SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 3
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Data Analysis & Forecasting                                  Faculty of Development Economics




                          TIME SERIES ANALYSIS
     TODA-YAMAMOTO VERSION OF GRANGER CAUSALITY
           (AUGMENTED GRANGER CAUSALITY)

According to Toda and Yamamoto (1995), economic series could be either integrated of the
different orders or non-cointegrated or both. In these cases, the ECM cannot be applied for
Granger causality tests. Hence, they developed an alternative test, irrespective of whether Yt
and Xt are I(0), I(1) or I(2), non-cointegrated or cointegrated of an arbitrary order. This is
widely known as the Toda and Yamamoto (1995) augmented Granger causality. This
procedure provides the possibility of testing for causality between integrated variables
based on asymptotic theory.

1. THE MODEL
Toda and Yamamoto (1995) augmented Granger causality test method is based on the
following equations:
                                              h +d          k +d
                                   Yt = α + ∑ β i Yt −i + ∑ γ j X t − j + u yt             (1)
                                              i =1           j=1

                                              h+d            k +d
                                   X t = α + ∑ θ i X t −i + ∑ δ j Yt − j + u xt            (2)
                                               i =1           j=1

where d is the maximal order of integration order of the variables in the system, h and k are
the optimal lag length of Yt and Xt, and are error terms that are assumed to be white noise
with zero mean, constant variance and no autocorrelation. Indeed, all one needs to do is to
determine the maximal order of integration d, which we expect to occur in the model and
construct a VAR in their levels with a total of (k + d) lags.
Important note is the same as other causality models.


2. TEST PROCEDURE
THE DYNAMIC GRANGER CAUSALITY is performed as follows:
Step 1: Testing for the unit root of Yt and Xt, and determining the maximal order of
integration order (d)
        (using either DF, ADF, or PP tests)
Suppose the test results indicate that Yt and Xt have different integration orders, say I(1)
and I(2). Thus, the maximal order of integration is 2.
Step 2: Determining the optimal lag length (k) of Yt and Xt
   a) Automatically determine the optimal lag length of Yt and Xt in their AR models
      (using AIC or SIC, see Section 8 of my lecture).
          Optimal lag length of Yt

Phung Thanh Binh (2010)                                                                         1
Data Analysis & Forecasting                                      Faculty of Development Economics


                                                    h
                                       Yt = α + ∑ β i Yt −i + u yt                             (3)
                                                   i =1

         Restricted model
      Estimate (4) by OLS, and obtain the RSS of this regression (which is the restricted
      one) and label it as RSSRY.
                                                   h +d          d
                                       Yt = α + ∑ β i Yt −i + ∑ γ j X t − j + u yt             (4)
                                                   i =1          j=1

         Optimal lag length of Xt
                                                    h'
                                       X t = α + ∑ θ i X t −i + u xt                           (5)
                                                    i =1

         Restricted model
      Estimate (6) by OLS, and obtain the RSS of this regression (which is the restricted
      one) and label it as RSSRX.
                                                   h '+ d            d
                                       X t = α + ∑ θ i X t −i + ∑ δ j Yt − j + u xt            (6)
                                                    i =1          j=1

   b) Manually determine the optimal lag length of Xt (k in equation (1)) and Yt (k in
      equation (2)), (using AIC or SIC, depending on which one you use in step 2a, see
      Section 8 of my lecture).
                                                   h +d         k +d
                                       Yt = α + ∑ β i Yt −i + ∑ γ j X t − j + u yt             (7)
                                                   i =1          j=1

      Then estimate (7) by OLS, and obtain the RSS of this regression (which is the
      unrestricted one) and label it as RSSUY.
                                                   h '+ d        k '+ d
                                       X t = α + ∑ θ i X t −i + ∑ δ j Yt − j + u xt            (8)
                                                    i =1          j=1

      Then estimate (8) by OLS, and obtain the RSS of this regression (which is the
      unrestricted one) and label it as RSSUX.
Step 3: Set the null and alternative hypotheses
   a) For equation (4) and (7), we set:
                                   k
                           H0 :   ∑γ
                                  j=1
                                          j   = 0 or X t does not cause Yt

                                  k
                           H1 :   ∑γ
                                  j=1
                                          j   ≠ 0 or X t causes Yt

   b) For equation (6) and (8), we set:
                                  k'
                           H0 :   ∑δ
                                  j=1
                                          j   = 0 or Yt does not cause X t




Phung Thanh Binh (2010)                                                                             2
Data Analysis & Forecasting                                    Faculty of Development Economics


                                    k'
                           H1 :    ∑δ
                                    j=1
                                          j   ≠ 0 or Yt causes X t

Step 4: Calculate the F statistic for the modified Wald test

   a) For equation (4) and (7), we set:
                                  (RSS RY − RSS UY ) / k
                           F=
                                    RSS UY /( N − K )
      where K is the number of estimated coefficients.
   b) For equation (6) and (8), we set:
                                  (RSS RX − RSS UX ) / k '
                           F=
                                    RSS UX /( N − K )
where K is the number of estimated coefficients.
   If the computed F value exceeds the critical F value, reject the null hypothesis and
conclude that Xt weakly causes Yt, or Yt weakly causes Xt.


                        Questions: How to explain the test results?




Phung Thanh Binh (2010)                                                                           3

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Granger Causality
Granger CausalityGranger Causality
Granger CausalityGaetan Lion
 
DYNAMIC ECONOMETRIC MODELS BY Ammara Aftab
DYNAMIC ECONOMETRIC MODELS BY Ammara AftabDYNAMIC ECONOMETRIC MODELS BY Ammara Aftab
DYNAMIC ECONOMETRIC MODELS BY Ammara AftabUniversity of Karachi
 
Granger causality testing
Granger causality testingGranger causality testing
Granger causality testingThomasReader
 
2.-Nature-of-Regression.pptx
2.-Nature-of-Regression.pptx2.-Nature-of-Regression.pptx
2.-Nature-of-Regression.pptxSabbirAlam32
 
Cointegration analysis: Modelling the complex interdependencies between finan...
Cointegration analysis: Modelling the complex interdependencies between finan...Cointegration analysis: Modelling the complex interdependencies between finan...
Cointegration analysis: Modelling the complex interdependencies between finan...Edward Thomas Jones
 
PanelDataAnalysis.pdf
PanelDataAnalysis.pdfPanelDataAnalysis.pdf
PanelDataAnalysis.pdfSabrinRahman5
 
Auto Correlation Presentation
Auto Correlation PresentationAuto Correlation Presentation
Auto Correlation PresentationIrfan Hussain
 
ders 3 Unit root test.pptx
ders 3 Unit root test.pptxders 3 Unit root test.pptx
ders 3 Unit root test.pptxErgin Akalpler
 
Cointegration and error correction model
Cointegration and error correction modelCointegration and error correction model
Cointegration and error correction modelAditya KS
 
Autocorrelation
AutocorrelationAutocorrelation
AutocorrelationAkram Ali
 
Instrumental Variables and Control Functions
Instrumental Variables and Control FunctionsInstrumental Variables and Control Functions
Instrumental Variables and Control FunctionsEconomic Research Forum
 
Time Series Analysis - Modeling and Forecasting
Time Series Analysis - Modeling and ForecastingTime Series Analysis - Modeling and Forecasting
Time Series Analysis - Modeling and ForecastingMaruthi Nataraj K
 
Exchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market: An Asset Approach
Exchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market: An Asset ApproachExchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market: An Asset Approach
Exchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market: An Asset ApproachGiorgi Jalaghonia
 
Lecture notes on Johansen cointegration
Lecture notes on Johansen cointegrationLecture notes on Johansen cointegration
Lecture notes on Johansen cointegrationMoses sichei
 
Simple regression and correlation
Simple regression and correlationSimple regression and correlation
Simple regression and correlationMary Grace
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Granger Causality
Granger CausalityGranger Causality
Granger Causality
 
DYNAMIC ECONOMETRIC MODELS BY Ammara Aftab
DYNAMIC ECONOMETRIC MODELS BY Ammara AftabDYNAMIC ECONOMETRIC MODELS BY Ammara Aftab
DYNAMIC ECONOMETRIC MODELS BY Ammara Aftab
 
Granger causality testing
Granger causality testingGranger causality testing
Granger causality testing
 
2.-Nature-of-Regression.pptx
2.-Nature-of-Regression.pptx2.-Nature-of-Regression.pptx
2.-Nature-of-Regression.pptx
 
Cointegration analysis: Modelling the complex interdependencies between finan...
Cointegration analysis: Modelling the complex interdependencies between finan...Cointegration analysis: Modelling the complex interdependencies between finan...
Cointegration analysis: Modelling the complex interdependencies between finan...
 
PanelDataAnalysis.pdf
PanelDataAnalysis.pdfPanelDataAnalysis.pdf
PanelDataAnalysis.pdf
 
Autocorrelation
AutocorrelationAutocorrelation
Autocorrelation
 
Time series
Time seriesTime series
Time series
 
Auto Correlation Presentation
Auto Correlation PresentationAuto Correlation Presentation
Auto Correlation Presentation
 
ders 3 Unit root test.pptx
ders 3 Unit root test.pptxders 3 Unit root test.pptx
ders 3 Unit root test.pptx
 
Cointegration and error correction model
Cointegration and error correction modelCointegration and error correction model
Cointegration and error correction model
 
Distributed lag model koyck
Distributed lag model koyckDistributed lag model koyck
Distributed lag model koyck
 
Co-integration
Co-integration Co-integration
Co-integration
 
Autocorrelation
AutocorrelationAutocorrelation
Autocorrelation
 
Econometrics- lecture 10 and 11
Econometrics- lecture 10 and 11Econometrics- lecture 10 and 11
Econometrics- lecture 10 and 11
 
Instrumental Variables and Control Functions
Instrumental Variables and Control FunctionsInstrumental Variables and Control Functions
Instrumental Variables and Control Functions
 
Time Series Analysis - Modeling and Forecasting
Time Series Analysis - Modeling and ForecastingTime Series Analysis - Modeling and Forecasting
Time Series Analysis - Modeling and Forecasting
 
Exchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market: An Asset Approach
Exchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market: An Asset ApproachExchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market: An Asset Approach
Exchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market: An Asset Approach
 
Lecture notes on Johansen cointegration
Lecture notes on Johansen cointegrationLecture notes on Johansen cointegration
Lecture notes on Johansen cointegration
 
Simple regression and correlation
Simple regression and correlationSimple regression and correlation
Simple regression and correlation
 

Andere mochten auch

Causality models
Causality modelsCausality models
Causality modelsQuang Hoang
 
5. cem granger causality ecm
5. cem granger causality  ecm 5. cem granger causality  ecm
5. cem granger causality ecm Quang Hoang
 
Granger causality test
Granger causality testGranger causality test
Granger causality testSuniya Sheikh
 
Granger Causality Test: A Useful Descriptive Tool for Time Series Data
Granger Causality Test: A Useful Descriptive Tool for Time  Series DataGranger Causality Test: A Useful Descriptive Tool for Time  Series Data
Granger Causality Test: A Useful Descriptive Tool for Time Series DataIJMER
 
Phan tich thong tin
Phan tich thong tinPhan tich thong tin
Phan tich thong tinQuang Hoang
 
Gioi thieu thi truong
Gioi thieu thi truongGioi thieu thi truong
Gioi thieu thi truongQuang Hoang
 

Andere mochten auch (9)

Causality models
Causality modelsCausality models
Causality models
 
5. cem granger causality ecm
5. cem granger causality  ecm 5. cem granger causality  ecm
5. cem granger causality ecm
 
Granger causality test
Granger causality testGranger causality test
Granger causality test
 
Granger Causality Test: A Useful Descriptive Tool for Time Series Data
Granger Causality Test: A Useful Descriptive Tool for Time  Series DataGranger Causality Test: A Useful Descriptive Tool for Time  Series Data
Granger Causality Test: A Useful Descriptive Tool for Time Series Data
 
1. df tests
1. df tests1. df tests
1. df tests
 
Phan tich thong tin
Phan tich thong tinPhan tich thong tin
Phan tich thong tin
 
Gioi thieu thi truong
Gioi thieu thi truongGioi thieu thi truong
Gioi thieu thi truong
 
Causality detection
Causality detectionCausality detection
Causality detection
 
Lecture 4
Lecture 4Lecture 4
Lecture 4
 

Ähnlich wie 7. toda yamamoto-granger causality

On estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility usingOn estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility usingkkislas
 
22nd BSS meeting poster
22nd BSS meeting poster 22nd BSS meeting poster
22nd BSS meeting poster Samuel Gbari
 
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo Method
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo MethodNonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo Method
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo MethodSSA KPI
 
Paris2012 session4
Paris2012 session4Paris2012 session4
Paris2012 session4Cdiscount
 
State Space Model
State Space ModelState Space Model
State Space ModelCdiscount
 
Seminar Talk: Multilevel Hybrid Split Step Implicit Tau-Leap for Stochastic R...
Seminar Talk: Multilevel Hybrid Split Step Implicit Tau-Leap for Stochastic R...Seminar Talk: Multilevel Hybrid Split Step Implicit Tau-Leap for Stochastic R...
Seminar Talk: Multilevel Hybrid Split Step Implicit Tau-Leap for Stochastic R...Chiheb Ben Hammouda
 
MCQMC 2020 talk: Importance Sampling for a Robust and Efficient Multilevel Mo...
MCQMC 2020 talk: Importance Sampling for a Robust and Efficient Multilevel Mo...MCQMC 2020 talk: Importance Sampling for a Robust and Efficient Multilevel Mo...
MCQMC 2020 talk: Importance Sampling for a Robust and Efficient Multilevel Mo...Chiheb Ben Hammouda
 
Ada boost brown boost performance with noisy data
Ada boost brown boost performance with noisy dataAda boost brown boost performance with noisy data
Ada boost brown boost performance with noisy dataShadhin Rahman
 
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017Arthur Charpentier
 
Univariate Financial Time Series Analysis
Univariate Financial Time Series AnalysisUnivariate Financial Time Series Analysis
Univariate Financial Time Series AnalysisAnissa ATMANI
 
Sequential experimentation in clinical trials
Sequential experimentation in clinical trialsSequential experimentation in clinical trials
Sequential experimentation in clinical trialsSpringer
 
Hands-On Algorithms for Predictive Modeling
Hands-On Algorithms for Predictive ModelingHands-On Algorithms for Predictive Modeling
Hands-On Algorithms for Predictive ModelingArthur Charpentier
 
Bayesian inference for mixed-effects models driven by SDEs and other stochast...
Bayesian inference for mixed-effects models driven by SDEs and other stochast...Bayesian inference for mixed-effects models driven by SDEs and other stochast...
Bayesian inference for mixed-effects models driven by SDEs and other stochast...Umberto Picchini
 

Ähnlich wie 7. toda yamamoto-granger causality (20)

On estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility usingOn estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility using
 
22nd BSS meeting poster
22nd BSS meeting poster 22nd BSS meeting poster
22nd BSS meeting poster
 
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo Method
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo MethodNonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo Method
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo Method
 
Ols
OlsOls
Ols
 
Ichimura 1993: Semiparametric Least Squares (non-technical)
Ichimura 1993: Semiparametric Least Squares (non-technical)Ichimura 1993: Semiparametric Least Squares (non-technical)
Ichimura 1993: Semiparametric Least Squares (non-technical)
 
Paris2012 session4
Paris2012 session4Paris2012 session4
Paris2012 session4
 
State Space Model
State Space ModelState Space Model
State Space Model
 
Seminar Talk: Multilevel Hybrid Split Step Implicit Tau-Leap for Stochastic R...
Seminar Talk: Multilevel Hybrid Split Step Implicit Tau-Leap for Stochastic R...Seminar Talk: Multilevel Hybrid Split Step Implicit Tau-Leap for Stochastic R...
Seminar Talk: Multilevel Hybrid Split Step Implicit Tau-Leap for Stochastic R...
 
MCQMC 2020 talk: Importance Sampling for a Robust and Efficient Multilevel Mo...
MCQMC 2020 talk: Importance Sampling for a Robust and Efficient Multilevel Mo...MCQMC 2020 talk: Importance Sampling for a Robust and Efficient Multilevel Mo...
MCQMC 2020 talk: Importance Sampling for a Robust and Efficient Multilevel Mo...
 
Ada boost brown boost performance with noisy data
Ada boost brown boost performance with noisy dataAda boost brown boost performance with noisy data
Ada boost brown boost performance with noisy data
 
A Note on TopicRNN
A Note on TopicRNNA Note on TopicRNN
A Note on TopicRNN
 
Holographic Cotton Tensor
Holographic Cotton TensorHolographic Cotton Tensor
Holographic Cotton Tensor
 
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
 
Univariate Financial Time Series Analysis
Univariate Financial Time Series AnalysisUnivariate Financial Time Series Analysis
Univariate Financial Time Series Analysis
 
Sequential experimentation in clinical trials
Sequential experimentation in clinical trialsSequential experimentation in clinical trials
Sequential experimentation in clinical trials
 
Adaptive dynamic programming algorithm for uncertain nonlinear switched systems
Adaptive dynamic programming algorithm for uncertain nonlinear switched systemsAdaptive dynamic programming algorithm for uncertain nonlinear switched systems
Adaptive dynamic programming algorithm for uncertain nonlinear switched systems
 
Side 2019, part 2
Side 2019, part 2Side 2019, part 2
Side 2019, part 2
 
Hands-On Algorithms for Predictive Modeling
Hands-On Algorithms for Predictive ModelingHands-On Algorithms for Predictive Modeling
Hands-On Algorithms for Predictive Modeling
 
Bayesian inference for mixed-effects models driven by SDEs and other stochast...
Bayesian inference for mixed-effects models driven by SDEs and other stochast...Bayesian inference for mixed-effects models driven by SDEs and other stochast...
Bayesian inference for mixed-effects models driven by SDEs and other stochast...
 
Slides ensae-2016-9
Slides ensae-2016-9Slides ensae-2016-9
Slides ensae-2016-9
 

7. toda yamamoto-granger causality

  • 1. Data Analysis & Forecasting Faculty of Development Economics TIME SERIES ANALYSIS TODA-YAMAMOTO VERSION OF GRANGER CAUSALITY (AUGMENTED GRANGER CAUSALITY) According to Toda and Yamamoto (1995), economic series could be either integrated of the different orders or non-cointegrated or both. In these cases, the ECM cannot be applied for Granger causality tests. Hence, they developed an alternative test, irrespective of whether Yt and Xt are I(0), I(1) or I(2), non-cointegrated or cointegrated of an arbitrary order. This is widely known as the Toda and Yamamoto (1995) augmented Granger causality. This procedure provides the possibility of testing for causality between integrated variables based on asymptotic theory. 1. THE MODEL Toda and Yamamoto (1995) augmented Granger causality test method is based on the following equations: h +d k +d Yt = α + ∑ β i Yt −i + ∑ γ j X t − j + u yt (1) i =1 j=1 h+d k +d X t = α + ∑ θ i X t −i + ∑ δ j Yt − j + u xt (2) i =1 j=1 where d is the maximal order of integration order of the variables in the system, h and k are the optimal lag length of Yt and Xt, and are error terms that are assumed to be white noise with zero mean, constant variance and no autocorrelation. Indeed, all one needs to do is to determine the maximal order of integration d, which we expect to occur in the model and construct a VAR in their levels with a total of (k + d) lags. Important note is the same as other causality models. 2. TEST PROCEDURE THE DYNAMIC GRANGER CAUSALITY is performed as follows: Step 1: Testing for the unit root of Yt and Xt, and determining the maximal order of integration order (d) (using either DF, ADF, or PP tests) Suppose the test results indicate that Yt and Xt have different integration orders, say I(1) and I(2). Thus, the maximal order of integration is 2. Step 2: Determining the optimal lag length (k) of Yt and Xt a) Automatically determine the optimal lag length of Yt and Xt in their AR models (using AIC or SIC, see Section 8 of my lecture). Optimal lag length of Yt Phung Thanh Binh (2010) 1
  • 2. Data Analysis & Forecasting Faculty of Development Economics h Yt = α + ∑ β i Yt −i + u yt (3) i =1 Restricted model Estimate (4) by OLS, and obtain the RSS of this regression (which is the restricted one) and label it as RSSRY. h +d d Yt = α + ∑ β i Yt −i + ∑ γ j X t − j + u yt (4) i =1 j=1 Optimal lag length of Xt h' X t = α + ∑ θ i X t −i + u xt (5) i =1 Restricted model Estimate (6) by OLS, and obtain the RSS of this regression (which is the restricted one) and label it as RSSRX. h '+ d d X t = α + ∑ θ i X t −i + ∑ δ j Yt − j + u xt (6) i =1 j=1 b) Manually determine the optimal lag length of Xt (k in equation (1)) and Yt (k in equation (2)), (using AIC or SIC, depending on which one you use in step 2a, see Section 8 of my lecture). h +d k +d Yt = α + ∑ β i Yt −i + ∑ γ j X t − j + u yt (7) i =1 j=1 Then estimate (7) by OLS, and obtain the RSS of this regression (which is the unrestricted one) and label it as RSSUY. h '+ d k '+ d X t = α + ∑ θ i X t −i + ∑ δ j Yt − j + u xt (8) i =1 j=1 Then estimate (8) by OLS, and obtain the RSS of this regression (which is the unrestricted one) and label it as RSSUX. Step 3: Set the null and alternative hypotheses a) For equation (4) and (7), we set: k H0 : ∑γ j=1 j = 0 or X t does not cause Yt k H1 : ∑γ j=1 j ≠ 0 or X t causes Yt b) For equation (6) and (8), we set: k' H0 : ∑δ j=1 j = 0 or Yt does not cause X t Phung Thanh Binh (2010) 2
  • 3. Data Analysis & Forecasting Faculty of Development Economics k' H1 : ∑δ j=1 j ≠ 0 or Yt causes X t Step 4: Calculate the F statistic for the modified Wald test a) For equation (4) and (7), we set: (RSS RY − RSS UY ) / k F= RSS UY /( N − K ) where K is the number of estimated coefficients. b) For equation (6) and (8), we set: (RSS RX − RSS UX ) / k ' F= RSS UX /( N − K ) where K is the number of estimated coefficients. If the computed F value exceeds the critical F value, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that Xt weakly causes Yt, or Yt weakly causes Xt. Questions: How to explain the test results? Phung Thanh Binh (2010) 3