ICH

Dr.K.Venkateswara raju
Dr.K.Venkateswara rajuTEACHER um SVCP

ICH

DR. K. VENKATESWARA RAJU
ICH – GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION
 ICH stands for “International Conference on Harmonization of Technical
Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use”.
 Which is international non-profit Association, which is unique in bringing
together the regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical industries.
 Where European Union, Japan and the USA involve in scientific and technical
discussions of the testing procedures required to assess and ensure the safety,
quality and efficacy of medicines.
 These are the three pillars on which the health of the patients depend.
 ICH Guidelines accepted as law in several Countries to ensure and access the Q,
S, E of medicines but are only used as guidance for the U.S Food and Drug
Administration.
Need to Harmonize
 Many time-consuming and expensive test procedures, in order to market new
products, internationally.
 Over rising costs of health care making safe and efficacious new treatments
available to patients in need.
 Divergence in technical requirements from country to country.
ORIGIN OF ICH
 Harmonization of regulatory requirements was pioneered by the EU, Europe, in
the 1980s as the Europe move towards the development of single market.
 The success achieved in Europe demonstrated that harmonization was feasible.
 At the same time there were discussions between Europe, Japan and the US on
possibilities for harmonization.
 The birth of ICH took place at a meeting in April 1990.
ICH MEMBERS
 EU
 EFPIA (European federation of pharmaceutical industries’ associations).
 MHLW (Ministry of health, Labor and welfare, Japan).
 JPMA (Japan Pharmaceuticals manufacturers Association).
 US FDA.
 PhRMA (pharmaceutical research and manufacturers association).
 Observers: WHO, TPP (Canada).
 International federation of Pharmaceutical manufacturers association.
OBJECTIVES OF ICH
 Promote public health by early availability of drug in the market.
 Improve efficiency of new drug development, Reduce registration cost.
 Less expensive drugs for patients.
 Prevent the duplication of clinical trials in humans.
 Minimize the animal use without compromising in safety, efficacy of the product.
 Mutual acceptance of clinical data by regulatory authority.
 Reducing testing duplication.
The guidelines of ICH are broadly categorized into four types.
QUALITY GUIDELINES
 Harmonisation achievements in the Quality area include pivotal milestones such
as the conduct of stability studies, defining relevant thresholds for impurities
testing and a more flexible approach to pharmaceutical quality based on Good
Manufacturing Practice (GMP) risk management.
Safety Guidelines
 ICH has produced a comprehensive set of safety Guidelines to uncover potential
risks like carcinogenicity, genotoxicity and reprotoxicity. A recent breakthrough
has been a non-clinical testing strategy for assessing the QT interval prolongation
liability: the single most important cause of drug withdrawals in recent years.
Efficacy Guidelines
 The work carried out by ICH under the Efficacy heading is concerned with the
design, conduct, safety and reporting of clinical trials. It also covers novel types
of medicines derived from biotechnological processes and the use of
pharmacogenetics/genomics techniques to produce better targeted medicines.
Multidisciplinary Guidelines
 Those are the cross-cutting topics which do not fit uniquely into one of the
Quality, Safety and Efficacy categories. It includes the ICH medical terminology
(MedDRA), the Common Technical Document (CTD) and the development of
Electronic Standards for the Transfer of Regulatory Information (ESTRI).
QUALITY GUIDELINES
 Q1A - Q1F: Stability
 Q2: Analytical Validation
 Q3A - Q3D: Impurities
 Q4 - Q4B: Pharmacopoeias
 Q5A - Q5E: Quality of Biotechnological Products
 Q6A- Q6B: Specifications
 Q7: Good Manufacturing Practice
 Q8: Pharmaceutical Development
 Q9: Quality Risk Management
 Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System
 Q11: Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances
 Q12: Lifecycle Management (DRAFT FORM)
 Q13: Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products
(CONCEPT PAPER)
 Q14: Analytical Procedure Development (CONCEPT PAPER)
SAFETY GUIDELINES
 S1A - S1C: Carcinogenicity Studies
 S2: Genotoxicity Studies
 S3A - S3B: Toxicokinetic and Pharmacokinetics
 S4: Toxicity Testing
 S5: Reproductive Toxicology
 S6: Biotechnological Products
 S7A - S7B: Pharmacology Studies
 S8: Immunotoxicology Studies
 S9: Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer Pharmaceuticals
 S10: Photo safety Evaluation
 S11: Nonclinical Pediatric Safety
EFFICACY GUIDELINES
 E1: Clinical Safety for Drugs used in Long-Term Treatment
 E2A - E2F: Pharmacovigilance
 E3: Clinical Study Reports
 E4: Dose-Response Studies
 E5: Ethnic Factors
 E6: Good Clinical Practice
 E7: Clinical Trials in Geriatric Population
 E8: General Considerations for Clinical Trials
 E9: Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials
 E10: Choice of Control Group in Clinical Trials
 E11 - E11A: Clinical Trials in Pediatric Population
 E12: Clinical Evaluation by Therapeutic Category
 E14: Clinical Evaluation of QT
 E15: Definitions in Pharmacogenetics / Pharmacogenomics
 E16: Qualification of genomic biomarkers
 E17: Multi-Regional Clinical Trials
 E18: Genomic Sampling
MULTIDISCIPLINARY GUIDELINES
 M1: MedDRA Terminology
 M2: Electronic Standards
 M3: Nonclinical Safety Studies
 M4: Common Technical Document.
 M5: Data Elements and Standards for Drug Dictionaries
 M6: Gene Therapy
 M7: Mutagenic impurities
 M8: Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD)
 M9: Biopharmaceutics Classification System-based Biowaivers
 M10: Bioanalytical Method Validation
The Impact of ICH (Quality) on industry:
1. The ICH guidelines in the quality area have provided recommendations in two of
the key areas that define bulk drug and drug product quality- stability data and
impurities- and led to significant reduction in duplicate testing.
2. Prior to there was no harmonized approach to the data requirements in these
areas. With stability for example, it was typical to run studies at “room
temperature” as defined by the company concerned, and appropriate to the
locality.
3. There was also no humidity control. This resulted in registrations in different
regions requiring new stability data if the climatic zone was different to that
where the original study had been conducted.
4. ICH harmonization provided standard sets of conditions taking account of the
climatic zones in each of the three regions.
5. This means that the information on stability generated in any one of the three
regions is mutually acceptable in the other two areas, provided it meets the
requirements of the guideline. This removed the duplicate testing.
6. The impurities guidelines [Impurities in New Drug Substances (Q3A), Impurities
in New Drug Products (Q3B), and Impurities: Guideline for Residual Solvents
(Q3C)] also served, as with the stability guidelines, to provide scientific
agreement on the recording and reporting of impurity levels.
7. Guidelines were also provided on how changes in impurity profile over the course
of a development program should be managed. The result of this is that it should
be possible to determine a single specification for any drug substance or product
that is acceptable across the three ICH regions. This makes the supply chain far
simpler, and minimizes supply error.
8. The ICH has also produced a parallel set of guidelines covering the specification
issues associated with biotechnological products. Standardization through the
guidelines has been a very positive step for the biotechnology industry, and has
certainly had a significant favorable impact on both development times and
resource utilization.
9. Duplication of research was reduced related to the stability testing, impurity
profiles.
ICH STABILITY GUIDELINES
Definitions and storage
conditions for four climatic
zones:-
Storage conditions for general
case:-
Type of study Storage Condition Minimum time period covered
by data at submission
Long term 30ºC ± 2ºC and 65%RH ± 5%RH 12 Months
Accelerated 40ºC ± 2ºC and 75%RH ± 5%RH 6 Months
Climatic Zone Definition Storage Condition Examples
I Temperate climate 21ºC ± 2ºC and
45%RH ± 5%RH
Northern Europe,
Canada.
II Mediterranean and
subtropical climate
25ºC ± 2ºC and
60%RH ± 5%RH
Southern Europe, US,
Japan.
III Hot dry climate 30ºC ± 2ºC and
35%RH ± 5%RH
Egypt, Sudan.
IV Hot and humid
climate
30ºC ± 2ºC and
75%RH ± 5%RH
Central Africa, south
Pacific.
Common technical document
Introduction:
Common technical document (CTD) is a format that was created by the ICH in an
attempt to harmonize the format of a drug approval’s applications in all 3 ICH
regions , i.e. the USA, Europe, and japan. The CTD was agreed upon in November
2000, in san Diego, California, the USA.
CTD is a common format/ template to provide the information to the drug regulatory
authorities in the 3 ICH regions. It is not a “single” dossier, with a “single” content
since legal requirements and applicant preferences differ in the 3 different ICH
regions.
The CTD as defined by the ich m4 expert working group(EWG)does not cover the
full submission that is to be made in a region.it describes only module 2 to 5, which
are common across all regions. The CTD does not describe the content of module 1
, the regional administrative information and prescribing information, nor does it
describe documents that can be submitted as amendments or variations to the initial
application.
The CTD is a set of specifications for the submission of regulatory data in the
application for obtaining market approval for pharmaceuticals. the format of the
CTD is not to be confused with its content or submission type, rather ,it is the means
by which information in a submission is organized.
Specifications for the organization of content of CTD
For modules 2-5, the ICH specifies the organization and content for CTD. For
module 1, the ICH specifies the regional sections, the specific regulatory authority
(i.e. FDA, Singapore, health Canada and india) specifies the organization and
content for CTD, therefore regional section content may vary between different ICH
regions.
Objectives of ICH behind CTD
1. To present a well-structured common format for the preparation for
approvals applications which will be submitted to regulatory authorities.
2. To significantly reduce the time and resources needed to compile
applications for registration of human pharmaceuticals and ease the
preparation of electronic submissions.
3. To facilitate the regulatory reviews and communication with the applicant
by using a standard document of common elements.
4. To prevent unnecessary duplication of work.
Benefits of the CTD
1.Complete, well organized submissions
2. More predictable format
3.More consistent reviews
4.Easier analysis across applications
5.Eaiser exchange of information
6.Facilitates electronic submissions
ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMON TECHNICAL DOCUMENT
The common technical document is organized in to five modules
OBJECTIVES OF CTD GUIDELINE
This guideline is intended to provide recommendations on how to use stability
data generated in accordance with the principles detailed in the ICH guideline
Q1A(R) stability testing of new drug substances and products.
MODULE 1
A regional specific module containing administrative information,
and is unique to each regulatory authority.
MODULE 2
Contains overviews, written summaries and tabulated summaries
of the data contained in modules3,4 and 5
MODULE 3
Contains quality data relating to the drug substances and drug
product
MODULE 4
Contains non clinical data
MODULE 5
Contains clinical date
Stability protocol and report
1.Batches tested
2.General information
3.Container/closure system
4.Literature and supporting data
5.Stability-indicating analytical method
6.Testing plan
7.Test parameters
8.Test results
9.Other requirements (Post -approval commitments)
10.Conclusion

Recomendados

GOOD PHARMACOVIGILANCE PRACTICES von
GOOD PHARMACOVIGILANCE PRACTICESGOOD PHARMACOVIGILANCE PRACTICES
GOOD PHARMACOVIGILANCE PRACTICESISF COLLEGE OF PHARMACY MOGA
8.9K views37 Folien
Regulatory affairs-Introduction to CTD von
Regulatory affairs-Introduction to CTDRegulatory affairs-Introduction to CTD
Regulatory affairs-Introduction to CTDMahesh shinde
30.5K views37 Folien
ICH safety guidelines von
ICH safety guidelinesICH safety guidelines
ICH safety guidelinesvishnu Jatoth
20.4K views33 Folien
Protocol Design & Development: What You Need to Know to Ensure a Successful S... von
Protocol Design & Development: What You Need to Know to Ensure a Successful S...Protocol Design & Development: What You Need to Know to Ensure a Successful S...
Protocol Design & Development: What You Need to Know to Ensure a Successful S...Brook White, PMP
8K views59 Folien
Regulatory authorities (US-FDA, WHO and ICH) von
Regulatory authorities (US-FDA, WHO and ICH)Regulatory authorities (US-FDA, WHO and ICH)
Regulatory authorities (US-FDA, WHO and ICH)Sagar Savale
34.6K views32 Folien
ICH Stability Studies von
ICH Stability StudiesICH Stability Studies
ICH Stability Studiessandeepdecharaju
45.1K views45 Folien

Más contenido relacionado

Was ist angesagt?

ICH GUIDELINES von
ICH GUIDELINESICH GUIDELINES
ICH GUIDELINESNaveen Kumar
203.1K views30 Folien
pharmacovigilance in INDIA,US,EUROPEAN UNION von
pharmacovigilance in INDIA,US,EUROPEAN UNIONpharmacovigilance in INDIA,US,EUROPEAN UNION
pharmacovigilance in INDIA,US,EUROPEAN UNIONgarimasaini33
666 views30 Folien
Regulatory authority of japan von
Regulatory authority of japanRegulatory authority of japan
Regulatory authority of japanAadityaThole
4.7K views19 Folien
ICH & It's Guidelines von
ICH & It's GuidelinesICH & It's Guidelines
ICH & It's GuidelinesMd Mostafijur Rahman
145 views23 Folien
Contract Research Organisations- CRO in Pharma Field von
Contract Research Organisations- CRO in Pharma FieldContract Research Organisations- CRO in Pharma Field
Contract Research Organisations- CRO in Pharma FieldVINOTH R
2.4K views28 Folien
Ppt 1 overview of regulatory affairs and diff bodies_august2016_final von
Ppt 1 overview of regulatory affairs and diff bodies_august2016_finalPpt 1 overview of regulatory affairs and diff bodies_august2016_final
Ppt 1 overview of regulatory affairs and diff bodies_august2016_finalRajashri Survase Ojha
18.6K views85 Folien

Was ist angesagt?(20)

pharmacovigilance in INDIA,US,EUROPEAN UNION von garimasaini33
pharmacovigilance in INDIA,US,EUROPEAN UNIONpharmacovigilance in INDIA,US,EUROPEAN UNION
pharmacovigilance in INDIA,US,EUROPEAN UNION
garimasaini33666 views
Regulatory authority of japan von AadityaThole
Regulatory authority of japanRegulatory authority of japan
Regulatory authority of japan
AadityaThole4.7K views
Contract Research Organisations- CRO in Pharma Field von VINOTH R
Contract Research Organisations- CRO in Pharma FieldContract Research Organisations- CRO in Pharma Field
Contract Research Organisations- CRO in Pharma Field
VINOTH R2.4K views
Ppt 1 overview of regulatory affairs and diff bodies_august2016_final von Rajashri Survase Ojha
Ppt 1 overview of regulatory affairs and diff bodies_august2016_finalPpt 1 overview of regulatory affairs and diff bodies_august2016_final
Ppt 1 overview of regulatory affairs and diff bodies_august2016_final
Rajashri Survase Ojha18.6K views
Cinical trial protocol writing von Urmila Aswar
Cinical trial protocol writingCinical trial protocol writing
Cinical trial protocol writing
Urmila Aswar24.9K views
Investigator's Brochure von Riyaz Gohil
Investigator's BrochureInvestigator's Brochure
Investigator's Brochure
Riyaz Gohil26.9K views
INVESTIGATOR’S BROCHURE (IB) von SachinFartade
 INVESTIGATOR’S BROCHURE (IB) INVESTIGATOR’S BROCHURE (IB)
INVESTIGATOR’S BROCHURE (IB)
SachinFartade32K views
MARKETING AUTHORISATION, LICENSING AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF VACCINES IN INDI... von Swapnil Fernandes
MARKETING AUTHORISATION, LICENSING AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF VACCINES IN INDI...MARKETING AUTHORISATION, LICENSING AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF VACCINES IN INDI...
MARKETING AUTHORISATION, LICENSING AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF VACCINES IN INDI...
Swapnil Fernandes6.5K views
Reconciliation and Literature Review and Signal Detection_Katalyst HLS von Katalyst HLS
Reconciliation and Literature Review and Signal Detection_Katalyst HLSReconciliation and Literature Review and Signal Detection_Katalyst HLS
Reconciliation and Literature Review and Signal Detection_Katalyst HLS
Katalyst HLS3.9K views
CTD AND ECTD von ROHIT
CTD AND ECTDCTD AND ECTD
CTD AND ECTD
ROHIT 2.7K views

Similar a ICH

Jignesh ich von
Jignesh ichJignesh ich
Jignesh ichjigs2163
2.3K views24 Folien
ICH AND ICH GUIDELINES von
ICH AND ICH GUIDELINESICH AND ICH GUIDELINES
ICH AND ICH GUIDELINESJAYA PRAKASH VELUCHURI
93.3K views18 Folien
ICH GUIDELINE SPECIFIC WITH Q SERIES von
ICH GUIDELINE SPECIFIC WITH Q SERIESICH GUIDELINE SPECIFIC WITH Q SERIES
ICH GUIDELINE SPECIFIC WITH Q SERIESHEALY LAD
3.5K views49 Folien
Ich guidelines of pharmaceutical products von
Ich guidelines of pharmaceutical productsIch guidelines of pharmaceutical products
Ich guidelines of pharmaceutical productsAmoghGV
176 views17 Folien
ICH PPT von
ICH PPTICH PPT
ICH PPTAPOORVA MISHRA
43 views19 Folien
Ich guidelines von
Ich guidelinesIch guidelines
Ich guidelineshimanshu kamboj
401 views15 Folien

Similar a ICH(20)

Jignesh ich von jigs2163
Jignesh ichJignesh ich
Jignesh ich
jigs21632.3K views
ICH GUIDELINE SPECIFIC WITH Q SERIES von HEALY LAD
ICH GUIDELINE SPECIFIC WITH Q SERIESICH GUIDELINE SPECIFIC WITH Q SERIES
ICH GUIDELINE SPECIFIC WITH Q SERIES
HEALY LAD3.5K views
Ich guidelines of pharmaceutical products von AmoghGV
Ich guidelines of pharmaceutical productsIch guidelines of pharmaceutical products
Ich guidelines of pharmaceutical products
AmoghGV176 views
Ich quality guidelines von SAMEERS17
Ich quality guidelinesIch quality guidelines
Ich quality guidelines
SAMEERS171K views
ICH_Public_Mtg._Montreal_2017-converted.pptx von RamchandraKeny
ICH_Public_Mtg._Montreal_2017-converted.pptxICH_Public_Mtg._Montreal_2017-converted.pptx
ICH_Public_Mtg._Montreal_2017-converted.pptx
RamchandraKeny56 views
Series of interview Questions von ClinosolIndia
Series of interview QuestionsSeries of interview Questions
Series of interview Questions
ClinosolIndia48 views

Más de Dr.K.Venkateswara raju

BMR & MFR von
BMR & MFRBMR & MFR
BMR & MFRDr.K.Venkateswara raju
6.4K views10 Folien
GMP REQUIREMENTS von
GMP REQUIREMENTSGMP REQUIREMENTS
GMP REQUIREMENTSDr.K.Venkateswara raju
307 views112 Folien
Qualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER von
Qualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETERQualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Qualification of UV VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETERDr.K.Venkateswara raju
9.5K views10 Folien
Good Warehousing Practices von
Good Warehousing PracticesGood Warehousing Practices
Good Warehousing PracticesDr.K.Venkateswara raju
5.1K views15 Folien
GMP REQUIREMENTS von
GMP REQUIREMENTSGMP REQUIREMENTS
GMP REQUIREMENTSDr.K.Venkateswara raju
410 views65 Folien
NABL von
NABLNABL
NABLDr.K.Venkateswara raju
654 views18 Folien

Último

CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE.pptx von
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE.pptxCONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE.pptx
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE.pptxShagufta Farooqui
108 views20 Folien
DELIRIUM.pptx von
DELIRIUM.pptxDELIRIUM.pptx
DELIRIUM.pptxMeenakshiGursamy
8 views16 Folien
vital signs...ILAYARAJA SAMPATH von
vital signs...ILAYARAJA SAMPATHvital signs...ILAYARAJA SAMPATH
vital signs...ILAYARAJA SAMPATHS ILAYA RAJA
170 views35 Folien
NURSING IS AN ART AND SCIENCE.pptx von
NURSING IS AN ART AND SCIENCE.pptxNURSING IS AN ART AND SCIENCE.pptx
NURSING IS AN ART AND SCIENCE.pptxKrishna Gandhi
8 views7 Folien
LASIK REFRACTIVE EYE SURGERY IN MUMBAI von
LASIK REFRACTIVE EYE SURGERY IN MUMBAILASIK REFRACTIVE EYE SURGERY IN MUMBAI
LASIK REFRACTIVE EYE SURGERY IN MUMBAICharvi Jain
9 views14 Folien

Último(20)

vital signs...ILAYARAJA SAMPATH von S ILAYA RAJA
vital signs...ILAYARAJA SAMPATHvital signs...ILAYARAJA SAMPATH
vital signs...ILAYARAJA SAMPATH
S ILAYA RAJA170 views
LASIK REFRACTIVE EYE SURGERY IN MUMBAI von Charvi Jain
LASIK REFRACTIVE EYE SURGERY IN MUMBAILASIK REFRACTIVE EYE SURGERY IN MUMBAI
LASIK REFRACTIVE EYE SURGERY IN MUMBAI
Charvi Jain9 views
Telecounselling-Manual.pdf von manali9054
Telecounselling-Manual.pdfTelecounselling-Manual.pdf
Telecounselling-Manual.pdf
manali905411 views
Compounding in hospitals.pptx von Komal Sathe
Compounding in hospitals.pptxCompounding in hospitals.pptx
Compounding in hospitals.pptx
Komal Sathe14 views
What are the benefits of a dental crown.pdf von BridgesDental2
What are the benefits of a dental crown.pdfWhat are the benefits of a dental crown.pdf
What are the benefits of a dental crown.pdf
BridgesDental29 views
Bubble Tea Manufacturing Plant Project Report 2024 von AlinaEllis1
Bubble Tea Manufacturing Plant Project Report 2024Bubble Tea Manufacturing Plant Project Report 2024
Bubble Tea Manufacturing Plant Project Report 2024
AlinaEllis18 views
OBJECTIVES , CHARACTERISTICS , CONCEPT AND PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING.pptx von Krishna Gandhi
OBJECTIVES , CHARACTERISTICS ,  CONCEPT AND PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING.pptxOBJECTIVES , CHARACTERISTICS ,  CONCEPT AND PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING.pptx
OBJECTIVES , CHARACTERISTICS , CONCEPT AND PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING.pptx
Krishna Gandhi8 views
Neurological Assessment for nursing students ppt von blessyjannu21
Neurological Assessment for nursing students pptNeurological Assessment for nursing students ppt
Neurological Assessment for nursing students ppt
blessyjannu2111 views
Presentation1 BLACKTOWN AND DRUITT HOSPITALS YOU ARE ALL SCUM.pptx von BraydenStoch2
Presentation1 BLACKTOWN AND DRUITT HOSPITALS YOU ARE ALL SCUM.pptxPresentation1 BLACKTOWN AND DRUITT HOSPITALS YOU ARE ALL SCUM.pptx
Presentation1 BLACKTOWN AND DRUITT HOSPITALS YOU ARE ALL SCUM.pptx
BraydenStoch210 views
Working-across-sectors_fulldraftreport_Aug-2019.pdf von manali9054
Working-across-sectors_fulldraftreport_Aug-2019.pdfWorking-across-sectors_fulldraftreport_Aug-2019.pdf
Working-across-sectors_fulldraftreport_Aug-2019.pdf
manali905425 views
Whole Egg Powder Manufacturing Plant Project Report 2024 von AlinaEllis1
Whole Egg Powder Manufacturing Plant Project Report 2024Whole Egg Powder Manufacturing Plant Project Report 2024
Whole Egg Powder Manufacturing Plant Project Report 2024
AlinaEllis17 views
NURSING AS A PROFESSION, CHARACTERISTICS OF NURSE,NURSING PRINCIPLES.pptx von Krishna Gandhi
NURSING AS A PROFESSION, CHARACTERISTICS OF NURSE,NURSING PRINCIPLES.pptxNURSING AS A PROFESSION, CHARACTERISTICS OF NURSE,NURSING PRINCIPLES.pptx
NURSING AS A PROFESSION, CHARACTERISTICS OF NURSE,NURSING PRINCIPLES.pptx
Krishna Gandhi36 views
MEAUREMENT OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC POWER TEST.pptx von Rishab Mishra
MEAUREMENT OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC POWER TEST.pptxMEAUREMENT OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC POWER TEST.pptx
MEAUREMENT OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC POWER TEST.pptx
Rishab Mishra42 views

ICH

  • 1. DR. K. VENKATESWARA RAJU ICH – GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION  ICH stands for “International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use”.  Which is international non-profit Association, which is unique in bringing together the regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical industries.  Where European Union, Japan and the USA involve in scientific and technical discussions of the testing procedures required to assess and ensure the safety, quality and efficacy of medicines.  These are the three pillars on which the health of the patients depend.  ICH Guidelines accepted as law in several Countries to ensure and access the Q, S, E of medicines but are only used as guidance for the U.S Food and Drug Administration. Need to Harmonize  Many time-consuming and expensive test procedures, in order to market new products, internationally.  Over rising costs of health care making safe and efficacious new treatments available to patients in need.  Divergence in technical requirements from country to country. ORIGIN OF ICH  Harmonization of regulatory requirements was pioneered by the EU, Europe, in the 1980s as the Europe move towards the development of single market.  The success achieved in Europe demonstrated that harmonization was feasible.
  • 2.  At the same time there were discussions between Europe, Japan and the US on possibilities for harmonization.  The birth of ICH took place at a meeting in April 1990. ICH MEMBERS  EU  EFPIA (European federation of pharmaceutical industries’ associations).  MHLW (Ministry of health, Labor and welfare, Japan).  JPMA (Japan Pharmaceuticals manufacturers Association).  US FDA.  PhRMA (pharmaceutical research and manufacturers association).  Observers: WHO, TPP (Canada).  International federation of Pharmaceutical manufacturers association. OBJECTIVES OF ICH  Promote public health by early availability of drug in the market.  Improve efficiency of new drug development, Reduce registration cost.  Less expensive drugs for patients.  Prevent the duplication of clinical trials in humans.  Minimize the animal use without compromising in safety, efficacy of the product.  Mutual acceptance of clinical data by regulatory authority.  Reducing testing duplication.
  • 3. The guidelines of ICH are broadly categorized into four types. QUALITY GUIDELINES  Harmonisation achievements in the Quality area include pivotal milestones such as the conduct of stability studies, defining relevant thresholds for impurities testing and a more flexible approach to pharmaceutical quality based on Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) risk management. Safety Guidelines  ICH has produced a comprehensive set of safety Guidelines to uncover potential risks like carcinogenicity, genotoxicity and reprotoxicity. A recent breakthrough has been a non-clinical testing strategy for assessing the QT interval prolongation liability: the single most important cause of drug withdrawals in recent years. Efficacy Guidelines  The work carried out by ICH under the Efficacy heading is concerned with the design, conduct, safety and reporting of clinical trials. It also covers novel types of medicines derived from biotechnological processes and the use of pharmacogenetics/genomics techniques to produce better targeted medicines. Multidisciplinary Guidelines  Those are the cross-cutting topics which do not fit uniquely into one of the Quality, Safety and Efficacy categories. It includes the ICH medical terminology (MedDRA), the Common Technical Document (CTD) and the development of Electronic Standards for the Transfer of Regulatory Information (ESTRI).
  • 4. QUALITY GUIDELINES  Q1A - Q1F: Stability  Q2: Analytical Validation  Q3A - Q3D: Impurities  Q4 - Q4B: Pharmacopoeias  Q5A - Q5E: Quality of Biotechnological Products  Q6A- Q6B: Specifications  Q7: Good Manufacturing Practice  Q8: Pharmaceutical Development  Q9: Quality Risk Management  Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System  Q11: Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances  Q12: Lifecycle Management (DRAFT FORM)  Q13: Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products (CONCEPT PAPER)  Q14: Analytical Procedure Development (CONCEPT PAPER) SAFETY GUIDELINES  S1A - S1C: Carcinogenicity Studies  S2: Genotoxicity Studies  S3A - S3B: Toxicokinetic and Pharmacokinetics  S4: Toxicity Testing  S5: Reproductive Toxicology  S6: Biotechnological Products  S7A - S7B: Pharmacology Studies  S8: Immunotoxicology Studies
  • 5.  S9: Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer Pharmaceuticals  S10: Photo safety Evaluation  S11: Nonclinical Pediatric Safety EFFICACY GUIDELINES  E1: Clinical Safety for Drugs used in Long-Term Treatment  E2A - E2F: Pharmacovigilance  E3: Clinical Study Reports  E4: Dose-Response Studies  E5: Ethnic Factors  E6: Good Clinical Practice  E7: Clinical Trials in Geriatric Population  E8: General Considerations for Clinical Trials  E9: Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials  E10: Choice of Control Group in Clinical Trials  E11 - E11A: Clinical Trials in Pediatric Population  E12: Clinical Evaluation by Therapeutic Category  E14: Clinical Evaluation of QT  E15: Definitions in Pharmacogenetics / Pharmacogenomics  E16: Qualification of genomic biomarkers  E17: Multi-Regional Clinical Trials  E18: Genomic Sampling
  • 6. MULTIDISCIPLINARY GUIDELINES  M1: MedDRA Terminology  M2: Electronic Standards  M3: Nonclinical Safety Studies  M4: Common Technical Document.  M5: Data Elements and Standards for Drug Dictionaries  M6: Gene Therapy  M7: Mutagenic impurities  M8: Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD)  M9: Biopharmaceutics Classification System-based Biowaivers  M10: Bioanalytical Method Validation The Impact of ICH (Quality) on industry: 1. The ICH guidelines in the quality area have provided recommendations in two of the key areas that define bulk drug and drug product quality- stability data and impurities- and led to significant reduction in duplicate testing. 2. Prior to there was no harmonized approach to the data requirements in these areas. With stability for example, it was typical to run studies at “room temperature” as defined by the company concerned, and appropriate to the locality. 3. There was also no humidity control. This resulted in registrations in different regions requiring new stability data if the climatic zone was different to that where the original study had been conducted.
  • 7. 4. ICH harmonization provided standard sets of conditions taking account of the climatic zones in each of the three regions. 5. This means that the information on stability generated in any one of the three regions is mutually acceptable in the other two areas, provided it meets the requirements of the guideline. This removed the duplicate testing. 6. The impurities guidelines [Impurities in New Drug Substances (Q3A), Impurities in New Drug Products (Q3B), and Impurities: Guideline for Residual Solvents (Q3C)] also served, as with the stability guidelines, to provide scientific agreement on the recording and reporting of impurity levels. 7. Guidelines were also provided on how changes in impurity profile over the course of a development program should be managed. The result of this is that it should be possible to determine a single specification for any drug substance or product that is acceptable across the three ICH regions. This makes the supply chain far simpler, and minimizes supply error. 8. The ICH has also produced a parallel set of guidelines covering the specification issues associated with biotechnological products. Standardization through the guidelines has been a very positive step for the biotechnology industry, and has certainly had a significant favorable impact on both development times and resource utilization. 9. Duplication of research was reduced related to the stability testing, impurity profiles. ICH STABILITY GUIDELINES
  • 8. Definitions and storage conditions for four climatic zones:- Storage conditions for general case:- Type of study Storage Condition Minimum time period covered by data at submission Long term 30ºC ± 2ºC and 65%RH ± 5%RH 12 Months Accelerated 40ºC ± 2ºC and 75%RH ± 5%RH 6 Months Climatic Zone Definition Storage Condition Examples I Temperate climate 21ºC ± 2ºC and 45%RH ± 5%RH Northern Europe, Canada. II Mediterranean and subtropical climate 25ºC ± 2ºC and 60%RH ± 5%RH Southern Europe, US, Japan. III Hot dry climate 30ºC ± 2ºC and 35%RH ± 5%RH Egypt, Sudan. IV Hot and humid climate 30ºC ± 2ºC and 75%RH ± 5%RH Central Africa, south Pacific.
  • 9. Common technical document Introduction: Common technical document (CTD) is a format that was created by the ICH in an attempt to harmonize the format of a drug approval’s applications in all 3 ICH regions , i.e. the USA, Europe, and japan. The CTD was agreed upon in November 2000, in san Diego, California, the USA. CTD is a common format/ template to provide the information to the drug regulatory authorities in the 3 ICH regions. It is not a “single” dossier, with a “single” content since legal requirements and applicant preferences differ in the 3 different ICH regions. The CTD as defined by the ich m4 expert working group(EWG)does not cover the full submission that is to be made in a region.it describes only module 2 to 5, which are common across all regions. The CTD does not describe the content of module 1 , the regional administrative information and prescribing information, nor does it describe documents that can be submitted as amendments or variations to the initial application. The CTD is a set of specifications for the submission of regulatory data in the application for obtaining market approval for pharmaceuticals. the format of the CTD is not to be confused with its content or submission type, rather ,it is the means by which information in a submission is organized. Specifications for the organization of content of CTD For modules 2-5, the ICH specifies the organization and content for CTD. For module 1, the ICH specifies the regional sections, the specific regulatory authority (i.e. FDA, Singapore, health Canada and india) specifies the organization and content for CTD, therefore regional section content may vary between different ICH regions. Objectives of ICH behind CTD
  • 10. 1. To present a well-structured common format for the preparation for approvals applications which will be submitted to regulatory authorities. 2. To significantly reduce the time and resources needed to compile applications for registration of human pharmaceuticals and ease the preparation of electronic submissions. 3. To facilitate the regulatory reviews and communication with the applicant by using a standard document of common elements. 4. To prevent unnecessary duplication of work. Benefits of the CTD 1.Complete, well organized submissions 2. More predictable format 3.More consistent reviews 4.Easier analysis across applications 5.Eaiser exchange of information 6.Facilitates electronic submissions
  • 11. ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMON TECHNICAL DOCUMENT The common technical document is organized in to five modules OBJECTIVES OF CTD GUIDELINE This guideline is intended to provide recommendations on how to use stability data generated in accordance with the principles detailed in the ICH guideline Q1A(R) stability testing of new drug substances and products. MODULE 1 A regional specific module containing administrative information, and is unique to each regulatory authority. MODULE 2 Contains overviews, written summaries and tabulated summaries of the data contained in modules3,4 and 5 MODULE 3 Contains quality data relating to the drug substances and drug product MODULE 4 Contains non clinical data MODULE 5 Contains clinical date
  • 12. Stability protocol and report 1.Batches tested 2.General information 3.Container/closure system 4.Literature and supporting data 5.Stability-indicating analytical method 6.Testing plan 7.Test parameters 8.Test results 9.Other requirements (Post -approval commitments) 10.Conclusion