Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Trilateration-based Indoor Location using Supervised Learning Algorithms

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 15 Anzeige

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Trilateration-based Indoor Location using Supervised Learning Algorithms

Herunterladen, um offline zu lesen

The indoor positioning system (IPS) has a wide range of applications, due to the advantages it has over Global Positioning Systems (GPS) in indoor environments. Due to the biosecurity measures established by the World Health Organization (WHO), where the social distancing is provided, being stricter in indoor environments. This work proposes the design of a positioning system based on trilateration. The main objective is to predict the positioning in both the ‘x’ and ‘y’ axis in an area of 8 square meters. For this purpose, 3 Access Points (AP) and a Mobile Device (DM), which works as a raster, have been used. The Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) values measured at each AP are the variables used in regression algorithms that predict the x and y position. In this work, 24 regression algorithms have been evaluated, of which the lowest errors obtained are 70.322 [cm] and 30.1508 [cm], for the x and y axes, respectively.
Published in: 2022 International Conference on Applied Electronics (AE)

⭐ For more information visit our blog:
https://vasanza.blogspot.com/

The indoor positioning system (IPS) has a wide range of applications, due to the advantages it has over Global Positioning Systems (GPS) in indoor environments. Due to the biosecurity measures established by the World Health Organization (WHO), where the social distancing is provided, being stricter in indoor environments. This work proposes the design of a positioning system based on trilateration. The main objective is to predict the positioning in both the ‘x’ and ‘y’ axis in an area of 8 square meters. For this purpose, 3 Access Points (AP) and a Mobile Device (DM), which works as a raster, have been used. The Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) values measured at each AP are the variables used in regression algorithms that predict the x and y position. In this work, 24 regression algorithms have been evaluated, of which the lowest errors obtained are 70.322 [cm] and 30.1508 [cm], for the x and y axes, respectively.
Published in: 2022 International Conference on Applied Electronics (AE)

⭐ For more information visit our blog:
https://vasanza.blogspot.com/

Anzeige
Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Ähnlich wie ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Trilateration-based Indoor Location using Supervised Learning Algorithms (20)

Weitere von Victor Asanza (20)

Anzeige

Aktuellste (20)

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Trilateration-based Indoor Location using Supervised Learning Algorithms

  1. 1. Juan Carlos Avilés and Diego Hernan Peluffo-Ordóñez Trilateration-based Indoor Location using Supervised Learning Algorithms Jerry Landívar , Carolina Ormaza , Víctor Asanza , Verónica Ojeda , Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, Guayaquil, Ecuador Facultad de Ingeniería en Electricidad y Computación, FIEC Smart Data Analysis Systems Group Modeling, Simulation and Data Analysis Research Program
  2. 2. Published in: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9920073
  3. 3. Introduction The coronavirus can enter to the organism of people through the mucous membranes of the nose, mouth or eyes. Not all infected people usually show the characteristic symptoms of COVID 19. The risk of contagion is greater in enclosed spaces. Indoor Positioning System based on trilateration. Distance monitoring bewteen people within an enclosed space.
  4. 4. Related Works • Bluetooth Low Energy based approaches [1] • Wi-Fi based approaches [2] • Radio Frequency Identification based approaches [3] • Ultra-wideband based approaches • Visible Light Communication based approaches [1] Guoquan Li, Enxu Geng, Zhouyang Ye, Yongjun Xu, Jinzhao Lin, and Yu Pang. Indoor positioning algorithm based on the improved rssi distance model. Sensors, 18(9):2820, 2018. [2] Carolina Aguilar Aravena and Luciene Stamato Delazaria. Solution for indoor positioning using wifi networks. In Proceedings of the ICA, volume 2, pages NA–NA. Copernicus GmbH, 2019 [3] Eduardo Luis Gomes, Mauro Fonseca, André Eugenio Lazzaretti, Anelise Munaretto, and Carlos Guerber. Clustering and hierarchical classification for high-precision rfid indoor location systems. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2021
  5. 5. Methodology System devices Device Function Access point 1 It’s programmed to emit a WiFi signal Access point 2 Access point 3 Mobile device It scans for nearby WiFi networks and updates the RSSI vector.
  6. 6. Methodology System components • Access points (APs) • Mobile device (MD)
  7. 7. Methodology Access point Component Description DC power connector Gets power from AC-DC adapter (9-12V) Buck converter Reduces input voltage to 3.3V ESP01 Module ESP8266 based module (emitting WiFi signal)
  8. 8. Methodology Mobile device Component Description Lithium Battery Gets power from AC-DC adapter (9-12V) Buck converter Reduces battery voltage from 3.7V to 3.3V RSSI receptor ESP01 scanning the RSSI of each AP network Local Server Host ESP01 sending data to computer
  9. 9. Methodology Data acquisition
  10. 10. Results RMSE by positions Algorithm X position Y position SVM - Coarse Gaussian 105.85 46.781 Ensemble - Boosted Trees 94,493 43.23 Ensemble - Bagged Trees 77.991 34.684 GPR - Squared Exponential 76.756 32.752 GPR - Matern 5/2 73.77 31.445 GPR - Exponential 70.454 30.212 GPR - Rational Quadratic 100.75 30.169 NN - Narrow 103.63 45.149 NN - Medium 98.19 41.587 NN - Wide 99.32 36.766 NN - Bilayered 95.533 41.739 NN - Trilayered 98.52 40.966 RMSE by positions Algorithm X position Y position LR - Linear 107.57 50.962 LR - Interactions Linear 107.1 49.793 LR - Robust Linear 107.58 51.004 LR - Stepwise Linear 107.08 49.793 Tree - Fine Tree 75.055 32.39 Tree - Medium Tree 77.284 33.967 Tree - Coarse Tree 82.509 36.798 SVM - Linear 108.04 51.323 SVM - Quadratic 108.79 48.441 SVM - Cubic 105.63 47.26 SVM - Fine Gaussian 78.583 33.299 SVM - Medium Gaussian 94.489 42.45
  11. 11. Results 70.322 30.1508 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Error X and Y position RMSE by position X position Y position
  12. 12. Discussion and Conclusions • The algorithm selected for the position prediction on the ‘x’ axis (400 [cm] length) is GPR-Exponential with a validation error of 70.322 [cm]. • The algorithm selected for the position prediction on the ‘y’ axis (200 [cm] length) with a validation error of 30.1508 [cm]. • The model is not over-trained and is able to generalize with new data, obtaining even a lower error during validation. • As future work, we propose to perform measurements in larger areas, quantifying how the number of squares used affects the prediction accuracy. Also, to increase the number of APs to analyze how it affects the accuracy of the prediction on each axis.
  13. 13. For more information
  14. 14. For more information Víctor Asanza Mail: vasanza@espol.edu.ec Facultad de Ingeniería en Electricidad y Computación, FIEC Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL Campus Gustavo Galindo Km 30.5 Vía Perimetral, P.O. Box 09-01-5863 090150 Guayaquil, Ecuador
  15. 15. Thank you!

×