SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
Presenter: Rickey Warner
Require the following components for a quality course.
Helpful Recommendation
Standard + Annotation + Course Evidence +Characteristics
Requires the inclusion of :
• Standards
• Helpful Recommendations
• Annotation
• Course Evidence
• Characteristics
 The Standards provide the bases for evaluating
the course.
 This is a rigorous set of standards that is
consistently applied to online courses for
continuous improvement.
 There are 8 General and 43 Specific Review
Standards used in the Quality Matters Rubric.
 Information about the standard
 Directions for the Reviewers
 Instructions of the reviewer, example,
ï‚¡ Standard 6.1 The tools used in the course support the
learning objectives or competencies.
ï‚¡ Annotations provide an explanation of the standard,
for instance, This standard requires Aligning the
course with module objectives. The tools can be
software, discussion boards, chat rooms etc.
 Specific examples from the course, including
location, quotes and details.
 Example, students will use the LMS platform to
interact with their peers on The Benefits and
effect of The Affordable Care Act on Low
Income Americans.
 Students should use Moodle, online resources,
government documents, electronic periodicals
and documentaries to support their positions.
 Constructive
 e
 Specific
 Measurable
 Sensitive
 Balanced
 Providing relevant and useful feedback to
learners. Criticism of the learner’s work, with
requirements needed to meet objectives. This
element also requires the reviewer to provide
resources, example, video-tapes, textbooks,
blogs, electronic devices that can be useful in
aligning the course and module level objectives
to enable the learner to meet expectations.
 Course information provides details of where
course content can be found. Objectives are clearly
defined and the learner understands what is
expected.
 Example, the learner should read Chapter 1 in the
text, answer the questions marked highlights of the
Chapter, complete a short essay on how Technology
has effected the learner’s performance in online
courses, interact with at least a peer, who reviews
your essay with feedback.
 Assessment of online activities and work. The
course level and module level objectives and
competencies are aligned to the work
completed in the course. This work is assessed
to determine if students were successful in
meeting expectations. In quality matters, the
threshold is 85%.
 Showing empathy, compassion and a
respectful demeanor in feedback given to the
online learner. The comments should address
the work completed, not ones emotions.
 Determining is the learn met expectations. The
student’s strengths and weaknesses should be
pointed out, with feedback on how to improve
their work. An array of online resources should
be used in delivering the course, online and
blended formats. …The objective is to create a
savvy QM Reviewer.
 The End.

More Related Content

What's hot

Evaluation of online learning
Evaluation of online learningEvaluation of online learning
Evaluation of online learningAlaa Sadik
 
Instructional software evaluation
Instructional software evaluationInstructional software evaluation
Instructional software evaluationfawzif2000
 
Software Selection & Evaluation
Software Selection & EvaluationSoftware Selection & Evaluation
Software Selection & EvaluationAlaa Sadik
 
Learning Enhancement Support System
Learning Enhancement Support SystemLearning Enhancement Support System
Learning Enhancement Support SystemSanjaya Mishra
 
Evaluating instructional software
Evaluating instructional softwareEvaluating instructional software
Evaluating instructional softwarememo200
 
Assessment of Learning
Assessment of LearningAssessment of Learning
Assessment of LearningChristine Serrano
 
Assignment 7 teacher workforce (state of mississippi)after revi
Assignment 7 teacher workforce (state of mississippi)after reviAssignment 7 teacher workforce (state of mississippi)after revi
Assignment 7 teacher workforce (state of mississippi)after revisodhi3
 
Formative assessment in efl blended instruction, april, 4, google hangout ses...
Formative assessment in efl blended instruction, april, 4, google hangout ses...Formative assessment in efl blended instruction, april, 4, google hangout ses...
Formative assessment in efl blended instruction, april, 4, google hangout ses...Olga Morozan
 
Evaluation in distance education @ VIVES: some tools and trends - Jean-Claude...
Evaluation in distance education @ VIVES: some tools and trends - Jean-Claude...Evaluation in distance education @ VIVES: some tools and trends - Jean-Claude...
Evaluation in distance education @ VIVES: some tools and trends - Jean-Claude...EDEN Digital Learning Europe
 
Improving student engagement with the assessment process in undergraduate mic...
Improving student engagement with the assessment process in undergraduate mic...Improving student engagement with the assessment process in undergraduate mic...
Improving student engagement with the assessment process in undergraduate mic...Alison Graham
 
Assessment brief – component 1 academic year 2021 2022semeste
Assessment brief – component 1 academic year  2021 2022semesteAssessment brief – component 1 academic year  2021 2022semeste
Assessment brief – component 1 academic year 2021 2022semestesodhi3
 
Examining the exam
Examining the examExamining the exam
Examining the examDonnaOti
 
Can electronic marking help engage students with assessment and feedback
Can electronic marking help engage students with assessment and feedbackCan electronic marking help engage students with assessment and feedback
Can electronic marking help engage students with assessment and feedbackSara Marsham
 
Arnold serrano (chapter 7)
Arnold serrano (chapter 7)Arnold serrano (chapter 7)
Arnold serrano (chapter 7)Jaypee Tan
 
Technology and Assessment
Technology and AssessmentTechnology and Assessment
Technology and AssessmentRoselle Reonal
 
Canton planning materials intro share
Canton planning materials intro shareCanton planning materials intro share
Canton planning materials intro shareEdAdvance
 
Using ExamSoft and Examination Blueprints to Guide Development of Every 3-Wee...
Using ExamSoft and Examination Blueprints to Guide Development of Every 3-Wee...Using ExamSoft and Examination Blueprints to Guide Development of Every 3-Wee...
Using ExamSoft and Examination Blueprints to Guide Development of Every 3-Wee...ExamSoft
 
Can electronic marking help to engage students with assessment and feedback?
Can electronic marking help to engage students with assessment and feedback?Can electronic marking help to engage students with assessment and feedback?
Can electronic marking help to engage students with assessment and feedback?Alison Graham
 

What's hot (19)

Evaluation of online learning
Evaluation of online learningEvaluation of online learning
Evaluation of online learning
 
Instructional software evaluation
Instructional software evaluationInstructional software evaluation
Instructional software evaluation
 
Software Selection & Evaluation
Software Selection & EvaluationSoftware Selection & Evaluation
Software Selection & Evaluation
 
Learning Enhancement Support System
Learning Enhancement Support SystemLearning Enhancement Support System
Learning Enhancement Support System
 
SAS, Brief Intro (K-2)
SAS, Brief Intro (K-2)SAS, Brief Intro (K-2)
SAS, Brief Intro (K-2)
 
Evaluating instructional software
Evaluating instructional softwareEvaluating instructional software
Evaluating instructional software
 
Assessment of Learning
Assessment of LearningAssessment of Learning
Assessment of Learning
 
Assignment 7 teacher workforce (state of mississippi)after revi
Assignment 7 teacher workforce (state of mississippi)after reviAssignment 7 teacher workforce (state of mississippi)after revi
Assignment 7 teacher workforce (state of mississippi)after revi
 
Formative assessment in efl blended instruction, april, 4, google hangout ses...
Formative assessment in efl blended instruction, april, 4, google hangout ses...Formative assessment in efl blended instruction, april, 4, google hangout ses...
Formative assessment in efl blended instruction, april, 4, google hangout ses...
 
Evaluation in distance education @ VIVES: some tools and trends - Jean-Claude...
Evaluation in distance education @ VIVES: some tools and trends - Jean-Claude...Evaluation in distance education @ VIVES: some tools and trends - Jean-Claude...
Evaluation in distance education @ VIVES: some tools and trends - Jean-Claude...
 
Improving student engagement with the assessment process in undergraduate mic...
Improving student engagement with the assessment process in undergraduate mic...Improving student engagement with the assessment process in undergraduate mic...
Improving student engagement with the assessment process in undergraduate mic...
 
Assessment brief – component 1 academic year 2021 2022semeste
Assessment brief – component 1 academic year  2021 2022semesteAssessment brief – component 1 academic year  2021 2022semeste
Assessment brief – component 1 academic year 2021 2022semeste
 
Examining the exam
Examining the examExamining the exam
Examining the exam
 
Can electronic marking help engage students with assessment and feedback
Can electronic marking help engage students with assessment and feedbackCan electronic marking help engage students with assessment and feedback
Can electronic marking help engage students with assessment and feedback
 
Arnold serrano (chapter 7)
Arnold serrano (chapter 7)Arnold serrano (chapter 7)
Arnold serrano (chapter 7)
 
Technology and Assessment
Technology and AssessmentTechnology and Assessment
Technology and Assessment
 
Canton planning materials intro share
Canton planning materials intro shareCanton planning materials intro share
Canton planning materials intro share
 
Using ExamSoft and Examination Blueprints to Guide Development of Every 3-Wee...
Using ExamSoft and Examination Blueprints to Guide Development of Every 3-Wee...Using ExamSoft and Examination Blueprints to Guide Development of Every 3-Wee...
Using ExamSoft and Examination Blueprints to Guide Development of Every 3-Wee...
 
Can electronic marking help to engage students with assessment and feedback?
Can electronic marking help to engage students with assessment and feedback?Can electronic marking help to engage students with assessment and feedback?
Can electronic marking help to engage students with assessment and feedback?
 

Viewers also liked

หัวข้อคอม
หัวข้อคอมหัวข้อคอม
หัวข้อคอมjena20810
 
บทที่ 11
บทที่ 11บทที่ 11
บทที่ 11Jaohjaaee
 
บทที่3
บทที่3บทที่3
บทที่3Jaohjaaee
 
Components of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationComponents of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationRickey Warner
 
บทที่6
บทที่6 บทที่6
บทที่6 Jaohjaaee
 
Components of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationComponents of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationRickey Warner
 
TUTORIAL Silde Show
TUTORIAL Silde ShowTUTORIAL Silde Show
TUTORIAL Silde Showcimol777
 
บทที่1
บทที่1บทที่1
บทที่1Jaohjaaee
 
บทที่9
บทที่9บทที่9
บทที่9Jaohjaaee
 
บทที่ 10
บทที่ 10บทที่ 10
บทที่ 10Jaohjaaee
 
Pengertian tim dan tanggung jawab anggota tim
Pengertian tim dan tanggung jawab anggota timPengertian tim dan tanggung jawab anggota tim
Pengertian tim dan tanggung jawab anggota timcimol777
 
Korean media insights
Korean media insightsKorean media insights
Korean media insightsLAB-SIX
 

Viewers also liked (13)

หัวข้อคอม
หัวข้อคอมหัวข้อคอม
หัวข้อคอม
 
บทที่ 11
บทที่ 11บทที่ 11
บทที่ 11
 
บทที่3
บทที่3บทที่3
บทที่3
 
Components of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationComponents of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendation
 
บทที่6
บทที่6 บทที่6
บทที่6
 
test upload
test uploadtest upload
test upload
 
Components of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendationComponents of helpful recommendation
Components of helpful recommendation
 
TUTORIAL Silde Show
TUTORIAL Silde ShowTUTORIAL Silde Show
TUTORIAL Silde Show
 
บทที่1
บทที่1บทที่1
บทที่1
 
บทที่9
บทที่9บทที่9
บทที่9
 
บทที่ 10
บทที่ 10บทที่ 10
บทที่ 10
 
Pengertian tim dan tanggung jawab anggota tim
Pengertian tim dan tanggung jawab anggota timPengertian tim dan tanggung jawab anggota tim
Pengertian tim dan tanggung jawab anggota tim
 
Korean media insights
Korean media insightsKorean media insights
Korean media insights
 

Similar to Standards Course Evidence Characteristics

What Makes a Quality Online Course: The Student Perspective
What Makes a Quality Online Course: The Student PerspectiveWhat Makes a Quality Online Course: The Student Perspective
What Makes a Quality Online Course: The Student PerspectivePenny Ralston-Berg
 
Distance learning guide with cover v1.2
Distance learning guide with cover v1.2Distance learning guide with cover v1.2
Distance learning guide with cover v1.2Vicki McGarvey
 
Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt
Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.pptEvaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt
Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppteugrissom
 
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluation
Designing and Conducting Formative EvaluationDesigning and Conducting Formative Evaluation
Designing and Conducting Formative EvaluationAngel Jones
 
E learning fundanemtals and standards
E learning fundanemtals and standardsE learning fundanemtals and standards
E learning fundanemtals and standardsNelly Kamel
 
Evaluating Educational Technology
Evaluating Educational TechnologyEvaluating Educational Technology
Evaluating Educational TechnologyChano Alfornon
 
Assessing the Quality of Your Course
Assessing the Quality of Your CourseAssessing the Quality of Your Course
Assessing the Quality of Your CourseD2L Barry
 
Quality Teaching in Online Courses
Quality Teaching in Online CoursesQuality Teaching in Online Courses
Quality Teaching in Online CoursesFoothill College
 
Fall 2012 Gen Ed Program Guide(1)
Fall 2012 Gen Ed Program Guide(1)Fall 2012 Gen Ed Program Guide(1)
Fall 2012 Gen Ed Program Guide(1)Colleen LaMay
 
A7 UsryR
A7 UsryRA7 UsryR
A7 UsryRSheet32
 
EDUCAUSE 08
EDUCAUSE 08EDUCAUSE 08
EDUCAUSE 08EDUCAUSE
 
Ischoolwebboard 1
Ischoolwebboard 1Ischoolwebboard 1
Ischoolwebboard 1John Macasio
 
Proactive Feedback Strategies in Online (and Offline) Teaching
Proactive Feedback Strategies in Online (and Offline) TeachingProactive Feedback Strategies in Online (and Offline) Teaching
Proactive Feedback Strategies in Online (and Offline) TeachingDavid Lynn Painter
 
Designing Online Courses for Quality Assurance
Designing Online Courses for Quality AssuranceDesigning Online Courses for Quality Assurance
Designing Online Courses for Quality AssuranceD2L
 
ASSURE Model-WPS Office.pptx
ASSURE Model-WPS Office.pptxASSURE Model-WPS Office.pptx
ASSURE Model-WPS Office.pptxJoCheRence
 
iNACOL eLearning Design standards
iNACOL eLearning Design standardsiNACOL eLearning Design standards
iNACOL eLearning Design standardsMichael Payne
 
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docx
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docxAssignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docx
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docxbraycarissa250
 
Scavenger Hunt: Standard D
Scavenger Hunt:  Standard DScavenger Hunt:  Standard D
Scavenger Hunt: Standard Dm_brssrd
 
Evaluating educational technology and integration strategies chapter
Evaluating educational technology and integration strategies chapterEvaluating educational technology and integration strategies chapter
Evaluating educational technology and integration strategies chapterTheresa Ann Rollins-Fanning
 

Similar to Standards Course Evidence Characteristics (20)

What Makes a Quality Online Course: The Student Perspective
What Makes a Quality Online Course: The Student PerspectiveWhat Makes a Quality Online Course: The Student Perspective
What Makes a Quality Online Course: The Student Perspective
 
Distance learning guide with cover v1.2
Distance learning guide with cover v1.2Distance learning guide with cover v1.2
Distance learning guide with cover v1.2
 
Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt
Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.pptEvaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt
Evaluating the efficacy of an online class.ppt
 
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluation
Designing and Conducting Formative EvaluationDesigning and Conducting Formative Evaluation
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluation
 
E learning fundanemtals and standards
E learning fundanemtals and standardsE learning fundanemtals and standards
E learning fundanemtals and standards
 
Evaluating Educational Technology
Evaluating Educational TechnologyEvaluating Educational Technology
Evaluating Educational Technology
 
Assessing the Quality of Your Course
Assessing the Quality of Your CourseAssessing the Quality of Your Course
Assessing the Quality of Your Course
 
Quality Teaching in Online Courses
Quality Teaching in Online CoursesQuality Teaching in Online Courses
Quality Teaching in Online Courses
 
Fall 2012 Gen Ed Program Guide(1)
Fall 2012 Gen Ed Program Guide(1)Fall 2012 Gen Ed Program Guide(1)
Fall 2012 Gen Ed Program Guide(1)
 
A7 UsryR
A7 UsryRA7 UsryR
A7 UsryR
 
EDUCAUSE 08
EDUCAUSE 08EDUCAUSE 08
EDUCAUSE 08
 
Ischoolwebboard 1
Ischoolwebboard 1Ischoolwebboard 1
Ischoolwebboard 1
 
Proactive Feedback Strategies in Online (and Offline) Teaching
Proactive Feedback Strategies in Online (and Offline) TeachingProactive Feedback Strategies in Online (and Offline) Teaching
Proactive Feedback Strategies in Online (and Offline) Teaching
 
Designing Online Courses for Quality Assurance
Designing Online Courses for Quality AssuranceDesigning Online Courses for Quality Assurance
Designing Online Courses for Quality Assurance
 
ASSURE Model-WPS Office.pptx
ASSURE Model-WPS Office.pptxASSURE Model-WPS Office.pptx
ASSURE Model-WPS Office.pptx
 
Product
ProductProduct
Product
 
iNACOL eLearning Design standards
iNACOL eLearning Design standardsiNACOL eLearning Design standards
iNACOL eLearning Design standards
 
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docx
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docxAssignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docx
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docx
 
Scavenger Hunt: Standard D
Scavenger Hunt:  Standard DScavenger Hunt:  Standard D
Scavenger Hunt: Standard D
 
Evaluating educational technology and integration strategies chapter
Evaluating educational technology and integration strategies chapterEvaluating educational technology and integration strategies chapter
Evaluating educational technology and integration strategies chapter
 

Standards Course Evidence Characteristics

  • 2. Require the following components for a quality course. Helpful Recommendation Standard + Annotation + Course Evidence +Characteristics
  • 3. Requires the inclusion of : • Standards • Helpful Recommendations • Annotation • Course Evidence • Characteristics
  • 4.  The Standards provide the bases for evaluating the course.  This is a rigorous set of standards that is consistently applied to online courses for continuous improvement.  There are 8 General and 43 Specific Review Standards used in the Quality Matters Rubric.
  • 5.  Information about the standard  Directions for the Reviewers  Instructions of the reviewer, example, ï‚¡ Standard 6.1 The tools used in the course support the learning objectives or competencies. ï‚¡ Annotations provide an explanation of the standard, for instance, This standard requires Aligning the course with module objectives. The tools can be software, discussion boards, chat rooms etc.
  • 6.  Specific examples from the course, including location, quotes and details.  Example, students will use the LMS platform to interact with their peers on The Benefits and effect of The Affordable Care Act on Low Income Americans.  Students should use Moodle, online resources, government documents, electronic periodicals and documentaries to support their positions.
  • 7.  Constructive  e  Specific  Measurable  Sensitive  Balanced
  • 8.  Providing relevant and useful feedback to learners. Criticism of the learner’s work, with requirements needed to meet objectives. This element also requires the reviewer to provide resources, example, video-tapes, textbooks, blogs, electronic devices that can be useful in aligning the course and module level objectives to enable the learner to meet expectations.
  • 9.  Course information provides details of where course content can be found. Objectives are clearly defined and the learner understands what is expected.  Example, the learner should read Chapter 1 in the text, answer the questions marked highlights of the Chapter, complete a short essay on how Technology has effected the learner’s performance in online courses, interact with at least a peer, who reviews your essay with feedback.
  • 10.  Assessment of online activities and work. The course level and module level objectives and competencies are aligned to the work completed in the course. This work is assessed to determine if students were successful in meeting expectations. In quality matters, the threshold is 85%.
  • 11.  Showing empathy, compassion and a respectful demeanor in feedback given to the online learner. The comments should address the work completed, not ones emotions.
  • 12.  Determining is the learn met expectations. The student’s strengths and weaknesses should be pointed out, with feedback on how to improve their work. An array of online resources should be used in delivering the course, online and blended formats. …The objective is to create a savvy QM Reviewer.  The End.