Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Social Web lecture for Matching dag IMM 2016

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 49 Anzeige

Social Web lecture for Matching dag IMM 2016

Herunterladen, um offline zu lesen

Social Web lecture for Matching dag IMM 2016. With input from Davide Ceolin, Lora Aroyo.

Hands on session instructions can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XW4UBr_dZeejI2Rp8T4tHaDxNrGsu4xxlVJh91s2AGM/edit#heading=h.jel9otx51ed

Social Web lecture for Matching dag IMM 2016. With input from Davide Ceolin, Lora Aroyo.

Hands on session instructions can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XW4UBr_dZeejI2Rp8T4tHaDxNrGsu4xxlVJh91s2AGM/edit#heading=h.jel9otx51ed

Anzeige
Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (20)

Ähnlich wie Social Web lecture for Matching dag IMM 2016 (20)

Anzeige

Weitere von Victor de Boer (20)

Aktuellste (20)

Anzeige

Social Web lecture for Matching dag IMM 2016

  1. 1. The Social WebThe Social Web Matching IMM 2016Matching IMM 2016 Victor de BoerVictor de Boer (met slides van Lora Aroyo, Davide Ceolin en Marieke van Erp)(met slides van Lora Aroyo, Davide Ceolin en Marieke van Erp)
  2. 2. Our goal is to … understand the practices, implications, culture, & meaning of the sites, as well as users' engagement with them include this understanding as part of software engineering for the new social world agapegeek.com
  3. 3. In Social Web course to goal is to understand & try out how the Social Web works • What IS the Social Web? • What do people DO on the Social Web? • How is DATA on the Social Web ACCESSED? • How is DATA on the Social Web STUDIED? • What are typical Social Web APPLICATIONS? • What are CHALLENGES on the Social Web?
  4. 4. What is the Social Web?
  5. 5. Social Web = Social + Web Images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnkay/3182986643/sizes/m/in/photostream/ om/4132/4831892926_99a2cc1db6_t.jpg, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dizfunk/3066153143/sizes/m/in/photostream/
  6. 6. How did it all start? Social Web 2016, Davide Ceolin
  7. 7. How old is the Internet? How old is the Web? How old is the Social Web?
  8. 8. 1969 - WWW http://www.creativeramblings.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/style1-1000px-rec7-MILLION.jpg Social Web 2016, Davide Ceolin
  9. 9. 1994 – Last.fm http://www.creativeramblings.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/style1-1000px-rec7-MILLION.jpg Social Web 2016, Davide Ceolin
  10. 10. 2003 - Twitter http://www.creativeramblings.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/style1-1000px-rec7-MILLION.jpg Social Web 2016, Davide Ceolin
  11. 11. 2007 – Google+ http://www.creativeramblings.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/style1-1000px-rec7-MILLION.jpg Social Web 2016, Davide Ceolin
  12. 12. Social Web = Web 2.0 ?
  13. 13. Highlights http://www.booksaresocial.com/social-media-timeline/#lightbox/0/ Social Web 2016, Davide Ceolin
  14. 14. Classmates.com (1995) SixDegrees.com (1997) Friendster (2002) MySpace, Bebo, Facebook (2004) Social networking sites are Web sites that allow people to stay connected with other people in online communities Social networking sites are Web sites that allow people to stay connected with other people in online communities Social media sites are Web sites that allow people to share UCCs. Flickr (2004) Youtube (2005) Social Web = Social Networking + Social Media sites General-purpose, e.g. Facebook, LinkedIn Vertical, e.g. Dogster, Couchsurfing Media types, e.g. Flickr (photos), Last.FM (Music), YouTube (video) (open vs. closed) (open vs. closed) Won Kim, Ok-Ran Jeong, Sang-Won Lee (2010). On social Web sites. Information Systems 35, 215–236
  15. 15. Another view
  16. 16. aka User Generated Content material on websites that is produced by the users of the website. little or no cost for uploading user-generated content Exabytes of content Re-mix culture Collaborative creation User Created Content
  17. 17. http://wearesocial.sg/blog/2016/01/digital-2016/ The Rise of Users & Content Social Web 2016, Davide Ceolin
  18. 18. http://wearesocial.sg/blog/2016/01/digital-2016/ http://proto-knowledge.blogspot.nl/2011_03_01_archive.html The Rise of Users & Content Social Web 2016, Davide Ceolin
  19. 19. The Big Ones
  20. 20. https://leveragenewagemedia.com/blog/category/social-media/ Some big ones
  21. 21. • MySpace: US & abroad • Friendster: Pacific Islands • Orkut: Brazil, India • Mixi: Japan • LunarStorm: Sweden • Hyves: NL • Grono: Poland • Hi5: South America, Europe • Bebo: UK, New Zealand, Australia • QQ: China • Cyworld: Korea • Skyrock: France • Windows Live Spaces: Mexico, • Italy, and Spain Diversity in Cultures
  22. 22. Global vs. Local
  23. 23. Global vs. Local
  24. 24. Countries that block social media sites
  25. 25. Diversity in Activities • aSmallWorld & BeautifulPeople: restricted access - appear selective & elite • Couchsurfing: activity-centered • BlackPlanet: identity-driven • MyChurch: affiliation-focused • Usenet & public discussion forums: structured by topics • SNS are structured as personal networks • "egocentric”: individual at the center of their own community • mirror unmediated social structures Social Web 2016, Davide Ceolin
  26. 26. New Form of Collaboration • The Social Web enables innovative types of collaboration • E.g., Github for collaborative coding • Overleaf,Authorea and Sharelatex for collaborative writing Social Web 2016, Davide Ceolin
  27. 27. It’s not all fun and games...
  28. 28. Source: http://infosthetics.com/archives/2011/12/all_the_information_facebook_knows_about_you.ht See also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=kJvAUqs3Ofg A Single Person
  29. 29. “Dogs urinating on everything” “Landscapers in Liliburn, GA” “Bob Arnold” “Homes sold in shadow lake subdivision gwinnet county”
  30. 30. Privacy: Awareness not Paranoia "privacy paradox" = lack of awareness of the public nature of Internet
  31. 31. Social Web Analysis
  32. 32. Social Network Analysis (SNA) Investigates social structures through the use of network and graph theories. •Hubs •Centrality •Connectedness (in degree/ out degree)
  33. 33. SNA example: my facebook graph
  34. 34. SNA example: terrorism
  35. 35. Watch people wake up onTwitter http://cartodb.s3.amazonaws.com/static_vizz/sunrise.html? title=true&description=true&search=false&shareable=true&cartodb_logo=true&layer_selector=false&legends=false&scrollwheel=true&sublayer_options=1%7C1 &sql=&zoom=2&center_lat=22.917922936146045&center_lon=51.328125#
  36. 36. How we use the social web FloatingSheep.org
  37. 37. Languages of the world according toTwitter https://www.flickr.com/photos/walkingsf/6277163176/
  38. 38. http://www.brandrants.com/brandrants/obama/ Populations
  39. 39. http://flowingdata.com/2011/07/25/brand-sentiment-showdown/ Great Meh Good Yuck Love Stale Like Hate Fun Blegh Nice Sucks Tasty Too late Sentiment / Brand analysis
  40. 40. Bernardo Huberman, HP Labs $ 100 M $ 30 M ? $ 26 M Movie success prediction
  41. 41. Bernardo Huberman:http://www.slideserve.com/presentation/15373/Bernardo-Huberman-HP-Labs Trend Analysis
  42. 42. Recommendation networks
  43. 43. Health care
  44. 44. Take home Social media are here to stay, but it is a changing landscape The line between consumers and producers is fading -> prosumers We can analyse social media use using computational methods … to better understand how the social web works … to better understand how people work … to solve problems … to improve the social web
  45. 45. Hands on • Work with online Social Web analysis tools and visualisations • Get an idea on how to use such tools to answer research questions • http://tinyurl.com/socialwebimm2016

Hinweis der Redaktion

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdyBM-p05Ss
  • Naturally we won’t treat everything here, but just to give you a taste of what aspects are all in there. Perhaps also link to other courses in introduction.
  • 1997
  • boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
    first connecting people, bringing people together across the boundaries of email
    in the beginning most of the content on the web was done by selected people
    grows out of existing communities of students/classmates
  • Before 1997: AIM, ICQ, Classmates.com
    1997: SixDegrees.com - combining all in one (2000 the service went offline) - not enough user base, not enough interaction
    1997 - 2001: AsianAvenue, BlackPlanet, MiGente, LiveJournal, Cyworld (Korean), LunarStorm (Swedish)
    Friendster - a social complement to Ryze to compete with Match.com - online dating site
    early adopters: bloggers, attendees of the Burning Man arts festival & gay men
    300,000 users in 2003 and it couldn’t handle its rapid growth
    started restricted access to profiles, e.g. not more than four degrees away
    "Fakesters": fake profiles representing iconic fictional characters: celebrities, concepts
    only a few managed to succeed- at the time of the burst of the internet bubble (after 2001); ISPs, AmericaOnline ... value was not clear
    all started with user profiles and connections; from 2003 also media starts playing a role
    failures: Google's Orkut, Microsoft's Windows Live Spaces (MSN Spaces)
  • The time of: YASNS: "Yet Another Social Networking Service." (Clay Shirky)
    After rumors emerged that Friendster would adopt a fee-based system, users posted Friendster messages encouraging people to join alternate SNSs, including Tribe.net and MySpace (T. Anderson, personal communication, August 2, 2007).
    rumors that they will ask for money - so people turned to other services - allowed others to surface
    passion and interests start to surface
    also failures also from the big ones
    2001: professional networks - Ryze.com (San Francisco business and technology community), Tribe.net, LinkedIn
    professional: LinkedIn, Visible Path, Xing (formerly openBC)
    passion-centric: Dogster (dogs), Care2 (activists), Couchsurfing (travel), MyChurch (christian), Flickr (photos), Last.FM (music), YouTube (video)
    MySpace to compete with Friendster, Xanga, AsianAvenue;
    2004 massive popularity (bands, teenagers);
    2005 News Corporation purchase for $580
    popularity in Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia & Indonesia
  • exabyte (EB)1018
     1 Miljard gigabytes
  • As his animated map shows, over the last few years Facebook has cut down the number of top social networks around the world from 17 to just six. More specifically, there were 17 in June 2009, 16 in December 2009, 14 in June 2010, 11 in December 2010, nine in June 2011, and six in December 2011. Here are the remaining six: Facebook, QZone, V Kontakte, Odnoklassniki,Drauglem, and Zing.
    Between June 2011 and December 2011, Facebook managed to conquer Netherlands, and with it the whole Europe, Brazil, after a long struggle to overtake Google's Orkut, as well as Japan (although a large part of Japanese networking activities are on mobile, including Gree, Mobage, and Mixi).
    If you remember that Facebook is still banned in many countries, such as China (the world's largest Internet population with 500 million people), the service's dominance is certainly impressive. If this trend continues, it won't be long before the social network is king in all the countries it can be accessed in.
  • The social media sites Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter are frequent targets for censorious governments. This map from Mother Jones shows which countries restrict their users from accessing these sites. China doesn't just block access to Western social media sites, it has also cultivated home-grown alternatives that are under the thumb of the Chinese authorities. These social media sites enable users to engage in relatively unfettered discusion, but the providers are required to participate in an elaborate monitoring and censorship regime to ensure that sensitive topics do not receive widespread discussion.
  • - the world is composed of networks, and now they have means to communicate across geo boundaries
  • "privacy paradox" lack of awareness of the public nature of Internet (safety of younger users)reconstruct users' social security numbers with profile info, e.g. hometown and date of birthfrom freely accessible profile data - craft a "phishing" scheme appearing from a friendusers' ability to control impressions and manage social contexts, e.g. "News Feed" could disrupt users’ sense of controlno flexibility to handle conflicts with friends with different conceptions of privacy
  • One of the amazing things about the internet is the way it permits the collection and aggregation of large-scale data about human behavior. For example, this map shows where people are tweeting about sunrises over the course of a 24-hour period. There's a yellow flash of sunrise tweets whenever the sun rises above the horizon in a part of the world. You can see an interactive version of this map 
  • Social media sites like Twitter enable a lot of public discussion of the important issues of the day. But they also enable an even larger quantity of frivolous conversation. Last September was a good example. The nation was discussing two big topics: possible US involvement in a the war in Syria and Miley Cyrus's scandalous dance moves. In Washington DC, Syria conversations on Twitter were way more common than twerking conversations. But twerking was a more popular subject in most other states.
  • Brand example

×