3. Definition : Geo-hydrological entity having common drainage
point
Concept : Area development in an integrated approach
Principle : Use land according to its capability
Components : Natural resources, institutions, technologies,
management, etc.
Objectives : Conserving and developing resource base
Effect : Desired changes in knowledge, skills, attitudes for
enhancing resource use efficiency (HRD)
Impact : Desired improvement in socio-economic and
ecological conditions
4. Why the concept of watershed?Why the concept of watershed?
Soil, water and vegetation are so interdependent that one can not be
managed efficiently with out the other two.
But water can be conveniently and efficiently managed only if the
hydrological unit vis-a-vis watershed is taken as a whole.
Since these three are interdependent resources, watershed
is considered to be the ideal unit.
Deforestation, soil degradation, sedimentation and the resultant
floods, droughts, and poverty often require different kinds of
solutions but are connected by the fact that they can best be
understood and managed as physical units defined by the flow of
water, that is watershed.
6. Parameter Aims and Opportunities
Area Catchment
Devt. Components Integrated
Approach Holistic
Team Multi-disciplinary
Action Simultaneous
Implementation Ridge to valley
Basis Site specific and need-based
Input Man, material, message
Output Human Resource Development
Effect Knowledge and skill improvement
Impact Socio-economic improvement
Benefits Sustainable
7. Completed watershed development programmes in Karnataka (1984-85 to 1999-2000)
Sl.
No
.
Name of the programme Implementing agency and year No. of
districts
No. of
water-
sheds
Total
geographical
area (ha)
Area
treated
since
inception
(ha)
Amount spent
since inception
(Rs.crores)
1. World Bank assisted Watershed
Projects
DLDB/Department of Watershed
Development (1984-1993)
6 7 136337 136337 37.564
2 District watershed development
programmes
DLDB/Department of Watershed
Development (1984-1993)
18 18 578420 515200 121.978
3 Participative and integrated
development of watersheds (PIDOW)
DLDB/MYRADA
(1985-86 to 1993-94
1 1 20300 9680 4.140
4 Swiss assisted ISPWD-K Project DLDB/WDD
(1995-96 to 1999-2000)
5 5 74968 30000 12.595
5 KFW assisted Integrated Watershed
Management
DLDB/WDD
(1995-96 to 1999-2000)
3 5 53627 24600 16.221
6 River valley projects
(Tungabhadra,Nizamsagar and
Nagarjuna Sagar)
A&H Department through Dept.
of Agri. (Centrally sponsored,
1963-64 onwards)
15 723
(225 W/s
saturated)
106.88 (Area
to be treated
26.15 lakhs)
541800 91.119
7 National Watershed Development
Programme for Rainfed Areas
(NWDPRA)
A&H Dept. through Dept. of Agri.
In the State Sector coordinated by
ZP 1986-87. As NWDP 1990-91
onwards as NWDPRA.
26 141 872872 872872 182.995
8 i) Drought Prone Areas Programme
ii) Desert Development Programme
iii) Western Ghat Development
RD & PR Zilla Panchayat and
Watershed Development
Associations
i) 15
ii) 6
iii) 11
423 in 81
blocks 130
in 22
blocks 40
taluks
- - 75.600 (1995-
99) 20.220
(1995-99)
53.540 (1995-
99)
9 Karnataka Watershed Development
Project (DANIDA Assistance)
A&H Department through
Directorate of Agriculture I Phase
1990-91 to 96-97
II phase 1997-98 to 2004
3
4
14
12
53000
-
23000
-
16.036
-
Total 2153489 632.008
Source: Karnataka Watershed Development Department and annual reports of the RD&PR Department.
8. Table-11: Projects in operation and administrative arrangement
Sl.
No.
Name of the programme Administra
tive control
Fund releasing
department
Implementing
department
Mode of
implementati
on
No. of
Micro
watershed
Area
treated
(ha)
Amount spent
(Rs.in lakhs)
I. State Sector Schemes
a. National Watershed
Development Project for
Rainfed Areas (NWDPRA)
WDD WDD WDD WDC 568 102514 6353.17
b. River Valley Project (RVP) WDD WDD WDD WDD 117 134305 4489.71
c. Reclamation of saline, alkaline
and waterlogged soils
WDD WDD WDD WDD 6 dist. 1701 249.00
II. District Sector Schemes
a. Drought Prone Areas
Programme (DPAP)
RDPR &
ZP
RDPR & ZP WDD WDC 959 143391 9880.48
b. Desert Development
Programme (DDP)
RDPR &
ZP
RDPR & ZP WDD WDC 644 59125.5 5013.88
c. Integrated Watershed
Development Project (IWDP)
RDPR &
ZP
RDPR & ZP WDD WDC 258 81885 4421.89
d. Western Ghats Development
Project (WGDP)
RDPR &
ZP
RDPR & ZP WDD WDC 215 25394 3814.85
e. Special Component Plan (SCP) ZP ZP WDD WDD - 2755.3 142.36
III. Aided Projects
a. Sujala Watershed Project WDD WDD WDD Sujala
Sangha
(WDC)
753 26115 3442.01
b. KAWAD Project (DFID) KAWAD
Society
WDD KAWAD Society NGO, WDC,
Dept.
108 34749 1818.13
c. DANIDA project (Denmark
Govt.)
WDD WDD WDD WDC/WDD 12 20143 1387.51
d. NABARD assisted watershed
Projects
NABARD
& WDD
NABARD &
WDD
NGO & WDD People’s
participation
, WDC
47 1405 75.90
For further reading:
1.Perspective Land Use Plan for Karnataka, 2025. (2001) State Land Use Board, Bangalore
9. Utilizing the land according to its capability
Establishing adequate vegetative cover
Conserving as much rain water as possible in situ
Draining-out surplus water and divert it to storage ponds
Avoiding gully formation through suitable checks to
minimize soil erosion and enhance ground water recharge
Maximize productivity per unit area, per unit time and
per unit water
Increasing cropping intensity – Intercropping and
Sequence cropping
10. Better utilization of marginal lands through ALUS
Ensuring sustainability of the ecosystem
Maximizing the combined income:
- Crop-livestock-tree-labour complex
Generating off-season employment
Minimising the risks from aberrant weather
Processing and value addition of the farm produce
Developing and improving infra –structure: Storage,
transport and marketing
Promotion of balanced nutrition – Dryland fruits and
vegetables besides cereals, pulses and oilseeds
11. Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
Integrated Pest and Disease Management (IPDM)
Farming Systems Approach (FSA)
Low External Input Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA)
Alternate land use systems viz., agro-forestry, agri-horticulture,
silvi-pasture, horti-silvi-pasture, etc.
Animal Husbandry, Backyard Poultry and Apiculture
Restore or develop gomala/gokatte/gundu topu/devara kadu
Indigenous Technical Knowledge (ITK)
Post-harvest Processing and Value Addition-APCs
Agri-clinic and agri-business management
HRD-capacity building/leadership development/SHG
formation/MWMG formation/custom hiring services
12. Enhance the quality of inputs
Reduce losses at various post harvest stages
Reduces cost of processing
Restriction of middlemen involvement
Opportunities for the farmer himself to become a grower-cum-
processor
Improves the quality of rural life and affords dignity
Motivates educated rural youth to keep engage in processing
industry and thus preventing their migration to urban areas
Ensures fair prices to growers for their produce
Makes available diversified products to rural consumer at
reasonable and affordable prices
13.
Sujala is a Watershed Development Project
designed by the Government of Karnataka and
implemented by the Watershed Development
Department of Government of Karnataka
The World Bank through International
Development Association provided major portion
of plan outlay as a loan to Government of India
and in turn loan to Government of Karnataka.
14. It is being implemented
in seven districts,
namely Kolar,
Chikkabalapur, Tumkur,
Madhugiri, Chitradurga,
Haveri and Dharwad of
Karnataka covering 4.29
lakhs hectare. of land
spread over in 77 sub-
watersheds and 1270
villages benefiting nearly
4.0 lakhs households
including landless.
15. The Government of Karnataka finances some
portion of the budget and the Watershed
Communities contribute some portion.
Sujala a community driven watershed development
project with a total budget of Rs.557 crores,
As planned, the project period started from
10.09.2001 and likely to end by 31.03.2009.
16. To improve the productive potential of
selected watersheds and their associated
natural resource base.
Strengthen community and institutional
arrangements for natural resource
management.
An associated objective is to strengthen the
capacity of communities in the project
districts for participatory involvement in
planning, implementation, social and
environmental management and maintenance.
17. The implementing department operates
in a more socially inclusive manner,
with in the frame work of a convergent
watershed development plan.
This will be achieved through having the
community groups implement the
project, the project’s collaborative
approach and capacity building
initiatives.
18.
19.
20. Increasing House Hold Income
Improving Agriculture Productivity.
Improving Vegetative Cover.
Increasing Milk and Horticulture Production.
Increasing Fodder and Fuel availability.
Reducing Soil Erosion & Runoff to Improve Water
Availability.
Enhancing Quality and Life of Village
Communities.
Ensuring Institutional support. by Watershed
Development Department as facilitator and by
NGOs for community organization and
strengthening.
21. Peoples participation as a focus of the entire
project
NGOs involvement at all levels
Adopting Area Group approach
Cost sharing by the community to enhance
ownership & respect towards peoples choices
Use of agriculture & water resource action
plans developed through remote sensing to
complement peoples plan
22. Involvement of various resource agencies for
provision of specialized inputs
Monitoring & Evaluation is inbuilt within the
project implementation structure & process
Effective accountability & transparency by
adopting appropriate financial management
systems at all levels
Adopting ESA (Environmental & Social impact
assessment)
Involvement of PRIs (Panchayat Raj Institution)
23. Community development programmesCommunity development programmes
Afforestation Dry land horticulture Construction of bunds
Soil conservation
Construction of Farm pond
Bore well recharge
Inter cropping
Construction of loose border checks
Fodder production for animal husbandry
Income generating activities for rural poor
Development of animal husbandry
Open well recharge Construction of NALA bunds
24. Use of land, water and vegetation accordingUse of land, water and vegetation according
to its capability we can changes into its capability we can changes in
knowledge, skills, attitudes for enhancingknowledge, skills, attitudes for enhancing
resource use efficiency and improvementresource use efficiency and improvement
in socio-economic and ecologicalin socio-economic and ecological
conditionsconditions