SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 33
PATENT TERM ADJUSTMENT  CALCULATIONS UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 154(b) “ Playing Sudoku With The USPTO” Sudoku  ( sūdoku )  is a logic-based, combinatorial number-placement puzzle.
TOPICS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
APPLICATION ELIGIBILITY ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Old 35 U.S.C. § 154(b) “Extensions”  (not Adjustments) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
NEW  35 U.S.C. § 154(b)  “ADJUSTMENTS” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
NEW  35 U.S.C. § 154(b)  “ADJUSTMCENTS” Cont’d ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
(B) GROUNDS: 37 CFR  §  1.702(b)  (3 YEAR RULE) USPTO FAILURE TO: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
COMMON A AND B DELAYS ELIGIBLE  FOR DAY FOR DAY ADJUSTMENT: 37 CFR  1.703 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
REDUCTIONS TO ADJUSTMENT  37 USC  § 1.704 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
STEPS IN PTA VERIFICATION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Example For 111a Application  PAIR ADJUSTMENT FILE 14 month date is 9-18-2006 3 yr date is 7-18-2008 [Potentially eligible under 35 USC  §   154(b)(1)(B)]    Patent Term Adjustments Explanation Of Calculations    -  USPTO Adjustment(days):   192  Total PTA (days):    -  Post-Issue Petitions (days):   -  Applicant Delay (APPL) Delay (days):   -  Pre-Issue Petitions (days):   -  Three Years:   01-05-2010   Issue Date of Patent:   -  USPTO Delay (PTO) Delay (days):   07-18-2005  Filing or 371(c) Date: Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) for Application Number:  11/184,429
PAIR ADJUSTMENT FILE 9-27-2007 is beyond 14 month date of 9-18-2006 so eligible under   35 USC  §   154(b)(1)(A) Application Is Now Complete  02-27-2006  Application Dispatched from OIPE  02-27-2006  Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU  03-24-2006  IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center Complete  03-24-2006  Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed  06-22-2007  Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed  06-22-2007  Reference capture on IDS  06-22-2007  Requirement for Restriction / Election  09-26-2007  374  Mail Restriction Requirement  09-27-2007
Potential PTA 35 USC  §  154(b)(1)(A) From and including:  Tuesday, September 19, 2006 To and including:  Thursday, September 27, 2007 It is  374  days from the start date to the end date, end date included
POTENTIAL PTA 35 USC  §  154(b)(1)(B) From and including:  Saturday, July 19, 2008 To and including:  Tuesday, January 5, 2010 It is  536  days from the start date to the end date, end date included No additional USPTO delays were detected under 4 month rule
REDUCTION TO ADJUSTMENTS 1 From and including:  Saturday, November 12, 2005 (3 months for reply) To and including:  Wednesday, February 15, 2006 It is  96  days from the start date to the end date (end date included) Notice Mailed--Application Incomplete--Filing Date Assigned  08-11-2005  A statement by one or more inventors satisfying the requirement under 35 USC 115, Oath of the Applic  02-15-2006  96  Additional Application Filing Fees  02-15-2006
REDUCTION TO ADJUSTMENTS 2 From and including:  Friday, August 8, 2008 (3 months for reply) To and including:  Tuesday, August 19, 2008 It is  12  days from the start date to the end date (end date included) Mail Non-Final Rejection  05-07-2008  Request for Extension of Time - Granted  08-19-2008  12  Response after Non-Final Action  08-19-2008
REDUCTION TO ADJUSTMENTS 3 From and including:  Sunday, March 1, 2009 (3 months for reply) To and including:  Wednesday, May 13, 2009 It is  74  days from the start date to the end date (end date included) Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)  11-28-2008  Workflow - Request for RCE - Begin  05-13-2009  Request for Extension of Time - Granted  05-13-2009  Disposal for a RCE / CPA / R129  05-20-2009  74  Request for Continued Examination (RCE)  05-13-2009
RCE REDUCTION From and including:  Wednesday, May 13, 2009 To and including:  Tuesday, January 5, 2010 It is  238  days from the start date to the end (end date included) Application Is Considered Ready for Issue  11-17-2009  Dispatch to FDC  11-24-2009  Patent Issue Date Used in PTA Calculation  01-05-2010  74  Request for Continued Examination (RCE)  05-13-2009  Date Forwarded to Examiner  05-20-2009
FINAL PTA CALCULATIONS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Wyeth v Kappos  Decided by CAFC 1-7-2010  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
371 Application Example  PAIR ADJUSTMENT FILE 14 month date is 8-04-2008 3 yr date is 6-4-2010  Ineligible for PTA? No!  For 3 yr date, date is measured from 371 (b or f) date (371(b) date is 30 months after priority date for PCT filing) [This calculation error was just discovered in 2009]    Patent Term Adjustments   160 Total PTA (days):    -  Post-Issue Petitions (days):   -  Applicant Delay (APPL) Delay (days):   -  Pre-Issue Petitions (days):   -  Three Years:   01-19-2010  Issue Date of Patent:   -  USPTO Delay (PTO) Delay (days):   06-04-2007  Filing or 371(c) Date: Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) for Application Number:  10/583,814
10/583,814 IMAGE FILE 3 yr date is actually 6-22-2009, Potentially eligible for PTA   under 35 USC  §   154(b)(1)(B) since issue date was 1-19-2010 1 PROSECUTION Abstract  ABST  06-22-2006  21 PROSECUTION Claims  CLM  06-22-2006  243 PROSECUTION Specification  SPEC  06-22-2006  3 PROSECUTION Transmittal of New Application  TRNA  06-22-2006
PAIR PTA FILE: USPTO DELAY Calculations verify that first action from 371(c) date was  191 days after 14 month date A Notice of Allowance was mailed within four months  of applicants response so there was no further USPTO delay. Patent issued on 1-19-2010 211 days beyond the 3 yr date  371 Completion Date  06-04-2007     Application Dispatched from OIPE  07-17-2007     PG-Pub Issue Notification  10-19-2007     Email Notification  10-21-2007     Non-Compliant Preliminary Amendment  12-07-2007     Mail Non-Compliant Preliminary Amendment  12-11-2007     IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center Complete  12-07-2007     Email Notification  12-12-2007     Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU  12-19-2007     Preliminary Amendment  12-26-2007     Non-Final Rejection  02-06-2009     191  Mail Non-Final Rejection  02-11-2009
APPLICANT REDUCTIONS FOR DELAY Calculations verify that Applicant delayed 31 days beyond 3 month date in replying to first action.    Email Notification  02-11-2009     Electronic Review  02-11-2009     Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed  06-11-2009     Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed  06-11-2009     Reference capture on IDS  06-11-2009     Request for Extension of Time - Granted  06-11-2009  31     Response after Non-Final Action  06-11-2009        Date Forwarded to Examiner  07-08-2009        Information Disclosure Statement considered  06-11-2009        Examiner's Amendment Communication  09-10-2009        Notice of Allowance Data Verification Completed  09-11-2009        Document Verification  09-11-2009        Mail Notice of Allowance  09-15-2009
FINAL PTA CALCULATIONS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PRE-GRANT CORRECTION OF PTA ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
POST-GRANT CORRECTION OF PTA ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION CONTENT ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PTA CORRECTIONS IN THE USPTO’S FAVOR ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
APPEAL OF CORRECTIONS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PRACTICE TIPS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
USPTO HELP ,[object Object]

More Related Content

What's hot

Presentation on patent search
Presentation on patent searchPresentation on patent search
Presentation on patent searchtinasingh30
 
Procedure for filing an application for patent
Procedure for filing an application for patentProcedure for filing an application for patent
Procedure for filing an application for patentDiganth Raj Sehgal
 
Online Patent Registration | Patent Application Process in India
Online Patent Registration | Patent Application Process in IndiaOnline Patent Registration | Patent Application Process in India
Online Patent Registration | Patent Application Process in Indiaregistrationwala
 
Key terms of Patent Act Term #6: Anticipation
Key terms of Patent Act Term #6: AnticipationKey terms of Patent Act Term #6: Anticipation
Key terms of Patent Act Term #6: AnticipationOrigiin IP Solutions LLP
 
Patent Term Extension Case Law In Japan
Patent Term Extension Case Law In JapanPatent Term Extension Case Law In Japan
Patent Term Extension Case Law In Japankhirayama
 
Introduction to patent search
Introduction to patent searchIntroduction to patent search
Introduction to patent searchPatSnap
 
Pregrant and Postgrant opposition ppt
Pregrant and Postgrant opposition  pptPregrant and Postgrant opposition  ppt
Pregrant and Postgrant opposition pptAnumulaSurendra
 
FILING OF PATENT AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF PATENTING
FILING OF PATENT AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF PATENTINGFILING OF PATENT AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF PATENTING
FILING OF PATENT AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF PATENTINGSuraj Vasista
 
Patent infringement analysis
Patent infringement analysisPatent infringement analysis
Patent infringement analysisBananaIP Counsels
 
International Patent Application - PCT Route
International Patent Application -  PCT RouteInternational Patent Application -  PCT Route
International Patent Application - PCT RouteIntepat IP
 
Patent landscape
Patent landscapePatent landscape
Patent landscapeSagar Patil
 

What's hot (20)

Patent Claims
Patent ClaimsPatent Claims
Patent Claims
 
Presentation on patent search
Presentation on patent searchPresentation on patent search
Presentation on patent search
 
Patent Life Cycle
Patent Life CyclePatent Life Cycle
Patent Life Cycle
 
Patent Search & Drafting Patent Claims
Patent Search & Drafting Patent ClaimsPatent Search & Drafting Patent Claims
Patent Search & Drafting Patent Claims
 
Procedure for filing an application for patent
Procedure for filing an application for patentProcedure for filing an application for patent
Procedure for filing an application for patent
 
International patent systems
International patent systemsInternational patent systems
International patent systems
 
Online Patent Registration | Patent Application Process in India
Online Patent Registration | Patent Application Process in IndiaOnline Patent Registration | Patent Application Process in India
Online Patent Registration | Patent Application Process in India
 
Recursos Proc Civl
Recursos Proc CivlRecursos Proc Civl
Recursos Proc Civl
 
Patent Drafting
Patent DraftingPatent Drafting
Patent Drafting
 
Key terms of Patent Act Term #6: Anticipation
Key terms of Patent Act Term #6: AnticipationKey terms of Patent Act Term #6: Anticipation
Key terms of Patent Act Term #6: Anticipation
 
Patent Term Extension Case Law In Japan
Patent Term Extension Case Law In JapanPatent Term Extension Case Law In Japan
Patent Term Extension Case Law In Japan
 
Introduction to patent search
Introduction to patent searchIntroduction to patent search
Introduction to patent search
 
Pregrant and Postgrant opposition ppt
Pregrant and Postgrant opposition  pptPregrant and Postgrant opposition  ppt
Pregrant and Postgrant opposition ppt
 
Foreign Filing Licenses
Foreign Filing LicensesForeign Filing Licenses
Foreign Filing Licenses
 
Ipr Enforcement
Ipr EnforcementIpr Enforcement
Ipr Enforcement
 
FILING OF PATENT AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF PATENTING
FILING OF PATENT AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF PATENTINGFILING OF PATENT AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF PATENTING
FILING OF PATENT AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF PATENTING
 
Patent infringement analysis
Patent infringement analysisPatent infringement analysis
Patent infringement analysis
 
International Patent Application - PCT Route
International Patent Application -  PCT RouteInternational Patent Application -  PCT Route
International Patent Application - PCT Route
 
Patent landscape
Patent landscapePatent landscape
Patent landscape
 
Patent Document, Its Form and Substance
Patent Document, Its Form and SubstancePatent Document, Its Form and Substance
Patent Document, Its Form and Substance
 

Similar to Calculating Sec. 154 Patent Term Adjustments

America Invents Act May 2012
America Invents Act May 2012America Invents Act May 2012
America Invents Act May 2012Tracy Dann
 
Oct 2013 IP Legal Minute
Oct 2013 IP Legal Minute Oct 2013 IP Legal Minute
Oct 2013 IP Legal Minute Ken Horton
 
Innovaters Patents
Innovaters PatentsInnovaters Patents
Innovaters PatentsIncuba8
 
Knobbe practice webinar series overview of statutory requirements, timeline...
Knobbe practice webinar series   overview of statutory requirements, timeline...Knobbe practice webinar series   overview of statutory requirements, timeline...
Knobbe practice webinar series overview of statutory requirements, timeline...Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 
The Leahy-Smith American Invents Act: More Complicated than 3D Chess?
The Leahy-Smith American Invents Act: More Complicated than 3D Chess?The Leahy-Smith American Invents Act: More Complicated than 3D Chess?
The Leahy-Smith American Invents Act: More Complicated than 3D Chess?Patterson Thuente IP
 
Income tax appeals and Revision by abhishek murali
Income tax appeals and Revision by abhishek muraliIncome tax appeals and Revision by abhishek murali
Income tax appeals and Revision by abhishek muraliAbhishek Murali
 
New Tools and Procedures Under the Trademark Modernization Act
New Tools and Procedures Under the Trademark Modernization ActNew Tools and Procedures Under the Trademark Modernization Act
New Tools and Procedures Under the Trademark Modernization Acterikpelton
 
TWCA Annual Convention: TWCA Contested Case Hearing Reform, Derek Seal
TWCA Annual Convention: TWCA Contested Case Hearing Reform, Derek SealTWCA Annual Convention: TWCA Contested Case Hearing Reform, Derek Seal
TWCA Annual Convention: TWCA Contested Case Hearing Reform, Derek SealTWCA
 
Five major differences between IPRs and invalidation proceedings
Five major differences between IPRs and invalidation proceedingsFive major differences between IPRs and invalidation proceedings
Five major differences between IPRs and invalidation proceedingsAlexandraPuYang
 
IP-301: Post-Grant Review Trials 2020 - Interplay With District Court Litigation
IP-301: Post-Grant Review Trials 2020 - Interplay With District Court LitigationIP-301: Post-Grant Review Trials 2020 - Interplay With District Court Litigation
IP-301: Post-Grant Review Trials 2020 - Interplay With District Court LitigationFinancial Poise
 
Protecting Innovation Under the American Invents Act
Protecting Innovation Under the American Invents ActProtecting Innovation Under the American Invents Act
Protecting Innovation Under the American Invents ActPatterson Thuente IP
 

Similar to Calculating Sec. 154 Patent Term Adjustments (20)

Patent Prosecution Lunch Presentation February 2014
Patent Prosecution Lunch Presentation February 2014Patent Prosecution Lunch Presentation February 2014
Patent Prosecution Lunch Presentation February 2014
 
Speeding Up Invalidity Using Procedures at the USPTO
Speeding Up Invalidity Using Procedures at the USPTOSpeeding Up Invalidity Using Procedures at the USPTO
Speeding Up Invalidity Using Procedures at the USPTO
 
The America Invents Act (AIA)
The America Invents Act (AIA)The America Invents Act (AIA)
The America Invents Act (AIA)
 
America Invents Act May 2012
America Invents Act May 2012America Invents Act May 2012
America Invents Act May 2012
 
Oct 2013 IP Legal Minute
Oct 2013 IP Legal Minute Oct 2013 IP Legal Minute
Oct 2013 IP Legal Minute
 
Innovaters Patents
Innovaters PatentsInnovaters Patents
Innovaters Patents
 
IPR Presentation
IPR PresentationIPR Presentation
IPR Presentation
 
Knobbe practice webinar series overview of statutory requirements, timeline...
Knobbe practice webinar series   overview of statutory requirements, timeline...Knobbe practice webinar series   overview of statutory requirements, timeline...
Knobbe practice webinar series overview of statutory requirements, timeline...
 
The Leahy-Smith American Invents Act: More Complicated than 3D Chess?
The Leahy-Smith American Invents Act: More Complicated than 3D Chess?The Leahy-Smith American Invents Act: More Complicated than 3D Chess?
The Leahy-Smith American Invents Act: More Complicated than 3D Chess?
 
The American Invents Act (AIA)
The American Invents Act (AIA)The American Invents Act (AIA)
The American Invents Act (AIA)
 
Income tax appeals and Revision by abhishek murali
Income tax appeals and Revision by abhishek muraliIncome tax appeals and Revision by abhishek murali
Income tax appeals and Revision by abhishek murali
 
New Tools and Procedures Under the Trademark Modernization Act
New Tools and Procedures Under the Trademark Modernization ActNew Tools and Procedures Under the Trademark Modernization Act
New Tools and Procedures Under the Trademark Modernization Act
 
AIA Patent Etiquete
AIA Patent EtiqueteAIA Patent Etiquete
AIA Patent Etiquete
 
TWCA Annual Convention: TWCA Contested Case Hearing Reform, Derek Seal
TWCA Annual Convention: TWCA Contested Case Hearing Reform, Derek SealTWCA Annual Convention: TWCA Contested Case Hearing Reform, Derek Seal
TWCA Annual Convention: TWCA Contested Case Hearing Reform, Derek Seal
 
Five major differences between IPRs and invalidation proceedings
Five major differences between IPRs and invalidation proceedingsFive major differences between IPRs and invalidation proceedings
Five major differences between IPRs and invalidation proceedings
 
IP-301: Post-Grant Review Trials 2020 - Interplay With District Court Litigation
IP-301: Post-Grant Review Trials 2020 - Interplay With District Court LitigationIP-301: Post-Grant Review Trials 2020 - Interplay With District Court Litigation
IP-301: Post-Grant Review Trials 2020 - Interplay With District Court Litigation
 
Protecting Innovation Under the American Invents Act
Protecting Innovation Under the American Invents ActProtecting Innovation Under the American Invents Act
Protecting Innovation Under the American Invents Act
 
CloverQT22162-3 .pdf
CloverQT22162-3 .pdfCloverQT22162-3 .pdf
CloverQT22162-3 .pdf
 
Patent Reform Update
Patent Reform UpdatePatent Reform Update
Patent Reform Update
 
Ipab procedures
Ipab proceduresIpab procedures
Ipab procedures
 

Calculating Sec. 154 Patent Term Adjustments

  • 1. PATENT TERM ADJUSTMENT CALCULATIONS UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 154(b) “ Playing Sudoku With The USPTO” Sudoku ( sūdoku ) is a logic-based, combinatorial number-placement puzzle.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12. Example For 111a Application PAIR ADJUSTMENT FILE 14 month date is 9-18-2006 3 yr date is 7-18-2008 [Potentially eligible under 35 USC § 154(b)(1)(B)]   Patent Term Adjustments Explanation Of Calculations   - USPTO Adjustment(days):   192 Total PTA (days):   - Post-Issue Petitions (days):   - Applicant Delay (APPL) Delay (days):   - Pre-Issue Petitions (days):   - Three Years:   01-05-2010 Issue Date of Patent:   - USPTO Delay (PTO) Delay (days):   07-18-2005 Filing or 371(c) Date: Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) for Application Number:  11/184,429
  • 13. PAIR ADJUSTMENT FILE 9-27-2007 is beyond 14 month date of 9-18-2006 so eligible under 35 USC § 154(b)(1)(A) Application Is Now Complete 02-27-2006 Application Dispatched from OIPE 02-27-2006 Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU 03-24-2006 IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center Complete 03-24-2006 Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed 06-22-2007 Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed 06-22-2007 Reference capture on IDS 06-22-2007 Requirement for Restriction / Election 09-26-2007 374 Mail Restriction Requirement 09-27-2007
  • 14. Potential PTA 35 USC § 154(b)(1)(A) From and including: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 To and including: Thursday, September 27, 2007 It is 374 days from the start date to the end date, end date included
  • 15. POTENTIAL PTA 35 USC § 154(b)(1)(B) From and including: Saturday, July 19, 2008 To and including: Tuesday, January 5, 2010 It is 536 days from the start date to the end date, end date included No additional USPTO delays were detected under 4 month rule
  • 16. REDUCTION TO ADJUSTMENTS 1 From and including: Saturday, November 12, 2005 (3 months for reply) To and including: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 It is 96 days from the start date to the end date (end date included) Notice Mailed--Application Incomplete--Filing Date Assigned 08-11-2005 A statement by one or more inventors satisfying the requirement under 35 USC 115, Oath of the Applic 02-15-2006 96 Additional Application Filing Fees 02-15-2006
  • 17. REDUCTION TO ADJUSTMENTS 2 From and including: Friday, August 8, 2008 (3 months for reply) To and including: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 It is 12 days from the start date to the end date (end date included) Mail Non-Final Rejection 05-07-2008 Request for Extension of Time - Granted 08-19-2008 12 Response after Non-Final Action 08-19-2008
  • 18. REDUCTION TO ADJUSTMENTS 3 From and including: Sunday, March 1, 2009 (3 months for reply) To and including: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 It is 74 days from the start date to the end date (end date included) Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326) 11-28-2008 Workflow - Request for RCE - Begin 05-13-2009 Request for Extension of Time - Granted 05-13-2009 Disposal for a RCE / CPA / R129 05-20-2009 74 Request for Continued Examination (RCE) 05-13-2009
  • 19. RCE REDUCTION From and including: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 To and including: Tuesday, January 5, 2010 It is 238 days from the start date to the end (end date included) Application Is Considered Ready for Issue 11-17-2009 Dispatch to FDC 11-24-2009 Patent Issue Date Used in PTA Calculation 01-05-2010 74 Request for Continued Examination (RCE) 05-13-2009 Date Forwarded to Examiner 05-20-2009
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22. 371 Application Example PAIR ADJUSTMENT FILE 14 month date is 8-04-2008 3 yr date is 6-4-2010 Ineligible for PTA? No! For 3 yr date, date is measured from 371 (b or f) date (371(b) date is 30 months after priority date for PCT filing) [This calculation error was just discovered in 2009]   Patent Term Adjustments   160 Total PTA (days):   - Post-Issue Petitions (days):   - Applicant Delay (APPL) Delay (days):   - Pre-Issue Petitions (days):   - Three Years:   01-19-2010 Issue Date of Patent:   - USPTO Delay (PTO) Delay (days):   06-04-2007 Filing or 371(c) Date: Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) for Application Number:  10/583,814
  • 23. 10/583,814 IMAGE FILE 3 yr date is actually 6-22-2009, Potentially eligible for PTA under 35 USC § 154(b)(1)(B) since issue date was 1-19-2010 1 PROSECUTION Abstract ABST 06-22-2006 21 PROSECUTION Claims CLM 06-22-2006 243 PROSECUTION Specification SPEC 06-22-2006 3 PROSECUTION Transmittal of New Application TRNA 06-22-2006
  • 24. PAIR PTA FILE: USPTO DELAY Calculations verify that first action from 371(c) date was 191 days after 14 month date A Notice of Allowance was mailed within four months of applicants response so there was no further USPTO delay. Patent issued on 1-19-2010 211 days beyond the 3 yr date 371 Completion Date 06-04-2007   Application Dispatched from OIPE 07-17-2007   PG-Pub Issue Notification 10-19-2007   Email Notification 10-21-2007   Non-Compliant Preliminary Amendment 12-07-2007   Mail Non-Compliant Preliminary Amendment 12-11-2007   IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center Complete 12-07-2007   Email Notification 12-12-2007   Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU 12-19-2007   Preliminary Amendment 12-26-2007   Non-Final Rejection 02-06-2009   191 Mail Non-Final Rejection 02-11-2009
  • 25. APPLICANT REDUCTIONS FOR DELAY Calculations verify that Applicant delayed 31 days beyond 3 month date in replying to first action.   Email Notification 02-11-2009   Electronic Review 02-11-2009   Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed 06-11-2009   Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed 06-11-2009   Reference capture on IDS 06-11-2009   Request for Extension of Time - Granted 06-11-2009 31   Response after Non-Final Action 06-11-2009     Date Forwarded to Examiner 07-08-2009     Information Disclosure Statement considered 06-11-2009     Examiner's Amendment Communication 09-10-2009     Notice of Allowance Data Verification Completed 09-11-2009     Document Verification 09-11-2009     Mail Notice of Allowance 09-15-2009
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.