SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
IMD WORLD COMPETITIVENESS YEARBOOK 2013IMD WORLD COMPETITIVENESS YEARBOOK 2013
2004
2006
2013
2009
2010
2006
2011
2001
1997
2010
2011
2006
2013
2013
2012
1998
2005
2004
2013
2008
2009
2012
2013
2003
2007
2007
2013
2011
2011
2012
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2012
2013
2013
2010
2002
2013
2010
1999
2001
1998
2011
2001
2007
2002
2012
2013
2000
2010
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2002
2003
2011
2011
2013
2013
1997
2013
2013
2000
2000
2003
1997
2006
2007
2007
2011
2004
2013
1999
2008
2007
2010
1997
2006
2012
2013
2006
1999
1997
2009
2008
2003
2001
2009
1999
2008
2012
2003
1997
2013
2010
2005
2006
2009
2004
2010
2007
2005
2008
2004
1999
2005
1999
1999
2008
19972002
2007 2010
2013
W or l d C o m p e t i t i v en e s s i n
The IMD’s World Competitiveness Center has been calculating the competitiveness of nations since 1989. In 1997,
the globalization of the world’s economy led us to move from a split ranking (advanced vs. emerging economies) to an
integrated one. Because the robust methodology has been maintained since then, it is now possible to track a country’s
competitiveness evolution over that period of time.
How the chart is elaborated?
•	 The vertical axis on the left indicates the 2013 ranking and the name of the country.
•	 The blue 2013 diagonal line from top to bottom indicates the same ranking, which also intersects with the
axis below.
•	 In addition, the horizontal axis allows to read the best and worst rankings over time.
•	 Each country’s bar highlights on the left the worst competitiveness ranking and its date and on the right the
best ranking and its date.
•	 The length of the bar indicates the spread between the two; a long bar can mean dynamism and/or volatility
– a shorter bar meaning stability/and or inertia.
Example: Ireland
•	 Ireland ranks 17th in the 2013 scoreboard (left axis).
•	 Ireland’s bar indicates that its best ranking was in 2000 (on the right) and the worst in 2011 (on the left) and
the respective positions can be read on the bottom axis.
•	 The length of the bar means a large spread between the two results (dynamism and/or volatility).
•	 Since the 2013 results diagonal intersects Ireland’s bar closer to its worst point, it suggests that Ireland has
regressed in competitiveness.The worst ranking date (2011) is more recent than the best ranking date
(2000) confirming this.
Trends
•	 Countries with a short bar (spread) at the top of the scoreboard have shown consistency in competitiveness.
This is the case of the USA (1st), Singapore (5th) and Canada (7th).
•	 However a similar short bar (spread) lower in the scoreboard, rather means inertia, such as for France (28th)
and Belgium (26th).
•	 Countries with a long bar (spread) mainly on the left of the 2013 diagonal have shown dynamism in improving
their competitiveness.These are Hong Kong (3rd),Taiwan (11th), Norway (6th), Korea (22nd) or Poland
(33th).
•	 However countries with a similar long bar (spread) on the right of the 2013 diagonal rather show volatility
and a regression in competitiveness.This is the case of Iceland (29th), Spain (45th), Slovenia (52nd), Greece
(54th) and Argentina (59th).
•	 If a country spread is a longer bar equally on both sides of the 2013 diagonal, it suggests volatility, such as
Malaysia (15th) or Indonesia (39th).
P ersp e c t i v e 1 9 9 7 - 2 0 1 3
USA 1
Switzerland 2
Hong Kong 3
Sweden 4
Singapore 5
Norway 6
Canada 7
UAE 8
Germany 9
Qatar 10
Taiwan 11
Denmark 12
Luxembourg 13
Netherlands 14
Malaysia 15
Australia 16
Ireland 17
United Kingdom 18
Israel 19
Finland 20
China Mainland 21
Korea 22
Austria 23
Japan 24
New Zealand 25
Belgium 26
Thailand 27
France 28
Iceland 29
Chile 30
Lithuania 31
Mexico 32
Poland 33
Kazakhstan 34
Czech Republic 35
Estonia 36
Turkey 37
Philippines 38
Indonesia 39
India 40
Latvia 41
Russia 42
Peru 43
Italy 44
Spain 45
Portugal 46
Slovak Republic 47
Colombia 48
Ukraine 49
Hungary 50
Brazil 51
Slovenia 52
South Africa 53
Greece 54
Romania 55
Jordan 56
Bulgaria 57
Croatia 59
Argentina 59
Venezuela 60
60 55 50 45 40 45 30 25 20 15 10 5 1
2013 Ranking
Year of Best Ranking
Year of Worst Ranking
2013
How to Read the Chart
•	 The vertical axis (left) is the 2013 ranking
•	 The left date indicates the worst ranking
•	 The right date indicated the best ranking
•	 The blue line is the 2013 ranking
•	 The bottom axis allows reading the best
and worst ranking over time
•	 The length of the bar is the spread
•	 If most of the bar is on the left then the
country has improved in competitiveness
•	 If most of the bar is on the right, then a
country has regressed in competititveness
Worst / Best Ranking

More Related Content

More from Eduardo Zegarra Méndez

Dieta peruana y seguridad alimentaria zegarrav02
Dieta peruana y seguridad alimentaria zegarrav02Dieta peruana y seguridad alimentaria zegarrav02
Dieta peruana y seguridad alimentaria zegarrav02
Eduardo Zegarra Méndez
 
Pronunciamiento del Frente Amplio ante cambio de gabinete
Pronunciamiento del Frente Amplio ante cambio de gabinetePronunciamiento del Frente Amplio ante cambio de gabinete
Pronunciamiento del Frente Amplio ante cambio de gabinete
Eduardo Zegarra Méndez
 
Mesa de Discusión sobre Modelo Económico
Mesa de Discusión sobre Modelo EconómicoMesa de Discusión sobre Modelo Económico
Mesa de Discusión sobre Modelo Económico
Eduardo Zegarra Méndez
 

More from Eduardo Zegarra Méndez (20)

Pronunciamiento Conveagro rechaza el DS 103 del MEF sobre franja de precios
Pronunciamiento Conveagro  rechaza el DS 103 del MEF sobre franja de preciosPronunciamiento Conveagro  rechaza el DS 103 del MEF sobre franja de precios
Pronunciamiento Conveagro rechaza el DS 103 del MEF sobre franja de precios
 
Pronunciamiento franja de precios de seis ex ministros
Pronunciamiento franja de precios de seis ex ministrosPronunciamiento franja de precios de seis ex ministros
Pronunciamiento franja de precios de seis ex ministros
 
Informe mercado semillas maiz amarillo duro
Informe mercado semillas maiz amarillo duroInforme mercado semillas maiz amarillo duro
Informe mercado semillas maiz amarillo duro
 
Ez consultivo 2015
Ez consultivo 2015Ez consultivo 2015
Ez consultivo 2015
 
Presentación el trabajo digno como derecho ciudadano
Presentación el trabajo digno como derecho ciudadanoPresentación el trabajo digno como derecho ciudadano
Presentación el trabajo digno como derecho ciudadano
 
Razones para derogar la llamada ley pulpín
Razones para derogar la llamada ley pulpínRazones para derogar la llamada ley pulpín
Razones para derogar la llamada ley pulpín
 
Alan garcia
Alan garciaAlan garcia
Alan garcia
 
Emmsa gmml 5-12-2014 comunicado 25 no a la corrupcion
Emmsa gmml 5-12-2014 comunicado 25 no a la corrupcionEmmsa gmml 5-12-2014 comunicado 25 no a la corrupcion
Emmsa gmml 5-12-2014 comunicado 25 no a la corrupcion
 
230647748 obras-de-infraestructura
230647748 obras-de-infraestructura230647748 obras-de-infraestructura
230647748 obras-de-infraestructura
 
Lanzamiento del Acuerdo Democratico por Lima
Lanzamiento del Acuerdo Democratico por LimaLanzamiento del Acuerdo Democratico por Lima
Lanzamiento del Acuerdo Democratico por Lima
 
Dieta peruana y seguridad alimentaria zegarrav02
Dieta peruana y seguridad alimentaria zegarrav02Dieta peruana y seguridad alimentaria zegarrav02
Dieta peruana y seguridad alimentaria zegarrav02
 
Comunicado EMMSA sobre cobro de alquileres
Comunicado EMMSA sobre cobro de alquileresComunicado EMMSA sobre cobro de alquileres
Comunicado EMMSA sobre cobro de alquileres
 
Pronunciamiento del Frente Amplio ante cambio de gabinete
Pronunciamiento del Frente Amplio ante cambio de gabinetePronunciamiento del Frente Amplio ante cambio de gabinete
Pronunciamiento del Frente Amplio ante cambio de gabinete
 
Salario mínimo e informalidad laboral
Salario mínimo e informalidad laboralSalario mínimo e informalidad laboral
Salario mínimo e informalidad laboral
 
Venezuela pron fs
Venezuela pron fsVenezuela pron fs
Venezuela pron fs
 
Venezuela. Pronunciamiento de Fuerza Social
Venezuela. Pronunciamiento de Fuerza SocialVenezuela. Pronunciamiento de Fuerza Social
Venezuela. Pronunciamiento de Fuerza Social
 
Declaración sobre retiro art. séralini
Declaración sobre retiro art. séraliniDeclaración sobre retiro art. séralini
Declaración sobre retiro art. séralini
 
Carta sobre gustavo petro
Carta sobre gustavo petroCarta sobre gustavo petro
Carta sobre gustavo petro
 
Mesa 13 nov
Mesa 13 novMesa 13 nov
Mesa 13 nov
 
Mesa de Discusión sobre Modelo Económico
Mesa de Discusión sobre Modelo EconómicoMesa de Discusión sobre Modelo Económico
Mesa de Discusión sobre Modelo Económico
 

Perspective1997 2013 indice de competitividad

  • 1. IMD WORLD COMPETITIVENESS YEARBOOK 2013IMD WORLD COMPETITIVENESS YEARBOOK 2013 2004 2006 2013 2009 2010 2006 2011 2001 1997 2010 2011 2006 2013 2013 2012 1998 2005 2004 2013 2008 2009 2012 2013 2003 2007 2007 2013 2011 2011 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2012 2013 2013 2010 2002 2013 2010 1999 2001 1998 2011 2001 2007 2002 2012 2013 2000 2010 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2002 2003 2011 2011 2013 2013 1997 2013 2013 2000 2000 2003 1997 2006 2007 2007 2011 2004 2013 1999 2008 2007 2010 1997 2006 2012 2013 2006 1999 1997 2009 2008 2003 2001 2009 1999 2008 2012 2003 1997 2013 2010 2005 2006 2009 2004 2010 2007 2005 2008 2004 1999 2005 1999 1999 2008 19972002 2007 2010 2013 W or l d C o m p e t i t i v en e s s i n The IMD’s World Competitiveness Center has been calculating the competitiveness of nations since 1989. In 1997, the globalization of the world’s economy led us to move from a split ranking (advanced vs. emerging economies) to an integrated one. Because the robust methodology has been maintained since then, it is now possible to track a country’s competitiveness evolution over that period of time. How the chart is elaborated? • The vertical axis on the left indicates the 2013 ranking and the name of the country. • The blue 2013 diagonal line from top to bottom indicates the same ranking, which also intersects with the axis below. • In addition, the horizontal axis allows to read the best and worst rankings over time. • Each country’s bar highlights on the left the worst competitiveness ranking and its date and on the right the best ranking and its date. • The length of the bar indicates the spread between the two; a long bar can mean dynamism and/or volatility – a shorter bar meaning stability/and or inertia. Example: Ireland • Ireland ranks 17th in the 2013 scoreboard (left axis). • Ireland’s bar indicates that its best ranking was in 2000 (on the right) and the worst in 2011 (on the left) and the respective positions can be read on the bottom axis. • The length of the bar means a large spread between the two results (dynamism and/or volatility). • Since the 2013 results diagonal intersects Ireland’s bar closer to its worst point, it suggests that Ireland has regressed in competitiveness.The worst ranking date (2011) is more recent than the best ranking date (2000) confirming this. Trends • Countries with a short bar (spread) at the top of the scoreboard have shown consistency in competitiveness. This is the case of the USA (1st), Singapore (5th) and Canada (7th). • However a similar short bar (spread) lower in the scoreboard, rather means inertia, such as for France (28th) and Belgium (26th). • Countries with a long bar (spread) mainly on the left of the 2013 diagonal have shown dynamism in improving their competitiveness.These are Hong Kong (3rd),Taiwan (11th), Norway (6th), Korea (22nd) or Poland (33th). • However countries with a similar long bar (spread) on the right of the 2013 diagonal rather show volatility and a regression in competitiveness.This is the case of Iceland (29th), Spain (45th), Slovenia (52nd), Greece (54th) and Argentina (59th). • If a country spread is a longer bar equally on both sides of the 2013 diagonal, it suggests volatility, such as Malaysia (15th) or Indonesia (39th). P ersp e c t i v e 1 9 9 7 - 2 0 1 3 USA 1 Switzerland 2 Hong Kong 3 Sweden 4 Singapore 5 Norway 6 Canada 7 UAE 8 Germany 9 Qatar 10 Taiwan 11 Denmark 12 Luxembourg 13 Netherlands 14 Malaysia 15 Australia 16 Ireland 17 United Kingdom 18 Israel 19 Finland 20 China Mainland 21 Korea 22 Austria 23 Japan 24 New Zealand 25 Belgium 26 Thailand 27 France 28 Iceland 29 Chile 30 Lithuania 31 Mexico 32 Poland 33 Kazakhstan 34 Czech Republic 35 Estonia 36 Turkey 37 Philippines 38 Indonesia 39 India 40 Latvia 41 Russia 42 Peru 43 Italy 44 Spain 45 Portugal 46 Slovak Republic 47 Colombia 48 Ukraine 49 Hungary 50 Brazil 51 Slovenia 52 South Africa 53 Greece 54 Romania 55 Jordan 56 Bulgaria 57 Croatia 59 Argentina 59 Venezuela 60 60 55 50 45 40 45 30 25 20 15 10 5 1 2013 Ranking Year of Best Ranking Year of Worst Ranking 2013 How to Read the Chart • The vertical axis (left) is the 2013 ranking • The left date indicates the worst ranking • The right date indicated the best ranking • The blue line is the 2013 ranking • The bottom axis allows reading the best and worst ranking over time • The length of the bar is the spread • If most of the bar is on the left then the country has improved in competitiveness • If most of the bar is on the right, then a country has regressed in competititveness Worst / Best Ranking