt 11
arpsychology
Adler clark 4e ppt 03
Adler clark 4e ppt 03
arpsychology
Describes the nuts and bolts of good survey design for research in the social sciences.
Survey Design
Survey Design
James Neill
Qualitative and quantitative methods of research
Qualitative and quantitative methods of research
Jordan Cruz
In this lecture you will learn about the importance of research questions, how they related to research problems, the properties of good research questions, and the differences between quantitative and qualitative research questions.
Research questions
Research questions
BabakFarshchian
This presentation is about Quantitative Research, its types and important aspects including advantages and disadvantages, characteristics and definitions.
Quantitative research
Quantitative research
Tooba Kanwal
identification of the problem
Research identification of the problem
Research identification of the problem
Gunjan Verma
Marketing research exploratory research using qualitative and observation me...
Marketing research exploratory research using qualitative and observation me...
Stevanus Handoko, S.Kom., MM
Mass communication and journalism Research methodology this PPT describes the details of TYPES of RESEARCH
Types of research
Types of research
PavithraBidkalkatte
Problem (how to form good research question)
Problem (how to form good research question)
metalkid132
Adler clark 4e ppt 04
Adler clark 4e ppt 04
arpsychology
It describes the types of research, differences between quantitative and qualitative research and gives an introduction to Participatory Rural Appraisal tools
Research
Research
Jayaramachandran S
This presentation is related to tools of Educational Research. This presentation slides deals various tools of educational research likes rating scale, opionnaire, checklist, aptitude test, inventory, observation, interview, schedule etc. This presentation slides also describe the item analysis, steps for item analysis and online survey tools.
Tools of Education Research- Dr. K. Thiyagu
Tools of Education Research- Dr. K. Thiyagu
Central University of Kerala
Identifying and formulating the research problem
Identification & formulation of problem
Identification & formulation of problem
Arun Deva
Chapter 9-METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
Chapter 9-METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
Ludy Mae Nalzaro,BSM,BSN,MN
developing research plan
Developing research plan
Developing research plan
Anvita Bharati
BUSINESS RESEARCH
Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Mohammad Hassan
6. Non Experimental Methods
6. Non Experimental Methods
rossbiology
types of research and process of research
Types of Research
Types of Research
Neha Bansal
Research design & secondary data
Research design & secondary data
Shameem Ali
This is a lesson in Research 1- Basic Research and is good for a 1.5 hours classroom activity. It covers images that can motivate undergraduate students from class participation during the class activity.
Quanti vs quali research
Quanti vs quali research
Holy Angel University
Audience research
Audience research
Heywoodmedia
Included all types of data collection.Includes primary data collection and secondary data collection. Described each and every classification of Data collections which are included in KTU Kerala.
Methods of data collection (research methodology)
Methods of data collection (research methodology)
Muhammed Konari
Tool development in research
Tool development presentation
Tool development presentation
Syed imran ali
Research methodology concept of pre-testing.
Pretesting in questionnaire
Pretesting in questionnaire
Saiyam Agrawal
Exploratory research design
Exploratory research design
horses7
research process
research process
Shruti Jain
case study method and survey method
case study methods and survey method by shafeek
case study methods and survey method by shafeek
Shafeek S
UNIT 36
INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES
INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES
Google
The slides from my day-long workshop on using social software in teaching and research sponsored by NITLE.
Social Software in Education
Social Software in Education
Laura Blankenship
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Mass communication and journalism Research methodology this PPT describes the details of TYPES of RESEARCH
Types of research
Types of research
PavithraBidkalkatte
Problem (how to form good research question)
Problem (how to form good research question)
metalkid132
Adler clark 4e ppt 04
Adler clark 4e ppt 04
arpsychology
It describes the types of research, differences between quantitative and qualitative research and gives an introduction to Participatory Rural Appraisal tools
Research
Research
Jayaramachandran S
This presentation is related to tools of Educational Research. This presentation slides deals various tools of educational research likes rating scale, opionnaire, checklist, aptitude test, inventory, observation, interview, schedule etc. This presentation slides also describe the item analysis, steps for item analysis and online survey tools.
Tools of Education Research- Dr. K. Thiyagu
Tools of Education Research- Dr. K. Thiyagu
Central University of Kerala
Identifying and formulating the research problem
Identification & formulation of problem
Identification & formulation of problem
Arun Deva
Chapter 9-METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
Chapter 9-METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
Ludy Mae Nalzaro,BSM,BSN,MN
developing research plan
Developing research plan
Developing research plan
Anvita Bharati
BUSINESS RESEARCH
Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Mohammad Hassan
6. Non Experimental Methods
6. Non Experimental Methods
rossbiology
types of research and process of research
Types of Research
Types of Research
Neha Bansal
Research design & secondary data
Research design & secondary data
Shameem Ali
This is a lesson in Research 1- Basic Research and is good for a 1.5 hours classroom activity. It covers images that can motivate undergraduate students from class participation during the class activity.
Quanti vs quali research
Quanti vs quali research
Holy Angel University
Audience research
Audience research
Heywoodmedia
Included all types of data collection.Includes primary data collection and secondary data collection. Described each and every classification of Data collections which are included in KTU Kerala.
Methods of data collection (research methodology)
Methods of data collection (research methodology)
Muhammed Konari
Tool development in research
Tool development presentation
Tool development presentation
Syed imran ali
Research methodology concept of pre-testing.
Pretesting in questionnaire
Pretesting in questionnaire
Saiyam Agrawal
Exploratory research design
Exploratory research design
horses7
research process
research process
Shruti Jain
case study method and survey method
case study methods and survey method by shafeek
case study methods and survey method by shafeek
Shafeek S
Was ist angesagt?
(20)
Types of research
Types of research
Problem (how to form good research question)
Problem (how to form good research question)
Adler clark 4e ppt 04
Adler clark 4e ppt 04
Research
Research
Tools of Education Research- Dr. K. Thiyagu
Tools of Education Research- Dr. K. Thiyagu
Identification & formulation of problem
Identification & formulation of problem
Chapter 9-METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
Chapter 9-METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
Developing research plan
Developing research plan
Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Quantitative and Qualitative Research
6. Non Experimental Methods
6. Non Experimental Methods
Types of Research
Types of Research
Research design & secondary data
Research design & secondary data
Quanti vs quali research
Quanti vs quali research
Audience research
Audience research
Methods of data collection (research methodology)
Methods of data collection (research methodology)
Tool development presentation
Tool development presentation
Pretesting in questionnaire
Pretesting in questionnaire
Exploratory research design
Exploratory research design
research process
research process
case study methods and survey method by shafeek
case study methods and survey method by shafeek
Andere mochten auch
UNIT 36
INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES
INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES
Google
The slides from my day-long workshop on using social software in teaching and research sponsored by NITLE.
Social Software in Education
Social Software in Education
Laura Blankenship
Technical report writing
Technical report writing
Penn State University
IT INCLUDES THE PROPER DESCRIPTION AND TYPES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS . I HAVE DISCUSSED ABOUT HISTORY OF TECHNICAL REPORTS AND BASICS OF TECHNICAL REPORTS ARE ALSO MENTIONED . MOREOVER THE OVERVIEW OF ALL TYPES ,STRUCTURE OF A TECHNICAL REPORT AND CHECKLIST FOR A REPORT ARE ALSO INCLUDED
TYPES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS
TYPES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS
farwa jafar
TV News interview techniques
6 Interview Techniques
6 Interview Techniques
Tony Rodgers
A detail presentation about the Technical Report Writing for Research Methodology
Technical Report writing
Technical Report writing
Gurukrushna Patnaik
Interviewtechniques ppt
Interviewtechniques ppt
Prof. Chhaya Sachin Patel
Presentation for Research Methodology Please download the file and view the presentation. Notes for each of the slides are present in the notes section (Images used for representational purposes only)
Data Collection by Interview Method
Data Collection by Interview Method
Akash Dhar
This slide will guide other researchers that wants to collect data using Interview method. It teaches how to analyse the data as well. This was a presentation that was carried out in our research method class by our group.
Research method - How to interview?
Research method - How to interview?
Hafizah Hajimia
This slide contains information about interview and various types of interviews like. Screening / Telephone Interview Video Conferencing One-on-One / Face to Face Interview Group Interview Panel Interview Behavioural Interview Sequential Interview Hope this video will help you
Interview and it's Types
Interview and it's Types
Learn By Watch
The intention of this resource is to provide you with enough information to produce a high quality reports and literature reviews. You may need to produce several small reports during the course of your undergraduate study as part of group coursework assignments. This guide along with other provide support.
Technical Report Writing
Technical Report Writing
The Engineering Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning
I have prepared this PPT to improve interview skill in short span.
Interview Ppt
Interview Ppt
dearvikashkumar
surveys used in research metodology
Surveys method in research methodology
Surveys method in research methodology
Sanjaya Sahoo
A different types of research design
Research Design
Research Design
Davao Institute for Educational Research Development & Consultancy
Research Design
Research Design
Research Design
Sathish Rajamani
creat by sir Naveed Iqbal
Survey research
Survey research
Punjab University Lahore
Interview method in research
Interview method in research
Vinay Kumar
Types of interview
Types of interview
Yevgeniya Grigoryeva
Data collection - Statistical data are a numerical statement of aggregates. Data, generally, are obtained through properly organized statistical inquiries conducted by the investigators. Data can either be from primary or secondary sources.
Data collection presentation
Data collection presentation
Kanchan Agarwal
Source of Data in Research
Source of Data in Research
Manu K M
Andere mochten auch
(20)
INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES
INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES
Social Software in Education
Social Software in Education
Technical report writing
Technical report writing
TYPES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS
TYPES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS
6 Interview Techniques
6 Interview Techniques
Technical Report writing
Technical Report writing
Interviewtechniques ppt
Interviewtechniques ppt
Data Collection by Interview Method
Data Collection by Interview Method
Research method - How to interview?
Research method - How to interview?
Interview and it's Types
Interview and it's Types
Technical Report Writing
Technical Report Writing
Interview Ppt
Interview Ppt
Surveys method in research methodology
Surveys method in research methodology
Research Design
Research Design
Research Design
Research Design
Survey research
Survey research
Interview method in research
Interview method in research
Types of interview
Types of interview
Data collection presentation
Data collection presentation
Source of Data in Research
Source of Data in Research
Ähnlich wie Chapter 15 Social Research
concept, goal, need and tools of programme evaluation
programme evaluation by priyadarshinee pradhan
programme evaluation by priyadarshinee pradhan
Priya Das
Evaluation Principles: Theory-Based, Utilization-Focused, Participatory. Find out more in this presentation about three approaches to evaluation.
Evaluation Principles: Theory-Based, Utilization-Focused, Participatory
Evaluation Principles: Theory-Based, Utilization-Focused, Participatory
MHTP Webmastere
This session was led as a Pre-Summit Workshop at the Healthy Minds | Healthy Campuses Summit 2016. Ben Pollard explored the question, "how do you know that your campus initiatives are making a difference?"
Evaluation of Settings and Whole Systems Approaches
Evaluation of Settings and Whole Systems Approaches
healthycampuses
Global Topic will be World Hunger, I will be representing the perspective of Confucianism and Daoism Prepare and present a multi-media Interfaith Initiative OR a Joint Resolution providing your group's solution to a real Global Issue that has been identified by the United Nations as needing major solutions in this day and age. The purpose of your task is to role play in such a way as though you are making a formal presentation of your solution to the United Nations Assembly. The key being that each person in your Group will represent at least one religious viewpoint from among those studied in this class and you must stay faithful to the beliefs and characteristics of your religion in developing your solution with the Group. Your Group will need to complete its work and the Leader post your work on or before Thursday of Week #8 in the weekly Forum for review by the class. You will need to reply to at least two other Group Projects. As a result, your Interfaith Initiative OR Joint Resolution should include the following components: · A brief Introduction that identifies the Global Issue presented by the United Nations as to the background information, history, and current status of the issue in the world today. · Identification of the major components offered by each individual in the Group representing their specific religious beliefs and characteristics in direct relation to this issue alone. · Presentation of your Group's Interfaith Initiative OR Joint Resolution which will include the specific directives of your solution, reasoning for the directives, and a brief plan for implementation by the United Nations. · A Summary Statement briefly wrapping up your presentation and progress made for addressing this Global Issue. · Be sure to include MLA citations and a Works Cited Page for inclusion of all resources used in each slide and in your presentation to avoid plagiarism. · Failure to participate in the formation of this statement with your Group will result in major deductions as Group Leaders will be tasked with submitting participation completions or failures to participate. Running head: GEORGIA SCHOOLS PUNISHMENT SYSTEM PROGRAM EVALUATION 1 GEORGIA SCHOOLS PUNISHMENT SYSTEM PROGRAM EVALUATION 4 Georgia Schools Punishment System Program Evaluation Vibert Jacob South University Program Evaluation Criteria The following five criteria are used in evaluating Georgia schools punishment system as a program: relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability (Posavac, 2015). Relevance is a measure or criterion of the extent to which the punishment program meets the needs of the teachers, students and other important state education stakeholders, and the needs are consistent with the policies of the education administration in Georgia. For instance, a common question that can be asked under thi ...
Global Topic will be World Hunger, I will be representing the pers.docx
Global Topic will be World Hunger, I will be representing the pers.docx
whittemorelucilla
We hope this guide helps practitioners and others strengthen programs designed to increase academic achievement, ultimately broadening access to higher education for youth and adults. We believe that evaluation is a critical part of program design and is necessary for ongoing program improvement. Evaluation requires collecting reliable, current and compelling information to empower stakeholders to make better decisions about programs and organizational practices that directly affect students. A good evaluation is an effective way of gathering information that strengthens programs, identifies problems, and assesses the extent of change over time. A sound evaluation that prompts program improvement is also a positive sign to funders and other stakeholders, and can help to sustain their commitment to your program. Theories of change are conceptual maps that show how and why program activities will achieve short-term, interim, and long-term outcomes. The underlying assumptions that promote, support, and sustain a program often seem self-evident to program planners. Consequently, they spend too little time clarifying those assumptions for implementers and participants. Explicit theories of change provoke continuous reflection and shared ownership of the work to be accomplished. Even the most experienced program planners sometimes make the mistake of thinking an innovative design will accomplish goals without checking the linkages among assumptions and plans. Developing a theory of change is a team effort. The collective knowledge and experience of program staff, stakeholders, and participants contribute to formulating a clear, precise statement about how and why a program will work. Using a theory-based approach, program collaborators state what they are doing and why by working backwards from the outcomes they seek to the interventions they plan, and forward from interventions to desired outcomes. When defining a theory of change, program planners usually begin by deciding expected outcomes, aligning outcomes with goals, deciding on the best indicators to evaluate progress toward desired outcomes, and developing specific measures for evaluating results. The end product is a statement of the expected change that specifies how implementation, resources, and evaluation translate into desired outcomes. Continuously evaluating a theory of change encourages program planners to keep an eye on their goals. Statements about how and why a program will work must be established using the knowledge of program staff, stakeholders, and participants. This statement represents the theory underlying the program plan and shows planners how resources and activities translate to desired improvements and outcomes. It also becomes a framework for program implementation and evaluation. Source: https://ebookscheaper.com/2022/04/06/a-good-program-can-improve-educational-outcomes/
A Good Program Can Improve Educational Outcomes.pdf
A Good Program Can Improve Educational Outcomes.pdf
noblex1
Program evaluations are one of the psychological techniques and it can involve equally quantitative and qualitative methods of social research.
Psychology Techniques - Program Evaluation
Psychology Techniques - Program Evaluation
psychegames2
June 20 2010 bsi christie
June 20 2010 bsi christie
harrindl
This is a brief presentation shared in a seminar
Evaluation approaches presented by hari bhusal
Evaluation approaches presented by hari bhusal
Hari Bhushal
Evaluating a community project
COMMUNITY EVALUATION 2023.pptx
COMMUNITY EVALUATION 2023.pptx
gggadiel
Evaluation Research Dr. Guerette IntroductionEvaluation Research –The purpose is to evaluate the impact of policiesEvidence – based policy analysisIs used to help public officials examine and select from alternative actions. Appropriate TopicsPolicy analysis and evaluation are used to develop justice policy and determine its impactPolicy analysis helps officials evaluate alternative actions, choose among them and formulate practices for implementing policy.Program evaluation is conducted at a later point in time than policy analysis for the purpose of determining if policies are implemented as planned and are they achieving their goals. Steps of EvaluationIn order to do evaluation research you must learn the goals as the initial step.Evaluability assessment –A pre-evaluation where a researcher determines whether conditions necessary for conducting an evaluation are present. Steps of EvaluationProblem formulation –Identify and specify program goals in concrete, measurable form.Measurement – How the program is doing in meeting its goals.Specifying outcomes – Program goals represent desired outcomes, while outcome measures are empirical indicators of whether or not those desired outcomes are achieved. Steps of EvaluationMeasuring program contexts – Measuring the context within which the program is conducted.Measuring program delivery – Measuring both the dependent and independent variables are necessary. Designs for Program EvaluationRandomized evaluation designs – may be limited by legal, ethical and practical reasons Program and agency acceptance – it is necessary to explain to the agency why random assignment is vital for this type of research. Minimize exceptions to random assignments – recognize that some exceptions are necessary but too many exceptions threatens the statistical equivalence of experimental and control groups. Designs for Program Evaluation Adequate Case Flow for Sample Size – The larger the sample size the more accurate the estimates of the population characteristics which will reduce threats to things like statistical conclusion validity. Maintaining treatment integrity – It is important to maintain treatment consistency (homogeneity) because it will impact measurement reliability. Designs for Program EvaluationQuasi-experimental Designs – used when one is not able to use random assignment of subjects to an experimental and a control group. Ex Post evaluations – done after (retrospectively) an experimental program has gone into effect. Designs for Program Evaluation Full Coverage programs – Usually national or statewide in nature where it is not possible to identify subjects who are not exposed to the intervention and cannot randomly assign persons to receive or not receive treatment. Larger treatment units – Incorporating a great number of people thus limiting the ability to use random assignment. Designs for Program Evaluation Non-equivalent groups design – Where treatment and control subjec ...
Evaluation ResearchDr. GueretteIntroductionEvalu.docx
Evaluation ResearchDr. GueretteIntroductionEvalu.docx
gitagrimston
Evaluation Research and Policy Analysis Chapter 11 * Introduction Evaluation research: refers to a research purpose rather than a specific method; seeks to evaluate the impact of interventions; if some result was produced Problem analysis: designed to help public officials choose from alternative future actions Evidence-based policy: actions of justice agencies are linked to evidence used for planning and evaluation Evidence generation: nonprofit organizations that document and evaluate programing to create evidence that can be shared with others Appropriate Topics for Evaluation and Problem AnalysisEvaluation research is appropriate whenever some policy intervention occurs or is plannedA policy intervention is action taken for the purpose of producing some intended resultProblem analysis focuses on deciding what intervention should be pursued Future oriented Linking the Process to Evaluation Are policies being implemented as planned? Are policies achieving their intended goals? Evaluation seeks to link intended actions and goals of policy to empirical evidence that: Impact assessment: examines whether policies are having the desired effects Process evaluation: examines whether policies are being carried out as planned Often conducted together Getting Started Evaluability Assessment – “preevaluation” – researcher determines whether requisite conditions are present Support from relevant organizations What goals and objectives are; how they are translated into program components What kinds of records or data are available Who has a direct or indirect stake in the program Problem Formulation and Measurement 1 Different stakeholders often have different goals and views as to how a program should actually operate Stakeholders: persons and organizations with a direct interest in the program Must clearly specify program goals – desired outcomes Create objectives – operationalized statements Problem Formulation and Measurement 2 Definition and measurement – specify target/beneficiary population, decide between using current measures or creating new ones Measure program contexts, outcomes, program delivery Designs for Program Evaluation Randomized evaluation designs – avoids selection bias, allows assumption that groups created by random assignment are statistically equivalent; may not be suitable when agency or staff makes exceptions Caseflow – represents process through which subjects are accumulated into experimental and control groups Treatment integrity – whether an experimental intervention is delivered as intended; ≈ reliability Threatened by midstream changes in program Conditions Requisite for Randomized Experiments Staff must accept random assignment and agree to minimize exceptions to randomization Caseflow must produce enough subjects in E and C for statistical tests Experimental interventions must be consistently applied to E and withheld from C Need equivalence prior to intervention, and ability to detect ...
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
elbanglis
Evaluation Research and Policy Analysis Chapter 11 * Introduction Evaluation research: refers to a research purpose rather than a specific method; seeks to evaluate the impact of interventions; if some result was produced Problem analysis: designed to help public officials choose from alternative future actions Evidence-based policy: actions of justice agencies are linked to evidence used for planning and evaluation Evidence generation: nonprofit organizations that document and evaluate programing to create evidence that can be shared with others Appropriate Topics for Evaluation and Problem AnalysisEvaluation research is appropriate whenever some policy intervention occurs or is plannedA policy intervention is action taken for the purpose of producing some intended resultProblem analysis focuses on deciding what intervention should be pursued Future oriented Linking the Process to Evaluation Are policies being implemented as planned? Are policies achieving their intended goals? Evaluation seeks to link intended actions and goals of policy to empirical evidence that: Impact assessment: examines whether policies are having the desired effects Process evaluation: examines whether policies are being carried out as planned Often conducted together Getting Started Evaluability Assessment – “preevaluation” – researcher determines whether requisite conditions are present Support from relevant organizations What goals and objectives are; how they are translated into program components What kinds of records or data are available Who has a direct or indirect stake in the program Problem Formulation and Measurement 1 Different stakeholders often have different goals and views as to how a program should actually operate Stakeholders: persons and organizations with a direct interest in the program Must clearly specify program goals – desired outcomes Create objectives – operationalized statements Problem Formulation and Measurement 2 Definition and measurement – specify target/beneficiary population, decide between using current measures or creating new ones Measure program contexts, outcomes, program delivery Designs for Program Evaluation Randomized evaluation designs – avoids selection bias, allows assumption that groups created by random assignment are statistically equivalent; may not be suitable when agency or staff makes exceptions Caseflow – represents process through which subjects are accumulated into experimental and control groups Treatment integrity – whether an experimental intervention is delivered as intended; ≈ reliability Threatened by midstream changes in program Conditions Requisite for Randomized Experiments Staff must accept random assignment and agree to minimize exceptions to randomization Caseflow must produce enough subjects in E and C for statistical tests Experimental interventions must be consistently applied to E and withheld from C Need equivalence prior to intervention, and ability to detect .
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
turveycharlyn
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images and claims about the nature and role of evaluation that confounds any attempt to construct a coher- ent account of its methods or confidently identify important new developments. We take the view that the overarching goal of the program evaluation enterprise is to contribute to the improvement of social conditions by providing scientifically credible information and balanced judgment to legitimate social agents about the effectiveness of interventions intended to produce social benefits. Because of its centrality in this perspective, this review focuses on outcome evaluation, that is, the assessment of the effects of interventions upon the populations they are intended to benefit. The coverage of this topic is concentrated on literature published within the last decade with particular attention to the period subsequent to the related reviews by Cook and Shadish (1994) on social experiments and Sechrest & Figueredo (1993) on program evaluation. The word ‘evaluation’ has become increasingly used in the language of community, health and social services and programs. The growth of talk and practice of evaluation in these fields has often been promoted and encouraged by funders and commissioners of services and programs. Following the interest of funders, has been a growth in the study and practice of evaluation by community, health and social service practitioners and academics. When we consider why this move in evaluative thinking and practice has occurred, we can assume the position of the funder and simply answer, ‘...because we want to know if this program or service works’. Practitioners, specialists and academics in these fields have been called upon by governments and philanthropists to aid the development of effective evaluation. Over time, they have led their own thinking and practice independently. Evaluation in its simplest form is about understanding the effect and impact of a program, service, or indeed a whole organization. Evaluation as a practice is not so simple however, largely because in order to assess impact, we need to be very clear at the beginning what effect or difference we are trying to achieve. The literature review begins with an overview of qualitative and quantitative research methods, followed by a description of key forms of evaluation. Health promotion evaluation and advocacy and policy evaluation will then be explored as two specific domains. These domains are not evaluation methodologies, but forms of evaluation that present unique requirements for effective community development evaluation. Following this discussion, the review will explore eight key evaluation methodologies: appreciative enquiry, empowerment evaluation, social capital, social return on investment, outcomes based evaluation, performance dashboards and scorecards and developmental evaluation. Each of these sections will include specific methods, the values base of each methodo ...
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images a.docx
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images a.docx
cherry686017
QUESTION 1 What are the main streams of influence, according to the Theory of Triadic Influence? Please provide examples factors/attributes that belong to each of those streams. What is the relationship/correlation between each of those streams? Your response should be at least 200 words in length. QUESTION 2 The PRECEDE-PROCEED approach has several key assessment/diagnosis phases. Please describe the epidemiological assessment. What are some key sources of data used in this assessment? Which main questions is this assessment is trying to address/answer? Your response should be at least 200 words in length. QUESTION 3 What specific questions the evaluators are bringing forward as they are trying to collect the necessary evaluation data? What are the three main types of evaluation discussed in the PRECEDE-PROCEED approach? What is each of them trying to identify, measure, evaluate? Your response should be at least 200 words in length. QUESTION 4 What are some of the key assumptions behind the PRECEDE-PROCEED approach? What are some of the key benefits of using this approach? What are some of the “real-life” examples of using this approach? Your response should be at least 200 words in length. Unit Lesson Study Guide In Unit 4, we will continue to discuss health behavior and its association with factors that could influence such behaviors. These types of influences are referred to as multilevel factors of behaviors, and they typically fall into five main categories: 1. individual factors, 2. inter-personal factors, 3. organizational factors, 4. community factors, and 5. policy factors Consider the following scenario: A 50-year-old man may purposely postpone getting a prostate cancer test because he is scared of finding out that he may have prostate cancer. This is an example of an individual- level factor. However, we need to look into this further and consider the following: his inaction might also be influenced by his primary physician’s failure to actually recommend and insist that he would need to take the prostate test. Another factor might be the difficulty of scheduling an appointment due to either unavailable equipment or the unavailability of staff at his local clinic. Another limiting factor could be that the fee for the exam is so high he cannot afford it, and his insurance does not cover this type of procedure. Thus, all these interpersonal, organizational, and policy factors are influencing this man’s behavior to not complete the prostate test. Therefore, for health promotion practitioners, it is very important to be aware of all these factors so effective change strategies or interventions can be prescribed. One of the multilevel theories that will be discussed is the Theory of Triadic Influence (TTI). TTI behaviors arise due to one’s current social situation, general cultural environment, and their personal characteristics. Any health-related behaviors are influenced by an individual’s decisions. What wo ...
QUESTION 1What are the main streams of influence, according to.docx
QUESTION 1What are the main streams of influence, according to.docx
makdul
Public Relations Research Course Text: Primer of Public Relations Research by Don W. Stacks Chapter 1: Understanding Research
Understanding Public Relations Research
Understanding Public Relations Research
Alli Mowrey
Dr. Uzo Anucha - Workshop presentation -Streetjibe - Thinking Critically to Improve Program Effectiveness
Street Jibe Evaluation Workshop 2
Street Jibe Evaluation Workshop 2
Brent MacKinnon
Program evaluation 20121016
Program evaluation 20121016
nida19
P process plus sa (1)
P process plus sa (1)
P process plus sa (1)
Dr. Heera Lal IAS
SOCW 6311 wk 11 discussion 1 peer responses Respond to at least two colleagues’ by doing the following: Respond to at least two colleagues by offering critiques of their analyses. Identify strengths in their analyses and strategies for presenting evaluation results to others. Identify ways your colleagues might improve their presentations. Identify potential needs or questions of the audience that they may not have considered. Provide an additional strategy for overcoming the obstacles or challenges in communicating the content of the evaluation reports. Name first and references after every person Instructor wants lay out like this: Respond to at least two colleagues ( 2 peers posts are provided) by doing all of the following: Identify strengths of your colleagues’ analyses and areas in which the analyses could be improved. Your response Address his or her evaluation of the efficacy and applicability of the evidence-based practice, Your response [Evaluate] his or her identification of factors that could support or hinder the implementation of the evidence-based practice, Your response And [evaluate] his or her solution for mitigating those factors. Your response Offer additional insight to your colleagues by either identifying additional factors that may support or limit implementation of the evidence-based practice or an alternative solution for mitigating one of the limitations that your colleagues identified. Your response References Your response Peer 1: McKenna Bull RE: Katie Otte Initial Post-Discussion 1 - Week 11 COLLAPSE Top of Form Identify strengths in their analyses and strategies for presenting evaluation results to others. You provided an insightful analysis of this particular process evaluation, and it seems that you were able to design a comprehensive presentation guideline. I agree with your tactic to break the presentation up into categories, and the categories you have selected seem to address the major components of the program, the evaluation itself, and the findings of said evaluation. You also provided a great analysis and summary of the PATHS program. The purpose of the program is clear, and the overarching purpose of the evaluation was made clear in your synopsis as well. Identify ways your colleagues might improve their presentations. You addressed outcome measures very well, however, there may have been some lacking information in regards to overall evaluation methods as a whole. Addressing factors such as who was collecting the data, how they were trained, how their training or standing could limit potential bias, and similar information. This may be an important piece of information that could help to provide audience members with a better understanding of the evaluation processes as a whole. Identify potential needs or questions of the audience that they may not have considered. As mentioned by Law and Shek (2011), this program was designed and facilitated in Hong Kong, Chi.
SOCW 6311 wk 11 discussion 1 peer responses Respond to a.docx
SOCW 6311 wk 11 discussion 1 peer responses Respond to a.docx
samuel699872
strategic planning- management of nursing course
policy analysis
policy analysis
OlaAlomoush
Ähnlich wie Chapter 15 Social Research
(20)
programme evaluation by priyadarshinee pradhan
programme evaluation by priyadarshinee pradhan
Evaluation Principles: Theory-Based, Utilization-Focused, Participatory
Evaluation Principles: Theory-Based, Utilization-Focused, Participatory
Evaluation of Settings and Whole Systems Approaches
Evaluation of Settings and Whole Systems Approaches
Global Topic will be World Hunger, I will be representing the pers.docx
Global Topic will be World Hunger, I will be representing the pers.docx
A Good Program Can Improve Educational Outcomes.pdf
A Good Program Can Improve Educational Outcomes.pdf
Psychology Techniques - Program Evaluation
Psychology Techniques - Program Evaluation
June 20 2010 bsi christie
June 20 2010 bsi christie
Evaluation approaches presented by hari bhusal
Evaluation approaches presented by hari bhusal
COMMUNITY EVALUATION 2023.pptx
COMMUNITY EVALUATION 2023.pptx
Evaluation ResearchDr. GueretteIntroductionEvalu.docx
Evaluation ResearchDr. GueretteIntroductionEvalu.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images a.docx
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images a.docx
QUESTION 1What are the main streams of influence, according to.docx
QUESTION 1What are the main streams of influence, according to.docx
Understanding Public Relations Research
Understanding Public Relations Research
Street Jibe Evaluation Workshop 2
Street Jibe Evaluation Workshop 2
Program evaluation 20121016
Program evaluation 20121016
P process plus sa (1)
P process plus sa (1)
SOCW 6311 wk 11 discussion 1 peer responses Respond to a.docx
SOCW 6311 wk 11 discussion 1 peer responses Respond to a.docx
policy analysis
policy analysis
Mehr von arpsychology
Chapter 1 Social Research
Chapter 1 Social Research
arpsychology
Chapter 15 Social Research
Chapter 15 Social Research
arpsychology
Adler clark 4e ppt 13
Adler clark 4e ppt 13
arpsychology
Adler clark 4e ppt 12
Adler clark 4e ppt 12
arpsychology
Adler clark 4e ppt 10
Adler clark 4e ppt 10
arpsychology
Adler clark 4e ppt 09
Adler clark 4e ppt 09
arpsychology
Adler clark 4e ppt 08
Adler clark 4e ppt 08
arpsychology
Adler clark 4e ppt 07
Adler clark 4e ppt 07
arpsychology
Adler clark 4e ppt 06
Adler clark 4e ppt 06
arpsychology
Adler clark 4e ppt 05
Adler clark 4e ppt 05
arpsychology
Chapter 2 Social Research
Chapter 2 Social Research
arpsychology
Ch13
Ch13
arpsychology
Ch9
Ch9
arpsychology
Ch8
Ch8
arpsychology
Ch7
Ch7
arpsychology
Ch5andclips
Ch5andclips
arpsychology
Ch6
Ch6
arpsychology
Ch4
Ch4
arpsychology
Ch12
Ch12
arpsychology
AR Psych Chapter 3
AR Psych Chapter 3
arpsychology
Mehr von arpsychology
(20)
Chapter 1 Social Research
Chapter 1 Social Research
Chapter 15 Social Research
Chapter 15 Social Research
Adler clark 4e ppt 13
Adler clark 4e ppt 13
Adler clark 4e ppt 12
Adler clark 4e ppt 12
Adler clark 4e ppt 10
Adler clark 4e ppt 10
Adler clark 4e ppt 09
Adler clark 4e ppt 09
Adler clark 4e ppt 08
Adler clark 4e ppt 08
Adler clark 4e ppt 07
Adler clark 4e ppt 07
Adler clark 4e ppt 06
Adler clark 4e ppt 06
Adler clark 4e ppt 05
Adler clark 4e ppt 05
Chapter 2 Social Research
Chapter 2 Social Research
Ch13
Ch13
Ch9
Ch9
Ch8
Ch8
Ch7
Ch7
Ch5andclips
Ch5andclips
Ch6
Ch6
Ch4
Ch4
Ch12
Ch12
AR Psych Chapter 3
AR Psych Chapter 3
Chapter 15 Social Research
1.
Applied Social Research
Chapter 14
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Jetzt herunterladen