Anzeige

The analysis should examine the historical author and intent of.docx

22. Mar 2023
The analysis should examine the historical author and intent of.docx
Nächste SlideShare
Primary Source Analysis PaperInstructions for Primary Source Analy.docxPrimary Source Analysis PaperInstructions for Primary Source Analy.docx
Wird geladen in ... 3
1 von 1
Anzeige

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a The analysis should examine the historical author and intent of.docx(20)

Más de write4(20)

Anzeige

Último(20)

The analysis should examine the historical author and intent of.docx

  1. The analysis should examine the historical setting, author and bias, intent of t The analysis should examine the historical setting, author and bias, intent of the source, reception of the source, and its relevance to the study of the United States history. The analysis should be 2-3 pages and follow standard paper formatting (Double spaced, 1″ margins, size 12 Times New Roman font). For more information about the primary source analysis, consult the Primary Source Analysis Assignment Guide and Sample Primary Source Analysis below. Your examination of the historical setting should examine the context in which the document is produced. What is going on in history during this time period? How does the historical setting affect the document or situate it within American history? In terms of author and bias, ask yourself, what do I know about the author—race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region,political beliefs, etc.? How do these things affect the source? Does the author have an inherent bias that affects his/her perspective on the topic? Next, think about the author’s intent in writing the document. Look at the purpose of the source. What was the author’s message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well? Also, how does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use? Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person’s eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?From there, I want you to look at how the source was received. How did people respond to it? Is it prescriptive (telling you what people thought should happen) or descriptive (telling you what people thought did happen)? Does it describe ideology and/or behavior? Finally, address the relevance of this source to United States History. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source? Whatquestions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source
Anzeige