17. System for protecting subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB) Gov’t guidelines Museum Researcher
18.
19.
20.
21. 3 Working Groups Name Group Alice Stevenson 1 Amy Henson 3 Amy Niedbalski any Anna Lindgren-Streicher 2 Beth Johnson 3 Betsy Adamson 2 Brent Williams 3 Name Group David Callahan 1 Eileen Sheu 2 Jane Schaefer 1 Julie Fritsch 3 Laetitia Habimana 1 Scott Ewing 2
Before we get into actually setting up video, want to talk about protecting and complying with fed guidelines
Interested in obedience to Nazis Experiment ordering subjects to give lethal level electric shocks to someone (fake) Subjects showed huge signs of stress, but most gave the shocks
Risks in informalL Interviewing people about sensitive topics Recording people
Inform them Get their consent - allow them to say ‘no’ Minimize risk to bystanders Next are a few approved ways to get informed consent Implied vs. explicit consent
Implied consent - simple set up with signs (English & Spanish), come back after 4pm Camera and mics in plain view Entrance and Exit (feels easier to leave)
Implied consent - complex set up with camera and mics mounted - still obvious Usually have four mics Multiple exhibits in the area - reduces reactivity at “target” exhibit Don’t use on school days - minimize risk of kids without parental consent
What is the system for protecting hs? How do we know that our methods are OK?
***Children can be included in public observations as long as the researcher doesn’t participate in activities
Case studies
More yellow pages in your packet, plus [next slide]
Health and Human Services - Office for Human Research Protections - Belmont
Online training courses
VSA making relationships with IRBs Explo’s umbrella protocol IRB’s will help you Use Resources Sheet we gave you