This document discusses selective extraction, a technique to improve water quality from groundwater wells. It summarizes a case study where selective extraction was used on a well in Lee County, Texas. Dynamic profiling identified zones of high contaminant levels, such as color and iron. Solutions included sleeving off shallow screens and grouting the deepest screen to block poor quality zones. This improved water quality, reducing total iron levels by over 95%. The water provider was initially skeptical but saw benefits from applying new diagnostic methods rather than traditional approaches.
2. Questions
• What have I been missing in
my well?
– Variable flow
– Variable quality
• What is selective extraction?
• How can it be applied to
solve water quality issues?
5. Comparisons of Technology for Groundwater Profiling
Dynamic Flow and Chemistry Profiling
Straddle Packer / Pump Assemblies for Zone
Isolation Testing
Flow
Packer
Pump
Vs.
Chemistry
6. Production Well XYZ
Zone Test #1
1,000 GPM
As = 9 - 12 PPB
NO3 = 49 – 53 PPM
Zone Test #2
Zone Test #3
Zone Test #4
Packer
As & NO3 ?
As & NO3?
Pump
Disadvantages of
Packer Testing
• Time – can take
weeks
• Effort and impact
• Cost-prohibitive
As & NO3 ?
As & NO3 ?
• Data quality – suction
on a well zone not
indicative of normal
operation conditions
7. High Tech, Low Cost Technology
• U.S. Geological Survey Developed Tracer-Pulse
Profiling Method
• BESST Inc. holds exclusive U.S. license
Tracer system deployed down hole with existing
pump in place
8. What data can be
collected?
Dynamic profiling breaks down
flow and quality into slices along
the length of production zones
9. Miniaturized Tools
• Apply easily attainable z-axis data for
three-dimensional view
• Minimally invasive downhole diagnostics
• To date, BESST has profiled over 400
wells for cost savings of ~$300 M
– Reduced or avoided treatment
10. Dynamic Flow and
Water Quality Profiling
• Fairly easy to implement
– Existing pump or test equivalent
close to normal operations
– In-line flowmeter
– Sample tap
– Water discharge and disposal
option
– Access pipe if limited annular
space
14. T1 ?
Profiling is a visual, volumetric and chemical mass accounting system
Incremental Flow
Contribution
Q1
Cumulative Flow
Contribution
T3 ?
Q2
Cumulative Flow
Contribution
Incremental Flow
Contribution
T2 ?
Cumulative Flow
Contribution
Q4
Q3
Cumulative Flow
Contribution
Q5
Cumulative Flow
Contribution
T4?
Incremental Flow
Contribution
15. Water Sampling
Spool
Flow From Well To
Fluorometer
Dye Injection
Spool
Fluorometer
Flow From Fluorometer To Waste
Explanation of Dye
Injection Process For
Dynamic Flow
Profiling In
Production Wells
Cumulative Flow
Slices (CFS)
Dynamic Flow Profile
Under Steady State
Draw-Down
Dye Injection Shot Points
1,900 GPM
Ft. Below
Ground
Surface
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
16. Flow Equation
The basic equation used for calculating flow between two
points is:
Q = vA where v = (d2-d1)/(t2-t1)
Q: flow
A: cross sectional area of
well
A = π(r12-r22) if above
intake
A = πr12 if below intake
v: velocity
d2: injection depth #2
d1: injection depth #1
t2: return time of d2
t1: return time of d1
r1: inner radius of well
casing
r2: outer radius of pump
column
19. Slices of Water Quality
Dynamic Groundwater
Sampling Under Steady
State Draw-Down
Groundwater Sampling Points
Ft. Below
Ground
Surface
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
Cumulative
Concentration
Ca1
Ca2
Ca3
Ca4
Ca5
Ca6
Ca7
Ca8
Ca9
Ca10
Ca11
Ca12
Ca13
Ca14
Ca15
Ca16
Ca17
Explanation of
Basic Mass
Balance
Calculations
20. Contaminant Concentration Calculation
Average Cumulative Contaminant Concentration
Calculation can be defined as:
Ca1= (Q1C1 – Q2C2)/Q1- Q2
Incremental Average Contaminant Concentration
between two imaginary flow planes within the
well can be expressed as:
Ca1- Ca2
21. Case Study: Groundwater
in Lee County, Texas
Lee County Water Supply
Corporation (LCWSC):
• Serves 3536 connections and over
10K customers
• Recipient of numerous industry
awards, including TCEQ Superior
rating
• Experienced water quality issues
from Country Corners well
site, primarily: color, turbidity, and
iron
• In 2012, contracted BESST Inc. to
locate zones of poor water quality
22. Dynamic Flow Profile: Keyes Well 7
Color
Dynamic Chemical Mass Balance Profile
1452’
Top of
Liner
Lithology
0
1400-1500
Hard Shale &
Rocks
1554’
110
1554-1600
Broken Rocks &
Fine Sand
High Color
correlates
with Shale
formations
Shale & Rocks
1636’
1646’
Coarse Light
Gray Sand &
Rocks
1664’
1672’
Sampling Interval (ft. bgs)
1600-1636
0
1646-1664
NC
~20% of flow
Lower Color
section
correlates with
Coarse Light
Gray Sand &
Rocks
~80%
combined
26
1672-1723
~60% of flow
1723’
60
1734-1755
1734’
Hard Shale
Hard Sand &
Shale Streaks
Hard Shale &
Rocks
1840’
8” Liner
High Color
correlates
with Shale
formations
20
1755-1820
100
below 1820
0
20
40
60
Color Units
80
100
120
23. Well Reconstruction / Re-Engineering
How Do We Hydraulically Manipulate Groundwater Production Wells?
Change Pumping Rate
Higher Pumping Rate Vertically Shifts Flow Contribution Downward
Inside Well – Away From Pump Intake
Lower Pumping Rate Vertically Shifts Flow Contribution Upward Inside
Well – Towards Pump Intake
Change Pump Intake Location and/or Diameter
Lower or Raise Pump (Intake)
Attach Suction Pipe To Bottom of Pump
Packers, Sleeves and Engineered Suctions
Change Well Diameter and/or Length Diameter
Install Liner
Backfill Bottom of Well
Well Rehabilitation
Remove mineral encrustations and biofilm on Well Screen
23
24. Dynamic Flow Profile: Keyes Well 7
Selective Extraction at Work:
Block off zones of poor water quality
13.25” Inner Casing
8” Pump
Column
460’
Pump
Intake
1452’
Top of Liner
Potential Solutions:
1554’
Sleeve off shallow screen
1636’
1646’
1664’
1672’
1723’
1734’
Grout deepest screen
1840’
8” Liner
25. Total Iron (mg/L)
0.6
0.501
0.5
Less than detect =
100% reduction
0.4
0.3
Total Iron (mg/L)
0.2
0.1
<
0.05
0
Before modification (avg)
After modification
26.
27.
28. Feedback from LCWSC
“Sometimes you have to look at the whole
picture, and take a chance on new science or
methods. Sticking our head in the dirt and
never trying anything new will not benefit us as
a water provider”
-- Wade Dane, LCWSC Assistant General Manager
29. Questions?
Debra Cerda-BESST Inc.
Director of Technical Sales and Licensing, Texas
dcerda@besstinc.com
512-785-6813 cell
--------------------------Steven Walden
stevenwalden@sbcglobal.net
512-971-7151
Hinweis der Redaktion
Examples given are non-exclusiveWhy should we capture data as close to normal working conditions as possible?We want to gather the most accurate data against the problem statement. If a well is producing 12 mg/L arsenic, we want to diagnose the well as it is producing that result. If we change the operating conditions, in any way, we will alter the results of the diagnostics and ultimately have less confidence in mitigating actions we can pursue since the data will have less fidelity to the situation that was producing the 12 mg/L arsenic in the first place.
Examples given are non-exclusiveWhy should we capture data as close to normal working conditions as possible?We want to gather the most accurate data against the problem statement. If a well is producing 12 mg/L arsenic, we want to diagnose the well as it is producing that result. If we change the operating conditions, in any way, we will alter the results of the diagnostics and ultimately have less confidence in mitigating actions we can pursue since the data will have less fidelity to the situation that was producing the 12 mg/L arsenic in the first place.
BESST founder and CTO co-inventor of that technology; just received extension and expansion of license
We can perform diagnostics for any testable water parameter and optimize production output to meet stated project goals. Minimally or non-invasive downhole diagnostics.Savings survey.
The dye tracer pulse technology was developed and patented by USGS and is licensed exclusively to BESST, Inc. During a dynamic profile test, fluorescent rhodamine red dye is injected into the well at a series of depths and tracked as it travels to the surface to determine the velocity of the water in the well. A portion of the wellhead discharge is rerouted through the fluorometer with a hose running off a sample tap. This portion of the flow mimics the dynamic dye concentration of the entire flow. The dye fluoresces when hit with a laser; the fluorometer induces and measures this fluorescence to detect concentrations of dye in the water passing through it.The dye is circulated through a pump which, when triggered, pushes it through hundreds of feet of spooled up nylon tubing. The dye-filled tubing is lowered into the well with a check valve and nozzle at the end. The valve ensures that dye is only released through the nozzle when the pump pressurizes the line and that water does not push itself up into the tubing. The nozzle guides the dye into a horizontal spray in four directions, 90° apart.The dye is injected in pulses, or discreet durations of injection. The injection time can be altered by changing the injection time set on the injection control box and by loosening or tightening the valve at the end of the tubing. The pulses are tracked by the fluorometer as they are pumped to the surface; each dye injection pulse returns as a distinct rise and fall in the numerical reading on the fluorometer. The duration between the beginning of an injection and the peak value of its appearance in the fluorometer is deemed a return time. Differences between return times are used to calculate the vertical velocity of water traveling from one point to another within the well.The basic equation used for calculating flow between two points is: