Korea entry strategy (biocon)

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.Executive-Business Development ,International Business at Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd um MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
Market entry strategy
for
Mihir Pandit [PC-09]
Jigar Raval [PA-08]
Vipul Patil [PA-20]
Bhakti Shethia [PC-20]
Sneha Agarwal [QA-17]
OUTLINE
 Biocon-Snapshot
 Country Choice-Why South Korea?
 External Challenges :Drivers and Restraints
 Forecast trends
 Entry Mode Strategy
 Target market and Positioning
 Strategic Implementation
 Controls
BIOCON SNAPSHOT
VISION
Biocon is an emerging, global Bio-pharmaceutical enterprise that
is focused on developing affordable products and services for
patients, partners and healthcare system across the world.
Biocon is committed to:
• Reducing therapy costs of chronic diseases.
• Research and marketing partnership that provide global access.
• Leveraging the India cost advantage to deliver high value,
licensable R & D assets.
Source: http://www.biocon.com/docs/Biocon_H1FY1_MediaPrstn.pdf
COMPANY PROFILE
Source: http://www.biocon.com/docs/Biocon_H1FY1_MediaPrstn.pdf
COMPANY PROFILE
Source: http://www.biocon.com/docs/Biocon_H1FY1_MediaPrstn.pdf
PRODUCT PORTFOLIO
Source: http://www.biocon.com/docs/Biocon_H1FY1_MediaPrstn.pdf
PRODUCT PIPELINE
2 New drugs in late stage clinical trials
Source: http://www.biocon.com/docs/Biocon_H1FY1_MediaPrstn.pdf
CEO PERSPECTIVE: WHY SOUTH KOREA?
Focus on high growth product classes
Continuous monitoring of Biobetters
globally.
Scalable production facilities
Parallel product registration in developed
markets products launch quickly and
gain advantage.
Partnerships with CROs will help speed
up the drug development and
registration process.
COUNTRY CHOICE
Why choose South
Korea Biosimilar
market?
•Long history in manufacturing
biologicals
•A regulatory pathway for
biosimilars
Requires upfront investment
and infrastructure for the
development, much lesser
than biologics
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis
Exports are expected to
contribute as much as 50% of
the total revenues.
•Government’s policy to promote the
biosimilars industry
•Korean Food and Drug Administration (KFDA)
•BLA (biologics license application)
By 2030, its total number
of retirees is forecast to be
approaching 40% of the
population.
http://www.icis.com/blogs/asian-chemical-connections/2012/11/south-koreas-demographicchall/#sthash.2x5UWyfc.dpuf
•Universal coverage of population through social
health insurance (SHI) since 1989
•High out-of-pocket payment, amounting to 35-40%
of total health expenditure
•Social insurance for long-term care, introduced in
July 2008
COUNTRY CHOICE
Rank Disease Deaths %
1 Stroke 38497 17.19
2 CHD 20496 9.15
3 Lung Cancer 16437 7.34
4 Diabetes Melitus 13766 6.15
5 Stomach cancer 12794 5.71
6 Liver cancer 11797 5.27
7 Suicide 11408 5.10
8 Road traffic
accident
7570 3.38
9 Colon cancer 7562 3.38
10 Liver disease 7406 3.31
Biocon’s Product portfolio is very suitable to penetrate market
Source : WHO health statistics
20 20.4 20.8 21.8 22.9 24.1 26.0 28.1
30 30.6 31.2
33.1
35.1
37.2
40.9
45.0
5 5.1 5.2
5.4
5.6
5.9
6.2
6.6
6 6.2 6.4
6.9
7.4
8.0
9.0
10.1
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Human Growth Hormone Erythropoietin Monoclonal Antibodies GCSF
COUNTRY CHOICE
Biosimilars Market: Revenue forecasts (Korea), 2010
Years
Revenues($million)
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis
Biosimilar market is growing very rapidly and South korea in particular, with plan to become a
leading biosimilars player.
ENVIORNMENT
1. 35% R&D biosimilar Investment in 2012 while
in chemical drug development accounted for
just 12 %.
2. Tailored consulting programme by KFDA
3. “Columbus” Project in 2011
4. Out of 36 biosimilars 47% are Mab included in
korean pipeline.
5. Global leader with 17 mAb portfolio by 9
korean co.
6. Paradigm shift away from imitation towards
innovation by focus on biobetters.
Regulatory enviornment Operating environment
1. New pricing system
2. Pharma industry competitive
enhancement plan:
3 criteria:
Four benefits from govt:
1. Drug price benefit
2. Tax system support
3. Financial support
4. R&D support
• Chalebols: Business conglomerate like Samsung and
LG
• Samsung to invest 389 million in biosimilar
devlopment.
• Extreme pressure on local generics.(limited resources)
• EU-FTA: July 2011
• US-FTA March 2012
• Tariff abolition
• Strengthen IPR protection
• Current negotiation with ASEAN countries and other
countries.
• Korean govt planning to invest 1 trillion won.
• Democratic union party if elected-renegotiate .
Local Industry and FTA’S
ENVIORNMENT
EXTERNAL CHALLENGES:
DRIVERS:
1. Strong experience + Active
government support
2. Accessibility +Cost
3. Focus on high growth G-CSF
&Mab
4. Early mover advantage
5. Strategic partnership: Korean
Biosimilars co. +foreign co.
6. Exmple: Samsung+ Quintiles
RESTRAINTS:
1. Large capacities for approval
(FDA/EMEA/PMDA)
2. Deep pockets.
3. Cost Effectiveness Major
threats in Asia
4. Ambiguity in nomenclature.
5. Reluctance by physicians
EXTERNAL CHALLENGES:
Forecast assumption
1. Market volume
2. Biosimilars penetration
3. Biosimilars market share
4. Economy indicators
Revenue forecast discussion
Among four segments
1.Erythropoitins : Example:
Espogen by LG life science
2.Human growth hormone:
Example: Euotropin
FORECAST TRENDS
ENTRY MODE STRATEGY
Source: http://www.imshealth.com/ims/Global/Content/Home%20Page%20Content/IMS%20News/Biosimilars_Whitepaper.pdf
ENTRY MODE STRATEGY
Current Scenario: Innovation is not an easy game and my business
model proves it can be done through partnering. One problem with
India has been that we are not good at innovation. My model has
been about partnering for innovation. - Kiran Mazumdar Shaw
New Proposition : Strategic alliance with LG life science ltd as an entry
mode strategy.
Vision : To become a "top-tier life sciences company
with world-class new drugs"
Main aim: Risk sharing &
Increasing competitive strengths
• To enter the South Korean market
• Health profile of South Korea
• Extensive sales & marketing network
• R& D resources & know-how
• Emerging as a global top brand in the
diagnostic field
• To add to the existing product
portfolio
RATIONALE FOR
SELECTION
ENTRY MODE STRATEGY
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
OF ALLIANCE
HURDLES
 Fast entry into the foreign
market
 Minimum risks
 Better understanding of the
host country
 Access to new technology
 More efficient production &
innovation
 Price – plays a key role
 Competition with local
Biosimilars
 Huge promotional
investment
 Changing regulatory policies
 Conflicts of control
TARGET MARKET
Aging korean population demanding affordable therapy for
diabetes, cancer & Cardiovascular diseases
 Large pool of patients
 Prevalence of diabetes- 8%, Incidence of disease – 0.4%
per year
 Insulin therapy
 Huge demand for affordable products
 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer drug market
 Majority of patients in stage III or IV at the time of
diagnosis
POSITIONING
Commodity Differentiated
BIOSIMILARS
• Payer driven
• Acute treatment
• Price driven
• Lower risk of
immunogenic reaction
• Fully understood mode
of action
• Chronic treatment
• Limited competition
• Higher risk of
immunogenic reaction
• Mode of action not
clear
• Influenced by multiple
stake holders
PLACEPROMOTION
STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION
PRODUCT PRICE
• Tailor go-to-market approach
• To local dynamics, both in terms of
sales force model and marketing
offering
• Target Therapy areas
• Build trust and network development
• Human Insulin
• Insulin Lispro
• Monoclonal Antibodies
• Oncology products
• Specialty and primary care products
• lower cost biosimilar drugs
•Value based pricing
•Payer Strategy
• South Korea
• Export drugs to Asia and developed
countries (EU, USA) through LG’s
distribution network
CORRECTIVE ACTIONCOMPARE ACTUAL Vs PLANNED PERF.
CONTROLS
SETTING STANDARDS MEASURING ACTUAL PERFORMANCE
• Build lasting, collaborative relationships
with our customers
• To check the above, consumer
satisfaction and feedback website
• Doing what’s right – for patients,
customers and employees
•Transaction strategy to balance and grow
portfolios
• Identification and evaluation of investment
opportunities
• Financial Report
• This is the point of decision making
• A thorough understanding of highly
complex and dynamic healthcare
systems
• To be done quarterly initially and take
proactive actions
•In case of failure ,send a specialized
team to assess the situation(risks and
benefits of continuation).
• Quality system design and optimization
• GCP, GLP, GMP and cGMP compliance
and risk mitigation
PUBLIC OPINION
India- Global leader in
Biosimilars
Korea entry strategy (biocon)
1 von 26

Más contenido relacionado

Was ist angesagt?(20)

Global immuno oncology io marketGlobal immuno oncology io market
Global immuno oncology io market
OliviaJames2064 views
Organic yeast marketOrganic yeast market
Organic yeast market
danishsmith0134 views
Bayer(benazir)Bayer(benazir)
Bayer(benazir)
Benazir Ahmed Siddique3.3K views
Immuno oncology marketImmuno oncology market
Immuno oncology market
Sidhant Kale31 views
Immuno oncologyImmuno oncology
Immuno oncology
RahulSaxena21638 views
Winning formula mena pharmaceutical Winning formula mena pharmaceutical
Winning formula mena pharmaceutical
Wesam Nehad1.1K views

Destacado(20)

Game den game console timelineGame den game console timeline
Game den game console timeline
rosstapher1.3K views
Execution game 2017Execution game 2017
Execution game 2017
princealfiyana239 views
N0656330_IDO_South Korea_230716 - FinalN0656330_IDO_South Korea_230716 - Final
N0656330_IDO_South Korea_230716 - Final
KKC Communications Ltd506 views
North and South Korea 2017 brochureNorth and South Korea 2017 brochure
North and South Korea 2017 brochure
Bill Altaffer480 views
Generic Pharma 2.0 Consulting -  Challenge the Status QuoGeneric Pharma 2.0 Consulting -  Challenge the Status Quo
Generic Pharma 2.0 Consulting - Challenge the Status Quo
✪ Asa Cox (ThePharmaPartner)963 views
Final Ib RanbaxyFinal Ib Ranbaxy
Final Ib Ranbaxy
Abhishek Verma1.2K views
TLG Business Plan PresentationTLG Business Plan Presentation
TLG Business Plan Presentation
nroopraj242.2K views
Biocon India Case StudyBiocon India Case Study
Biocon India Case Study
ANURAG GUPTA12.8K views
South koreaSouth korea
South korea
Andriana020634.5K views
Project 6 and archipelago 21Project 6 and archipelago 21
Project 6 and archipelago 21
GAW Consultants2.8K views
Victoria's Secret Marketing StrategiesVictoria's Secret Marketing Strategies
Victoria's Secret Marketing Strategies
Ankita Patil21.8K views

Más de MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.(10)

Analytical crm and social crmAnalytical crm and social crm
Analytical crm and social crm
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.3.3K views
Bhopal gas tragedyBhopal gas tragedy
Bhopal gas tragedy
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.1.5K views
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF NOVARTIS INDIAFINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF NOVARTIS INDIA
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF NOVARTIS INDIA
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.1.2K views
Marketing 3.0Marketing 3.0
Marketing 3.0
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.1.7K views
Pharma trends in bric economiesPharma trends in bric economies
Pharma trends in bric economies
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.1.1K views
Korea entry strategy (biocon) HypotheticalKorea entry strategy (biocon) Hypothetical
Korea entry strategy (biocon) Hypothetical
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.1.5K views
ZydusZydus
Zydus
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.2.7K views
Vipul Patil P.Marketing AssignmentVipul Patil P.Marketing Assignment
Vipul Patil P.Marketing Assignment
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.625 views
Porter Five Forces Review AssignmentPorter Five Forces Review Assignment
Porter Five Forces Review Assignment
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.16.4K views
pharma report 2020 vipul patilpharma report 2020 vipul patil
pharma report 2020 vipul patil
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.303 views

Korea entry strategy (biocon)

  • 1. Market entry strategy for Mihir Pandit [PC-09] Jigar Raval [PA-08] Vipul Patil [PA-20] Bhakti Shethia [PC-20] Sneha Agarwal [QA-17]
  • 2. OUTLINE  Biocon-Snapshot  Country Choice-Why South Korea?  External Challenges :Drivers and Restraints  Forecast trends  Entry Mode Strategy  Target market and Positioning  Strategic Implementation  Controls
  • 3. BIOCON SNAPSHOT VISION Biocon is an emerging, global Bio-pharmaceutical enterprise that is focused on developing affordable products and services for patients, partners and healthcare system across the world. Biocon is committed to: • Reducing therapy costs of chronic diseases. • Research and marketing partnership that provide global access. • Leveraging the India cost advantage to deliver high value, licensable R & D assets. Source: http://www.biocon.com/docs/Biocon_H1FY1_MediaPrstn.pdf
  • 7. PRODUCT PIPELINE 2 New drugs in late stage clinical trials Source: http://www.biocon.com/docs/Biocon_H1FY1_MediaPrstn.pdf
  • 8. CEO PERSPECTIVE: WHY SOUTH KOREA? Focus on high growth product classes Continuous monitoring of Biobetters globally. Scalable production facilities Parallel product registration in developed markets products launch quickly and gain advantage. Partnerships with CROs will help speed up the drug development and registration process.
  • 9. COUNTRY CHOICE Why choose South Korea Biosimilar market? •Long history in manufacturing biologicals •A regulatory pathway for biosimilars Requires upfront investment and infrastructure for the development, much lesser than biologics Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis Exports are expected to contribute as much as 50% of the total revenues. •Government’s policy to promote the biosimilars industry •Korean Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) •BLA (biologics license application) By 2030, its total number of retirees is forecast to be approaching 40% of the population. http://www.icis.com/blogs/asian-chemical-connections/2012/11/south-koreas-demographicchall/#sthash.2x5UWyfc.dpuf •Universal coverage of population through social health insurance (SHI) since 1989 •High out-of-pocket payment, amounting to 35-40% of total health expenditure •Social insurance for long-term care, introduced in July 2008
  • 10. COUNTRY CHOICE Rank Disease Deaths % 1 Stroke 38497 17.19 2 CHD 20496 9.15 3 Lung Cancer 16437 7.34 4 Diabetes Melitus 13766 6.15 5 Stomach cancer 12794 5.71 6 Liver cancer 11797 5.27 7 Suicide 11408 5.10 8 Road traffic accident 7570 3.38 9 Colon cancer 7562 3.38 10 Liver disease 7406 3.31 Biocon’s Product portfolio is very suitable to penetrate market Source : WHO health statistics
  • 11. 20 20.4 20.8 21.8 22.9 24.1 26.0 28.1 30 30.6 31.2 33.1 35.1 37.2 40.9 45.0 5 5.1 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.9 6.2 6.6 6 6.2 6.4 6.9 7.4 8.0 9.0 10.1 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Human Growth Hormone Erythropoietin Monoclonal Antibodies GCSF COUNTRY CHOICE Biosimilars Market: Revenue forecasts (Korea), 2010 Years Revenues($million) Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis Biosimilar market is growing very rapidly and South korea in particular, with plan to become a leading biosimilars player.
  • 12. ENVIORNMENT 1. 35% R&D biosimilar Investment in 2012 while in chemical drug development accounted for just 12 %. 2. Tailored consulting programme by KFDA 3. “Columbus” Project in 2011 4. Out of 36 biosimilars 47% are Mab included in korean pipeline. 5. Global leader with 17 mAb portfolio by 9 korean co. 6. Paradigm shift away from imitation towards innovation by focus on biobetters. Regulatory enviornment Operating environment 1. New pricing system 2. Pharma industry competitive enhancement plan: 3 criteria: Four benefits from govt: 1. Drug price benefit 2. Tax system support 3. Financial support 4. R&D support
  • 13. • Chalebols: Business conglomerate like Samsung and LG • Samsung to invest 389 million in biosimilar devlopment. • Extreme pressure on local generics.(limited resources) • EU-FTA: July 2011 • US-FTA March 2012 • Tariff abolition • Strengthen IPR protection • Current negotiation with ASEAN countries and other countries. • Korean govt planning to invest 1 trillion won. • Democratic union party if elected-renegotiate . Local Industry and FTA’S ENVIORNMENT
  • 15. DRIVERS: 1. Strong experience + Active government support 2. Accessibility +Cost 3. Focus on high growth G-CSF &Mab 4. Early mover advantage 5. Strategic partnership: Korean Biosimilars co. +foreign co. 6. Exmple: Samsung+ Quintiles RESTRAINTS: 1. Large capacities for approval (FDA/EMEA/PMDA) 2. Deep pockets. 3. Cost Effectiveness Major threats in Asia 4. Ambiguity in nomenclature. 5. Reluctance by physicians EXTERNAL CHALLENGES:
  • 16. Forecast assumption 1. Market volume 2. Biosimilars penetration 3. Biosimilars market share 4. Economy indicators Revenue forecast discussion Among four segments 1.Erythropoitins : Example: Espogen by LG life science 2.Human growth hormone: Example: Euotropin FORECAST TRENDS
  • 17. ENTRY MODE STRATEGY Source: http://www.imshealth.com/ims/Global/Content/Home%20Page%20Content/IMS%20News/Biosimilars_Whitepaper.pdf
  • 18. ENTRY MODE STRATEGY Current Scenario: Innovation is not an easy game and my business model proves it can be done through partnering. One problem with India has been that we are not good at innovation. My model has been about partnering for innovation. - Kiran Mazumdar Shaw New Proposition : Strategic alliance with LG life science ltd as an entry mode strategy. Vision : To become a "top-tier life sciences company with world-class new drugs"
  • 19. Main aim: Risk sharing & Increasing competitive strengths • To enter the South Korean market • Health profile of South Korea • Extensive sales & marketing network • R& D resources & know-how • Emerging as a global top brand in the diagnostic field • To add to the existing product portfolio RATIONALE FOR SELECTION
  • 20. ENTRY MODE STRATEGY COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE OF ALLIANCE HURDLES  Fast entry into the foreign market  Minimum risks  Better understanding of the host country  Access to new technology  More efficient production & innovation  Price – plays a key role  Competition with local Biosimilars  Huge promotional investment  Changing regulatory policies  Conflicts of control
  • 21. TARGET MARKET Aging korean population demanding affordable therapy for diabetes, cancer & Cardiovascular diseases  Large pool of patients  Prevalence of diabetes- 8%, Incidence of disease – 0.4% per year  Insulin therapy  Huge demand for affordable products  Non-small Cell Lung Cancer drug market  Majority of patients in stage III or IV at the time of diagnosis
  • 22. POSITIONING Commodity Differentiated BIOSIMILARS • Payer driven • Acute treatment • Price driven • Lower risk of immunogenic reaction • Fully understood mode of action • Chronic treatment • Limited competition • Higher risk of immunogenic reaction • Mode of action not clear • Influenced by multiple stake holders
  • 23. PLACEPROMOTION STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION PRODUCT PRICE • Tailor go-to-market approach • To local dynamics, both in terms of sales force model and marketing offering • Target Therapy areas • Build trust and network development • Human Insulin • Insulin Lispro • Monoclonal Antibodies • Oncology products • Specialty and primary care products • lower cost biosimilar drugs •Value based pricing •Payer Strategy • South Korea • Export drugs to Asia and developed countries (EU, USA) through LG’s distribution network
  • 24. CORRECTIVE ACTIONCOMPARE ACTUAL Vs PLANNED PERF. CONTROLS SETTING STANDARDS MEASURING ACTUAL PERFORMANCE • Build lasting, collaborative relationships with our customers • To check the above, consumer satisfaction and feedback website • Doing what’s right – for patients, customers and employees •Transaction strategy to balance and grow portfolios • Identification and evaluation of investment opportunities • Financial Report • This is the point of decision making • A thorough understanding of highly complex and dynamic healthcare systems • To be done quarterly initially and take proactive actions •In case of failure ,send a specialized team to assess the situation(risks and benefits of continuation). • Quality system design and optimization • GCP, GLP, GMP and cGMP compliance and risk mitigation
  • 25. PUBLIC OPINION India- Global leader in Biosimilars

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Biocon, India's largest biotech company is focused on delivering affordable innovation.
  2. As a fully integrated biopharma company it delivers innovative biopharmaceutical solution ranging from discovery to development and commercilizatnE.g. Mylan and biocon
  3. Biocon’s key innovation include world’s first pichia based recombinant human insulin “INSUGEN” and first indigeneously monoclonal antibody “BIOMAB”
  4. Oral insulin and itolizumab
  5. Chaebol (from chae: wealth or property + pol: faction or clan)[1] refers to a South Korean form of business conglomerate. They are typically globalmultinationals owning numerous international enterprises,[1] controlled by a chairman who has power over all the operations.[1][2] The term is often used in a context similar to that of the English word "conglomerate". The term was first used in 1984.[1] There are several dozen large Korean family-controlled corporate groups which fall under this definition.The chaebol has also played a significant role in South Korean politics. In 1988 a member of a chaebol family, Chung Mong-jun, president of Hyundai Heavy Industries, successfully ran for the National Assembly of South Korea. Other business leaders also were chosen to be members of the National Assembly through proportional representation. Since 2000, Hyundai has played a role in the thawing of North Korean and South Korean relationsin South Korea, it's apparently a different story. Samsung alone is responsible for 20 percent of the country's $1.1 trillion economy. For reference, government spen$237 billion in sales last year. Samsung Electronics is the crown jewel, and the country's biggest individual company.ding there also makes up about 20 percent of GDP.It plays such an outsized role in the nation's economic life that, according toBloombergBusinessweek, South Korea is referred to in some circles as "The Republic of Samsung.“It's closest rival is the Hyundai Motor Group, owner of the namesake car company and Kia Motors (and here you thought they were rivals). 
  6. Uptake of biosimilars varies between different countries when therapy areas are considered according to drug class [1]. For example, the market for somatropin is differentiated due to a complex stakeholder landscape influenced by physicians, the competition is based on multiple marketing levers. This results in uptake of biosimilarsomatropin being significantly lower than in commodity markets where access is mostly controlled by payers, e.g. tender, step-wise algorithms; and price competition, e.g. G-CSF, epoietins. Differentiated biosimilars are most likely when they are indicated for chronic treatment and/or long therapeutic cycles, where patients prefer to stick to a ‘known’ product. On the other hand, commodity biosimilars are most likely those indicated for acute treatment and/or frequent cycling among therapies.